intellectual pursuits as well as co-curricular activities. Among the primarymeasures of academic involvement is time spent on academic studies and tasks, and thedevelopment of higher cognitive skills. Co-curricular involvement includes measures ofparticipation in campus activities and membership in academic/honors associations and socialclubs. Connection refers to bonding with peers, faculty, and staff as well as sharing theinstitution’s values10. In addition to the positive effects on overall student performance andretention, early connections with faculty may have a particularly positive effect for Hispanicstudents13. Besides fostering a learning community between Engineering and EngineeringTechnology students, the objectives of the new course
involved atthe university level.STEM outreach programs began in the area of Manufacturing Engineering in 2002 when theinstitution was a lead partner in the PRIME (Partnership for Regional Innovation inManufacturing Education) coalition – a partnership delivering innovative manufacturingeducation and career development in Southwest Pennsylvania. A series of events that wereoffered under an umbrella called “Molding Minds in Manufacturing” enabled the authors to testand implement several ideas and programs that engaged over 700 students and teachers.Building on this foundation, the current STEM outreach campaign was launched across theschool in the fall of 2005. STEM outreach efforts take place throughout the year and there are
learning process,we expect to better engage students to promote the active participation and interaction formaximized learning outcome. Such active participation of the learning process is able to help toengage the underlying learning activities of students for effective and enjoyable learningexperiences.Embodied learning is a learning approach where physical and virtual environment throughphysical engagement, sensory interaction, and kinesthetic learning are emphasized to demonstratethe underlying concepts which otherwise find hard to comprehend. This learning paradigm isparticularly impactful for STEM education because it involves hands-on experiences andmanipulation of the physical components throughout the learning process. By engaging
pace and format ofthe instruction are adjusted based on the feedback. For a learning environment to be trulycommunity centered, learners interact and engage in dialogue with their peers, family members,and others in their community. In this approach, students witness the value and benefit of theirnew knowledge. The community-centered characteristics allow the designed learningenvironment to positively impact developing interest in and career aspirations for STEM fields.When students use the new knowledge in their social interactions with others, the ideal learningenvironment achieves its objective.There are several other instructional strategies that are among the evidence-based pedagogies.Active learning, cooperative learning, peer-led team
concerns, most research indicates that student test scores fromintensive courses are favorable comparable to scores from traditional semester long courses.An important issue related to intensive courses is whether they offer a long-term impact onlearning. This is where research does not offer any definitive answer. In fact the results aremixed and even conflicting. In one study13 involving two groups of students in business Page 6.1069.3administration classes, taught by the same instructor, evaluations of achievement were conducted Session 2793immediately
years ago). Even though both programs share someactivities and that students are placed in an environment that involves electrical and softwareconsiderations, students are still having difficulties integrating and applying the engineeringknowledge and skills that they learn. To avoid this problem, we thought that more could bedone to develop this ability early in the curricula. We also wanted to put students in situationscloser to the reality of the profession by making them work on projects that involvemultidisciplinary considerations, design and analysis abilities, autonomous learning, teamworkand communication skills. Page 4.583.1
the department faculty members who collaborated withLouis Stokes for Minority Participation in STEM, LSAMP, to implement research activities infreshman and sophomore classes. The work went further when the department obtained two majorgrants, NSF ATE and NASA CIPAIR. The NASA CIPAIR project is focusing in involving studentsin NASA and aerospace research in their early stages in college through building partnership withNASA. The project allows students to work in NASA active projects and faculty to collaborate withNASA scientists. Curriculum enhancement to include aerospace relevant material is a part of theproject. A new course in Remote Sensing has been introduced as well. On the other hand,collaboration is built with Hostos Community
provides an assessmentof the impact on student motivation/commitment and attainment of learning objectives.II. Service LearningMintz and Liu3 have defined service learning as: “a method and philosophy of experiential learning through which participants in community service meet community needs while developing their abilities for critical thinking and group problem-solving, their commitment and values and the skills needed for effective citizenship. The core elements of service learning are (1) service activities that help meet community needs that the community finds important and (2) structured educational components that challenge participants to think critically about and learn from their
faculty who did similar thingsand it may be that Katrina had one of the largest impacts on the classrooms of Americanuniversities of any disaster. If true, it is clearly worth developing a case study for it and manyprobably will do that.Public PolicySince the drama was unfolding while we studied it, we focused on understanding it rather thanteaching it as a case study in public policy. Nevertheless public policy issues were raised inalmost all the resources found by the students and almost all the redesign options theyconsidered. We hope that here, and later, we can extract the lessons in public policy and developit as a case study. Such a case study can always be brought up to date by future developments.So it will have currency for the
nods that indicate ‘yes’ or ‘no’ or hand gestures such as raising a hand or pointing when a student has a question or comment. These gestures can be very effective at minimizing chat and allowing the instructor to recognize students at the appropriate time. Finally, having text chats or sending Instant Message (I/M) sessions are to be used as a back up when voice chat is the primary means of communication. Engaging in multiple chat conversations other than the one meant for a particular group on hand, also referred to as chatting on the side, can be distracting by the typing sound and gestures that accompany texting activities and there is also the possibility of accidentally sending the I/M to
engagement and participation, facilitation of learning, and favorablestudent feedback.IntroductionA brief history of Flipped Classroom. Flipped Classroom, is a teaching methodology in whichinstead of learning the material in class and doing homework at home, the students watchpremade videos of the topics at home and spend the class time on working problems. Theconcept of a flipped classroom was inspired by teachers Jonathan Bergman and Aaron Sams.They developed “reversed instruction” by offering PowerPoint presentations online for studentswho had missed class [1].Since then, the concept has been developed into a teaching methodology, interpreted and appliedin various ways. Variations take two separate routes. One category of variations focusses on
engagement, especially in the final project work, was achieved forthe majority of the students. In almost every case, the first-year students completed work wellbeyond what faculty had believed possible.Assessment has included pre-surveys for the entire first-year class focusing on attitudes andexpectations connected to project work. An external consultant has interviewed focus groups aswell as the faculty. Post-surveys will be administered near the end of the academic year, onceagain to the entire first-year class. The most important component of assessment will study thelong-term impact of the seminars; do the students from the Great Problems Seminars have abetter project experience in their junior and senior years?Early observations from
engagement, especially in the final project work, was achieved forthe majority of the students. In almost every case, the first-year students completed work wellbeyond what faculty had believed possible.Assessment has included pre-surveys for the entire first-year class focusing on attitudes andexpectations connected to project work. An external consultant has interviewed focus groups aswell as the faculty. Post-surveys will be administered near the end of the academic year, onceagain to the entire first-year class. The most important component of assessment will study thelong-term impact of the seminars; do the students from the Great Problems Seminars have abetter project experience in their junior and senior years?Early observations from
engagement, especially in the final project work, was achieved forthe majority of the students. In almost every case, the first-year students completed work wellbeyond what faculty had believed possible.Assessment has included pre-surveys for the entire first-year class focusing on attitudes andexpectations connected to project work. An external consultant has interviewed focus groups aswell as the faculty. Post-surveys will be administered near the end of the academic year, onceagain to the entire first-year class. The most important component of assessment will study thelong-term impact of the seminars; do the students from the Great Problems Seminars have abetter project experience in their junior and senior years?Early observations from
manufacturing space. Nonetheless, allstudents were fully engaged in the whole process. The title ‘edible entertainment’ was intriguingto students and the project enabled them to think beyond their own disciplines. Students feedbackThe impact of this interdisciplinary project on the motivation, commitment, and success levels ofstudents were further measured using an end of semester student survey. Table 3 shows thesurvey questions provided to students.Table 3: End-of-Semester Student Survey on Project # Question 1 Food equity, security & nutrition: What do these topics mean to you and how do you interpret the problem? 2 What is your perspective on using play and digital entertainment
. IntroductionSustainability is one of the most pressing issues that the present generation beings need to address1Since the problem is global, complex, and comprehensive, all the members and communities inthe world must be engaged in and contribute to addressing the issue. The engineering community,particularly manufacturing engineering community has important roles to play2,3,4. However, thechallenge of educating engineering students to effectively addressing the grand sustainabilityissues requires truly innovate pedagogy. As Albert Einstein succinctly put, “we can’t solveproblems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”A course on sustainable manufacturing has been developed and offered since 2010 at XYZUniversity. In the course, a
related to engineering science.• Engaging students in their development of a greater understanding of concepts related to engineering and scientific literacy.• Relating goals and objectives of engineering science to the elementary/secondary school curriculum as well as state and local standards.• Facilitating the students’ understanding of the unique characteristics and needs to the elementary/secondary level students as they relate to learning.• Reflecting on the best instructional and assessment strategies for teaching problem solving in engineering in today's elementary/secondary classrooms.• Enabling our students to recognize the uniqueness of the special learners in a classroom.• Assisting the
incorporating one ormore community-based engineering projects as the core theme of the course. Service learning is 3of vital importance in the engineering profession and must be integrated into the engineeringcurriculum at an early stage of career development. Engineering projects with aspects of servicelearning are both challenging and motivating to students entering the engineering profession afterSTEM studies at the high school level. In addition to teaching the students engineering design 4and practice in the context of society and values, and instilling the recognition of engineeringissues and concerns, engineering project activity with service learning components
practice engineeringdesign and to facilitate the integration of what students have learned throughout theircurriculum”5 ,“to better prepare graduates for engineering practice”6, and “to demonstrate theirabilities to potential employers”7.Shuman et al., broke down the ABET Student Outcomes a-k into the categories of hard skills andprofessional skills. The Student Outcomes that represent professional, or ‘soft’, skills were an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility an ability to communicate effectively the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context a
worldaround them and build on the written knowledge of prior generations.Practicing engineers must have fluency in the languages of engineering; they must to use writing,math, and sketching to “paint in another’s mind the mental picture in one’s own”[22]. Engineersmust engage with the world curiously, aligning their mental model with the true nature of God’screated world as reliably described in published literature[23], [24]. How will the engineeringfield advance without knowing where it came from? In educating future practitioners, educatorsmust cover technical engineering concepts, but engineering students desperately need a recoveryof those lifelong learning habits of observation, understanding, affection, evaluation, application,and expression
to constant communication and engagement.The faculty lead, took the responsibility of coordinating the effort. An email was sent multipletimes a week with project information including: meeting times, location, goals for that week,and also what skills the students will learn. During the design phase this was mainly teachingmodeling software skills and basic residential construction principles. The build phase of theproject included weekly emails of the tools the students would be trained to use and what aspectsneeded to be built. The communication step was one of the key responses from students at theend of the project that kept them engaged in the project from beginning to end. Strongcommunication and direction was needed daily.TABLE 2 Tiny
. Page 23.1344.14Future research on this work will help establish the best portfolio presentation format,consistent rubric application and the impact of another LMS alternative.AcknowledgementsThanks to those who contributed to this work including IPC managers Tim Van Dyke andBarbara Ressler, Director of the Collaboratory David Vader, and Tim Whitmoyer, whohas guided efforts on correlating rubrics with ABET outcomes.Bibliography1. Coyle, E., Jamieson, L. and Oakes, W., “EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service,”International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005.2. Williams, J., “The Engineering Portfolio: Communication, Reflection, and Student Learning OutcomesAssessment,” International Journal of Engineering Education
were asked todiscuss the fictional situation in light of Engineering Code of Ethics. Students were given atleast three weeks to complete the assignment.These range of options were given so that students could use a creative outlet of their preference.Students worked in teams of two to three of their choosing. A grading rubric (Appendix) wasgiven to the students ahead of time so that they were clear on the grading metrics in thefollowing categories: ethics, broad impacts, engineering as profession, communication, andcreativity. A grading scale of 1 to 4 was used for each category with 4 being exceptional oroutstanding work and 1 being poor work. A “3” was considered satisfactory or good work. The
number of projects in first-year engineering courses at TexasA&M University (TAMU), found a lack of student abilities to manage learning and problem-solving. It is clear that there is vital need to help students improve their metacognitive skillsthrough metacognitive training.2. Metacognition and Self-Regulated LearningIn a simple definition, metacognition refers to one‟s state of awareness of one‟s thinking10.Flavell, regarded as a foundation researcher in metacognition, divided it into two aspects:metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experiences or strategies. He describedmetacognitive knowledge as “knowledge concerning one‟s own cognitive processes and productsor anything related to them”11, p. 232. It can lead someone to engage in
the Associate Dean in the U.A. Whitaker College of Engineering and Associate Profes- sor in Bioengineering. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering Health Care Management from the University of Wisconsin. She has served as the Vice President of Student Development for the Institute of Industrial Engineers. She is an ABET Program Evaluator for Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineer- ing, Industrial Engineering Technology and General Engineering programs. Her research interests are in engineering education, with particular emphasis on engineering entrepreneurship and service learning. She was selected to participate in the 2009-2010 Florida Campus Compact Engaged Scholarship Fellows program
include identification of existing or easily modifiable courses,which can be used as units in the RSIC curriculum. The case study will also include a descriptionof the laboratory infrastructure, necessary administrative procedures (admission, scheduling, andcredit transfer), an assessment methodology, and experimental development and delivery of aselected RSIC unit within the partners’ institutions. This experimental concurrent delivery willnot include student mobility and engage only on-site students.Educational Objectives and OutcomesThere is a general agreed upon set of non-technical skills and behaviors expected fromengineering school graduates (oral and written communications, professional ethics, team skills,etc.). The starting point for
needed to move a pin location so that a hydraulic cylinder on a backhoe wouldnot interfere.” Page 12.541.9Other students see the impact of the improved problem solving skills in other courses, eventhough not “dynamics” in content.Faculty PerceptionsAs students see the connection of the course material with actual application in civil engineeringpractice, they are more engaged in learning the material. During the course of the semestersseveral seminars are presented that relate to dynamics applications in different civil engineeringspecialties. While these seminars are geared to graduate students, undergraduates in this courseare encouraged to
many contexts, and identify geopolitical and economical concerns. For example, the Mechanical Engineering department’s thermodynamics course has for 10 years required both a “technical” textbook and the nonfiction history of the quixotic developers of thermodynamic theory, Warmth Disperses and Time Passes; faculty encourage students to juxtapose the stories told by both texts. • Three required courses and one elective in civil engineering affiliated with the College’s Center for Community Engagement and engaging students in project work with a community partner. • One mechanical engineering course that received a College “STEAM” grant to support the development of a music-related
thinking styles with its creativeaspects; engaging students who prefer collaborative rather than individual work. Design teachesskills such as: an open-ended problem solving process; teaming and communication;consideration of ethical issues. While design curricula have changed considerably in the last 15years, they will need to change even more to meet current and future needs. There are currentlymany commonalities in U.S. design curricula. There are also notable innovations in the areas ofdesign thinking development, communication, teaming, societal relevance, and assessment.Future innovations may come in areas such as entrepreneurship, global teams, on-line learning,and human factors. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest
gainsfrom pre-test to post-test. Hake reported that students receiving interactive engagementachieved average relative gains of 48% (s.d. = 14%), compared to 23% (s.d. = 4%) forstudents in standard instruction. He did not directly report post-test scores; I extractedthese through manual calculation.Table 1 summarizes the data collected by Hestenes and Hake, and also includesadditional analysis to facilitate direct comparisons between data sets. As can be seen, thetwo data sets are in close agreement with one another. Because the meaning of“interactive” is broad – many types of teaching methods can qualify as “interactive”,provided that they attempt student engagement beyond traditional classroom instruction –these two studies provide compelling