. "Hands-On Laboratory Experiments in Flexible and Distance Learning." Journal of Engineering Education 90, no. 2 (2001): 187-191.[7] Gustavsson, Ingvar, Kristian Nilsson, Johan Zackrisson, Javier Garcia-Zubia, Unai Hernandez-Jayo, Andrew Nafalski, Zorica Nedic et al. "On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories." Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on 2, no. 4 (2009): 263-274.[8] Goodwin, Graham C., Adrian M. Medioli, Willy Sher, Ljubo B. Vlacic, and James S. Welsh. "Emulation-based virtual laboratories: a low-cost alternative to physical experiments in control engineering education." Education, IEEE Transactions on 54, no. 1 (2011): 48-55.[9] Cagiltay
the Senior Resident Scholar and Reinvention Fund Program Manager for the Institute. Dr. Riley also leads multiple DOE funded energy centers, including the Northern Mid-Atlantic Solar Education and Resource Center, and the Grid-Smart Application and Resource Center. In 2009 he initiated the launch of the National Energy Leadership Corps (NELC), a hands-on program that challenges college students to engage residents in their communities in meaningful home energy and sustainability planning and actions. He is now working with collaborators at numerous institutions to advance the and replicate the NELC in sustainable and high-impact applications.Dr. Lisa Riley Brown, Penn State UniversityDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of
was purposely mixed across research laboratories and engineering subdisciplines to heighten students’ sense of accountability. Additionally, in the laboratory sciences,students often collaborate in narrow subject areas, and a peer may tacitly and even unknowinglysupplement his or her lab mate’s writing with insider knowledge unavailable to others.Therefore, each student had the ‘fresh eyes’ of peers outside their laboratories and subdisciplines to review their work. Page 23.959.7Each week, team members discussed each team member’s writing progress. To facilitate thisdiscussion, each week a ‘team productivity form’ (partly shown in Figure 3
project starts duringweek two of the ten-week quarter and is completed by week nine. The project culminates in apresentation of the model by the student to the entire class. The model is built individually, but Page 23.991.2since the methodology for each model is similar, much collaboration takes place. The graduatestudents in our department are all familiar with each other as they take many courses togetherenhancing their ability to work together. Although team projects have a place in our curriculum,since this is a excel model, learning is maximized when done individually.Figure 1: Topics incorporated into the projectThe basis for this stock
from Jadavpur University in Calcutta, India with a honors in Mechanical Engineering in 1983, thereafter, he worked in a multinational industry for four years before joining Tulane University as a graduate student in the fall of 1987. He received his M.S. degree from Tulane University in 1989 and Ph.D. degree from Duke University in 1992.Dr. Rajnish Sharma, University of Maryland Eastern Shore Dr. Rajnish Sharma is a full-time tenure-track Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering in the De- partment of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore.Dr. Sharma holds a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University. He has Bachelors and Masters of Technology degrees in
relevant to students’ livedexperiences, revising approaches to meet students’ interests and needs in local, situated contexts.This approach has been shown to improve further education prospects [16], develop identitiesand increase participation in STEM fields such as computing [17].This study was designed around a semester-long project for first year engineering students atAshesi University. The project was presented to the students on their first day of class anduniversity. Given the recent growth of the local drone industry in Ghana, the author’sconversations with students at the university eliciting their keen interest in the aerospacediscipline, and the goal of presenting a challenging project, the following scenario waspresented: A famous
, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college and university settings, particularly how facDr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design within University of Michigan College of Engineering. She earned a PhD and
of the rules, restrictions and limitation systems that degree. The relation between authentic learning and obtaining awere intended to ensure independent student work without course grade or degree has been weakened by changes related tounauthorized references or help. Students could copy and paste a technology and the mode of student assessment with a coursequestion into a web-service that would provide an answer, possibly [1]. As preparation for productive work, certain aspects ofafter a prolonged delay. Multiple Internet connected devices education endeavor to train students to collaborate with othersthwarted lock-down methods and enabled communication and and to use all
impact and inclusivity [11]. The collaborative and transdisciplinarynature of BME may also be more appealing to underrepresented students. Finally, traditionalengineering majors such as mechanical or electrical engineering are more associated withstereotypes of white male engineers working in isolation and may therefore be less appealing tounderrepresented students [12].A pilot study of the first BSI cohort found that the program helped develop students' engineeringidentity and improve their confidence for the transition to university [6]. However, furtherinvestigation is needed to assess the BSI’s efficacy for preparing students for first-yearengineering. Student success and retention within the engineering program, particularly forphysics
” [1]. Thisfollow-up will offer an additional three years of data related to course content, course materials,student demographics, and grades. Student’s progress and performance in future math coursesand performance in continuing in engineering courses will be evaluated over 2019-2022.Notably, the last two years evaluated in this study (2021 – 2022) represent a fully in-personexperience compared to the hybrid cohort of 2020.The first-year engineering math curriculum at Clemson University was designed to help studentsunderstand the relevance of basic math skills in engineering and strengthen mastery ofprerequisite math learning outcomes to improve preparedness for engineering. While engineeringprograms and professional industries expect
graduation, 45 are non-technical, 78 are STEM, and 3 are open electives. The engineering faculty teach just under halfof the required credits (62) in addition to teaching all the 0-credit reflection seminars. In very broad terms, the four courses that I’ve labeled as disciplinary foundations cover thebasics of mechanical, electrical, chemical, and industrial engineering. Somewhat more precisely,the contents are: 1) mechanical statics and materials science; 2) circuits; 3) transport processes;and 4) systems analysis, engineering economics, and lifecycle analysis. These courses are takenin the second year. Of the three courses I’ve labeled as “math”, only two are taught by the mathematicsdepartment: Calculus 1 and Calculus 2. The third course
technology’s inner workings while boosting their confidence by reinforcingthe idea that the barrier to entry is lower than they might have imagined. To demonstrate theaccessibility of some technologies, students are encouraged to collaborate with generative AI tobuild and understand technological products, enabling faster progress and a deeper understandingof key concepts. Together, the case studies and hands-on assignments emphasize several recurringthemes, including the advantage of exploring emerging technologies early and finding novel waysto employ them. Another critical theme is the transient nature of technological superiority, whichhighlights the importance of continuous assessment, adaptation, and exploration of newapplications to maintain a
Structural Industrial Chemical Electrical Materials Nuclear CivilUC Berkeley
to grasp and apply. The authors share samples ofengineering undergraduate students’ work “before” and “after” this teaching approach wasimplemented starting in fall 2024. This paper also points to open-access and/or free onlineresources that serve as easy-to-comprehend primers for students and educators alike who areinterested in learning introductory design principles.The goals of this paper are twofold: 1) to allow engineering educators to incorporate beginner-friendly design principles into their own classrooms quickly and 2) to help engineering studentsbecome better scientific communicators as a core skill for working in industry, strengthening thebroader impacts of their work.BackgroundContent, delivery, and design are often termed the
continuous improvement principles [19], faculty decision-making in teaching andlearning [20], and the impact of personal and environmental factors on faculty perspectivesregarding ethics and societal impacts [21]. These studies highlight how both internal factors(e.g., departmental culture, peer faculty, institutional missions) and external factors (e.g.,accreditation agencies, professional societies, industry, and government) shape the educationalenvironment and instructional practices in engineering education. Second, this research draws on the WRC/FB [13], [17], [22] to complement the APM byfocusing on how engineering faculty members' racial consciousness influences theirequity-oriented practices. It highlights how systems of power and
Action verbs used in resumes achieved, innovated, strategic, organized, led, collaborative, support, helped Education Level Highest education level attained Master’s, Bachelor’s, PhD Years Experience Years of relevant experience 0.0 - 17.0 years Skills Skills listed on the resume system architecture, soft
Paper ID #48307Changing the Grading Narrative in a Sophomore Biomechanics CourseDr. Jennifer Currey, Union College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Changing the Grading Narrative in a Sophomore Biomechanics CourseIntroductionThe history of grades in education can feel a bit mythical. Some sources state that grades cameabout with the industrialization of education in the US. Assessment of student learning movedfrom oral or written assessments in the era of one room school houses to more systematic waysof communicating students’ learning with the advent of larger school systems [1]. Our currentsystem of ABCDF was
of post-secondary education and beyond • K-12 education • University/College • Other contexts for the term “marginalization” • Industry • Margin • Academia • Engineering Projects • Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (JEDI) • Institutional-Specific studies Context for “marginalization” • Engineering Education • Lived Experiences in Engineering SpacesCharting the Data After the process of applying the Inclusion/Exclusion criteria is completed, it is critical torecord the relevant information regarding these studies. Arksey & O’Malley [4] recommendrecording the following
studentsemploy their textbooks.Technology Overview QuestionsThe three resource types have common questions to see students' exposure to each one (e.g., Doyour peers use [resource] in their coursework?). Of most interest will be exposure to generative AItools in an industrial setting for those who have participated in a co-op or internship, as more andmore employers are employing generative AI software to increase employee productivity.Usage-level Question BlocksStudents will be asked to self-identify their usage level of each resource. Because students useresources in different capacities or at all, not all questions may be relevant. Therefore, we intendto segment the questions for students into three categories: candidate, adopter, or rejector
steps.Future work will focus on collecting data using the described experiments to develop novel multi-modal neural network models to predict cognitive workload optimizing and integrating additionalcognitive tasks and expanding sensor compatibility. Additionally, adding remote access function-ality would allow researchers to monitor experiments and collect data from geographically dis-persed participants, making the testbed viable for large-scale collaborative studies. To ensure arobust system, incorporating strong encryption protocols for data security would further enhancethe testbed’s suitability for online applications. The testbed’s adaptability will be advantageous forcognitive neuroscience research with diverse applications in education
and Social Integration between Working-Class and Middle/Upper-Class Students at Large, Public Research Universities,” J. Coll. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 215–242, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.2190/CS.15.2.e.[18] S. Pierszalowski, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and L. Marlow, “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under-Researched Factors for Students of Color,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, p. 328, 2021, doi: 10.3390/socsci10090328.[19] J. Blue, B. Johnson, A. Summerville, and B. P. Kirkmeyer, “Beliefs and behaviors of first-generation and low-income students in early engineering courses,” presented at the CoNECD 2018 - Collaborative
and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration globally. Dr. Songong may be reached at feulefacksongonge@gmail.comDr. Tatiana V. Goris, Pittsburg State University Dr. Tatiana Goris is an Associate Professor & Graduate Academic Adviser at Pittsburg State University KS, School of Technology and Workforce Learning. Dr. Goris is a Fulbright Award-Recipient, a member of professional engineering societies, and the author of multiple publications related to post-secondary education of adult learners. She obtained her PhD in Technology from Purdue University (2012), West Lafayette, Indiana, with an emphasis in Engineering and Technology Education. She also has a background in Electronics Engineering graduating from
Professor of Game Design at Northeastern University, has affiliated appointments in Computer Science, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, and with the School of Law, and works closelDr. Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering and a recent Director of the Research Institute for Experiential Learning Science at Northeastern University. She earned her B.S. degree in Phy ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Pilot Implementations of a Game-Based Learning Module for Levee Inspection and
environment withfrequent interactions through small research groups and events”. Programs would often addmore context to student experiences within their presentation sharing elements like: We pride ourselves on having a very student centered culture, a culture that's supportive and collaborative. We consider our students to be our future colleagues, and so we treat them as such. They're our partners in just about everything that goes on from governance to teaching to mentoring new students. Our students are our partners in all of that. [Faculty 695]Less frequently, programs would share the flexibility of their course offerings and the option toselect personalized course work as part of the student’s program.In
Paper ID #48171Work in Progress: Enhancing Engineering Education through Course Alignment:A Structured Approach to Integrating Learning Outcomes, Content, andAssessmentDr. Cyrus Habibi, University of Wisconsin - Platteville Dr. Cyrus Habibi is an accomplished electrical engineer and associate professor at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville with over 13 years of teaching experience and a decade of industry expertise. Holding a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering, he is a registered professional engineer in Minnesota and has taught a variety of courses, including Power Electronics, Signals and Systems, and Control Systems
measure identity in terms of recognition, interest, and the performance of civilengineering students before and after joining the competition teams. The current paper describesthe effect of concrete canoe and steel bridge competition teams on identity. The results showedthat these competition teams help develop the identity of the students as engineers.IntroductionEngineering competition teams offer unique opportunities for undergraduate students to integrateconcepts learned in the classroom to further develop their technical and non-technical skillsoutside of the classroom. Each year, students collaborate in a team to design, build and testdifferent products per rules set forth by the professional organizations to compete against otherschools
Management, Economic Regulation, and Public Procurement Process Management. Additionally, he has supervised undergraduate and graduate theses. Currently, he serves as Academic Secretary for both the Industrial Engineering School and the Informatics Engineering School at the Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Andres Bello.Dr. Elizabeth Ginette Garrido-Ram´ırez, Centro de Investigaci´on para la Sustentabilidad, Facultad Ciencias dela Vida, Universidad Andres Bello Dr. Elizabeth Garrido Ram´ırez is an Associate Professor and researcher at the Center for Sustainability Research at Andres Bello University, Chile. She has held key academic leadership roles, including Director of the Environmental Engineering Program and
, mastery-focused tasks, and reflectivepractices could help students adapt to challenges and sustain motivation in demanding academiccontexts. For example, engineering programs could incorporate resilience-building modules intofoundational courses, teaching students to navigate setbacks while maintaining focus on self-improvement. Similarly, instructors could design assessments that prioritize skill mastery overcomparative performance to reinforce intrinsic motivations. Additionally, integrating mentorshipprograms, adaptive learning technologies, and industry partnerships can further enhance studentsupport systems, providing personalized learning experiences and real-world problem-solvingopportunities that cultivate resilience and self-efficacy.In
below as an example, though as campus partnersprovide more documents to The Citadel, the list can change. As only four options are provided,multiple groups may select the same topic. 1. Stream restoration project 2. Shrimping industry policy amendment 3. Telecom Network installation 4. Water treatment residual management planProject 1 Deliverable: As an EIS is a written document; students are instructed that they willpractice their written communication skills. The groups must collaboratively write a 500-100-word professional style memorandum to summarize the key aspects of their selected EIS for animaginary company supervisor. This requires them to review the EIS- which is 250 pages ormore- then create a summary of no more than
instruction canfoster the development of soft skills critical to success in the work place (Stohlman et al., 2011).For example, integrated ETS instruction promotes collaboration, compromise, problem solving,and communication (Hmelo-Silver, 2004; Stohlman et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). These softskills are becoming increasingly important to employers (Jones et al., 2017; Mardis et al., 2018;Patacsil & Tablatin, 2017).Technology and EngineeringTechnology integration has been encouraged for decades within general science education (e.g.,Bull & Bell, 2008; Hilton & Honey, 2011) and more recently within the engineeringopportunities teachers integrate into their science instruction (e.g., Wang et al., 2011, Maeng &Gonczi, 2020