learning (PBL) is an approach to learn-ing and instruction in which students tackle problems in small groups under the supervision of atutor [17]. These problems aim to prepare students for real-world settings [28]. Social interac-tion is an approach that enhances knowledge acquisition through social activities, such as studentsestablishing meaningful dialogue within student groups and with teachers [8, 11].Study of Learning and Engagement Strategies (LESs). Clarke et al. [4] described LESs andcompared them to the traditional lecture-style approach. The authors also performed a study thatquantifies the increased use of LESs in face-to-face (F2F) class activities to determine studentlearning improvement between Exams 1 and 2 for a software testing
].Epistemologically, progressive teaching methodologies in sustainability-focused engineeringeducation include experiential learning approaches such as project-based learning, collaborativedesign studios, field research experiences, and real-world problem-solving workshops. Thesemethods actively engage students in hands-on sustainability challenges, encouraging criticalthinking, systems analysis, and interdisciplinary collaboration but all prioritize learning throughexperience, student-centeredness, and community engagement [18-20]. By simulating complexenvironmental and social scenarios, these pedagogical strategies help students develop adaptiveskills, innovative mindsets, and a deeper understanding of sustainable technological solutions.Although claiming
the world from a different perspective. Putting oneself in the shoes of a noveltechnology, for instance, enables a viewpoint on how that technology came to be that isdifferently informative than the typical story from the perspective of the human inventor21.Recently, the engineering education research community is also beginning to acknowledge theimportance of non-humans in terms of material and representational artifacts, as learningengineering is dependent on tools including software programs and large equipment, andrepresentations including equations, flowcharts, diagrams, etc.22–24ANT comes with its own vocabulary, as words like actor, actor-network, symmetry, andtranslation take on nuanced meanings in the language of ANT. Here we
the scholarship of teaching and learning.Dr. Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Technology Adeel Khalid, Ph.D. Associate Professor Systems Engineering Office: 678-915-7241Dr. Daniel R Ferreira, Southern Polytechnic State University Dr. Dan Ferreira is an assistant professor of environmental science at Southern Polytechnic State Univer- sity in Marietta, GA. He is a passionate science educator who believes in giving his students a practical, real-world oriented learning experience. Dr. Ferreira’s research focuses on adsorption and ion-exchange reactions of cations at the soil mineral/water interface.Dr. Jeanne Law Bohannon, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Beth Stutzmann
can help improve students’ experience and help them learn how to present scientific information to other contexts.” [Georgia Tech FG09] Express that reflection is about students. Students often think of the reflection activity as an assignment and may not see how reflection can help them as individuals. Educators offered tips such as focusing on the broader impacts of reflection activity, helping students connect their learning to the real world, and broadening the students’ thinking beyond engineering [e.g. Cal PolySLO FG05, Clarkson University FG04, Highline College FG08, Stanford University FG05]. For example, one educator mentioned, “ Focus on
, particularly forstudents in the mechanical, civil and aerospace fields. This course introduces students tomodeling and solving real-world systems, including drawing Free Body Diagrams (FBD) andsetting up equilibrium equations. These two skills are critical for bridging introductory courses tomore advanced courses, such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materials and others. The process ofteaching these foundational skills typically involves giving students opportunities to hone theirproblem solving skills through homework assignments and exams. In this paper, the authorsintroduce reflection as a tool to gauge understanding, confidence and performance. This too isused to intervene in homework assignments and exams in order to enhance and improvestudents’ meta
what happens afterthe PD as teachers are bringing this novel content and practices back to their classrooms [25].Research Design This study utilized a multiple case study design as suggested by Yin [26] to understandhow three first grade teachers were integrating engineering and CT into their classroominstruction as they implemented the same engineering and CT curriculum across two years. Amultiple case study design was chosen as it allowed an in-depth investigation within and across asimilar real-world context to better understand how or why certain actions occurred related to thephenomena under investigation [26]. These cases were bounded by participation in the largerNSF-funded project across two years, which included participation
Paper ID #27458Beyond Trial & Error: Iteration-to-Learn using Computational Paper Craftsin a STEAM Camp for GirlsColin Dixon, Concord Consortium Colin Dixon holds a Ph.D. in Learning & Mind Sciences from the University of California, Davis. He researches the development of STEM practices and agency among young people creating things to use and share with the world. He writes about equity and identity in making and engineering, the role of community in science learning, and how youth leverage interests and experiences within STEM education.Dr. Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum Corey Schimpf is a Learning
engage inner-city youth in learning and creative activities. To this end, DHF offers arange of STEM-based courses and workshops, including programs that focus on 3D printing andgame design, on a pay-what-you-can basis. Additionally, DHF offers a unique employmenttraining program for youth in which youth who have completed a set of required learningprograms gain real world technical work experience in a professional setting. In the followingsubsections, we describe both of these components.3.1.DHF Learning ProgramsLearning programs at DHF take the form of courses and workshops. Workshops are shorter thancourses in duration (1-day, 2-day or 3-day) and are focused on specific topics. Courses takelonger (about 7-14 weeks), with classes meeting twice
, quantumentanglement, EPR paradox, single photon experiments, Schrödinger equation, infinite and finitesquare wells, quantum tunneling, and various applications of QM (e.g., scanning tunnelingmicroscope, semiconductors, LEDs).In the following sections, we present our approach and outcomes for: a) fostering an inclusiveenvironment through a collection of teaching practices and course structures, and b)implementing a specific unit which engages students in conversations around diversity in STEM.Fostering a culture of inclusionApproachIn order to create an inclusive environment, we focus on four elements—community, voice,agency, and representation—that are considered to be important for cultivating a sense ofbelonging [4]–[9]. We embed each of these components
discussed a number of issues related to audience. For example, the“Audience—Intended Reader” code captured any discussion, comment, or reference thatmentions the characteristics, attributes, or anything else about intended reader, i.e. whoever isgoing to read the Teaching Portfolio whether this is peer reviewers, search committees, friends,or random people on the web. The “Audience—Managing Reactions” code captureddiscussions, comments, or references to how any given audience will react to an idea in aportfolio element. This code also refers to how the author of the document might control theaudience reaction. Finally, the “Audience—Context Information” code captured any discussion,comment, reference, or sharing of information about a 'real world
Directives Conventions AffirmationsProfessional Language Error explanation Error identification Error correction ConventionsExamples of the application of both language choice and Téa’s self-identified characteristics ofprofessional communication are in evidence in her work with her team in CHE 230. The courseis set up to simulate a consulting project. Students work in teams of five, select one of threecontaminated sites (water, soil or air) and propose a strategy for dealing with the contaminants.Each
but with seeking to change those very pieces. Lateral thinking isconcerned with the perception part of thinking. This is where we organize the external world intothe pieces we can then 'process'.” 8 This method is practiced by having the students as a classcome up with a list of items taken for granted at a restaurant, eliminating one item at a time, andthen brainstorming ideas for a “new restaurant” that exploit the lack of the items .Mind mapping involves using works, phrases and pictures to branch from a central idea orproblem to many solutions or related ideas. The result is a central core that has branches thatbreak off as more detailed ideas are generated. Using this method, students are asked to solve avariety of problems including how
ofengineers in society, and illustrate how engineers design systems and solve problems in thecontext of how these systems influence, and are influenced, by the world around them. Theyintroduce basic engineering skills including how to identify, formulate and solve problems, howto verify and communicate results, and how to use computers to aid in this process. The goal isto actively engage the students in applying engineering analysis and design methods to solvepractical problems. This involves a team approach to plan, design, analyze, implement, evaluateand report engineering activities.Beyond the first year, the study stressed the need for increased focus on team-learning, self-discovery of knowledge, closer interaction between student and faculty
“emancipatory” aspects of the methodology. I.e.,the promotion of equity, inclusion, and social justice consciousness within the educationaldiscipline supports the empowerment of historically marginalized students along with thepotential of learning opportunities to be transformative for all.In our application of EAR to address our research questions, we have included a programmaticintervention implemented over three years in our engineering courses, and we have used amixed methods approach in order to capture not only quantitative trends but also qualitativecontent about our students’ experiences to support the interpretation of the significance of thosetrends. Details of the intervention applied as well as selection of data collection methods andtools
willprovide analyses for other engineering disciplines.Table 2. Student-reported outcomes scales used in this investigation as variables tooperationalize E2020 outcomes.FUNDAMENTAL SKILLS1 (alpha = .71); Please rate your ability to:Applying Math & Science to: The physical sciences to engineering problemsApplying Math & Science to: Math to engineering problemsApplying Math & Science to: Computer tools and applications to engineering problemsDESIGN SKILLS1 (alpha = .92); Please rate your ability to:Evaluate design solutions based on a specified set of criteria.Generate and prioritize criteria for evaluating the quality of a solution.Producing a product (prototype, program, simulation, etc.).Apply systems thinking in developing solutions to
[47-51]. Cardador and Hillsurveyed 274 industry-based engineers in the Midwestern United States and found that femaleengineers on a managerial career path were at greater risk for professional attrition than theircolleagues on other paths [49]. Their results are consistent with Fouad’s National ScienceFoundation study finding that 75% of women who left engineering were on a managerial path[50]. In a follow-up study, Cardador found that increasing female engineers’ access tomanagement had unintended consequences for the women on these paths who reported feelingless like real engineers, working longer hours with less flexibility than female counterparts intechnical roles. This finding challenges Goldner and Ritti’s claim five decades earlier
this tension between nuts and bolts (real) engineering identity, and managerial work ontwo levels [86]. First, touching on the fissure between professional norms and practices, shenotes that dualist thinking rooted in traditional nuts and bolts (coded masculine) vs social (codedfeminine) identities conflict with the reality of engineers’ work. Second, when it comes toresearch participants’ social locations, Faulkner’s empirical work confirms that women tend to bepenalized for these inevitable technical to managerial transitions more heavily than men [86]. Inother words, gender dynamics show up in two places on this figure—first by being tapped formiddle management at higher rates than men, women show up at the low professional status endof the
related professional development offerings and supporting opportunities intheir schools.The shift in K-12 STEM curriculum from being organized around specific academic disciplines to anemphasis on themes or big ideas (NRC, 2011) requires teachers to have more of a system perspectiveand broad STEM content knowledge. It is unlikely that without considerable continuing education K-5teachers can be prepared to effectively teach STEM curriculum around themes 9, 13, 24. An integralcomponent of teaching STEM curriculum is providing opportunities for students to engage in inquiry,design, authentic applications, and active learning environments 25, 26, which likely requires teachers toseek ongoing professional development 27. While professional
gateway to a research position,sometimes within weeks of the lab visit.What is Modeling?The complexity of the human body requires that biomedical engineers use models to developtheir hypothesis. Many variables can only be estimated based on previously published data.While there are multiple definitions of a “model”, we use the Hestenes’ definition which statesthat a model is a “conceptual representation of the real thing” [2]. In essence, a model is amathematical equation which provides a description of how a system works. In the human body,that description can be quite complex. Models allow us to use simplifying assumptions tounderstand multifaceted physiological processes.Faculty introduce each model by asking questions about the system to
Products and Processes (by means of self-, peer-, instructor-, andoutside evaluators-assessment results, as well as final grades received by students). At the sametime we held indirectly evaluation through a survey with various groups of the community.Indirect assessments were conducted (since fall 2008) through the application of a survey madeon the premises in which we asked the level of importance for each of the thirteen programoutcomes and the level of perceived progress of the students regarding these outcomes. Thissurvey was scored on a Likert scale by assigning values of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = most important).The same scale was used to rate progress (1 = least perceived progress, 5 = most perceivedprogress).This survey was conducted among
particular situation. Accordingly,teachers can only experience enactive mastery in an authentic teaching situation [4]. Teachers’self-efficacy evolves as they encounter challenges and successes in real teaching contexts. Research often emphasizes how teacher self-efficacy impacts student outcomes but lessso how student behavior shapes teacher self-efficacy. Positive student engagement can bolsterteachers' confidence, whereas negative interactions may trigger stress and lower self-efficacy,especially for novice teachers [16-18]. Supportive environments and positive feedback frommentors and colleagues can also enhance novice teachers’ self-efficacy [19-20]. For example,collaborating within a successful team fosters collective self-efficacy—the
barrier, istheir ability to succeed.Stephanie Adams (Dean)I thought about this from an ability standpoint. On a lot of our majority campuses, there's thisnotion of ability and belonging. There's still a subset that thinks that women and people of colorcan't or aren't able to do math, and therefore they don't belong. Or when you see them in theclassroom, “Well what are you doing here? How'd you get here?” Now there becomes thisconversation about whether you should be there from a perspective based on those things. Thatalso holds people back. So, “I can have all the ability in the world, but you don't think I belong.”For example, an African American male graduate student entered one of our research buildingsthrough the back door, like everybody
that the issue for engineering education is more ofrecruitment than retention. Further, Godwin et al.32 advised that efforts to recruit women shouldnot solely focus on building physics, math, or engineering identities but should also emphasizetheir empowerment in changing their world through engineering.Insight 2: Women students rely on their family members for choosing their careers Many authors have highlighted the influence of high school teachers on students’ careerchoices and preparation for the choices29,30,26,33, it appears that women students also rely on theirparents and other family members for making the choices34.Insight 3: The K12 system must help women students to develop social capital and navigationalcapital The K
aprofessional engineer. It’s first fundamental canon to “Hold paramount the safety, health, andwelfare of the public” (NSPE, n. d.) informed their decision making when navigating anunethical directive or request. Rather than serving merely as a symbol of good engineering practice, the NSPE Code ofEthics and other written standards provide the raw material necessary for professional engineersto form an identity, often coming to life through application to case studies. Participants sharedmemories of case studies they had learned about early in their career that helped them determinehow they wanted to be perceived as a professional engineer. In reference to the ChallengerDisaster, which was among a few frequently-cited case studies, Zac shared
the National Research Council[10], [11] Engineering education not only allows students to meaningfully apply scienceconcepts and content to relevant real-world problems, thereby increasing learning andengagement across disciplines, but also supports students’ development of the skills anddispositions they will need as literate citizens to address societal and global challenges [1], [12],[13].Despite this increased interest in implementing engineering instruction across pre-collegeclassrooms, research is still needed to better understand the scope of best practices andconditions for effective engineering education within elementary classrooms. Literature suggeststhat intentionally framing engineering lessons within the Engineering Design
desired success; and developing mutual trustto jointly cross the mentorship cultural bridge in a transformational mentorship process.Holistically, the paper explores how mentorship empowers participants for further success and growth onboth professional and personal levels, inside and outside of higher education. An extensive discussion ofresearch evidence on the barriers minority students face in graduate school, challenges majority facultyface in cross-racial and gender mentorships, and suggestions on how to address the identified barriers,make this exploration applicable for any faculty or graduate students who desire to maximize theopportunities from relational mentorship. Topic Index: Cultural bridge, relational mentorship, menteeship
electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. Michael S. Thompson, Bucknell University ”Stu” is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell Uni- versity, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer- related electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for en- gineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. He spends a great deal of time looking for
specifically point toa mathematics principle, law, or formula, and depict how it is used to carry out or understand anengineering concept, task or skill. Learning skills and new concepts requires a conceptual basisfor it to be impactful2. Furthermore, a lack of integration between one’s prior knowledge andnew curriculum materials is problematic given the education and cognitive science research thatemphasizes the importance of explicit integration of conceptual knowledge for successfultransfer of that knowledge to novel applications or new situations3 4 5.Project Lead the Way (PLTW) was chosen as the focal curriculum because of its widedissemination in the US (it has been adopted by over 17% of US high schools, and is present inall 50 states) and its