policies were coupled withaggressive advising for at-risk students with the intent to improve retention to graduation fromour university regardless of their final major. An enrollment model for evaluation of alternativestandards for admission was developed in 2014 for enrollment management at a sustainablelevel. The development of these measures was presented at previous FYEE conferences andresulted in improved 6-year graduation rates among our incoming engineering cohorts insubsequent years.Additional data mining of enrollment databases used in the development of enrollmentmanagement measures allowed further slicing of engineering enrollment into smaller cohorts ofinterest. Example sub-populations of interest include underrepresented minority
each of these issues, literature wasreviewed to develop a curriculum-wide solution.Course integration has been shown to promote student engagement2. Project based scenarios areoften used to connect course concepts that are individually important for the students tounderstand. Previous works demonstrating this include studies of vertical integration frameworkfor capstone design projects by Hardin and Sullivan4, an investigation of the importance ofintegration of engineering curricula by Froyd and Ohland2, and the use of a spiral learningcurriculum in the first two years of mechanical engineering by Roemer and Bamberg5. Researchof hands on learning has been shown to increase student retention6. Diverse courses such asmechanical design and
. In this paper, a novel way to address these issues within a Mechanical EngineeringTechnology Capstone Experience is presented. The novel implementation makes use of theASME Professional Practice Curriculum (PPC), a set of on-line “short courses” developed byASME and available to the public at no cost. By integrating these “short courses” into theCapstone Experience, students can participate in a significant professional developmentexperience that is beneficial to both their long-term career goals and their execution of theircapstone project. In addition, the on-line self-study provides an ideal format for engaging thestudent in the type of lifelong learning required for professional success. In this paper, a modeltechnique for integration of
experience on how it is constructed and how it works. 2] Disassembly and reassemble it from scratch and write a user friendly instruction/assembly manual, forming a “kit”. 3] This thermosyphon “kit” supplied with components and assembly manual will be sent to Zimbabwe for the client to assemble on their own. 4] Ideally, the students will oversee actual assembly.Hands-On Experience for the StudentsAs one can see from the examples of the projects mentioned above, the IPC curriculum givesstudents ‘real-world”, hands-on engineering experiences with clients’ projects. In the EnergyGroup students gain much knowledge in the areas of alternative energies, develop goodteamwork and communication (verbal and written
use by other schools andgroups.SummaryThe work funded under the NSF CCLI grant develops several portable experiments and relatedweb modules for each experiment, establishment of procedures and logistics to incorporate theseexperiments into the ECE curriculum at Georgia Tech, introduction of these experimentalmodules and procedures into existing ECE and ME classes, and assessment of the developedexperimental modules and procedures. We have a laboratory that houses these portableexperiments and can be used on a short-term basis by individual classes to run experiments. Thislaboratory serves as a place to hold sessions on hands-on demos to visiting high school groups inaddition to serving as a basis for camps for high school and middle school
developed and proposed to be used in the DSP courselabs. The motivation of this change is to increase student attainment of learning outcomes in boththe DSP course and culminating projects. Assessment measures have been developed to measurethe effectiveness of the new system which will be used in the DSP course for the first time inspring 2016. The first senior cohort that will be assessed for this work will complete theirculminating project during the spring 2017. If the system proves successful, it will be useful toother universities and to other areas of the EE curriculum such as controls and communications.References 1. Cameron H.G. Wright, Thad B. Welch, and Michael G. Morrow, “Real-time DSP using “See-Through.”, Computers in
Session 1526 Vertical Integration of an Esterification Reaction in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum Kevin Dahm, Daniel Fichana, Peter Otton and Karl Spiewak Rowan UniversityAbstractThe Rowan University Department of Chemical Engineering has received an NSF-CCLIgrant to develop realistic chemical reaction engineering experiments for theundergraduate curriculum. This paper discusses one such experiment, the reactionbetween ethanol and acetic acid to form ethyl acetate. Students examine this system intheir organic chemistry class, and it provides an
movement in engineering case development and classroom teaching has itsorigins in the 1960’s at Stanford University. The American Society of Engineering Education(ASEE) and the Rose-Holman Institute of Technology sponsor an engineering case website thathas about 350 case studies1. The presence of this website leads one to believe that someengineering and engineering technology faculty members use real-world case studies.The advantages for integrating cases into any curriculum abound in the literature. These can begeneralized into four categories: 1) cases provide students with a link to the real world; 2) casesdevelop students’ critical thinking and problem solving skills; 3) cases develop students’communication skills; and, 4) cases involve
interests include the areas of reconfigurable computing, analog circuit design, and semiconductor testing.Mukul Shirvaikar, University of Texas at Tyler Dr. Mukul Shirvaikar is the Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler, where he develops curriculum and laboratories in computer engineering. Prior to this he worked at Texas Instruments specializing in real time imaging systems. Dr. Shirvaikar graduated with his doc- torate from the University of Tennessee. He also has a M.S. degree from the University of Maine, and a B.Tech. from Banaras Hindu University, India. His current research interests include real time imaging and engineering education
Session 1202 Industry Expectations of New Engineers – A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers James D. Lang and Francis D. McVey The Boeing CompanyAbstractThe ABET Criteria 2000 approach creates opportunities for universities to work closely withtheir key constituencies; such as industry, state regulatory agencies, parents, and students todefine general and specific goals and objectives for their university - unique education programs.For example, while Criteria 2000 lists eleven student educational outcome categories, it requireseach accredited
-12engineering education, with emphasis on K-8 grades—a time when first impressions ofengineering may be developed. Calls for increased participation by all students, including thosewho have been historically marginalized, motivate the need for theoretically grounded ways ofdeveloping and assessing educational programs [1]. This paper draws from sociocultural learningtheory and applies four theoretical and empirical analyses to derive design principles for equitythat can inform curriculum, instruction, and assessment of preK-12 engineering educationprograms. We present a model for equity-oriented preK-12 engineering learning and delineate itsdimensions and principles, illustrating each with examples and discussing ways of implementingequity-oriented
necessary for engineering practice.Recommendations from the National Academy of Engineering and ideas from faculty, industryrepresentatives, and the popular literature were combined with ABET accreditation standards andrequirements from the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) examination were used as a basis forthe general engineering curriculum. The task force developed a list of desired learningobjectives and educational outcomes for the new degree program. Using the ABET accreditationcriteria and the FE licensure exam as guidelines, more than 200 detailed learning objectives weredeveloped and mapped to the individual courses in the new curriculum.The inaugural freshman class was accepted in August 2008. The new engineering programoffers a
Computer Science (SETCS), we continue to increase the number andimprove the quality of course offerings. A primary goal of the program is to provide anon-line curriculum that remains TAC-ABET accredited by conforming to TAC-ABETrequirements to ensure the quality of the on-line ARET courses. Development,applications, and testing of our course delivery method are addressed. The curriculumhas been designed to operate in our own interactive web-based environment forsubmission of coursework; concept diagrams, drawings, reports, assorted forms, andprogramming. Project submissions will be uploaded through our own CART CourseManagement System (CMS) for review, grading, and posted to the CMS for the studentto review. Students provide feedback evaluation
Session 3630 EPICS: A Model of Service-Learning in an Engineering Curriculum William C. Oakes, Edward J. Coyle and Leah H. Jamieson Purdue UniversityAbstractEngineering Projects in Community Service — EPICS — is a service-learning program that wasinitiated at Purdue University in the Fall of 1995. Under this program, undergraduate students inengineering earn academic credit for long-term team projects that solve technology basedproblems for local community service organizations. The program has grown to include 20project teams with approximately 250 students participating during the 1999 academic
new participants are grouped into project teams to carry out the conceptual designof an offshore oil and gas field development. The material presented here is derived from sixyears of experience with two or three field development teams each year.The paper goes into topics such as:• Team member selection procedure.• Stimulating early project team productivity - getting them working.• Adapting project requirements to accommodate team members’ backgrounds.• Overcoming (cultural and intellectual) differences.IntroductionAn offshore field development project has been included at the beginning of the OffshoreEngineering (OE) curriculum at the Delft University of Technology since the 1996-97academic year. This corresponded with the re-introduction
environment in ouryoung generation as well as develop their thinking and analytical skills in finding solutions toproblems raised by such issues. This paper describes the experience of introducing renewableenergy into the curriculum of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the steps taken to enhancethe learning process. It also highlights the impact of this experience on the students with respectto the environment and the community. Such experience is an example that can be followed inorder to promote renewable energy technologies and to develop expertise in this field.I. IntroductionThe United Arab Emirates (UAE) is an important oil producer with the fifth largest proven oilreserves in the Middle East. In 2004, natural gas supplied 64 percent of the
Beach 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840 - U.S.A Email: jinlee.kim@csulb.edu Abstract: This paper presents the results from an ongoing NSF TUES project that develops a unique and innovative virtual approach, named as Green-BIM teaching method, to deliver sustainability practices using Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology for undergraduate students and implement it as a hands-on laboratory- and project-based course in the construction education curriculum. This NSF TUES project aims to inspire undergraduate students with green building practices associated with BIM for the sustainable development of a built
wanted to spark enthusiasm in the curriculum and make learning computer design fundamentals a rewarding experience for our students.METHOD To address these concerns, the faculty and staff of the division developed a number ofstudent-centered educational tools. These tools evolved over a four year period. Each tool wascarefully considered, developed, implemented, and tested prior to incorporation into a course.Each of these tools is detailed below. VISICOMP. The VISIble COMPuter or “VISICOMP” was designed, as was itspredecessor EDUCOMP, to visibly show all major computer systems operation with softwaredriven stimulus. VISICOMP may be run in the automatic mode at a user-selected speed or in themanual mode. In the manual mode the
ETD 335 Vertical Integration of Experiential Learning in Construction Curriculum with Industry Collaboration Afshin Zahraee, Cheng Zhang, David Pratt, Chandramouli V. Chandramouli Purdue University NorthwestAbstractThis paper proposes to vertically integrate experiential learning components in courses at variouslevels in the Construction Engineering and Management Technology (CEMT) program at PurdueUniversity Northwest (PNW). Specifically, this project focuses on engaging industryprofessionals to incorporate newly developed
been developed and offered to theAET students since 2004. The course provides a requisite understanding of Internet basedrobotics/automation/machine vision for students to progress to an advanced level in the curriculum. Thecourse also serves as a means for students to gain exposure to advanced industrial automation concepts Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 4before their senior design project. The course has an applied learning focus, offering flexibility to thestudents through an open laboratory philosophy. Since
core curriculum, satisfying theobjective for scientific literacy in natural sciences. It is the first general education offering fromengineering faculty.Challenges in the development of this course included attaining the right balance betweenqualitative and quantitative material and tempering faculty’s enthusiasm for rigorousmathematical analysis in deference to a nontechnical audience that largely reflects the region’sdiversity. The overriding goals were to inform students about energy production andconsumption patterns, various technologies and their environmental consequences, and the prosand cons of renewable and nonrenewable energy systems. Other objectives were to provide astraightforward yet sophisticated appreciation of the negative
Practice across Higher Education, London: Earthscan, 2010.16. C. f. S. Engineering, "Center for Sustainable Engineering," 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.csengin.org/csengine/sub.html?skuvar=141. [Accessed 4 1 2015]..17. S. H. I. Hoffmann, E. Blatchley and L. Nies, "Integrating Sustainability into Courses Across the Engineering Curriculum: A Faculty Development Model," in Proceedings of the ASEE Natonal Conference, Louisville, 2010.18. K. Jahan and Y. Mehta, "Sustainability Across the Curriculum," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 209-17, 2007.19. F. Lozano-García, G. Gándara, O. Perrni, M. Manzano, D. Hernández and D. Huisingh, "Capacity Building: A Course on
. Catherine F. Cahill, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Dr. Catherine F. Cahill serves as the Director of the Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Inte- gration – RDT&E (ACUASI) at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) and the CEO of the Pan-Pacific UAS Test Range Complex. For more than 30 years Cathy has conducted research on atmospheric aerosols and their impacts on visibility, global climate, and human health including the size and composition of particulate matter entering the Arctic from Asia and the sources and potential health impacts on U.S. forces of atmospheric aerosols in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since 2006, Cathy has collaborated with the UAF UAS program and worked on developing unmanned aircraft
control technology development companies. Since 2010, he has been with UHD. Dr. Tzouanas’ research interests include process modeling, simulation and design, process control, and renewable energy systems. Dr. Tzouanas is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) for Engineering and Engineering Technology programs. He is also member of AIChE and ASEE, and currently serves as ETD Director. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Curriculum in Urban Agriculture and Sustainability and Lessons Learned AbstractLarge cities, like Houston, are growing fast and they face numerous environmental and food distributionproblems. These problems require collaborative
. Page 15.366.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Designing and Teaching Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Investigating Innovation and Our Engineered WorldIntroductionThrough a curriculum reform initiative, The University of Texas at Austin is developing“signature courses” for freshman undergraduate students. These courses expose studentsto a variety of subjects and engage them in a variety of skill sets. These are “signature”courses because they are developed and taught by the university’s top teaching faculty,where the goals are to foster a scholarly community and to create the most interesting andmeaningful classes possible. Embarking on its third year, Undergraduate Studies 302:The Engineered World
and administrators to create a more inclusive environment; c) Developing Advocate and Allies Mentoring Program for first year, and transfer students; d) Transforming existing engineering curriculum of second and third year from a narrow sub-discipline based approach to a more inclusive, system-based approach; e) Enriching students’ aspirations by providing successful and diverse role models from industry and academia; and f) Developing a model for inclusion of diverse students.The study is unique in that the definition of diversity is expanded to include both visible andinvisible aspects. It also takes a comprehensive approach in seeking to attract a more diversepopulation into engineering while also making sure that
technology, biosciences, societal attitudes and politics. In order to succeed in thesenew roles, the Engineer of 2020 needs to be trained in traditional areas such as science,technology, and mathematics, but also in leadership skills, creativity, communication, flexibilityand resilience3.The challenge, therefore, lies with engineering faculty to use or develop new courses andinstructional practices with which to teach and assess engineering knowledge, skills, andqualities. Faculty must simultaneously address how these concepts apply to real-life problemsolving, reasoning in engineering and uses beyond the classroom. Research has demonstratedthat incorporating student-centered curriculum can improve student understanding and retention.Unfortunately
Minded Learning (EML) into the undergraduateengineering curriculum. EML emphasizes educating the “whole engineer” by supplementingtraditional engineering theory with nontechnical concepts related to curiosity, connections, andcreating value (the three Cs). “Curiosity” encourages students to investigate and question thesociety that surrounds them within the context of the technical material they are learning in class.In short, it encourages students to be problem seekers and definers as opposed to just problemsolvers. Students are then ready to make “Connections” to synthesize new and old knowledge tocreate innovative solutions to problems. Lastly, “Creating Value” is about improving society andquality of life by creatively applying their
shortcomings in engineeringeducation by more effectively preparing students for their capstone projects and, ultimately, theircareers in engineering.This introduction outlines our response to the identified needs by proposing specific educationalenhancements aimed at closing the gaps highlighted in employer satisfaction surveys. Byintegrating innovative pedagogical methods such as flipped learning, gamification, and project-based learning, we seek to enhance student engagement, improve learning outcomes, and ensuregraduates are well-prepared to meet the demands of the modern workforce. This systematicapproach to curriculum design focuses on developing both hard and soft skills, which are crucialfor the success of our graduates in professional
studentsoverpassed those of students from New York State and the country. We believe that this is apractical course model can be easily replicated by programs with the same interest.I. IntroductionUndergraduate research is a high-impact practice leading to student success, engagement,interest in higher education, and skills development [1] [2]. There are two well-known modelsfor incorporating research experiences in a program: Undergraduate Research Experiences(UREs) and Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) [3]. UREs representthe apprentice model. They feature individual students in faculty research laboratories andprovide the opportunity for one-on-one mentoring. On the other hand, CUREs are embedded intothe curriculum and are available