Session 2275 Merging Research with Service and Teaching in an Engineering Technology Department Deborah Hochstein The University of Memphis ABSTRACT When asked for a definition of research, engineering and engineering technology facultyusually respond with definitions that describe the technical and scientific projects they have beeninvolved with. This type of research usually falls under the scholarship of discovery.Consequently, research activities are segregated from the other activities
page (http://www.hantronix.com/), with technical manuals and application notes on the LCD module in PDF format • A collection of hobbyist pages describing graphic LCD applications using various microcontrollersSupplying power to the LCD display, which requires +5 V and −15 V for its bias circuit, from asingle battery source turns out not to be a trivial task, and an LCD bias-generator chip (MaximMAX 766) and detailed application notes on its use were provided to all groups. Thesmall-geometry (1-mm centers) connectors on the LCD modules were problematic as well, and a Page 4.283.5converter board to the 0.1-in-center ribbon cable
array is the Xilinx Spartan-IIE XC2S200E-6FT256C. The Board IO Connectors are: o Two 50-pin, 0.1 expansion connectors o Pads for 3 mictor connectors o Pads for two 140 pin general purpose IO o Pads for 26 pin MDR connector for LVDS The power available on the board is flexible. (+5, +3.3, +2.5, +1.8, +1.5 Vdc) There is an audio codec (TI ALV320C23 16 bit audio codec) mounted on the bottom of the board. Communication is via the RS232 port (DB9). To configure the board a JTAG header is provided. There are also some miscellaneous features, 8 dip switches, dual 7 segment display, 8 leds, 2 pushbutton switches, 50 Mhz oscillator and an additional oscillator socket.(1
programs in physical and environmental oceansciences. DUT with its State Key Laboratories in Coastal and Offshore Engineering andStructural Analysis and Industrial Equipment is one of the top technical universities in China.Both universities are experienced in international exchanges and are enthusiastic about the REUProgram. Both cities, Dalian and Qingdao, are modern port cities, which provide good livingenvironments for REU students.Planning and ImplementationFrom our own experiences advising undergraduates in research projects, we have observed thatthere are two aspects of research projects that increase the benefits of participating in a summerresearch project: 1) students should work within a research team on a comprehensive researchproject
at Murray State University. Thesecond project was inspired by the work done on the first project and developed informally by agroup of students.The project context Generally the technical content in hard automation laboratory projects is significant andinvolves fabrication and integration of a number of mechanical and electro-mechanical devices.As a result, the students enrolled in ITD 592 must have basic knowledge and skills in at least oneof the following technologies: (a) Metal machining processes; including the ability to use manual and CNC machine tools. Most students in the class have already taken at least one course in machine tools processes. (b) Fluid power technology; including the ability to assemble
Session 3238 Enhancing Engineering Graphics Courses Through Animated, Sophisticated, Multi-Media, Graphical Presentations Dr. Wafeek S. Wahby Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IllinoisAbstractExploring new instructional methods that use technology tools adds an important aspectto the cognitive abilities and visualization skills of on-campus undergraduate students.This paper presents visual examples from an ongoing experiment that was started in 1998at the School of Technology, Eastern Illinois University to study the effectiveness of the“show-and-tell-and-let-apply” (SATALA) approach
Session 2642 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN MARINE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT Boris Butman, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, Kings Point, NYAbstractThe existing curricula in maritime colleges does not satisfy the growing requirement to providefuture marine engineering officers with the basic economic and management knowledge.Introduction of an engineering management program in such a highly specialized engineeringschool creates its own difficulties and specific challenges, and, as a result, requires a substantialmodification of the traditional approach. On one side, being
- mechanical GLOBAL CONTROL - electromechanical - sensors, actuators - robot and ball ID - microprocessor - estimation - comm. protocol - global strategy - comm. protocolFigure 1. Schematic diagram of systemThe RoboCup is an excellent vehicle for demonstrating SE principles. We outline below someof the key aspects:1) System Design and IntegrationThe design, construction and implementation of autonomous, soccer playing robots arechallenging tasks. Not only are the individual technical problems associated with these taskssubstantial
motivation. The class materials were delivered using powerpoint slides and recorded on cloud viaZoom. Each class contained many multiple-choice questions. Before the pandemic, instructorsused clicker questions in-class to collect prompt feedback and clarify any misconceptions. Eachclass section shares the clicker remotes and because of that, clickers were not used during thepandemic. Instead, Canvas quiz platform was used for questions.Fluid Mechanics Fluid Mechanics is a junior level engineering class. In Fall 2020, there were 48 studentsenrolled. The class has 3 lecture credits and 1 laboratory credit. The lecture portion of the class ison Tuesdays and Thursdays while there are laboratory sessions on Tuesdays, Wednesdays andThursdays
conducted in 1995, Atman and her colleagues4synthesized the texts’ depictions into a six-step model: 1. Problem Definition, 2. InformationGathering, 3. Generation of Alternative Solutions, 4. Analysis/Evaluation, 5. Selection, and 6.Implementation/Communication. Page 10.337.1 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” Figure 1. Block diagram of the design process reproduced from Dixon,1 p. 11, as cited in Bucciarelli,2 p. 93. Reproduced with permission. In recent years, the overall
Session 1455Framework for Integrating Project-Based Learning, Experience and Practice in Professional Graduate Education for Engineering Leaders in Industry Leading to the Professional Engineering Doctorate and Fellow Levels D. A. Keating, 1 T. G. Stanford, 1 D. D. Dunlap, 2 A. L. McHenry, 3 E. M. DeLoatch, 4 P. Y. Lee, 5 D. R. Depew, 6 G. R. Bertoline, 6 M. J. Dyrenfurth, 6 S. J. Tricamo, 7 H. J. Palmer 8 I.T. Davis, 9 R.E. Morrison, 10 J. P. Tidwell, 11 K. Gonzalez-Landis, 12 J. O’Brien 13 J. M. Snellenberger,14 D. H. Quick,14 R. N. Olson,14 L. M. Coulson14 University of South Carolina 1/ Western Carolina
autonomy on their content, assessment, and pedagogy. The study also describesthe experience of the graduate student instructors and their learning throughout the coursedevelopment and execution.PROGRAM MECHANICSThe one-credit summer course occurred from Sunday to Friday during the summer session,generally in July. In addition to the instructors, students were assigned peer mentors to transportstudents around campus and manage students from 5 pm to 8 am.Training Engineering EducatorsThis course is structured to help graduate student instructors develop and practice skills related toeffective teaching education. This process starts with instructor recruitment, course planning,teaching allotment, and post-course assessment.Instructor Recruitment and
established by thedepartment for adequacy in J1 and J2 sub-criteria (Figures 1 and 2).In the 2010-11 year, by contrast, the new module (incorporating guided discussion sessions andan online, open-ended and untimed quiz) was both presented and graded by a single appointedfaculty member (also an author of the study) in individual courses where a 30-40 minute blockcould be found for it in each year of the four-year degree program. Thus, consistency in deliveryand evaluation was assured. The class sizes ranged from 45 (freshman) to 20 (junior) and overall118 students were presented the module and then assessed. The resulting performance of eachclass ranged from satisfactory (above 70%) to very good (above 85%) in both criteria.It is important to mention
well? How do you measuresuccess?” This question was mostly answered by pointing back to the answer to Question 1, so itdid not provide substantial new information. Question 4 of the design task is “if you hadunlimited access to children, parents, experts, etc., how would you include each in the designprocess and what information would you want to learn from each?” The question was generallyanswered with only the persons itemized in the question and each was generally asked what theiropinions are, so these answers did not provide substantial new information in comparison toQuestion 3.DiscussionThe main expectation is that the students in the summer session increased their understanding ofhuman-centered design as a result of the immersive design
Page 2.327.7evaluation criteria and provide examples from previous problem-based learning setting whenpossible. The actual implementation of problem-based education always begins with the problem.The problem must come FIRST in the instructional process. It is the problem which provides thereason for learning, but more importantly the problem defines the context in which learning willoccur. The context in which learning occurs then defines what is to be learned and how it will belearned. This first step in implementing problem-based learning is exactly the reverse of mosttraditional teaching methods in engineering and technical courses. Traditional teachingtechniques generally call for the presentation of concepts, skills and procedures
programdevelopment.Keywords: communities of practice, transformative learning, sense of belonging, careerpreparedness, undergraduate education, capstone design, URM students, women inengineering, first-generation, underrepresented racial minority students, underserved studentcommunities, marginalized students, case study, program development research, developernarratives, longitudinal study, educational action research 1. IntroductionThis report describes the most recent full year (2022-2023) of the Oregon State UniversitySchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Design Student Community of PracticeProgram. The program development details and the research process, data collection, andimplementation methodology
semester GPA than non-EH students as shown in Tables 1 and 2 above, aswell as higher ratings on many elements of the STEP survey.Furthermore, STEP students as group had a statistically-significant ( = 0.05), higher coursesuccess rates (% grade >/= C) than non-STEP students taking the same course for Calculus II,General Chemistry I, and Engineering Graphics in Fall 2010; Pre-Calculus, Calculus II,University Physics I in Spring 2011; Pre-Calculus, Calculus I, Calculus II, General Chemistry I,Technical Communication and Engineering Graphics in Fall 2011; Algebra II, Calculus I,Calculus II, General Chemistry I, and Engineering Graphics in Fall 2012.A significant development in EH is the substantial growth in the number of students electing tolive
begins with the development of declarative and procedural knowledge for boththese tools and specific domain knowledge8. As expertise develops a person‟s knowledgedevelops to an efficient level where their ability to fluently use knowledge for routine proceduresis demonstrated. An expert who has learned to use this knowledge adaptively will illustrate theirpotential for generating new ideas7. If we consider the knowledge for both must co-development,and the knowledge develops through a partially linear transition from declarative to strategic (oradaptive), then the Framework in Figure 1 could demonstrate a relationship that illustrates apathway for how students with various knowledge skills can develop their conceptualunderstanding of tools and
) educationalintentions and general objectives, b) general, conceptual, procedural and attitudinal contents, c)learning strategies, d) summary of activities, e) resources, f) evaluation g) discussion and h)conclusions.II. EDUCATIONAL INTENTIONS AND OBJECTIVESThe redesign project describes the educational goals with the following statement: “Performing ateam effort between the student, who is the center of the learning process, and the instructors,who are facilitators of the teaching-learning process, the following educational intentions arefocused during the semester: 1. To supplement integral and formative education. 2. To recognize the value of learning. 3. To promote the critical thinking and reasoning in problem solving. 4. To enhance
assessment of othercurrent and future web based resources is necessary to promote long-term success.The project team included four female college students from various areas of engineering whofocused on the content and a female graduate in computer science who worked on thecomputational infrastructure. Professors Adams, Anderson-Rowland, and Wagner supervised thestudents and the project. After initial conceptualization, identification of appropriate campusresources, extensive research of the web and interactive sessions with the primary expectedconstituents of the proposed website, the following elements of an effective website wereidentified: 1. Biographies of women in science and engineering 2. Science/engineering knowledge game 3
the linkograph for Team 2’s design episode, while Table 3 summarizes of thedata taken from the linkography analysis for all three teams. The link index is the ratio betweenthe number of links and the number of moves that generate them. The link index, together withthe critical moves serve as an indication of the amount of linking activity and is used inevaluating the effectiveness of a design session (Kan & Gero, 2007).Figure 1: Linkograph for Team 2Table 3: Quantitative results of linkography analysis Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 Total moves 61 125 202 Total links 122 209
AC 2010-845: INTEGRATED DYNAMICS AND STATICS FOR FIRST SEMESTERSOPHOMORES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGSherrill Biggers, Clemson University Sherrill B. Biggers is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. He has over 29 years of experience in teaching engineering mechanics, including statics, dynamics, and strength of materials at two universities. His technical research is in the computational mechanics and optimal design of advanced composite structures. He developed advanced structural mechanics design methods in the aerospace industry for over 10 years. Recently he has also contributed to research being conducted in engineering education. He received teaching awards at
arange of resources and are required to use creativity, guided by their own aesthetic sensibility, to generate their Page 25.206.2fluid flows and visualization techniques. Grades are de-emphasized by grading based on full completion of allassignments. Constructive feedback is provided by in-class critique sessions. All student work is published on ahigh-visibility archival website 1, such that their work becomes a part of their permanent online persona. Noneof these innovations were research-based at the time; they were assembled based on the instructors’ personalvalues as an empirical experiment. As hoped, students
]. Also, learningmay occur. The games in this paper include three online gaming tools and two other physical,hands-on games that can be played in engineering education classrooms. These tools are easilyintegrated into classroom sessions for introducing new concepts, deliberate practice,kinesthetically experiencing abstract concepts and facilitating peer to peer discussion aroundchallenging topics.Theoretical Foundation and Related WorkGamification is described as activities that use game-like or ”fun” elements to promote learningand engagement [1]. The nine elements of a game, per Kapp [1] are: 1. System – a set of interconnected elements in the ”space” of the game. Scores linked to actions, and actions limited by rules. 2. Players – a
. Theice was available in 1 x 1 x 1 ft cubes, and the shaving was to be done automatically. The studentswere to consider economic, environmental, health and safety issues according to FDA guidelines,and to determine the cost (initial plus operating) of the entire system. The seniors, in addition, hadto write an ASTM standard for measuring the “quality” of shaved ice. (Quality in this sense doesnot refer to the traditional thermodynamic quantity. Instead, the seniors had to define a quality—good versus poor—of shaved ice, and the freshmen worked with them in this endeavor.)Typically, there were 2 freshmen assigned to each senior; that is, each company had at least 6freshmen co-op students to work with. The seniors (technically experienced persons
. Theice was available in 1 x 1 x 1 ft cubes, and the shaving was to be done automatically. The studentswere to consider economic, environmental, health and safety issues according to FDA guidelines,and to determine the cost (initial plus operating) of the entire system. The seniors, in addition, hadto write an ASTM standard for measuring the “quality” of shaved ice. (Quality in this sense doesnot refer to the traditional thermodynamic quantity. Instead, the seniors had to define a quality—good versus poor—of shaved ice, and the freshmen worked with them in this endeavor.)Typically, there were 2 freshmen assigned to each senior; that is, each company had at least 6freshmen co-op students to work with. The seniors (technically experienced persons
, the presentations themselves took place in two sessions, oneweek apart.After each presentation, both independent judges and peers assessed what they had just heard,using the following survey prompts:1. Rate how well the presenter told a story. Was it dynamic and engaging? Was there an easily identifiable impact, lesson or takeaway? Did the presenter adhere to the time limit? (On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best)2. What is the most important takeaway you learned from this presentation? (Open response)3. Rate how important you think the key lesson identified above is to our students for their future. (1 = not important; 5 = very important) 4. Please enter any other specific feedback for the presenter here: (Open
Session 3554 A Holistic Approach to Teaching Engineering Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization Carmo D’Cruz, P.N. Vaidy Vaidyanathan University of Central FloridaAbstractWith their creative product and technology ideas, engineers are excellent sources of high growth-potential entrepreneurial and technology commercialization ventures. However, this resource hasnot been effectively supported by academia in general, to fully realize its potential.This paper reviews
.661-668.4. Zecher, J., 1998, “Integration of a Rapid Prototyping System in a MET Curriculum,” Proceedings of 1998 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 3549.5. Stamper, R. E. and Dekker, D. L., 2000, “Utilizing Rapid Prototyping to Enhance Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session F3C, pp.1-4.6. Stier, K. and Brown, R., 2000, “Integrating Rapid Prototyping Technology into the Curriculum,” Journal of Industrial Technology, 17(1), pp.1-6.7. Strzelec, R. A. and Vavreck, A. N., 2005, “Rapid Prototyping in an Electromechanical Engineering Technology Program,” Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.8. Tester, J
graduate qualitiesAnother strategy that greatly assisted the development of inclusive curricula for engineering wasan approach to curriculum development adopted by our university that focuses on graduateoutcomes. The University of South Australia has identified seven generic ‘qualities’ as desirablein its graduates and the design of each program must now demonstrate how it will enablegraduates to acquire these qualities.The seven qualities are: 1. Graduates will be able to operate effectively with and upon a body of knowledge of sufficient depth to begin professional practice. 2. Graduates will be prepared for life-long learning in pursuit of ongoing personal development and excellence in their professional practice. 3. Graduates