we feel this integrated view of one operation is also an importantexperience for our students. In addition, the integration of the various plant visits and industryguests in our classroom activities meets the objective on integrating real world, experientialactivities into the student’s education. This is a part of the vision for our University, and webelieve it greatly facilitates a very graceful and successful transition of our students from theeducational program into mainstream industrial companies. We invite feedback and suggestionsfrom the reader, and are happy to engage in benchmarking activities with other institutions.Bibliography 1. Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., & Knight, W. Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly
one student can grasp the information well through traditional classroom lectures,another individual might better understand the same topic when delivered through audio-visualmultimedia. The interest for the topic, the attention depth at that moment, the style and methodof delivery are a few among many things that could be relevant for attaining maximum possibleeffectiveness through personalized learning.3. Why Now: Impacts of the Pandemic3.1 Pandemic as a Driving Force for ChangeHumans are often resistant to change. In the last two decades, despite the visible rise andavailability of online educational resources, we have perhaps overlooked the relevant butuncomfortable question of whether that should challenge the status quo and replace some
than 10% of instructional time is spent teaching science in the early grades and evenless addressing engineering [3, 4]. One explanation may be that there is significant emphasis onlanguage and literacy skills in these early years and there are limited engineering-related textswritten for this age group. The impact that engineering literature may have on engineeringlearning is therefore not well studied. Two very informative reports on this topic are: (1) theEngineering is Elementary report detailing assessing elementary students‟ understanding ofengineering and technology concepts [5] and Taylor and Smith‟s recent examination of writingassessments geared toward elementary level children [6]. These reports describe large scaleassessments
when weparticipated in the I-Corps L program sponsored by the National Science Foundation and ASEEin 2015. During the course of the program, we engaged in an intensive exploration ofopportunities to commercialize prior NSF TUES project on improving diagnostic skills forengineering and technology students 1 . Our goal was to identify industrial partners so that thediagnostic training programs can be adopted or adapted to tackle practical problems. During themonth-long customer interactions, the team had interviewed over 100 potential clients, themajority of whom were engineers, managers, and directors of operations in heavy industry likeenergy, manufacturing, or health care sector. At the beginning of this process, we did not have aclear vision
remember that? I don’t know I guess I learned it well” [Ben]Ben suggests that this kind of “background probably helps more with an abstract thinkingand kind of, drawing things together, in a later or in an unstructured environment.”Don, whose past experiences included getting a Ph.D., describes how the way his advisormentored him made a profound impact on him. His advisor himself had a broadbackground and had “expectations that his students develop breadth as well as depth.”Don describes the habit of making connections between things as something he doesfrequently as an integral part of his way of thinking: “I do it at the job; I do it when I’m not at the job, at home or, you know, out and about and looking at things. In Columbia, the
education and Latinx engineering entrepreneurship.Ms. Magdalini Z Lagoudas, Texas A&M University Magda Lagoudas, Executive Director for Industry & Nonprofit Partnerships, has been at Texas A&M University since 1992 and served on several capacities across the College of Engineering, including Director for the Space Engineering Institute and Associate Director for the Space Engineering Research Center. Current responsibilities include pursuing strategic partnerships with industry to provide engineering students with opportunities to collaborate on multidisciplinary teams addressing real world challenges and with industry engagement. College signature programs include the Texas A&M I-Corps Site, AggiE Challenge
effect size or Hedge’s g. As explained above, due to repeated testing on dependentvariables, the corrected alpha value is .006 for the benefits table and .004 for the two challengestables.Looking at the individual benefits across the interventions, improved student understanding,increased student engagement, and increased preparation for future career were statisticallysignificant benefits on the impression of an intervention’s benefit level. These were closelyfollowed by improved grades which was significant for 9 out of the 10 interventions, andincreased student participation which was significant for 8 out of the 10 interventions. Inaddition, increased teacher time savings (7 out of 10), greater material coverage (6 out of 10),improved
extremelywell-known, with dignitaries visiting the rustic classroom, and a ‘glass classroom’—completewith materials and children working—was showcased at the World Fair of 1919.11.3.1 What Engineering Does for the Montessori CurriculumEngineering offers Montessori teachers a way to access many of the deeper concepts embeddedin a lesson. In each case where engineering was added to a lesson or unit, it sprang to life,allowing for more critical engagement and inquiry as well as the influx of new content—andactivities to explore that content. Engineering made Montessori even more hands-on, moreinteractive, more dynamic and engaging to students. Work with the design process allowed fora more interdisciplinary approach—any number of connections could be made
impact of our preparation for ABET accreditation on the curriculum as well asassessment process. We also include an overview of our assessment process, assessmentinstruments and curriculum changes.IntroductionNational University (NU), an independent, nonprofit institution of higher education, hasdedicated itself to providing educational opportunities to a diverse population of working adultlearners since 1971. The School of Engineering, Technology and Media (SETM) at NationalUniversity was established in July 2002, and has attracted a current student body of over 1300whose profile generally mirrors that of the university itself. NU, the second largest private non-profit university in California, has over 23,000 mainly non-traditional students
student responses. Students come toclass motivated to cover the given topic as they know their comments and questions from theJiTT quiz will be addressed in class. The instructor then spends class time addressing students’misconceptions communicated in the quizzes, rather than lecturing on material students havealready grasped.Air Resources ModuleThe air resources module consists of reading assignments, lecture topics, JiTT quizzes andresponses, air quality data collection and analysis assignments, and an air emissions tradingsimulation. Supporting materials (including PowerPoint slides) can be found at the CCLI projectwebsite4. Each component of the curriculum is described below.ReadingsStudents are assigned readings from Henry and Heinke’s
communication in diverse contexts. ShDr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University & Carthage College Dr. Robert L. Nagel is Director of Engineering at Carthage College and Professor of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Nagel, a mechanical engineer by training, performs research on engineering student learning and engagement with a focus on interventions, pedagogies, and design methodologies. Through his research, he seeks to gain applicable knowledge for increasing student engagement and re- ducing barriers in engineering, design, and making. At James Madison University, Dr. Nagel has been KEEN Leader, sophomore design coordinator, and Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineer- ing Education. At
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education • An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data • An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs • An ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team • An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility • An ability to communicate effectively • The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, lifelong learning
Laboratory (BETL), twohigher level bioprocessing courses, a seminar course, and a multidisciplinary graduate trainingprogram. An undergraduate-run student chapter of the International Society of PharmaceuticalEngineers (ISPE) was also initiated and has provided professional and extracurricular benefitsfor the students. These programs are intended not only to provide additional exposure tobiological concepts but also to prepare chemical engineering graduates to communicate andinteract effectively with co-workers trained in different disciplines.Accreditation requirements have added to the pedagogical mix through the requirement thatengineering graduates have the ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (Criterion 3(d)).6Several models have been
these in groups in class. One article that has been cited bystudents as notable focuses on the creativity required in engineering of embedded systemsand the hardware-software design decisions bounded by constraints [24]. Students also readabout engineering ethics, including ethical considerations in hardware and software quality.Class discussion of ethics case studies involving embedded systems provided students withrealistic scenarios and different perspectives. Computer and communication standards andtheir importance is another discussion topic, highlighting the many standards that studentsencountered in their embedded system design projects. This topic is reinforced with a guestspeaker, who has worked with the IEEE standards development
Circuit-X: Circuit Analysis meets the X Files Glen E. Archer, Leonard J. Bohmann Michigan Technological UniversityCircuits education is one of the cornerstones in educating an electrical engineer. AsDavis points out1 there is a need to relate analysis skills to the real world. Other authorshave done this by incorporating design into the circuits lab2, 3, 4 or by integratingcomputer tools into the lab5, 6. An additional strategy is to challenge the students with acircuit identification task, one where they have to design test procedures and from theresults synthesize the unknown circuit. Most lab experiences consist of opportunities tobuild circuits from homework problems
State University Mr. Campbell currently serves as Senior Program Manager at New Mexico State University’s Engineering New Mexico Resource Network in Albuquerque, NM where he manages statewide pollution prevention, energy efficiency and recycling outreach programs. The Network provides information on pollution pre- vention and energy efficiency for New Mexico businesses, communities and Tribes. Chris has authored and managed sixteen EPA Pollution Prevention grants since 1999 (totaling over $2.8 million) providing outreach and training on rural and Borderland P2 issues. Chris implements on-site presentations and training for a variety of industrial sectors on pollution prevention, energy efficiency and Lean &
and curriculum committees to structure theirrespective curricula to maximize the benefits and to minimize the conflicts when offering both programs. Thiswill result in increased student satisfaction and enrollment, improved economics and better relationships withindustry. In addition these programs may also benefit if they are or are seeking to become accredited by ABET.Examples will be provided how both disciplines can benefit from mutual collaboration and how these collaborateprograms can be promoted to attract strong support from industry.The author anticipates that this paper will initiate an open discussion on both sides for the benefits of studentsand the profession.IntroductionThroughout the Engineering and Education Community we
everyone.Ron: Everyone made strong advancement in using the ETW model: five colors of chalk, activestudent participation through focused questioning, and well integrated physical training aids.Each participant experienced the one pitfall of active teaching – asking the students too manyquestions bogs down the class and prevents timely completion, but classroom student-teacherinteraction is so much fun! Insight: First practice class, few of the participants asked questions ofthe instructor, even though the class was very discipline specific (different from their own area ofexpertise). Second practice class, there was very engaging instruction with numerous questionsfrom the “students” – the ideal experience when students learn that asking questions is
Page 13.1197.8possess.The goals for the criteria were universally and simplicity. The criteria writers concentrated onwhat it was that all engineers should be able to do which resulted in eleven desirable outcomes,no matter what the discipline. The criteria can be divided into two categories: “hard skills” and“soft skills” or what is becoming increasingly better known as “professional skills”. Six of theeleven outcomes address the professional skills including:10• an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams• an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility• an ability to communicate effectively• the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and
course summaries arean important communication tool to assist faculty in their development.Faculty ImpactThe typical assessment methods, such as quizzes and tests, more commonly measure lower levelcognitive activities; consequently, a common pitfall to implementing a structured assessmentsystem is the reduction of the curriculum to the “lowest common denominator” in the level ofstudent learning. Perhaps the most dramatic change with our ABET approach is to counteractthis effect. There has been demonstration of the simultaneous engagement of faculty to directstudent learning towards higher cognitive processes and metacognition. For example, in hiscourse summary, one instructor wrote: “Assessment strategies for 2006 continue to refine the
Dr. Keenya G. Mosley serves as the Assessment & CAEP Manager/Assistant Professor for the School of Teacher Education at Savannah State University. As the first faculty hired, she has assisted with de- signing and preparing the unit which received state approval from the Georgia Professional Standards Commission. She has over 10 years of assessment experience and serves as the edTPA Coordinator for Savannah State University. Her role as the Assessment Manager includes serving on institutional and state assessment committees while preparing students and supporting faculty and collaborating teachers on using the assessment system. Dr. Mosley has recently be selected to serve as a Site Visitor with the Georgia
experience in capstone projects.We will discuss that the results of the developed processes not only fulfill these tworequirements but also end up with several other advantages for different parties. For students, theefforts help them experience challenging, up-to-date projects sponsored by the industry underindustrial and faculty advisors, engage them in solving existing problems, familiarize them withall aspects of development with an industrial approach, and assist them in the hands-on learningprocess. The projects also allow students to gain experience in a real work environment andaccess to more industrial facilities. They also help students familiarize themselves with potentialemployers in their areas of interest. For industry, the efforts
involved with schools in their local communities. Crockett found her true calling as an academic advisor for first-year engineering stu- dents at Clemson. During her 20 year career as an advisor she saw first-hand how students struggled to make the adjustment from high school to college. She helped develop and conduct transitional workshops on study skills, time management, test-taking and career/major choice for her students. She authored The General Engineering Newsletter and assisted in its transition from paper to electronic format. She also served as Transfer Coordinator for the College of Engineering and Science assisting all academic departments in the College with transfer evaluation and orientation as well as
Paper ID #45080WIP: Activity Centric Online Teaching and Learning with MATLABDr. Lynn A. Albers, Hofstra University Dr. Lynn Albers is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering of the Fred DeMatteis School of Engineering and Applied Science at Hofstra University. Her previous academic contribution was as one of the founding five faculty/staff at Campbell University, helping the newly formed School of Engineering grow and establish roots in the community. A proponent of Hands-On Activities in the classroom and during out-of-school time programs, she believes that they complement any teaching style thereby reaching
to focus on both outcomes and grades.Faculty providing students advice for either academic or career success can review the PSUtranscript to provide more targeted advice to the student. It is well known that grades are not aconsistent predictor of career success and we hope the PSU transcript will perform better in thisregard. Anecdotal evidence from student’s rating of teamwork and communication outcomesshow those students who receive a U rating have been consistently unsuccessful in obtainingcooperative work assignments. Making use of both the traditional transcript and the newlycreated outcomes transcript allows the possibility of better advice to ensure career success for ourgraduates. Although the PSU transcript is still in its infancy
solving, independent learning, teamwork andcommunication, while concurrently introducing basic principles of engineering to a group offreshman cadets. Problem Based Learning (PBL) 1,2 was the pedagogy used to engage the cadetsin a motivational project; design a plan to deploy a manned mission to Mars. Twelve speciallydesigned workshops were used to provide instruction on problem solving skills needed by thecadets to complete the project. A variety of assessment processes were used to evalua te theeffectiveness of the course. Among the findings, the final data show that without follow-on PBLexperiences in the remaining academic program, the problem solving skills initiated in thefreshman course are of little value to the students. Additional data
or the materials used. For example, the annualcollaborative workshop for Bioinformatics & Biometrics Community of Practices (CoP) underExcellence in Breeding (EiB) Platform Module 5 [9], held in July in Montpellier, France,discussed the untapped potential of deep learning methods to make a significant impact onfarming. The Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Summit (2017) in Boston [10], organized byRe-Work, listed Neural Networks and Deep Learning as two of twelve topics, but no furtherinformation is available. The lack of specific workshops led us to the idea of developing our ownmaterials for an Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Agriculture workshop, with particular emphasison a hands-on component.The educational benefit of
maker cultureinto our STEM courses to increase the enrollment as well as the retention rate ofunderrepresented students, including females and minorities. This improvement of teachinginfrastructure and pedagogy at a minority serving institution will significantly enhance theteaching quality and eventually will have a positive impact on the US's economy and well-being.The main question that will guide the investigations of this study is: “What are the effects of thecontextualized and student-centered instruction in computer science courses on students’learning outcomes and experiences?” This paper reports our planned activities that will beimplemented in Fall 2019 semester.2. BackgroundHow People Learn (HPL) framework [11] and the student
developed that willcontinue to fuel this growth? Science and engineering (S&E) enrollments have remainedrelatively stagnant for the past 20 years. If this trend continues, what will happen to theeconomy? The authors recognize the need to increase overall enrollments in S&E fields, and theopportunity to increase enrollments by attracting and retaining students from underrepresenteddemographic population groups. Women represent over half the nation’s population and nearlyhalf of the undergraduate enrollment, yet are dramatically underrepresented in the technical andacademic community. Increasing participation of underrepresented groups in S&E will not onlyincrease the available technical workforce, but will also interject ideas and
; (b) an ability to interpret data; (c) an ability to understand the design of a system, component, or process (d) an ability to function on interdisciplinary teams; (e) an ability to identify and help formulate, engineering problems; (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) an ability to communicate effectively; (h) an ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions (i) an ability to engage in life-long learning; (j) participation in activities related to contemporary societal challenges;In addition, each concentration has learning outcomes peculiar to that track:Management of Technology Concentration1. Ability to analyze