class meetings, the instructor would be able to tailor the class meetingsto match the needs of particular groups of students. They report that students reported satisfactionwith the course and expressed a preference for this type of course over traditional courses. Theinstructors were also satisfied with the inverted course. Lage et al. do not, however, report on howthe students in their inverted classroom performed with respect to achieving the intended learningoutcomes of the course compared to students in the traditional version of the course. Foertschet al. 2 , another group of early adopters of the flipped approach, report on their experiences with itin a large, previously lecture-based, computer science course for engineering majors. The
/Decision theory”. On the other hand, normative decision makingis concerned with how people should make decisions [2]. It generally works with the assumptionthat people who make decisions are rational decision makers and are fully armed with the bestand latest tools of decision making, so they can make optimal decisions [1]. It can be seen that,this section is more useful in engineering and economic related sciences, and therefore, moreuseful for engineering students. The authors’ main focus on this article is towards the latter caseof the decision-making types. Normative decision making can itself be divided into three sub-sections. The first part is concerned with the topic of single objective decision-making ordecision-making under uncertainty
serves as the Director of Educational Achievement for the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Her responsibilities include the oversight of recruitment and retention of high quality, diverse graduate students, professional development, graduate student success and management of federal grants focused on developing a diverse pool of scientists and engineers earning PhDs, like the NSF-funded Alliance for the Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) and the NIH-funded Texas A&M Initiative for Maximizing Student Diversity (IMSD).Rasheedah Richardson Dr. Ra'sheedah Richardson is the Associate Director of the Texas A&M University Center for Teaching Excellence. As Associate Director, Dr
Florida in Orlando, FL. From September 2011 to June 2012 he served as the Interim Assistant Vice President of Research at the Office of Research and Commercialization. He served as the Interim Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science from July 2012 to May 2013 and as the dean from May 2013 to present. His research interests lie in the areas of Machine Learning and applications with special emphasis on neural network and neuro-evolutionary algorithms, and their applications. He has published more than 70 journal papers and more than 180 conference papers in a variety of conference and journal venues. He has been an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks from 2002 to 2006, and an
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include solid mechanics, microme- chanics of materials, fracture mechanics, and STEM education research.Prof. Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Matthew West is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to joining Illinois he was on the faculties of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Stanford University and the Department of Mathematics at the University of California, Davis. Prof. West holds a Ph.D. in Control and Dynamical Systems from the California Institute of Technology and a B.Sc. in Pure and Applied Mathematics from the University of
working on this project - and produced a successful Stirling engine. (1B)The following annotation does not include any first person statements, which makes it difficultfor the reader to necessarily know what the student is claiming that they know. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING Many mechanical engineers will design and create products for a career. By using concurrent engineering, the time and cost of manufacturing can be reduced along with improving the quality of the part. This is done by considering how the product will be manufactured when designing the product, which is concurrent engineering. During the designing process, mechanical engineers should consider what materials are available, how easy it is to form the product
thechanging nature of our technological world. Cars that are computer controlled are not ones thatlend themselves to “tinkering.” Likewise, the microelectronics that runs through most all moderntechnological artifacts present our nascent engineers with little of the opportunity for hands-onlearning that so typified the pre-college experience of their counterparts in years past.On the other hand, students are very comfortable with videos and, hopefully, reasonably welloriented toward simulation/animation software. Their inclinations can be used [1], in a properlydesigned course, to enhance learning [2], [3], [4].What the authors have tried to do is add a new component to what have traditionally been pureanalysis courses as a way of addressing this
: ACognitively Motivated Tool Supporting Varied Assessment Functions”. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol 43,No. 2, May 2000.[7] Segalas, J., D. Ferrer-Balas and K.F. Multer. “Conceptual Maps: Measuring Learning Process ofEngineering Students Concerning Sustainable Development”. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 33,No. 3, June 2008.[8] How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Committee on Developments in the Science ofLearning. John D.Bransford, Ann L.Brown, and Rodney R.Cocking, editors with additional material from theCommittee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, M.Suzanne Donovan, John D.Bransford, and JamesW.Pellegrino, editors. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National
staff. A particular interest is in helping faculty to develop and implement classroom-based assessment and action research plans to establish the effectiveness of instruction and to use the data to improve teaching and student learning. She is currently working with several engineering faculty, researching the impact of in-class use of technology on teaching and student learning. Dianne has also worked as an education consultant for a number of organizations and is currently serving as external evaluator on several grants.Eric Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Eric Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education at NC State University
PSU/NSF-Sponsored Interdisciplinary Materials Research Experiences For Undergraduates (REU) Program, August 06, 1999, Pittsburg, KS.13. Ibeh C. C., Birk S., “Plastics In Fuel Cell Applications: An In-Lab Developed And Fabricated Molten carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) Electrolyte Matrix Support With Polyolefin-Based Binders,” Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE) Annual Technical Conference (ANTEC) Proceedings, May 1999, New York, NY.14. Van Vlack, L. H., “Elements of Materials Science and Engineering”, Addison-Wesley, Sixth Edition, Page 392 – 393.15. Narkis M., Lidor G., Vaxman A., Zuric L., “Novel Electrically-Conductive Injection Moldable Thermoplastic Composites For ESD Applications,” Society of Plastics Engineers
to pass back the quizzes.The second way I use informal cooperative learning is through in-class examples.III.C.2 In-Class ExamplesIn engineering science courses like dynamics I believe examples are a crucial element in helpingstudents learn how to apply the material. Therefore, my classes are characterized by a largenumber of example problems. When I first started teaching I would write the example problemon the board and then proceed to solve it while asking students questions. The copy machine haschanged this somewhat. I believe that there is very little pedagogical advantage in having thestudents transcribe the problem statement. When written by hand the problem statements aretypically messy since students are writing quickly, thereby
Paper ID #14720Development of Safety Protocol, Features, and Fail-Safes for a Laboratory-Scale Manufacturing ProcessMs. Nikki Larson, Western Washington University After receiving my bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from Bradley University, I started working for Boeing. While at Boeing I worked to receive my master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Materials and Manufacturing. After leaving Boeing I spent several years in equipment research and development at Starbucks Coffee Company. From there I decided my heart lied in teaching and left Starbucks to teach Materials Science Technology at
application and communication skills has been very successful inpreparing Embry-Riddle students for real world employment as evidenced by alumni comments.Senior students also enjoy being placed in a hands-on environment which allows verification ofthe theoretical learning they have been exposed to during their previous courses.IntroductionThis paper recounts a change in the senior capstone design curriculum at Embry-RiddleAeronautical University (ERAU)/Prescott campus that involves the introduction of verificationof analytical predictions via testing of physical models and a team-teaching effort between theDepartment of Aeronautical Engineering (AE) and the Department of Humanities/Communities(HU/COM). These changes address perceived gaps in student
time and over-packed coursecontents. As a result, traditional education in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) usually overemphasized on memorization of knowledge andprocedures rather than higher-order thinking skills, such as creative problem skills 14. Moststudents did not receive explicit instructions on development of creativity and metacognitveskills from their instructors in their major courses15. The problem-based service learning (PBSL) may offer unique opportunities differentfrom the traditional learning for students to face real world problems that may demandinnovative solution through creative problem solving processes. Thus, the PBSL may beutilized as a platform to develop creativity and metacognitive skills
University. He has published over 50 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investi- gator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State University, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D. Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan Uni- versity of Technology in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University in 1988. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and ATMAE.Dr. M. Affan Badar, Indiana State University M
as simply a product tobe handed in, and the correctness of their solutions did not seem to concern them. This struckthe author as the wrong approach in educating future Civil Engineers (and Army Officers in ourcase). Influenced by much research on the subject, the author also believed that students shouldbe more responsible for their own learning as well. If they were to truly learn the material, theymust take more ownership of it and see it as more than a requirement to be met and endured.While participating in the Master Teacher Program at the U.S. Military Academy, the authorcame across some work that suggested that one way to develop a student’s metacognition, thustheir ability for life-long learning, is to view them and treat them as
general themes in thedata. This is methodologically interesting because the two approaches complement one another:the coding can capture broad themes across individuals while the discourse analysis (particularlyat the small scale) can capture the linguistic choices used by these individuals. We think this is apromising avenue of study. Further, we have begun conducting our study on students from atraditional electrical engineering senior design course. We hope this study will help provideinteresting parallels and contrasts with our AME participants and provides a way to see how ourmethodology transfers to a slightly new context.Acknowledgements: This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1830730
a result, they derived more fromthe course than was possible prior to the integration of actual artifacts, graphics, pictures, andvideos. Incorporating a visual and hands-on component to the lectures fostered very interactiveresults in terms of questions and more in-depth discussions. Although not totally unexpected orunanticipated, it was still encouraging to realize this outcome. This aspect of the project, byitself, has made it a worthwhile and rewarding experience. By using a variety of differentpresentation styles, more students were able to relate directly to the material and learn from it.This was also reflected in the course and faculty student evaluations completed during the lastclass session of the term. Their comments were
a one- or two-credit “Intro to Industry 4.0” course that would provide theprogram graduate with an overview of the specific technologies, how they are being used, andhow they can be beneficial. So, if we don’t task the graduates of these programs with becomingvery knowledgeable about Industry 4.0. Who do we task?If one examines the topics typically cited by the four-year college faculty as being left out of themechanical engineering curriculum, we find data science and advanced data analysis (i.e. bigdata), novel human-machine interfaces (HMIs), digital-to-physical interface technologies (i.e.,3D printing, additive manufacturing, etc.), data networks and digital communications and systemautomation, artificial intelligence and machine/deep
for enhancing corporate support for design courses, managing design and fabrication/prototyping facilities, coordinating the design competitions/expo, and teaching design courses, with a strong focus on creating and enabling multidisciplinary educational experiences. His research interests are in makerspaces, evidence-based de- sign education, and advanced additive manufacturing processes.Nicholas Greenfield, Georgia Institute of TechnologyEmily Orton, Georgia Institute of Technology Industrial Systems Engineering BS with a concentration in AnalyticsMr. Rohan Banerjee, Georgia Institute of Technology Candidate for B.S. in Mechanical Engineering concentrating in Automation & Robotics, with a Minor in
project, students must design a handle with a maximum torque-to-weight ratio. Thestudents should select the length, thickness and shape of the handle, in order to optimize thetorque-to-weight ratio of their handle. For a successful design, the students must consider thegeometry of the handle, direction of the layers of the material deposited by the 3-D printer, andmethod for positioning the handle on the test stand. Upon completing the design, teamsparticipate in a design competition. The handle with the highest torque-to-weight ratio wins. Page 10.1345.4 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
traffic and log files. They also practice steganography tools to detect malicious activities.The above modules can enhance existing curriculum, e.g. • Enhance and strengthen existing courses by substituting outdated material with latest technologies to keep pace with technological advances. • Extend and enhance existing content with new topics, concepts, and technologies. • Function as assignments or projects providing hands-on exercises for existing courses. • Concatenate into a mini-course for industrial training of working professionals.4. Game Creator DesignAs we mentioned earlier, our game framework uses XML to decouple the game engine fromcontent. Therefore, creating new games (i.e., the modules/cases) need not modify the game
that (1) it is indeed possibleto integrate legitimate, realistic, open-ended design projects into introductory graphicscommunications courses, and (2) that these projects can serve as a viable introduction tothe engineering design process.DR. DAVID S. COTTRELL is an Assistant Professor in the School of Science and EngineeringTechnology at Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg. He graduated from the United States MilitaryAcademy in 1978 and retired in 2000 after over 22 years of service with the US Army Corps of Engineers.Studies at Texas A&M University resulted in a MS Degree in Civil Engineering in 1987 and a PhD in1995. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has taught courses in statics and dynamics, mechanicsof materials
misconceptions were addressed. The first misconception deals with the topic of base level,which is the equilibrium level, expressed by a curvilinear surface, to which streams will erode ordeposit material when adjusting to changes in sea level or land uplift or subsidence. The processis time dependent, and deposition and erosion can be occurring simultaneously along differentreaches of a river, as the response to changes in land or ocean levels starts at the downstream endand migrates upstream over time. Initial instruction consisted of a discussion of the process,complete with graphical examples drawn on the chalkboard. Students’ misconceptions tend tohinge on the notion that the response to change is immediate throughout the whole system.Revised
. Communicate effectively with stakeholders and broad audiences. 5. Work productively on diverse multidisciplinary teams.This training involves an individualized interdisciplinary curriculum, scaffolded by laboratoryrotations and hands-on workshops, a year-long community-engaged design project, and trainingin entrepreneurship, communication skills, and team science. Individualized curriculums aretailored to trainees to comply with the requirements of their home graduate degree programs.Our traineeship program began in the 2019-2020 academic year as a result of a National ScienceFoundation Research Traineeship award. This traineeship program is meant to prepare at least100 STEM graduate students to address major societal challenges within our local
have the experience to setthese kinds of quantitative specifications. A similar circumstance exists for anyone in the earlystages of the design process when the knowledge base is limited. Therefore “specifications” foran introductory design course will usually represent an attempt to better qualify the initial problemstatement rather than to quantify it. However, the objective is always to define the problem asprecisely as possible, and quantifying specifications are desirable as long as they representreasonable expectations. On the other hand, specifications must be met by the design solution. Ifa specific material, size, or weight is not absolutely necessary, it should not be specified since itover constrains the solution; only
impact was not realizedby those identified as “at risk” [4]. Most of the existing research on PBL addresses residential(i.e. in class) and flipped classrooms environments. As noted in the 2019 ASEE AnnualConference for the division of “Experimentation and Lab-Oriented Studies” the onlineinvolvement of PBL towards engineering experimentation was virtually absent [5].The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the applicability of an online engineeringexperimentation course that empowers engineering students to attain hands-on, appliedengineering experimentation experiences within their normal dwellings. This course usesinexpensive, yet reasonably accurate sensors and data acquisition systems. An objective of thecourse was to deliver students
and operating systems in market.Due to the large popularity of user market, research study of mobile computing is raising to achallenge level. In addition, the number of malicious applications is increasing continually. Allthese reasons raise a high challenge to computer science and educators. How to prepare the nextgeneration of workforce that are equipped with techniques and problem solving capabilities inthe mobile pervasive computing and security has drawn attentions from both researchers andSTEM educators.This paper presented a research study of the mobile and pervasive computing and security fromtwo angles of view points. One is how to equip the next generation of workforce with strongtechnical skills and problem solving capabilities
federal funding has been allocated towards preparing ourstudents, teachers, and future professionals in the areas of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM)2. Much of the research associated with this funding has focused on K-12education and more specifically with increasing student achievement in STEM areas beginningin Kindergarten. This growing concern to increase student achievement has resulted in a pushfor practitioners to utilize what has been termed, inquiry instruction, in the classroom. The term inquiry has been used in numerous journal articles, textbooks, pre-serviceeducation courses, and professional development workshops. The National Research Councilidentified the use of inquiry as an integral part of
State faculty, Wallace Catanach, Kathy Hauser, andTerry Speicher, have used and contributed to the ongoing development of this project.References1. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, National Academy of Engineering Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering, National Academies Press, 2008.2. Ehrlich, P. and Holdren, J., “Impacts of Population Growth,” Science, 171, pp. 1212-17, 1972.3. Source: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm.4. Graedel, T. and B. Allenby, Industrial ecology, 2nd edition, New Jersey: Pearson Education