Paper ID #9180Physical Testing in an Elementary Engineering CampChelsea J. Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a graduate student at Tufts University pursuing a Ph.D. in STEM education. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering and an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmental engineering. Her current research includes investigating how children naturally engage in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis. Page 24.981.1 c American
Software (https://cloud.anylogic.com/model/ea348854-83ba-4f23-aca6-0db78e47cfac?mode=DASHBOARD&experiment=86429e03-40d5-4eba-bca3-282cc173c186).The simulation was distributed to students through the Anylogic Public Cloud platform, whichenabled easy and scalable access to the simulation through a web browser. The simulation hastwo modes for students to interact with. The Animation mode (Figure 2) provides avisualization of the experiment for students in order to help them develop intuition regardinghow the chemicals mix together and how the flow rate and pH level can change in the mixture.The animation depicts a schematic view of different chemicals (acid mine drainage solution,soda ash solution, limestone, calcium carbonate and activated
ASEE.Ms. Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineer- ing at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, preservice and in- ser- vice teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and project director of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and
demonstrated how models could be used beyondtraditional “show-and-tell” types. During the course of these workshops, teachers completed aseries of activities that allowed them and us to investigate their conceptions of models in scienceand engineering instruction.As teachers’ knowledge mediates their classroom instruction, it follows that their conceptions ofmodels and the utility of models will mediate their use of models in the classroom. It isincumbent upon engineering educators, therefore, to understand teachers’ conceptions of models.In this study, we are interested specifically in teachers’ conceptions of models as they relate tonanoscale science and engineering education. Through a design-based framework, we hope tocreate a professional
through controlled implementations of evidence-based practices in the classroom. Dr. Bego has an undergraduate Mechanical Engineering degree from Columbia University, a Professional Engineering license in the state of NY, and a doctorate in Cognitive Science. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Turning the Tables on Partial Credit: Computer Aided Exam with Student Reflection for Partial Credit (CAESR4PC)AbstractThis full-length research paper describes a new type of exam, the Computer Assisted Exam withStudent Reflection for Partial Credit (CAESR4PC). CAESR4PC combines the automatic gradingof computer
possible inengineering education and in engineering departments. Intentionality and evidence-basedstrategies are a must. There are many implications for new and established engineeringdepartments from this case study. In fact, strategies described in this case study have thepotential to transform higher education departments and institutions.I. INTRODUCTIONThe role of higher education and its impacts towards advancing citizens towards economicprosperity, to enrich the human experience through knowledge and perspective, to be a force forgood and human flourishing, to produce the next generation of leaders in our society, to advanceknowledge discovery and community empowerment are well established (Rudolph, 2021;Rhodes, 2001). Along with the many
-curricular engineering education activities,this paper continues the debate around introducing engineering education into the PrimarySchool Curriculum (K-6). Contextualised by the current UK Primary School NationalCurriculum, from which engineering is totally absent and applied science is only superficiallycovered, the paper argues that the inclusion of engineering as a foundational level subjectcould not only enhance children’s learning experiences, but could also ignite their‘engineering imaginations’ thereby unlocking potential which is currently left mostlyuntapped.BackgroundLooking across modern-day society it is not unreasonable to postulate that the world hasreached a ‘tipping point’. Indeed, environmentalists warn that continued industrial
AC 2011-686: MAKING ELEMENTARY ENGINEERING WORK: LESSONSFROM PARTNERSHIPS AND PRACTICETHE SYSTEMIC PROJECT, MARY-LANDPamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, and has been involved in both Project Lead the Way and Project FIRST robotics. She was a Hub Site Partner for Engineering is Elementary (EiE) through their National Dissemination through Regional Partners program. As a pre-service teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early childhood
. Nutr., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1035–1042, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.125.[35] C. Criado-Perez, Invisible women: data bias in a world designed for men. New York: Abrams Press, 2019.[36] K. Bell, ‘A philosophy of social work beyond the anthropocene’, in Post-Anthropocentric Social Work: Critical Posthuman and New Materialist Perspectives, 1st ed., V. Bozalek and B. Pease, Eds., Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge advances in social work: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429329982.[37] W. Faulkner, ‘Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering’, Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759–792, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005.[38] W. Faulkner, ‘Doing gender in engineering
others’ ideas, beliefs and opinions: keep an open mind. 11. Value the person: respect individual differences. 12. Empower others: demonstrate trust. 13. Be sensitive to others: sympathize and empathize.Benefits of Civility“Civility costs nothing, and buys everything.”7 “You don’t have to join anything, there’s noinitiation, there’s no fee. It’s simply what is expected of us,” according to Chuck Hughes,Executive Director of the Gary (Indiana) Chamber of Commerce.5 “Individuals feel valued andpowerful when (they are) respected.”12 People have a better sense about themselves and otherswhen they are treated in a respectful, professional and courteous manner.The benefits of civility extend beyond academia and the workplace. Civility can have a
andK12 students benefit from having a “role model-expert” or “role model-content resource”in the classroom for up to 20 hours per week, and graduate students build criticalcommunications skills while developing an appreciation for the day-to-day challenges ofnurturing the next generation of science and engineering professionals. In the currentarticle, we report on our experiences with the National Science Foundation’s GraduateTeaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) Program. The GK12 program at Old Dominion University* is based on a constructivistapproach for learning as an active and continuous process where students takeinformation from the classroom and construct personal interpretations and meaningsbased on prior knowledge and
-based digital environments, microelectronics, and artificial intelligence on learning, interest, identity, motivation, and decision making in STEM. His research views learning through self-regulated learning, constructivist, and embodied cognition lenses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025How Microelectronics and Microcontrollers are Integrated into First-Year and Sophomore Engineering Programs: A Systematized Review. ABSTRACTIn this complete, evidence-based paper, we conducted a systemized literature review to examinethe ongoing efforts to introduce microcontrollers and microelectronics to undergraduateengineering students. The
particular interest is how parents’ actions can engage children in engineering.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Page 26.183.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Engineering Tale: Using storybooks to analyze parent-child conversations about engineering (K-12 Fundamental)IntroductionEnvisioning a larger workforce of engineers, with broad participation from a diverse setof
Creating Partnerships between the University and Secondary Schools Laura A. Koehl, Suzanne W. Soled, Anant R. Kukreti and Ted W. Fowler Colleges of Engineering and Education, University Of CincinnatiProject STEP (Science and Technology Enhancement Program) is a joint effort between theColleges of Engineering and Education at the University of Cincinnati to partner with schools inthe Cincinnati Public School system. Project STEP connects engineering graduate students(Fellows) with middle and high school science educators to help bring authentic learningactivities into the classroom. The project is funded through the NSF GK12 program to enhancescience education.The project had two primary goals; 1) to
servicefrom the university to the community, to viewing them as engagements of mutual benefit.As such, a key objective of the WAVES project was to develop a program that wouldadvance student learning for both K-12 students and university undergraduates. To thisend, students from two undergraduate classes played critical roles in developing materialsfor WAVES, as well as working directly with the fifth graders on the day of the event.Details on these two courses are provided below.Special Topics Course: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, andMathematicsAn interdisciplinary 200-level special topics course through the Engineering, Science,Technology, and Society series entitled, “Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering,Arts, and
engineering design process by asking themto create a LEGO robotic shopping cart of the future. The curriculum built uponthe principal investigators’ prior work in this area, and addressed the need forscaffolding students through the robotics programming to reduce thetechnical/troubleshooting load on the teacher. The team hosted a weeklongteacher professional development program to introduce teachers to teachingengineering design with the RoboBooks tool. The paper reports on the teachers’engineering design self-efficacy using a validated survey tool in a pre-test/ post-test design. Page 15.1336.2The Need Involving students in solving problems, both well- and ill
AC 2011-1762: INTEGRATING CHILDREN’S LITERATURE INTO OC-CUPATIONAL LEARNING ABOUT ENGINEERSBrianna L Dorie, Purdue University Brianna Dorie is a Ph.D student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She previously received her M.S. in environmental engineering from the University of Arizona, and her B.S. in civil engineering from the University of Portland. For the past three years, Brianna has coordinated the K-5 outreach program through the Women in Engineering Program (WIEP) at Purdue.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and is the Co-Director of As- sessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and
that has successfully engaged 20 K-12 schools and hosted over 18,000students through direct classroom and out-of-school activities. STEM-UpTM has developedschool agendas, hands-on classroom activities for 4th - 6th grade students, the Viva TechnologyTMProgram for middle school and high school students, parent workshops, an educators’ institute,and teacher ambassadors.IntroductionAt the core of the New Economy is science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), anartifact that must increasingly be leveraged to maximize earning potential and learningexperiences. The economic well-being of the United States hinges on its capacity fortechnological innovation, which depends on a competitive supply of high-skilled, technicalworkers to innovate, and
University proposed a new approach forrecruiting Hispanic students into computing disciplines and careers through the HispanicComputer Brigade (HCB) initiative. By forming HCBs in two local high schools, we aimed toinspire and engage Hispanic students through IT service learning projects. The high schoolstudents began the program with a summer camp, continued to learn and engage computingthroughout the year with community service learning, and will end with a local competitionwhere students will showcase their computing projects with high school faculty, SJSU faculty,parents/guardians, and the community. Students are learning computer and programming skillsand processes in weekly meetings with the help of advisors and mentors.To support the Hispanic
Montgomery College students, the outcomes of the project forthe college students and the high school students will be compared in this paper.IntroductionThe College Institute was created through a partnership between Montgomery Collegeand Montgomery County, Maryland, Public Schools as a means of providing outstandinghigh school students with an opportunity to not only be taught college-level courses aspart of their high school curriculum, but also to earn up to thirty (30) college credits inthe environment of their own school buildings. Advantages of this program toparticipants include the possibility of the several of the courses to count towards a collegedegree or satisfy some pre-requisite requirement (depending on the institution attendedby the
60% come from low-income households. Because of its success withurban students, BAA is a recognized leader in public education reform movement. Its innovativeuse of the arts as a strategy for improving teaching and learning has attracted national andinternational attention. Through the school’s Center for Arts in Education, BAA’s best practicesare documented and shared with educators, administrators and policymakers worldwide. Students at BAA are required to take three years of science and four years of math inorder to graduate. Typically, students take Engineering in the 9th grade, Chemistry in the 10thgrade, and Biology in the 11th grade, with an elective course on Current Issues in Science in the12th grade. In math, students
contrast to extending thealready growing demands of content coverage.Data-based decision making is the expectation within classrooms and this extends to KEEP. Thetraining, development and implementation are all being studied. During the past three years,KEEP has matured into a collaborative research program of the University of Kentucky Collegesof Engineering and Education with the main objective being to improve grade 5-12 science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education through circuit building activitiesthat expand beyond the traditional “bulbs and batteries” approach to teaching and learning aboutelectricity. Considering the breadth and depth of microelectronics, there is no shortage ofexamples and technology applications
examining dam failure through modeling is an equally usefulactivity in the K-12 STEM classroom. These models can then become the vehicle for usingstudent observations and sense making to develop linkages between underlying STEM conceptsand the constructed world around us. The pedagogical challenge is instruction that exploitsstudent learning around the processes and mechanisms that underlie visible phenomena, which isoften temporally and spatially inaccessible within the elementary science classroom. Studentsremain fixed on reporting the observable aspects of the phenomena without truly understandingwhy. As important, when students begin thinking about phenomena at a microscopic level, theyapply their macroscopic observations as to why something
Recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in STEM education continues tobe a national challenge. Accordingly, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has required awardrecipients within the NSF’s Division of Engineering Education to create pipeline opportunitiesfor underrepresented students to enter university STEM programs. Outreach through EngineeringResearch Centers (ERCs) is one such effort. This paper describes a mixed methods researchendeavor that addresses this engineering challenge and one engineering research center’sresponse to recruiting underrepresented groups into biomedical engineering using two broadlydefined pipeline efforts: (1) teachers in K-12 via a Research Experience for Teachers programand (2) undergraduate students via
. 241-255, Jun. 2002.[12] W.-M. Roth, “Editorial power/authorial suffering,” Res. in Sci. Edu., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 215-240, Jun. 2002.[13] W.-M. Roth, “Evaluation and adjudication of research proposals: Vagaries and politics of funding,” Forum: Qualitative Social Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1-29, Sep. 2002.[14] W.-M. Roth and K. Tobin, “Peer review in science education: An introduction,” Res. in Sci. Edu., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 127-134, Jun. 2002.[15] W.-M. Roth, “Vagaries and politics of funding: Beyond ‘I told you so.’,” Forum: Qualitative Social Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-15, Jan. 2004.[16] K. Scantlebury, “A snake in the nest or in a snake’s nest: What counts as peer review for a female science educator
AC 2011-2777: EXCHANGE: OOBLECK, SLIME, AND PLAYDOUGH MA-TERIALS ENGINEERING FOR THE ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMGail Ellen Gerdemann, Oregon State University Elementary classroom teacher for over 30 years including teaching junior high science as a Peace Corps volunteer in Montserrat, West Indies, 6th grade in Virginia, primary and intermediate grades in Albany and Corvallis, Oregon. K-5 STEPs Coordinator at Oregon State University funded by Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant since 1994 working with classroom teachers and university/community scientists developing STEM curriculum and training teachers. Currently also employed by Corvallis School Dis- trict to develop, pilot, manufacture materials kits, and inservice
teachers whowork in a “team-teaching” model will have greater confidence with the material which in turnwill allow them to feel more able to go beyond the basic curriculum and provide a richerexperience for the students. Within the context of the engineering lessons, we foresee this takingshape through the teachers asking students questions such as “why do you think that happened”or “what do you think that means”. Questions like this get the students to think critically andtruly be able to “own” their knowledge, rather than being told to memorize terms or concepts.This is where the practical applications of assessment categories most show through in theclassroom.Results:In our pre-survey we interviewed 18 elementary school teachers to see if they
the development of a novel high school engineering textbook. This developmentis unique within engineering in several different ways. First, the text is a Flexbook – an open-sourcebook developed with the support of and within the context of the CK12 Foundation; the Flexbookformat and open-source licensing allows anyone to extend and customize the book. Second, writingthe text was a collaboration between university engineering and education faculty with input fromCK12 personnel; this collaboration has led to a textbook structure that supports constructivistapproaches to learning. Third, the text conforms to a draft K–12 standard for engineering content.CK12 is a non-profit foundation launched in 2007 to reduce the cost of textbooks for the K–12
Paper ID #40781Envisioning Equitable Pathways to STEM Graduate Education: Creating aCoalition including University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Bowie StateUniversity, and University of Maryland College Park to Make It HappenMs. Rosemary Parker, University of Maryland, College ParkJACQUELINE SMITH, Bowie State UniversityProf. Isabel K Lloyd, Materials Science and Engineering Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, MDDr. Jennifer Johnson, Temple UniversityDr. Yuanwei Jin, University of Maryland Eastern Shore Yuanwei Jin is a Professor and Chair of Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences with the Uni- versity of Maryland Eastern
. Lachapelle, Museum of Science, Boston Cathy Lachapelle currently leads the assessment efforts for the EiE curriculum, designing assessment in- struments, pilot and field testing them, and conducting research on how children use the EiE materials. She has worked on a number of research and evaluation projects related to K-16 STEM education, includ- ing the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) study of factors influencing the persistence of undergraduate women in engineering schools. She is particularly interested in how students learn sci- ence, engineering, and mathematics through collaborative interaction and through scaffolded experiences engaging in disciplinary practices. Lachapelle received her B.S. in