and lectures are based on this strength. Realize that this is not the only intelligencethat we could utilize to enhance students long-term comprehension of concepts.3. Visual/Spatial Intelligence: x the ability to perceive the visual-spatial world accurately and to perform transformations upon those perceptions, x sensitivity to color, line, shape, form, space, and the relationships that exist between these elements, and x the capacity to visualize, to graphically represent visual or spatial ideas, and to orient oneself in the spatial matrix.Visual intelligence can be seen in the works of artists, architects, engineers, hunters, and interiordecorators, among others. Lectures which rely on one’s ability to transform
Page 4.362.2methodological framework for model building. No equations are demanded of the students at thisstage. Once the declarations are complete, the software writes the equations and solves them. Thefocus of the software is modeling, not process simulation as in Aspen or Chemcad. We describe thesoftwareÀs contribution to teaching modeling in a later section.Why build a model? Models are at the heart of problem solving in engineering and the sciences, as forcefully statedby Middleman [2] in the preface of his recent textbook. We need models to inform us about thecharacteristics or behavior of a process, information needed in making decisions about designs andoperations. For example, one has to decide on the turbine discharge
weak and needs to be reinforced in high school so that the students can have theopportunity to succeed in fields such as science and engineering. On the other hand, a commondenominator found in arithmetic, algebra, and trigonometry is students’ struggle when solvingword problems and answering conceptual questions. Our numerical results evidence thenecessity of building problem-solving skills in our students during primary and secondaryeducation. Moreover, our analysis indicates that much effort in high school mathematics coursesis put into solving operational exercises that neglect the concepts and theory in whichmathematics is supported. Interestingly, the structure of MATH 101 revealed those topics thatneed improvement and the skills that
problem is not effective in serving the other functions of exams, feedback and evaluation. Tounderstand why this type of problems is inappropriate, it is imperative to appreciate whatactually goes on during taking an exam from the students' point of view.To successfully solve an engineering problem, students must have the knowledge of subjectmatter, know the necessary background material (usually math, physics, and other prerequisitecourse material), the good problem solving skills (including being systematic and managing thetime wisely), and the ability to perform under stress.8 It is this multifaceted requirement thatmakes a proper interpretation of an exam score very difficult for students and teachers alike.Suppose a student scored 17 points
of core science concepts using digital video: A “hands-on” laptop approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(6), 16–24.20. Ludlow, D. K. (2012). Using student-produced videos to enhance learning engagement in a chemical engineering thermodynamics course. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers 2012 Annual Meeting. New York, NY: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.21. Abulencia, J. P., Vigeant, M. A., & Silverstein, D. L. (2013). Using video media to enhance conceptual learning in an undergraduate thermodynamics course. In Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA.22. Talley, K. G. (2013). Lights, camera, action
science and engineering facultyshould learn about learning styles and psychological types will be addressed. A brief overviewof two learning style models and assessment instruments will be presented. These learning stylemodels are: The Dunn and Dunn Model and the Kolb Model. These models will be comparedand contrasted in terms of their usefulness and application both inside and outside of theclassroom. A comparison will also be made between these learning style models and one well-known application that has been developed to assess psychological type. To this end, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) will be described.I. IntroductionSeveral practitioners within the domains of science and engineering education have noted theimportance of
foundations and state and federal agencies, and has numerous publications in refereed journals and edited books. Her research interests include communities of practice, gender, transformative learning, and identity.Dr. Sarah Hug, Colorado Evaluation & Research Consulting Dr. Sarah Hug is Director of Colorado Evaluation & Research Consulting. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.Dr. Heather Thiry, Golden
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Southeast Section Conference Adaptive Solar Energy Harvesting and Data TransmissionJames Kaul, Greg Weed, Jared Cunningham, Alisha Sue Pettit, Imtiaz Ahmed, Wook-Sung Yoo Computer Sciences and Electrical Electrical Enginering Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USAAbstractA prototype for an adaptive solar tracking and efficient data communication system empoweredby the harvested solar energy was developed by a capstone project team at Marshall University.The prototype is developed on Raspberry Pi and Arduino development boards and the overallsystem comprises a solar tracking module
new curricula integrated laboratory activities into class routines in order to emphasize the nature and processes of science [3]. Laboratory courses complement theory by providing hand-on experiences that allowstudents to further explore technical concepts. So as not to eliminate laboratory courses in orderto reduce cost, an alternative methodological approach was required. This study evaluated thecurrent process of teaching electronics within the laboratory and, without eliminating coursematerials, a unique approach was developed and trials ensued. The results indicate thatlaboratory learning was equal to and exceeded that of a traditional style laboratory offering. Inaddition, student laboratory report grades and
& Exposition Copyright ø2004, American Society for Engineering Educationgrouping users according to the supervisor. The Manage User option allows the manager to addauthorized users into the system. User Progress provides a way to monitor all user performancethrough the web. The User List provides easy access to view or modify user information. TheManage Guest option allows the administrators to edit guest information. Also, to help facilitatethe management level user to review all content quickly, special navigation tools are available tothe administrators and mangers so that they can go through the lessons and objectivesnonlinearly. Regular users and the guests, on the other hand, have to follow lesson content in
fallsophomore course presents Rowan engineering students with their first exposure to open-endeddesign problems in a team setting. The current course features a four-week introductory projecton bottle rocket design, completed in teams of 3-4, and a 10-week main project on crane design,completed in teams of 4-5. The teaming aspect of the course is a challenge to engineeringstudents, particularly in that many of them are naturally pre-disposed to prefer working alone.The Let Me Learn (LML) Process is an integrated approach to teaching and learning that startswith administration of the Learning Connections Inventory (LCI), a survey instrument thatassesses individual learning patterns. All Rowan Students now take the LCI as enteringfreshmen. In this study
Paper ID #28293Testing an assessment of problem-solving in introductory chemicalprocess design courses (WIP)Dr. Eric Burkholder, Stanford UniversityProf. carl e wieman American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Testing an assessment of problem-solving in introductory chemical process design courses (WIP)Introduction:Problem-solving is consistently cited as one of the most important outcomes of an undergraduateeducation in engineering [1-3]. While it is generally held that scientists and engineers are trainedto be good problem-solvers, there is very little
current was achieved and calculations predicted atomic-resolution capabilitiesof the designed instruments. While the scans of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite showedsurface characteristics the microscopes could not distinguish individual atoms.1. IntroductionNanotechnology is one of the most vibrant research areas today. Some of the research isin the commercialization stage, like carbon nanotube applications in computer monitorsor energy storage devices. In academia, at the graduate level, there was a substantialnumber of course offerings dealing with various nanotechnology topics. There werefewer successful attempts in presenting this material to the undergraduate studentpopulation, mostly in sciences, while only a handful of isolated reports
Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through research related to undergraduate research programs and navigational capital needed for graduate school.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and
found the project to be a useful opportunity for hands-on problem-solving,as well as for gaining knowledge of engineering design and product marketing. 70% of surveyedstudents also reported learning new ideas beyond the material presented in the course, includingimproved time management, novel calculation techniques, CAD software, market analysis,carbon emissions and energy savings estimates, and sustainability strategies. Additionally, the project provided students with opportunities to develop their soft skillssuch as communication, problem-solving, and team coordination. Despite the overall positiveresponse, some students did not feel that the project augmented their education. Some studentsfelt that the project was disjointed from
Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. She was awarded the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award.Dr. Cara Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is the Manager of Qualitative
(ANAB), and numerous others catering to institutions within a singlecountry [3].One of the most popular accreditation organizations for science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) disciplines is the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), a nonprofit, non-governmental organization that accredits programs in applied andnatural science, computing, engineering, and engineering technology. According to ABET, thepurpose of program accreditation is to assure confidence that a graduate of a program has met thestandards essential to enter critical fields in the global workforce. While there are eight generalcriteria, the foundation of ABET accreditation is an ongoing assessment process related to threecriteria [4
medium forinterdisciplinary engineering design”, in Proc. American Society for Engineering Education, June 1998.2. Grose, T.K., “Starting over at Sherbrooke”, ASEE Prism, December 2000, pp. 24-27.3. Hambley, A.R., Electrical Engineering Principles and Applications, Prentice Hall, 1997.4. Martin, F., Robot Exploration A Hands-On Introduction to Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2000.5. Martin, F., The Handy Board Technical Reference, Technical Report, 1998,http://el.www.media.mit.edu/groups/el/projects/handy-board/.6. Maxwell, B.A., Meeden, L.A., “Integrating robotics reseach with undergraduate education”, IEEE IntelligentSystems, Nov./Dec. 2000, pp. 2-7.7. Michaud, F., Clavet, A., Lachiver, G., Lucas, M., "Designing toy robots to help autistic
availablecourse management software primarily to distribute course content (e.g., slides) to students. Inaddition, the software can be used to implement various instruction interventions including polls,electronic ink, and screen broadcast. Limited instructor training is available for the software.New instructors are encouraged to observe more experienced instructors classrooms for TPCincorporation strategies.The first-year engineering program consists of a two-semester course sequence. Each semester-long course is composed of one 50-minute large lecture (ranging from 75-300 students) and onetwo-hour, hands-on laboratory (approximately 30 students) each week. This research studyinvestigates a new instructor assigned to teach one of the large lectures (93
Supplemental Instructional Videos(SIV). SIVs can be assigned to students, be presented in the LMS as reference material, or act asan additional external resource like YouTube videos. Participating faculty utilize SIVs in avariety of ways and surveyed their students on perception of those SIVs. This research seeks todetermine student perceptions on SIVs, student use and how SIVs can be more conducive forlearning.MethodologyA 25-question survey was created to determine student perceptions of Supplemental InstructionVideos. The survey was delivered via Qualtrics. The faculty research team teaches in STEMfields. Students surveyed were typically in Architecture, Construction, Engineering orEngineering Technology type majors from two universities, Kennesaw
. The course was team taught by an EE,Graphics, and ME professor. Page 23.551.7The thrust of the course was to answer the question, “What do engineers really do?” Morespecific details of the course’s content can be found in the course syllabus, but a few highlightsinclude the components listed below.8 Lecture Topics: Introduction to the Engineering Profession Teamwork Design Basics Creativity Industry Standards Engineering Components Engineering Professionalism Hands-on Activities: Toy Dissection Wind Turbine Material Properties Guitar Amplifier
acrossdifferent Engineering and science disciplines noting that 30% of the labs assessed werereplacement of in-person lab while the rest were complements to existing courses and labs andpresent the top ten labs [6]. Gillet et al [7] look at ways of making web-based remote lab systemsmore robust.Several studies compare different lab formats. Corter et al. [8] present the results of a large-scalestudy comparing learning outcomes and student preferences for different lab formats, includingtraditional hands-on labs, remotely operated labs, and simulations. Similar to [1], students notedthe advantages of technology-enabled labs are they are convenient and reliable but preferredhands-on labs. The authors also noted that differences in lab formats led to
start the project) and limited resources (because there is one small shop roomavailable for construction work). The developers may also encounter constraints imposed byuniversity systems and procedures for ordering parts and materials. Additionally, decisions madeor problems encountered by one of the three development teams can impact the others. Two ofthe TAs saw these constraints as a drawback to being involved with the design. One of these twofound this to be a surprise.Professional Development Page 26.1469.10Most (17) described bringing technical skills specific to engineering with them to the project,while others (6) mentioned things more
mechanical engineering,including engineering economics, engineering graphics and solid modeling, instrumentation andmeasurements, numerical methods and simulation, and manufacturing. Most schools will havesufficient hardware on hand to perform the project, and the only actual cost incurred will be thatfor the material (foam). An additional reference that may be useful to students is the UIUCairfoil geometry database29.Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of David Miller, Shop Technician inthe College of Engineering and Technology at Bradley University, Dr. Kalyani Nair for her helpwith the Pro-E modeling, Dr. Abanto-Bueno for his help with AutoCAD, Curtis Boirum,graduate student in M.E. for his help with the CNC
Interactive Engagement (IE), in the sense thatstudents are engaged in both “hands-on” (sometimes) and “minds-on” (always) in the learningprocess. FCI data were collected for 10 semesters and 15 sections (2003 – 2007) with a total of292 students participating. Table 2 shows the conceptual Hake-gain for each semester. The dataclearly show that there is a substantial gain in conceptual understanding despite the fact that thestandard deviations are significant. A one-tailed t-test was performed for each semester in orderto detect differences in achievement between the night and day sections. In each case, the null Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright
request of theState Workforce Development Council. This action was taken by the Council in response toindustry demand for skilled training professionals with technical competence. This uniqueprogram affords students at the undergraduate level the opportunity to acquire technicalcompetence in one of four technical concentrations (computer technology, constructiontechnology, environmental science, or industrial/ manufacturing), as well as competence as atraining professional. In parallel, SET also established two new emphasis areas in the graduateprogram leading to the degree Master of Science in Engineering Technology with an emphasisin either workforce training and development or environmental safety. These programs firstaccepted students in the
assistantships in the Fall directly afier baccalaureategraduation. (A commonly used term for this in the UK is “staying on”.) It is fairly uncommon for a Ph.D.candidate to have obtained a Master’s degree before embarking on doctoral studies, unless coming from anon-UK institution. The University of Wales at Swansea is part of a multi-campus, but very traditiona~British institution and is active in sponsored research. On the other hand, Professor D. W. Russell, a professor in Electrical Engineering at Penn State GreatValley, has access only to a part-time evening, adult student body seeking professional Master’s degrees.The majority of this student body is gainfidly employed and already weighted with family responsibilities andobligations, and
AC 2010-1281: INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION THROUGH THE SWISSDARWIN21 DESIGN COMPETITIONJeffrey Richardson, Purdue UniversityGlenn Blackwell, Purdue University Page 15.796.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 International Collaboration through the Swiss Darwin21 Design CompetitionAbstract:The Swiss Darwin21 design competition is sponsored by companies related to the Swissautomation industry, and is run on a two-year cycle in Switzerland. It involves most of theUniversities of Applied Sciences in Switzerland, and for the 2009 competition, included oneinternational Swiss-USA team comprised of students from the electrical
moved from theory toreal-world applications, and the need for skilled engineers has grown. Therefore, many collegesand universities are strategizing ways to provide students with hands-on experiences to developthe needed practical skills in industry. One of the pillars of I4.0 is human-machine interactionwhich includes robotics and automation. Undergraduate degrees need to provide appliedknowledge of robots that use modern controllers and other integrated hardware rather than theclassic robotic design. The curriculum should provide the students with real-world experienceswith real hardware. This paper presents the steps of designing and constructing a reconfigurableand affordable industrial robotic arm platform that can be used to teach
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Ashmun Express - A Mobile-Based Study Application for STEM StudentsAbstractThere has been an increase in the usage of technology in classrooms nationwide, fromsmartboards to study applications. The dearth of the latter as a part of the curriculum for STEMstudents in higher education and particularly at a historically black university prompted twoprofessors in biology and computer science to develop a mobile application that focuses on mathapplications in a variety of biological fields.The prime objective of the mobile app - codenamed Ashmun Express - is to serve as a tool forearly career STEM majors, almost all of whom have