AC 2008-2564: CLASSROOM TEACHING AIDS AND LABORATORYEXPERIMENTATION TO ENGAGE STUDENTS IN MATERIALS LEARNINGStephan Durham, University of Colorado at DenverMicah Hale, University of ArkansasSeamus Freyne, Manhattan College Page 13.296.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Classroom Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experimentation to Engage Students in Materials LearningAbstractMost civil engineering programs require one course in materials and materials testing. Thesecourses are designed to provide students with general knowledge of the production, properties,and behavior of common structural materials. Emphasis is often placed on the
engaging demonstrations into the classroom and faculty development. His educational background includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and a M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Florida. He has experience in implementing robotics solutions for biomechanics applications, including a postdoctoral fellowship with the UF Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute.Dr. Philip Jackson, University of Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Demonstrations in Large Enrollment Courses: Designing for ImpactWhat impact do course demonstrations have on engineering students motivation andknowledge? Can the addition of a few core demos of engineering practical
the local community on the opioid crisis facing rural America.Interdisciplinary communication methods used by student teams to engage various communitystakeholders and the project sponsors are discussed. The challenges and lessons learnedassociated with connecting a large community project across three semesters in two differentdepartments with different learning objectives are discussed.IntroductionA senior design project course is designed to satisfy Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) engineering design criteria. ABET Criterion 5 on Curriculum describes theintegration of content as follows: “ The Integration of Content: Baccalaureate degree curriculamust provide a capstone or integrating experience that develops
computer science and engineering, this Fall semester course is required for any studentinterested in studying in one of the six undergraduate major programs. The impacts of this intervention areanalyzed according to Social Cognitive Career Theory (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994, 2000) which posits thatbeliefs about the self and knowledge about careers are socially influenced, amenable to intervention, andpowerful drivers of the development of career interests, goals, and actions. A pre/post survey design includingthe items of the Computing Attitudes Survey (Dorne & Tew, 2015), major and career interests, as well as open-ended items. A qualitative analysis of student claims of field-based identities in both computer science andengineering and
. Project-based learning (PBL) is an instructionalapproach that engages students’ interest and motivation, relates the theoretical concepts studentsstudied inside the classroom and their applications explored during the activities outside of theclassroom and provides more opportunities for direct interactions among students. This paperpresents the implementations of PBL in Physics I and Statics courses at WKCTC. Sample teamprojects are described in details and the assessment on learning outcomes are discussed.IntroductionStudents at West Kentucky Community and Technical College (WKCTC) can pursue Universityof Kentucky (UK)’s Bachelor of Science degrees in either chemical or mechanical engineeringwithout leaving home. All four years of classes can
The places they will go: What happens when engineering students critically reflectAbstractOver the last 30 years, “engineering for development” initiatives have proliferated across theWestern world and have become woven into the fabric of many higher education programs.Despite their good intentions, these programs have been critiqued due to lack of appropriateengagement with communities in co-creating solutions, failing to recognize the limitations oftechnology in achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs), as well as failing to interrogatestructures and relations of power that impact on development interventions. In some cases, theseefforts have reinforced social injustices.There have been numerous efforts to
understanding the development, use, impact, and consequences ofpast technologies, students are better equipped to tackle the challenging problems the future willbring.Initially, the course was lecture and discussion based with a few videos included for variety. Thisformat proved successful and the popularity of the course grew. Soon students from alldisciplines across campus started enrolling in the course and it became apparent that the scopeand method of delivery had to be enhanced to suit this diverse audience. The focus of the coursewould stay the same with a new added emphasis on technological literacy using a hands-onapproach.Theoretical or Conceptual SupportAn unacknowledged paradox exists in our modern technological society. "As technology
Lessons Learned in K-12 Engineering Outreach and Their Impact on Program PlanningIntroduction The United States relies on a well-prepared workforce to remain competitive in scienceand engineering. However, the number of engineering graduates is insufficient to cover thegrowing demand. As a result, an abundance of outreach programs exist throughout the countrywith a specific goal to increase the interest in engineering and the number of students pursuingengineering degrees. Unfortunately, the ideal format for effective outreach programs does notyet exist and needs formal evaluation. This paper highlights two formal engineering outreachprograms that were part of two Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for
conclusion from a particular plot point or story, they should challenge their students toinvent their own scenario where that conclusion doesn’t hold. This sort of creative thinkingreaches the upper echelons of Bloom's Taxonomy and will be a valuable exercise in theengineering classroom. The final question along the sequence is a “decide” question. These questions are notabout making concrete decisions as the name may indicate, but rather about encouraging studentsto communicate and debate their personal ideas about the topic. “Decide” questions may askstudents about their hopes and concerns for a certain topic or simply ask for their opinion on acertain idea. The hope for these questions is that students will share their viewpoint and
California Science Center, and New York Hall of Science. She is a member of the UM College of Engineering’s Diversity and Outreach Council, and since July, 2007 serves as full time director of the College’s new Office of Engineering Outreach and Engagement [(OE)2], http://www.engin.umich.edu/outreach/. About (OE)2 (OE)2 focuses on three areas of effort: 1) to promote diversity within the College of Engineering (CoE), 2) to serve as a resource for educators, potential students and parents, and 3) to contribute to the community at large. (OE)2 encourages and facilitates efforts of CoE faculty, scholars, students and staff to motivate, prepare, educate, and support outstanding
students were required to take a new University-wide course “ESLfor Graduate Students;” (this course was so popular with research advisors that the Universitycreated three sections for spring 2011). A total of 19 students participated in the 2010-2011UML communications meetings; this group included seven American students and 12 Asianstudents (4 Chinese, 5 Indian; 1 Korean, and 2 Thai).In addition, the Boston Museum of Science and CHN team provided Sharing Science workshopsin science demonstration skills and inquiry-based learning for over 60 graduate students in fall2009. The students spent a day at the Museum, training to engage the public in nanotechnologywith hands-on, inquiry-based activities. The students followed up on this training by
premiere global computing society. Core values: Technical excellence Education and technical advancement Ethical computing and technology for positive impact Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” 2021-2025 Goals most relevant to DEIJ: - “Continuing to diversify the ACM global community, providing a welcoming community for all.” - “Educating the public and policy makers on the benefits, potential, limits, and pitfalls of computing and computer science.”ASEE [10] Vision: “Excellent and broadly accessible education empowering students and engineering professionals to create a better world.” Mission: “ASEE advances
.” Student quotes highlighted theimportance of learning mindfulness through the app, and connecting mindfulness learned fromthe app to concepts in the course, including innovation and creative thinking. One student said,“mindfulness will boost and stimulate creative thinking, and the concepts learned in thiscourse will enable me to transform creativity into practical innovation.”Conclusion As can be seen through these three examples, the center’s initiative to align with aholistic faculty development approach was very well-received by faculty, staff, administrators,and students who participated in the offerings. All feedback received in evaluations fromparticipants of the projects was positive and highlighted community-building, being better
team-formation toolto form teams based on some specific criteria.Team composition is just one factor influencing teamwork effectiveness. Another factor isteamwork training. Engineering students should be educated about working in diverse teams tounderstand and accept the differences among team members [11], [13]–[16]. Additionally, teamtraining should include how to conduct peer evaluation [17], and how to build trust [18].Students should learn teamwork skills and knowledge, different team roles, time managementskills, communication skills, and conflict resolution and leadership skills [19]–[27]. In themeantime, these skills have been investigated by several researchers [28]–[36].Also, students should be aware of the common problems in teams
is a nonprofit association thatmentors K-12 teachers on sustainable energy education through STEM topics and activities. TheNEED Project offers a curriculum and mentorship to professors on how to use creativity to teachK-12 students and invent new ways of thinking and practicing sustainability addressing STEMtopics. Students can effectively make changes that directly impact their community, building solidvalues of respect between men and nature from an early age. The NEED Project launched in WestVirginia (WV) recently, successfully mentoring many teachers around the state. To express theimportance of the NEED Project to the teachers and students in WV, there is a need to study theeffects of the NEED Project approach in developing the
structured with the assumption of a regular (i.e., 9:00-5:00) work schedule, similar to that of staff members, which did not coincide with the looser,more continuous work structure of faculty. STEM faculty members could not simply stopresearch, particularly grant-funded research, publications, mentoring graduate students,maintaining labs, and other responsibilities.In addition to not aligning with the work context of faculty careers, researchers have found thatother members of an organization, in academia and beyond, influence if and how an employeetakes leave49, 58, 61, 62. For instance, Blair-Loy & Wharton found that supervisors’ views ofparental leave had a substantial impact on employees’ decisions to take leave62. Furthermore,Kirby &
to how students receive and processinformation: sensory vs. intuitive, visual vs. verbal, active vs. reflective, and sequential vs.global.1This approach was, from the beginning, extremely influential within engineering education.Numerous other methods and instruments have arisen, and research into the impact of learningstyles on student learning and the implications for teaching has burgeoned. (For an excellentoverview and comprehensive links to resources, see the University of Michigan College ofEngineering webpage on learning.2 See also Felder’s review of four commonly cited learningstyles theories.3 An overview of several approaches and an annotated list of online instrumentscan be found on the University of Guelph Learning Styles page.4
B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of California, Merced. She earned her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Robotics and Mechatronics from Santa Clara University (SCU). She is currently employed by SCU where her responsibilities include or- ganizing student engagement activities focused on entrepreneurial mindset and managing the SCU Maker Lab. Recently, she launched the SCU Mobile Maker Lab for outreach with K-12 schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Santa Clara University Maker Lab: Creating the Lab, Engaging the Community, and Promoting Entrepreneurially Minded Learning
research. The Impacts section should not be a list of activities, goals, or objectives. The Impacts section should include a synthesis of the meaning and value of the activities, goals, or objectives. (Emphasis added) Attendees were asked to reflect on answering questions about impact, questions such as:1) What can we do now that we previously could not do? and 2) What is different about ourability to do research, educate students, engage with policy makers, etc. as a result of this work?Tutorial Activities After orienting attendees to the tutorial objectives, we formed groups made up ofrepresentatives from different RED teams. These groups were charged to work together on aseries of activities that would help them think
student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Impact on Retention: Integrating Engineering Concepts into a Freshman University Seminar ExperienceAbstractA four-year study meant to analyze the effects of a modified introductory engineering course ontwo-year retention of women and minorities was conducted at Texas State University. Introductionto Engineering modules were integrated into a general freshman university seminar course. Twoexperimental tactics were followed. One section type, Early Career Intervention (ECI), focused ongiving students resources and
advanced degrees, from a variety of sectors. These roundtables havebeen held at the university for a broad audience of graduate students, and at the PROMISEAGEP’s Summer Conferences. The PROMISE AGEP conferences, also known as the PROMISESummer Success Institute (SSI), in particular, draw large audiences of underrepresented minoritygraduate students. Both the university-based sessions, and the AGEP sessions include severalwomen and underrepresented minority (URM) professionals as “Roundtable Mentors.”This paper utilizes data from these roundtables to identify the impact that this community ofpractice has had on the success and professional development of graduate students in STEMfields, related to exposure to career options and networking. Several
mechanical engineering students. Technical Communications features situatedexperiences in which students take on the role of product design engineer at a commercialcompany. Students engage in a range of industry-relevant assignments, including composingemails to colleagues and superiors, interpreting data sets from sales associates and vendors, andcomposing memos and technical briefs. In addition to writing composition, the courseemphasizes graphical representation of data, experimental design and statistics, and presentationskills. Following recommended pedagogical practices in the field, Technical Communications isthe foundational course in our program’s WAC thread; and it features templates, exemplars, andrubrics designed to be carried forward
sustainable environments.Integrating this reciprocal connection between public policy and civil engineering intoundergraduate civil engineering education is critical for the preparation of the next generation ofengineers. This project, first, reviews the guidance of public policy in civil engineeringprograms, such as ASCE’s Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. Then, a pedagogicalapplication is presented that focuses on the integration of public policy concepts, methods,assessment tools and techniques in a required, upper level course in civil and environmentalengineering at Bucknell University. Iterations of this course integration have been taught for overa decade, and experiences on how to engage students around this timely topic is
measuringand tracking how a study has impacted a community or group of students. Program Officersacknowledge the difficulty establishing a one-to-one comparison of how awarding X number ofdollars will translate to an equitable outcome.There is currently no policy explicitly requiring a measurable, “one-to-one correspondence,”however, Program Officers have been advising the community of PIs on moving towardsmeasurable and scalable statements of Broader Impact outcomes. There is a general understandingfrom both PIs and Program Officers of the ambiguity around assessing or measuring benefits tosociety.Lastly, Program Officers spoke about Broader Impacts as reaching non-academic spaces, inaddition to the academic spaces. For example, “putting a briefing
-buildingactivities between 2003 and 2011 that occurred between the PROMISE AGEP director and theUMET university community. The activities in Table 1 demonstrate the results of those earlyactivities, and showcase information and dissemination events that were developed byPROMISE at UMBC to serve larger groups of students. We spent 9 years with UMET in small-scale meetings that led to expanded engagement. Between 2003 and 2010, UMBC and UMETspent time building relationships through meetings, facilitating faculty and administratorexchanges, mentoring students, collaborating with faculty on ideas for expanding curricula, andwriting some grants to the National Institutes of Health, and the National Science Foundation tosupport our activities. In 2012, UMBC and
of Texas Rio Grande Valley Expertise in water quality and algal physiology and culture. Interest in use of algae as biofuel. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engaging Minority Students in Sustainable Bioenergy and Water Quality through an Education and Research Network Krystel K. Castillo-Villar1, Mauricio Cabrera-Rios2, Michael Persans3, Hudson Deyoe3 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 2 Department of Industrial Engineering, The University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, PO BOX 9000, Mayaguez, PR 00681 3 Department of Biology, The University of Texas
Initiative adopts interventions, including panel discussions, mentoring programs, andtown hall meetings, to provide HUG students opportunities to develop their skill sets, increasenetworking within the department and research field, and advocate community support for HUGstudents. Based on the post-event feedback from attendees, we evaluated the impact of theseinterventions on the career perspectives of HUG students. The panel discussions covered topicsfor students from first-year undergraduates to last-year Ph.D., and therefore, the attendees ofHUG events include students enrolled in the Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Ph.D. programs. Themixed participation of student attendees creates potential networking opportunities betweenundergraduate and graduate
focus on tissue engineering and peripheral nerve regeneration. At WSU, she taught BE 1300 (”Materials Science for Engineering Ap- plications”) and BME 1910/20/25 (”Biomedical Engineering Design Laboratory”). Melissa also holds a Bachelor’s in Materials Science & Engineering from the University of Michigan and loves being back and teaching at her alma mater! ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-in-Progress: KLIQED, A Feedback Tool for Fostering Peer Engagement during Student Oral PresentationsAbstractOral communication skills are important in all academic disciplines (e.g. liberalarts, science, and engineering) and hiring decisions. In
feedback, unlimited submission attempts, and optional exercises on student engagement, performance, and academic integrity in an introductory computer programming course for engineersAbstractWe explore how automated just-in-time feedback, unlimited submission attempts, and optionalno-credit programming assignments impact student engagement, course performance, andacademic integrity in an undergraduate introductory computer programming course forengineers. An interactive browser-based coding platform called MATLAB Grader was used toprovide customized actionable feedback to students as they develop their solutions to homework,practice, and exam problems. Statistical analysis of students’ engagement with the no-creditassignments and their academic
AC 2007-1178: "LESSONS WITH LUNCH" USING A COMMON TECHNOLOGYWITH A GLOBAL IMPACT TO ADDRESS TECHNOLOGY AND DATALITERACYCamille George, University of St. Thomas Professor George, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in mechanical engineering at the University of St. Thomas. She teaches the core course in thermodynamics and maintains a strong interest in technology literacy and educating the general public. Professor George has prepared several innovative courses including a course specifically about fuel cells that mixed senior engineering students with students from other disciplines and adult learners (non-engineers). Professor George has also spearheaded several international service-learning