the major. The primary goal of the Environmental Engineeringcourse is to inform students about what environmental engineering is and what environmental Page 14.330.4engineers do on the job. Since 2006, rather than solely bringing in a variety of guest speakers tothe class, students also work on projects to illustrate types of work done by environmentalengineers. By nature, the projects cannot be too technical or involved since the background ofthe students is minimal. The fifteen 50-minute class periods is the course also limits the scope ofwhat can be done and expected from the students.The first year 1-credit Introduction to Environmental
Paper ID #19379Incorporating Faculty Sense Making in the Implementation and Modificationof an Instrument to Measure Social and Cognitive EngagementMs. Allyson Jo Ironside, Oregon State University Ally Ironside is a recent graduate from LeTourneau University where she studied Water Resources in Civil Engineering. She is currently fusing her technical background with her passion for education in pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering while conducting research in Engineering Education at Oregon State University. Her research interests include the adoption of teaching best practices in engineering and the personal
been teaching re- medial math and engineering classes at SAC since 2000. He has also been involved in various engineering summer programs at SAC, including instructor for Robotics Camps for 3rd to 5th graders (2012 - 2014), instructor and coordinator for the Early Development of General Engineering program for high school stu- dents (2007 - 2015), and faculty adviser for alternative energy Summer Undergraduate Research Programs (2011 - present). In addition, he is currently the SAC Co-PI for the 3-year NSF CIMA-LSAMP Alliance grant supporting increased representation of Underrepresented Minorities (URMs) in STEM education and undergraduate research.Ms. Dee Dixon c American Society for
. Pawley, D. Riley, T. Harding, S. M. Lord, and C. J. Finelli, “Special session-from active learning to liberative pedagogies: Alternative teaching philosophies in CSET education,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2009. FIE’09. 39th IEEE, 2009, pp. 1– 2.[26] D. Riley, A. L. Pawley, J. Tucker, and G. D. Catalano, “Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities,” NWSA J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21–40, 2009.[27] B. Hooks, “Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom,” J. Leis. Res., vol. 28, no. 4, p. 316, 1996.[28] D. Lee Kleinman, M. Powell, J. Grice, J. Adrian, and C. Lobes, “A toolkit for democratizing science and technology policy: the practical mechanics of
Strasbour Large center in may also be taken. g Madrid. Students live with 15 for host families. London 33Virginia Tech Germany, 1 year abroad Two programs: One year spent in 10 German, Sweden senior Bi-lateral senior Germany taking Swedish program Dual year abroad technical courses
Session: 3420 (Computers in Education) A Study of Students’ Perceptions of Computer-Based Instruction in Introductory Thermodynamics Courses M.P. Sharma1, Edward E. Anderson2, and Roman Taraban3 1 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071-3295 sharma@uwyo.edu 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering Texas Tech University
program is to meet the intent of thecriteria. The generality of the specifications and the associated flexibility in operationalizingEC2000’s Criterion 3 learning outcomes (hereafter, the “a-k criteria”) have led to the emergenceof a wide array of items, scales, and instruments for assessing student performance on one ormore of the criteria. Few, if any, of the existing measures appear to have been developedaccording to the instrument/test-development standards generally recommended. Although thelanguage and steps vary to some degree, instrument development experts typically recommend atleast the following basic process:3,4 1. Identify content domains, the important concepts that need to be included in the instrument, and determine
Session 1353 Experiences with a Comprehensive Freshman Hands-On Course – Designing, Building, and Testing Small Autonomous Robots Richard J. Freuler, Michael J. Hoffmann, Theodore P. Pavlic, James M. Beams, Jeffery P. Radigan, Prabal K. Dutta, John T. Demel, and Erik D. Justen The Ohio State UniversityAbstractDuring the past ten years, The Ohio State University's College of Engineering has beenaggressively addressing the issue of student retention. A major element in this effort is thedevelopment of a first-year engineering program that has moved from a series of related butseparate
Memory Memory Environment Response Effectors Generator AutomatismsExternal Stimuli Filtering and Shaping Processing Stocking Figure 1 Brain Information Processing Model Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
Session 2468 Integrated statics experiments in the ‘MechANEX’ mini-laboratory Christine B. Masters, Richard A. Behr The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstract‘MechANEX’ is a mini-laboratory combining comprehensive software analysis modules andmatched, bench-scale verification experiments to improve and enrich a sophomore-levelengineering mechanics course in statics. Each of the seven statics modules in MechANEXinvolves a pre-lab exercise combining hand calculations and software analyses, a lab exerciseproviding a physical connection to
interpreting or explaining the exhibit to others. Thisincluded not only tour guides, but also young adult children explaining the exhibits to theirparents, as well as spouses and friends explaining the exhibit to their peers.20Visitors were positive about their experiences with interactive exhibits and panels. Throughinterviews with visitors, evaluators concluded that concepts generally were accessible to visitors.Visitors were able to understand technical concepts such as: the bridge moves in response to wind, temperature, gravity loads, and earthquakes the bridge has different types of motion – twisting, up and down, back and forth high towers (greater cable sag) make it easier to lift more weight the design of the Bridge
increased the participation of undergraduates in research and also was able to attract atalented pool of students from multiple disciplines. They analyzed demographics, profiles andoutcomes of 26 undergraduate students working on a total of 17 interdisciplinary projects. Theproposed model was successful to generate 16 conference papers, 1 journal paper, 9 extendedabstracts and posters by engaging undergraduate students in interdisciplinary research.There have been several research studies that focused on the strategies taken by universities, bothmajor research universities and small liberal arts colleges. Leverson [12] discussed theapproaches taken by Florida State University (FSU) office of research to enhance participation ofundergraduates in
,Mentor,Sponsor Brainstorming/Idea Session 2 hrs Fri 9/9/11 Fri 9/9/11 14 Team Understand Customer Requirements 7.63 days Fri 9/9/11 Tue 9/20/11 14 Team,Sponsor Customer Meeting 1 hr Wed 9/21/11 Wed 9/21/11 16 Team,Sponsor Design Decision Matrix/Proposal 4 days Thu 9/22/11 Tue 9/27/11 17,16 Team,Sponsor Finalize Concept Drawing 9 days Wed 9/28/11 Mon 10/10/11 16,17,18 Team CAD Drawings 6 days Mon 10/17/11 Mon 10/24/11 Chris,Josh,Keith Material Selection 12 days Fri 10/28/11 Mon 11/14/11
Session 1332 S.P.I.R.I.T. Student Rocket Payload: Characteristics of a Long-duration Undergraduate Research Project Timothy F. Wheeler, Charles Croskey, John D. Mitchell, The Pennsylvania State University Rose M. Marra University of Missouri - ColumbiaAbstractStudent Projects Involving Rocket Investigation Techniques (SPIRIT) used experiential learningand vertical integration techniques to guide students of diverse backgrounds through a three-yeardesign and fabrication process for a
professional societies and engineering related activities?Scale 5. Competition (Alpha = .59)1. To what degree do you feel your grades reflect your knowledge of course material?2. To what extent do you feel overwhelmed by the fast pace and heavy work load?3. To what extent does the competition in your departmental classes positively impact you?4. To what extent does the competition in your departmental classes negatively impact you?Scale 6: Intrinsic Interest (Alpha = .50)1. To what extent do you feel a non-technical major offers a better education?2. To what extent do you feel you were influenced by others to pursue an engineering degree?3. To what extent do you feel you had an intrinsic interest in studying engineering?Scale 7. Study Groups (Alpha
to the Fast Track/Phased Construction (Figure 1)software model. The role of each group was defined in the model method10. Each group had twoto three people to execute the task.The Fast Track model was chosen as the courses project management model because the modeldemonstrates a non-linear development process to the students. The model further identities thedeliverables required for each project phase and the structure of the model indicates that alldocuments need to be stored in a central repository to provide easy access to all team members.The requirement of this centralized document repository emphasizes how important interactivecommunication and availability of documentation shared between all stakeholders is critical forthe success of
offering of AP 773 – BioinstrumentationLaboratory, a 1-hour laboratory section that is part of a 4-credit-hour Bioinstrumentation coursesequence jointly taught by faculty from the KSU Department of Electrical & ComputerEngineering and the KSU Department of Anatomy and Physiology. The course is offered toundergraduate and graduate students, and enrollment in the course is not limited to electricalengineering students; students from veterinary medicine, kinesiology, biological & agriculturalengineering, etc. often enroll in this course sequence. Five devices were constructed for thislaboratory session, which was designed to meet the following learning objectives (i.e., things astudent should be able to do upon completion of the laboratory
3 2 90-100% 76-89% 50-75% > 49%Figure 10: Student Estimate of Percentage of Videos Viewed (n=27)Students were also asked how much time they spent on each type of preparatory work prior tothe first class session of the week. In general students reported spending between four to fivehours preparing for class, as demonstrated in Figure 11. (One student’s responses were removeddue to obvious falsification.) 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 .80 Hours Spent .60 .40 .20 .00 Reading Viewing video Working on prep Assignment
The Summer Engineering Enrichment Program described in [1] revealed some interestingtrends, although it will take another 3-5 years to have sufficient data to quantify the retention andgraduation rate impact of SEEP in a statistically significant manner. SEEP intakes students withMath ACT scores from 17 to 25 inclusive. They are enrolled in College Algebra during the firstsummer term and in Trigonometry during the second summer term. Classes are Monday thruThursday during each summer term. A non-credit Introduction to Engineering course is taughtduring the first summer term. Laboratory study sessions are open 10:30am-12:30pm and1:30pm-4:00pm. Labs are open in the evening as needed, Monday thru Thursday. Graduatestudents, who attend the
theposttest. The students responded on a Likert scale of 1 – 5. In these four questions, studentswere asked to evaluate their own learning of the following: ♦ the lab objective; ♦ the objective compared with how they would have done in the other laboratory environment; ♦ the theory compared with how they would have done in the other laboratory environment; and ♦ troubleshooting compared with how they would have done in the other laboratory environment.Finally, throughout the semester students were asked to report on their experiences in the twodifferent lab environments. To do this, I talked to students individually, in small groups, and inthe classes as a whole. At the end of the semester, I conducted a focus group session with
Narratives(1.) Narrative reflection by Dr. Ann D. Christy, P.E.“How do I bring my whole self to engineering education?” The first step is the self-awareness toknow who that whole self is, and to recognize that my professional and personal selves are oneinterconnected whole. So, who am I professionally and personally?Professionally, I am an engineer. I have earned multiple engineering degrees and credentials inagricultural, biomedical, civil, and environmental engineering, working in the engineeringconsulting industry, and ultimately returning to ag and biological engineering as a facultymember at the Ohio State University. I am a second-generation woman engineer; my mother isan industrial engineer. Her example and training inoculated me against much
college or during the EPRA survey, so their survey major and interviewmajor are both noted. The institution acronyms are as follows - LPU: Large Public University inthe Western US; SRU: Small Research University in the Eastern US; EU: EngineeringUniversity, highly technical in the Midwestern US; MPU: Midsize-Private University in theEastern US. Table 1. Interviewee Characteristics Total SR Score Pseudonym Gender Major (Pre-/Interview) Institution 35 – 39.5 Thomas M ME LPU (< -1.5σ ) Travis M EnvE SRU Quinn* M CE
Session 3255 Issues in Reshaping Innovative Professionally Oriented Graduate Education to Meet the Needs of Engineering Leaders in Industry in the 21st Century D. A. Keating1 T. G. Stanford1 R. J. Bennett2 R. Jacoby3 M. I. Mendelson4 University of South Carolina,1 University of St. Thomas,2 Cooper Union,3 Loyola Marymount University,4 1. Introduction and Context1.1 Framing the IssuesAs we enter the 21st century, the further education of the nation’s graduate engineers in industry
pursuing the creative practice of engineering in industry for technology development and innovation. For these engineers, a different approach and educational process is needed, which better supports lifelong learning and the modern paradigm of the practice of engineering for creative technology development and innovation throughout their professional careers. As the 1974 National Science Foundation report [Workshop on Continuing Education for Engineers at Mid-Career] pointed out ─ “Coursework has not been designed which correlates well with the professional growth of engineers, either as technical specialists or as managers … Selection of educational experiences generally relies on the individual
Session ETD 325 Pitfalls to Avoid in Industry Capstone Project Elke Howe Missouri Southern State UniversityAbstractThe capstone course in the B.S. in Industrial Engineering Technology (IET) program (accreditedby ETAC of ABET) gives each student the opportunity to demonstrate the ability to accomplishthe integration of systems using appropriate analytical, computational, and application practicesand procedures. Students are expected to use technical and non-technical skills to solve a problemin industry. The Six Sigma DMAIC model is used to manage the project
. Amelink, Virginia Tech Page 24.872.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Living, Learning, and Staying: The Impact of a Women in Engineering Living and Learning CommunityAbstractA number of studies highlight living and learning communities (LLCs) as a factor contributing tostudent persistence, particularly in STEM programs.1-3 For several years, the University ofMaryland – College Park has housed Flexus: The Dr. Marilyn Berman Pollans Women inEngineering Living and Learning Community. This LLC is solely for first and second yearwomen, who are in vital years of
Session 35040 Design and Development of Virtual Reality Engineering Expeditions - Innovations in Online Engineering Education Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD Research Associate Professor, Engineering Education LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research Texas State University Cindy D. Rojas Annicchiarico Masters Degree Student Department of Engineering Technology Texas State University BJ Spencer, PhD Assistant
Engineering (KGCOE) to address the needs ofan engineering workforce that is lacking women leaders and to promote gender diversity withinour engineering programs. As the number of retirements in science and engineering and thedemand for trained professionals in those fields increases, while enrollment in college degreeprograms remains steady, our nation may be facing a shortage of scientists and engineers [1]. Itis critical to expose young people to the broad range of opportunities within engineering.WE@RIT outreach programs include fun activities that highlight applications of math andscience in less traditional areas of engineering thus appealing in particular to women and
AC 2009-388: OF BYTES AND BOOKS: KEEPING IT ALL TOGETHER ANDSTILL CALLING IT A LIBRARYAdriana Popescu, Princeton University Adriana Popescu held positions in science and technology librarianship for more than ten years, both in Canada and United States. She holds a graduate degree in Civil Engineering from the Technical University of Civil Engineering in Bucharest and an MLS degree from Rutgers University. Before joining Princeton University Library in 2001 as Plasma Physics Librarian, she was the Head of the Research & Information Center at the NRC Institute of Ocean Technology in St. John’s, Newfoundland (Canada). Since 2006 she holds the position of Engineering Librarian at
Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[3] J. Trevelyan, "Technical coordination in engineering practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 191-204, 2007.[4] S. Summers, R. Bercich, P. Cornwell, and J. Mayhew, "Technical Communications across the ME Curriculum at Rose-Hulman," 2018.[5] J. Chen, F. Damanpour, and R. R. Reilly, "Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis," Journal of Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17-33, 2010.[6] R. G. Cooper and E. Kleinschmidt, "New product performance: keys to success, profitability & cycle time reduction," Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 315-337, 1995.[7] R. A. Guzzo and G. P