Graduating senior exit survey data for the questions: “Through my education in theMaterials Science and Engineering program (including required courses, technical electives andother educational experiences) I have developed…”Left: “...an understanding of theperformance of engineering materials.”Right: “...an ability to integrate these four elements(structure, properties, processing, performance) to solve materials selection and designproblems.” The developments in CAD and 3D printing have had additional impacts on the students.The Material Advantage (MA) student group has been using 3D printing to make forms forcreating ceramic parts. In this case, the 3DP form is used to make a gypsum mold, which is thenused to create a ceramic mug
in Education Conference (FIE), 2015.[16] J. Mynderse and J. Shelton, “Assessment of an improved problem-based learning implementation in a senior/graduate mechatronic design course.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015.[17] K. Meah, “First-time experience of teaching a project-based mechatronics course.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[18] T. van Gog, L. Kester, and F. Paas, “Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 212 – 218, 2011.[19] O. Chen, S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller, “The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity,” Journal of Educational Psychology
course level assessment. In the present paper a newcourse level assessment model using formative course grading is presented. The primaryfocus of the method proposed herein is to strongly align the relationship between thecourse objectives, the various tasks that a student performs during a course, and themethods that are used to assess those tasks. This paper describes the establishment anduse of this approach on a trial basis for a single course.I. IntroductionThe ABET 2000 accreditation criteria require that an institution have in place acomprehensive outcomes assessment program to ensure the quality and continuousimprovement of the educational process1. There are two general levels of assessment2:• Course Level Assessment• Program Level
forsolidifying personal meaning and purpose. What better place than in higher education toaddress such monumental and multi-faceted questions? These are the issues that studentswant to discuss, since the answers they uncover play a significant role in shaping andmotivating their future careers and lives. The fields of science and engineering have ahuge role to play in this discussion, but they need other disciplines to join them at thetable. Engineering students in particular are well equipped to address such big questions,but they benefit greatly from dialogue with students and faculty in other areas. If the goalof higher education is to produce well-rounded and responsible professionals, theninstitutions should seriously consider addressing the issue
........................................................................................................................17 2.12 References ..........................................................................................................................17 2.13 Appendices [Parts List, Program Listings] .......................................................................17INTRODUCTIONLack of technical report writing skills is one of the most common deficiencies identified byemployers of engineering graduates [1]. This concern prompted the Engineering Accreditationbody, ABET, to include oral and written presentation skills in their list of criteria thatengineering education programs must satisfy in order to be accredited [2]. Villanova’s ECEdepartment also responded by stating in both CPE and EE Program objectives that students mustbe “able to
Wireless Automated Highway System: The AutoNet SuperProjectAbstractA Master’s Research Project, the culmination of the Master of Science in WirelessCommunications (MSWC) degree at National University, is normally completed within three tofour months. This paper discusses National University’s experience with an approach in whichresearch on various aspects of topics too complex to be completed within three months is to bepassed to successive groups of students.The initial project chosen for this approach is the AutoNet Progressive Research Project.“AutoNet” is a next-generation automobile traffic wireless network system for future “smartcars” that can both communicate with each other wirelessly, and be operated automatically
science(e.g., general chemistry, physical chemistry, and organic chemistry) and engineering sciences(e.g., mass and energy balances, thermodynamics, transport processes, reaction engineering,process dynamics and control). The student is then asked to synthesize this material in unitoperations and then the capstone design course. However, the majority of graduates are hired asProcess Engineers whose main focus is on production. Topics such as statistical process control,process capability and capability indices are essential to manufacture quality products at reducedcosts.1 In fact, upon accepting their first job offer, most entry level engineers, enroll in in-housestatistics related courses such as Practical Data Analysis, Statistical Process
, length and time scales, and the solutions are generally obtained bysophisticated experiments and computations that are difficult to explain. However, when theresult of a fluid flow simulation is presented as a visualization of the calculated flow field, itbecomes a powerful educational tool, giving students an idea of how the fluid behaves undermany different conditions. Although many Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software packages such as CFXand Fluent are available in the market, their availability to undergraduate engineering curriculumhas been limited due to the following reasons1: ‚" The software is targeted towards industrial users and the cost tends to be high ‚" The users must have access to powerful, high speed
Paper ID #43393Project-Based and Active Collaborative Learning to Teach Students AboutRenewable and Conventional Energy SystemsDr. Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver Dr. Roney is currently a Teaching Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Dr. Roney joined the University of Denver (DU) in Autumn 2014. Prior to joining DU, Dr. Roney held both industry and academic positions. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project Based and Active Collaborative Learning to Teach Students About Renewable and Conventional Energy SystemsProject Based Learning (PBL) and Active
of Table 1. The indicators in Table 1 were written to address a variety © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceof domains (cognitive, affective, and skills-based) and levels of complexity so that students areassessed throughout the development of their expertise [8].Performance indicators 3.1.1 and 3.2.1 were created as first steps with a lower level ofcomplexity. Students need to demonstrate an ability to be informed consumers of communicationwho able to understand and critique technical documents and presentations. With the rise ofartificial intelligence, these critiquing skills are critical for the next generation of engineeringstudents
recommendations are discussed in this paper. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Fig.1: Telephone Subscriber Loop EnvironmentIn this paper, Section 2 covers brief description of Telephone Subscriber Loop Environment,Section 3 briefly describes the Test Plan TR-048, Section 4 describes the Test Equipments,Automation Methods/General Algorithm. Section 5 includes the Conclusions while Section 6includes the references. The Appendix includes sample modem reports and some Sections of theBroadband Access Technologies Research Laboratory (BATRL).2. Telephone Subscriber Loop
Paper ID #10101An Autonomous Arduino-based Racecar for First-Year Engineering Technol-ogy StudentsDr. Warren Rosen, Drexel University (Eng.) Dr. Warren Rosen received his Ph.D. in physics from Temple University. Following graduation he served as assistant professor of physics at Colby and Vassar Colleges where he carried out research in optical physics, solar physics, and medical physics. During this time he was a visiting scientist at Kitt Peak National Observatory and a research scientist at Atmospheric and Environmental Research in Cambridge, MA. He then moved to the Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division in
semester with reasonable success.While the increases in second year retention are promising, the ultimate goal of the program is toincrease graduation rates at both the college and university levels. We will continue to monitorstudent progression through the math sequence and persistence in the CoE. Future work willinclude an assessment of students’ ability to successfully complete Calculus 2.[1] Klingbeil, N.W. et. al. “Rethinking Engineering Mathematics Education: A Model for Increased Retention,Motivation and Success in Engineering.” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, SaltLake City, Utah, June 2004.[2] Klingbeil, N., High, K., Keller, M., White, I., Brummel, B., Daily, J., Cheville, A. and Wolk, J., “The
to choosewhat aspect of the streamlined motorcycle fuel economy competition they would pursue andwhat they would design and fabricate to move the project forward. To assess their interest in andengagement in as well as their general impression of the project, they were asked to answerquestions on their interest in and engagement in the project at three different points in the projectas well as their overall reflection on the experience.Student Survey Response DataThe Four Survey Questions asked Students at the A. beginning, M. the middle, and F. finally atthe end of the REU experience:1. When you first saw the VT Student Engineering Education Collaboratory (SEEC) Project “Critical Engineering Challenges”, what did you think this project
campuses. Not onlyhas this technology been paramount to extending course offerings not generally available at the branchcampuses, but it has also directly benefited students who might not otherwise be able to travel the long distanceto the main campus for the course. In the Summer of 1995, the author taught a newly developed graduateIndustrial Engineering course entitled “Cost Management for Advanced Manufacturing” using ITV. This paperwill begin with a general overview of distance education and specifically describe ITV, the components makingup an ITV system and various advantages/disadvantages of the technology. It will discuss the necessarycomponents for effective instruction and learning along with recommendations as to the frequency and type
viable IAB is a requirement for each accreditedacademic program as outlined in Section 8 below: 8.1.1 SUPPORT FROM INDUSTRY 8.1.1.1 Provide evidence that the construction industry advisory committee is representative of potential employers of graduates of the degree program and other industry professionals. 8.1.1.2 Provide evidence that the construction industry advisory committee meets at least once a year for the purpose of advising and assisting the development and enhancement of the degree program. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
aspirations for growing the mechatronics curriculum. Afterreceiving student feedback from this course and improve the curriculum based on that feedback,we would like to develop a mechatronics course series that allow students to receive amechatronics minor to add concentration to their education before graduation. The course seriesmay address advanced mechatronics course topics such as embedded programming, processautomation, and wireless networks.Bibliography[1] M. K. Habib, "Mechatronics engineering the evolution, the needs and the challenges," IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 4510-4515, 2006.[2] S. M. K. a. S. A. Y. Das, "Work in progress-the outgrowth of mechatronics curriculum development efforts: an
apply CO_2: Select and implement basic and advanced methods of artificial intelligence CO_3: Design smart systems based on the methods of artificial intelligenceThe assessment methods comprise laboratory exercises and projects which integrate the conceptsfrom the topics listed earlier with software implementations using Python, Keras, TensorFlow,and/or Caffe platforms. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 3The course schedule is shown below in Table 1. There are twenty-eight sessions (two in a week)in the semester. Each session lasts eighty minutes. Table 1
act backing it(Clinger Cohen Act). Some of the Universities in US that have introduced this unitinclude National Defense University, University of North Texas, and U.C Berkeley. Ithas become as a general trend for more and more universities to consider enterprise Page 10.575.4architecture as a core curriculum [19]. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationOrganizations in US that offer courses dedicated to enterprise architecture [19]: • The National Defense University Information Resources
robust deployable structures [13].Megahed [8] provides a good overview of the origins and development of origami, itsgeometrical, structural and architectural capabilities. Evans et al. [3] gives a rigorous,comprehensive and thorough mathematical analysis of folding patterns, including the well-known Miura [9] and Yoshimura fold patterns. After understanding the geometricfundamentals of these forms, students in my course are encouraged explore the architecturalpotential and engineering strengths and weaknesses of these patterns. In general, knowledge ofplane geometry, fold-patterns, polyhedra and linkages would provide a solid foundation forstudents to pursue advanced origami-based projects.MaterialsViollet-le-Duc [14] noted that proper use of
Paper ID #6117Mentoring Engineering Students: Realities, Challenges, and RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili is an academician and a civil engineering consultant in Ames, Iowa. Has published in various fields including: geotechnical engineering, foundations, and pavement materials & design. He has been involved with contemporary engineering education issues, addressing a wide range of topics of interest and relevance to engineering institutions and practicing engineers, in the U.S. and abroad
able to continue to adapt to new trends and provide education to the next generation of students so as to arm them with the tools needed for the world as it will be, not as it is today.”The NAE report also states (p15) that there is “an undercurrent of awareness that current complexities are so daunting that tinkering at the edges—reforming one course, one program, one department at a time, developing isolated instances of success here and there — is no longer a viable response if we are to build the kind of robust programs in research and education now needed to strengthen the U.S. engineering community by 2020.”The need for a dramatic reform in engineering education is not something we are claiming, it is
supported most importantly by ourundergraduate and graduate engineering, engineering management and computingstudents at NJIT, and elsewhere in the world, who have worked through differentversions of our objects and helped us shaping it to its current, robust multi-platform(Apple Mac, OS 9 and OS X, PC Win 98, 2000, NT, XP, Linux and Unix compatible)format. Page 8.87.10We would like to thank for the continuous support of our students, the companies andProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education.organizations, and pleased to report
new manufacturing pathways by incorporating advanced technologiesand to prepare the next generation of workers through educational initiatives.The Additive Manufacturing (AM) Division is a leader in the additive manufacturing space, bringingtogether the equipment and technical expertise needed to foster academia and industry advancement.The AM lab houses more than $8 million in additive manufacturing equipment, including industrial 3Dprinters capable of processing metals, polymers, composites, biomaterials, and ceramics. They employ ateam of experts in the additive manufacturing space who leverage this equipment while fosteringcollaboration across disciplines to advance the technology and grow the 3D printing ecosystem in Ohio.The AM Division
it was educational and it will help all of us have a better understanding of what is going on around us.An excerpt from the one negative essay is quoted here: My ideas about science have undergone very little change due to this segment. Science has always been of great interest to me, particularly astronomy, chemistry, and zoology. My background in physical science has been very general, so this project was my first introduction to the practical aspects of physics. In this sense, therefore, my eyes were opened to a new field. I liked doing the projects, but I am not intrigued enough to pursue this courseEven then, the negative comment has more to do with the topic (in this case, the
communication/networks, multimedia bandwidth forecasting, smart grid applications, and engineering education.Dr. Youakim Al Kalaani P.E., Georgia Southern University Youakim Kalaani is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering in the Department of Electrical En- gineering at Georgia Southern University. Dr. Kalaani received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Cleveland State University (CSU). He graduated from CSU with M.S. and Doctoral degrees in Elec- trical Engineering with concentration in power systems. Dr. Kalaani is a licensed professional engineer (PE) and an ABET Program Evaluator (PA). He is a Member of IEEE and ASEE and has research interests in distributed power generations, optimization, and
Paper ID #35057Experiential Learning through Undergraduate Research on a Roadway En-ergyHarvesting Design (WIP) ASEE NCSMs. Sabrina Martin, University of Pittsburgh An undergraduate mechanical engineering student at the University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Tony Kerzmann’s higher education background began with a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University, as well as a Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, Dr. Kerzmann began his career as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at Robert
many to pursue a career in Robotics; whileothers opt to take elective courses at the undergraduate level to get some exposure to the field.Robotic courses teaching the fundamentals often cover topics involving rigid transformations,forward/inverse kinematics, dynamics, control, and mobile kinematics. These topics are oftenmore reserved for graduate-level students as they require a strong mathematical background andcan be perceived as abstract without proper simulations and animations. To mitigate this problema popular Robotics Toolbox was created [1] that contains a collection of MATLAB functions thatperform many mathematical operations required in robotics. It provides tools to analyze serialmanipulators and mobile robotics. It also provides
following research lines: conceptual understanding of students on subjects of physics, transfer of understanding between the different areas of knowledge, use of tech- nology in learning, impact of using innovative learning environments and development of assessment tools. He has 76 articles in refereed journals and conferences, over 450 citations according to the ISI Web of Science, 6 books, 13 book chapters, 139 national and international presentations in countries like Korea, Denmark, Hungary, Cuba, United States, Chile, Ecuador and Argentina and 29 international work- shops in Mexico, Chile, Argentina and Italy. Genaro Zavala was appointed to the editorial board of the Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education
Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Evaluating Improved Program-Level Assessment and the Subsequent Influence on Associate Constructor ExamAbstractThe American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) requires all accredited constructionprograms to demonstrate a direct assessment of twenty Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs).Before graduation, many construction programs require students to take the American Institute ofConstructors (AIC) Associate Constructor (AC) exam, where SLOs will be assessed at thenational level. There has been some discussion in the literature regarding an improvement toprogram-level SLO assessment to increase the overall AC exam