engineering technology in the United States that educates students to step intocareers in the new Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology field.One of the most important subjects in engineering and technology programs is manufacturing.Manufacturing involves a complex system of materials, machines and people. Most subjects ofthe curriculum in manufacturing focus on teaching the fundamentals of current materials (i.e.,metals, ceramics, composites, and petroleum based plastics) and processes; however, fewprepare students to work with a broad range of new/future materials, particularly green materials(such as, green nano-materials, biodegradable polymers, and ecofriendly-hybrid materials) inadvanced manufacturing technology. The primary goal of the study
), which was established at CIT in 1997 forthis collaborative approach, is described. Then, two case studies are introduced illustrating thenature of industry-academia cooperation and the use of real world cases resulting from suchcooperation to educate manufacturing professionals for Japanese industries.Our preliminaryexperiences with this new curriculum and approach to educating manufacturing professionals atChiba Institute of Technology in Japan since its implementation in 1997 is also presented in theconclusions.1. IntroductionIn the past, engineering education in Japanese Universities followed the classical model (1)-(3) oflecture methods and laboratory experiments to illustrate and reinforce the basic principles ofscience and technology. In
Producing Enterprise5“Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engineering of a Product Producing Enterprise” body ofknowledge (BOK) developed by SME, manufacturing engineers need to be prepared andcompetent in four thrust areas: (i) materials and manufacturing processes, (ii) product, tooling,and assembly engineering, (iii) manufacturing systems and operations, and (iv) manufacturing Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © American Society for Engineering Education 4competitiveness5. In addition, a good manufacturing engineering curriculum has to have to astrong foundation in mathematical and science preparation, and personal effectiveness
Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 43. No. 9, pp. 871-877, 2003.26. Information Systems Engineering Program at Georgia Tech, E-Manufacturing, E- Business, E-Engineering Design, 2005, URL: http://www.isye.gatech.edu/information/index.html.27. Chiou, R., Kwon, Y., Rauniar, S. and Sosa, H., “Laboratory Enhancement through NSF/Industrial Partnership for Manufacturing Engineering Technology Undergraduate Curriculum,” American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Section Spring 2005 Conference on the Evolution and Innovation in the Engineering Classroom, Teaneck, NJ, USA, April 2005.28. Lohse, N., Ratchev, S. and Valtchanov, G., “Towards Web-enabled design of modular
degree program, much ofwhich continues to be used in both two year and four year colleges, as well as in high schoolsand technical schools. As part of the curriculum development effort, the NCME producedpowerful tools for faculty to create their own activity-based classroom materials. Thus,METEC’s pedagogical roots and its mission of serving educators goes back more than a decade,during which time it has had an impact on manufacturing and engineering technology facultynationwide. (NOTE: while this presentation focuses on METEC, it is worth noting that theNCME offers a variety of products and services to enhance teaching and learning, such as:webinars on selected topics highlighting emerging technologies; professional developmentworkshops in
Manufacturing Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 3, 1998, pp. 211-214. 9. “Manufacturing Education for the 21st Century,” vol. I, Curricula 2000 Report, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1995.10. “Manufacturing Education for the 21 st Century,” vol. III, Preparing World-Class Manufacturing Professionals, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1996.11. Rogers, D. M.J. Stratton and R.E. King, “Manufacturing Education Plan: 1999 Critical Competency Gaps,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) and SME Education Foundation, Dearborn, MI, 1999.12. Roberds, R.M., “Developing an Integrated Curriculum in Science for Higher Education,” Failure &
field of manufacturing. Specifically, the colleges targeted industryperceptions of the competency gaps that are commonly seen in newly hired graduates. Thisfollowed the report entitled “Manufacturing Education Plan: 1999 Critical Competency Gaps” bythe Society of Manufacturing Engineers4, 5. In interviews, manufacturing and human resourcemanagers in diverse industries cited the need for a workforce with a continuum of technical skillsto meet the demands of new technology and increased domestic and international competition.The findings of the study appear in Table I. Table I. Competency Gaps to be addressed by PRIME Competency Gap Institution
Session 3263 Using Design Contests to Enhance Manufacturing Education Devdas M. Pai, Juri Filatovs & Richard Layton North Carolina A&T State UniversityAbstractSynthesis and design of new materials, devices and processes is typically consideredthe capstone of the engineering education experience. Design contests of one sort oranother proliferate engineering societies of all disciplines. Less emphasis is placedon manufacturing - the basic enabling technology required to reduce art to part.For curricula that allocate insufficient curricular credits for courses explicitlylabeled as
projectselection and execution. Finally, students would be prepared to offer recommendations andsuggestions for the selected business on manufacturing processes. As with any instructional and curriculum material, a course in Six Sigma methodologyshould also provide a means of assessing outcomes and student learning. This paper willpresent and discuss these issues and should be of great interest to those educators who wish tooffer instructions on this topic. Page 11.508.2 Key words: Six Sigma, Yellow Belts, Green Belts, Black Belts, Master Black Belts,process management, DMAIC, ANOVA, SIPOC analysis, VoC (voice of the customer) analysis,CTQ
. Engineering: An Overview,” The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, Fall 2005, National Academy of Engineering, pp. 5-12.11. Swearengen, J.C., S. Barnes, S. Coe, C. Reinhardt, K. Subramanian, “Globalization and the Undergraduate Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 2002, pp. 255-261.12. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (2004),” National Academy of Engineering, available at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309091624/html/, last visited January 2006.13. “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century”, National Academy of Engineering, 2005. Available at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html (phase I) and http
., Barnes, S., Coe, S., Reinhard, C., and Subramania, K., “Globalization and the Undergraduate Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum,” 2002, ASEE Journal of Engineering Education 91, pp. 255-261.[2] National Association of Manufacturing, “Keeping America Competitive: How A Talent Shortage Threats U.S. Manufacturing,” a white paper on http://www.nam.org/~/media/Files/s_nam/docs/226500/226411.pdf.ashx, accessed October 6, 2008.[3] Bee, D., and Meyer, B., “Opportunities and Challenges for Manufacturing Engineering,” 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24-27, 2007, Honolulu, HI.[4] Waldorf, D., Alptekin, S., and Bjurman, R., “Plotting a Bright Future for Manufacturing
increase as the scientificunderstanding of the students increases through their undergraduate career. In addition tocontent changes, curriculum changes will use pedagogical innovations advocated by the NSF-funded Foundation Coalition (FC), one of eight engineering education coalitions:active/cooperative learning, technology-enabled learning and student teams. Further, theprincipal investigators will use the lessons about processes of curricular change gained from theFC experiences. As a result, many engineering students will become better acquainted with thepossibilities offered by nanotechnology, and some engineering students will gain an in-depthunderstanding of nanoscale manufacturing processes.The envisioned curricular change has four
and team development, personnel issues, financial issues, and assessment.This paper focuses on the SAE projects, but all function in a similar manner. A companionpaper documents the solar car.5 There may be more or less senior design effort depending on thedepartment that is primarily responsible for the project. The ASME and SAE projects tend to befocused in the Mechanical Engineering department, the solar car and the IEEE Robot are focusedin the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, and the concrete canoe is focused in theCivil and Environmental Engineering department.(3) Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Production“To those who want to see real improvement in American education, I say: There will be norenaissance without
/~kcorbett/LWTL/ENGR120/schedule.html, access on Jan-23-2019.7 Hall, D. E., Cronk, S. R., Brackin, P. D., Barker, J. M., Crittenden, K. B., “Living with theLab: A Curriculum to Prepare Freshman Students to Meet the Attributes of The Engineer of2020,” 2008 American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.8 Student Project in MANE 205, Virginia State University, Fall 2018.9 Zhenhua Wu, Marthony Hobgood, Mathias Wolf, “Energy Mapping and Optimization inRough Machining of Impellers”, ASME 11th International Manufacturing Science andEngineering Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia Tech, Virginia, 2016.10 Zhenhua Wu, Nasser Ghariban, 2015, “PLM Based Design Manufacturing and ProcessMonitoring for Impellers,” 122nd
AC 2011-1971: RECONFIGURABLE AND SCALABLE AUTOMATED SYS-TEMS PROJECTS FOR MANUFACTURING AUTOMATION AND CON-TROL EDUCATIONSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano man- ufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and
Paper ID #15498Social Network Platforms in Educational Settings: A Network Analysis Ap-proach to Analyze Online Student InteractionsProf. Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Tseng is a Professor and Chair of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering at UTEP. His research focuses on the computational intelligence, data mining, bio- informatics and advanced manu- facturing. Dr. Tseng published in many refereed journals such as IEEE Transactions, IIE Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA
induction by human interaction,” Mach. Learn., vol. 23, no. 2–3, pp. 163–189, 1996.[6] J. Aleotti and S. Caselli, “Robust trajectory learning and approximation for robot programming by demonstration,” Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 409–413, 2006.[7] B. Matthias, S. Kock, H. Jerregard, M. Kallman, I. Lundberg, and R. Mellander, “Safety of collaborative industrial robots: Certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept,” in 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM), 2011, pp. 1–6.[8] K. Devine and L. Reifschneider, “Agile robotic work cells for teaching manufacturing engineering,” in Proceedings of the 116th American Society for Engineering Education Conference
leadership workshops were arranged and delivered during the Industrial,Manufacturing and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Day. The paper is aimed at integrating greenenergy into the manufacturing engineering curriculum and to cultivate leaders in the field amongminority and female engineering students. Successful completion of the course will lead toexcellence in green energy and advanced engineering education. Keywords: Project Based Learning, Leadership Workshop, Green Energy, Green Manufacturing, Engineering EducationINTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Green Energy today, is not only seen as a trend in industries but also as a tool to addressmany sustainability issues along with increased educational opportunities and
Paper ID #34833An Online Learning Community to Conduct Collaborative Education andInnovation in Renewable Energy, Environment, and ManufacturingDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses
Paper ID #37075Non-traditional Delivery of Hands-on ManufacturingCoursesIsmail Fidan (Professor) Dr. Fidan serves as a Professor in the Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Technology at Tennessee Technological University. His research and teaching interests are in additive manufacturing, electronics manufacturing, distance learning, and STEM education. Dr. Fidan is a member and active participant of SME, ASEE, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Journal of Engineering Technology, Journal of Advanced
university departments such as Education, Physics,Curriculum and Instruction, and the Office of Cultural Diversity, and also by a consultant from themanufacturing industry. The insight and the input provided by these consultants have been valuable forimproving the course.6. CONCLUSIONS In this poster session, the details of an innovative course on manufacturing systems that gives non-engineering students an opportunity to learn, appreciate, and understand the role manufacturing plays in today’ssociety and the potential it has for career opportunities was discussed. The course has been innovativelydesigned to accommodate the different learning styles of students and teaching styles of instructors. This courseis currently being offered as a
Manufacturing Engineering has published a series of videocassettes on Leanmanufacturing. These tapes have been incorporated into the training program at strategiclocations. In addition, videocassettes on 5S from the Productivity inc. also have beenincorporated into the curriculum. These tapes provide real life examples of leanimplementation by companies both inside USA and abroad. Page 8.422.6Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationIX. Testing the Course Modules The training program has been tested in
. Page 11.1433.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Virtual Prototyping: A Bridge between Design and ManufacturingAbstractThis paper intends to study integration of design curriculum and manufacturing curriculum viavirtual prototyping. Design and manufacturing are two important subject areas in mostengineering schools. Various courses are offered in these two areas. However under the currentcurriculum setting, the design program and manufacturing program have been developeddiscretely without regard to the potential benefits provided by the integration of both of them dueto lack of a curricular bridge to properly link them together.Virtual prototyping, which is also called dynamic
undergraduate students at Stony Brook. Since becoming the Associate Dean of CEAS, he has been leading and/or participating in various curriculum initiatives such as SUNY Korea, the new Civil Engineering, 5-year BE/MS, and Mechatronics programs. He is also responsible for College-wide ABET assessment and accreditation. Professor Kao has received Student Service Award and Center for Prevention and Outreach Partnership Award. He is co-author of a book chapter ”Pedagogical Use of Video Podcast in Higher Education: Teaching, Learning and Assessment”, In Ubiquitous Learning: A Survey of Applications, Research, and Trends, edited by Terry Kidd & Irene Chen, Published by Information Age Publishing. Being the Director of the
LearningAdditional guidance came from an examination of the best practices and curriculum content ofexemplar manufacturing engineering programs in the U.S. These included Brigham YoungUniversity, General Motors Institute (now Kettering University) and Worchester PolytechnicInstitute. Based on the input from the abovementioned sources and the specific stakeholders ofthe Texas State University Manufacturing Engineering program, the mission statement,educational objectives, and educational outcomes were developed.Mission StatementAfter several revisions made in consultation with the program’s stakeholders, the Texas StateUniversity Manufacturing Engineering Mission Statement was created. The Mission Statementfor the program is:Our mission is• To sustain a
. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(4), p. 628-636.4. Anderson, E., Taraban, R., and Sharma, M. P. (2005) Implementing and Assessing Computer-Based ActiveLearning Materials in Introductory Thermodynamics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(6), p.1168-1176.5. Gurbuz, R. (2004) Web-Based Curriculum Development of a Manufacturing Technology Programme.International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(4), p. 566-577.6. Huang, S., Su, Q., Samant, N., and Khan, I. (2001) Development of a Web-Based Integrated ManufacturingLaboratory. Computer Applications in Engineering Education.7. Ozer, T., Kenworthy, M., Brisson, J. G., Cravalho, E. G., and McKinley, G. H. (2003) On Developments inInteractive Web-Based Learning Modules in a
manufacturingengineering/technology educators and practitioners access and use it in their dailylectures/operations. The findings of the summer research study and its implementation in amanufacturing course are reported in this paper.2. IntroductionRETainUS program contributes to advancing the manufacturing base in the U.S. throughmeaningful changes in the teachers' understanding of manufacturing and how it relates to theMath and Science curriculum. This program aims at improving the teachers' comprehension ofthe research and development process through hands-on experience and real world problems thatrelate to: a) advancing the state of the art in conventional manufacturing processes; b) new trendsin manufacturing such as rapid prototyping, c) emerging
the mechanism. Theuse of Mathematica enhances the students understanding of the mechanism design process, whilethe use of I-DEAS gives the students an appreciation for the ease with which physically realisticmodels can be generated using high end solid modeling packages.I. IntroductionThe past twenty years has seen a rapid advancement in the capability of computer-aided designtools. Commercial software is readily available to assist with all phases of the design processfrom ideation though synthesis and analysis, detail design and testing to prototype andproduction. Computer-aided design tools have become an essential part of the modern designand manufacturing environment and engineering curricula has evolved to include instruction inthis
agents, agent-based manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently an Assistant Professor in the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America. Page 20.5.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Assessment of Remote Laboratory Practices in
. (N.W) • “ …. detailing the total cost for an entirely new manufacturing company was eye opening. … If I were to ever start my own business, this is very useful course.” (D.S.) • “I am really happy with the amount of material that I learned in this class.” (R.B.)5. ConclusionThe proposed curriculum had student progress through key steps that are required whenpursuing a new idea and starting a new business. Those steps range from the development ofnew product or service to the design of the facility and floor plan and the determination of thenumbers of machines and workers that are required. As the last step of this course, studentswere required to complete a PowerPoint presentation that represented a business