. NJIT has found that an integrated approach to address issuesof communication skills, pedagogical techniques, and cultural issues has served well to enhancethe services provided to faculty, staff, and most importantly to undergraduate students.NJIT had a total Fall 2006 enrollment of 8, 209 students, with 433 doctoral students and 2,396master's students. Half of all master's students are full-time. About 85% of the doctoralstudents are full-time with a large percentage of those international students. In any given year,about 180-200 graduate students, almost all doctoral, will serve as Teaching Assistants.Anywhere from 20 to 40 new TAs with international backgrounds may begin their service each
2013.When appropriate, comparisons will be made to a non-flipped section of the same course fromFall 2012.The purpose of the study is to determine if the flipped classroom structure is acceptable tostudents, and to discover student opinions about the pedagogy. The author wished to understandany flaws in the flipped classroom implementation and determine if the process was in any waydetrimental to the learning experience. As the results demonstrate, students were initiallyhesitant but open-minded about the flipped classroom experience, and in the end showed anoticeable appreciation for the modified course layout.Choosing the Flipped ClassroomPrior to the study, the author participated in a faculty learning community (FLC) that researchedthe
large quantitiesof new proposals which will make the model much more interesting and hopefully valuable asthe numbers get larger.Adding Workload ConsiderationsThe simple model discussed above considers only total funding. The ability to actually carry outthe proposed research work will be dependent on the ability to free up the resources necessaryfor the project. Faculty and graduate student time being the most immediate concern, we addthese to the model next. The full time equivalent (FTE) effort required for research projects isoften not directly correlated to the total amount of funding. Grant proposals can containsignificant capital equipment items, subcontracts, indirect cost, cost-share and other items. So itis possible to have very large
student additional XP (effectively extra credit), butalso another resource, called Reputation. While reputation did not affect a student’s gradedirectly, by working collectively with other students in their guild, students could poolReputation to effectively ‘win’ the game. In this context, the guild with the most reputation at theend of the semester was allowed to choose from several rewards (dinner out with the faculty, theability to choose an experiment the following semester, a small boost to one of their best grades,etc.). Optional tasks were ones that the instructors thought would benefit the students, but inpractice, without incentivization, few students attempted. Examples include peer evaluation oftheir work, seeking out and using
normativedifferences across departments concerning how much students were expected to be self-directed.For example, with the largest number of students, electrical engineering faculty need students tobe more self-directed while faculty in departments with far lower student: faculty ratios couldafford to engage in more “hand-holding.” Obviously, students who themselves prefer to be self-directed may find “hand-holding” stifling, while those who need more assistance—such as thosewho lack adequate preparation for a new course of study—will feel that their advisor isinadequate when they are expected to be more self-sufficient.Mentors’ assessments of the Bridge Program’s level of support to them—for those with studentsin cohort one and/or two—differed greatly
Paper ID #8570An Integrated Approach to Developing Technical Communication Skills inEngineering StudentsProf. Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven. He leads the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits and implemented a similar program in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University when he was the chair there. Dr. Harichandran received his BE in Civil Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, and his MS and PhD from MIT. He was a faculty member
academia requires a diverse set of abilities. Grayand Armstrong (2003) recommend that “A future dean must have vision and enthusiasm to leadchange, be cognizant of trends, create flexible business plan, recognize new opportunities andserve as a catalyst for change”.10 The research suggests that high level administrative positionsare in a state of evolution which involves many issues, including the vision to lead faculty.Stevenson recommends that this group of administrators must take full advantage of theknowledge outcomes for both faculty and students.Academic leaders at the Department Head/Chair (DH/C) level are leaders who spend a largeamount of time managing conflict, which not only involves those they manage but also theirequals and those
including engineering educationresearchers in the rotation of technical speakers, we created opportunities for faculty learning aswell as enhancing student buy-in. We brought in faculty from other universities and departments,not only to learn from them, but to learn together, as we found that the most engaging and usefulworkshops were those that opened up discussions of concerns and shifted into generativediscussions of ways faculty could resolve their concerns and try out new approaches [34]. Thisapproach supported faculty beyond the guiding team to engage in inquiry about their teachingand its effect on learning [35]. In addition, early in the project, through external evaluation, wediscovered a covert value: all of our faculty expressed that
. Gu is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at New York Institute of Technology. Prior to join- ing the NYIT faculty, she was an Associate Professor of Health Informatics at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. She is a research associate of Structural Analysis of Biomedical Ontologies Center at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Dr. Gu’s research interests include controlled terminolo- gies, ontologies, object-oriented modeling, conceptual modeling, data mining, and medical informatics with an emphasis on controlled biomedical terminologies. Dr. Gu’s research has been supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH), the UMDNJ foundation, PDR network, and NYIT ISRC grants. She has
challenges involved withmanufacturing of pharmaceutical products, and thus help educate future generations of students,helping create a strong pipeline of talented students interested in pursuing careers in engineeringand science.The ERC-SOPS is a four-university project, involving about 30 faculty, with a central systems-oriented theme of developing a model-predictive, integrated framework for systematicallydesigning materials, composites, and the processes used to manufacture them. The NJIT ERCincludes seven faculty members, who mentor research projects aligned with three main researchthrusts: 1) A New Manufacturing Science for Structured Organic Particulates, 2) CompositeStructuring and Characterization of Organic Particulates, and 3) Particle
evaluate teaching offaculty members based on three factors: (a) student evaluations, (b) peer faculty observations and(c) grade distributions (see Fig 1).Fig 1: Three sources of data which are input to our descriptive tool for flagging faculty: (a)Student evaluation of teaching, (b) Peer evaluation of teaching and (c) Grade distributionby faculty.This output provided by the descriptive tools is then used to flag those individuals for furtherreview and provide them with support and resources (for e.g. summer teaching workshops) tohelp improve their performance. Additionally, we have seen that clustering helps identify anysystematic issues or patterns in the data that may be contributing to poor performance, such as aninstructor's communication
. Citing the work of Alicia Dowd et al. at the Center for UrbanEducation at the University of Southern California, the NAE report (2012) goes on to state thattransfer assistance in the form of scholarships, the availability of mentoring, and the “culture,values, and beliefs of faculty” increase the number of community college students transferring tofour-year STEM degree programs. A number of additional issues critical in increasing STEMtransfer rates are suggested by the report, including the transparency of information about STEMcareer paths and the availability of effective articulation agreements. The support provided tostudents is especially critical in states like New Mexico, where students face a number ofeducational and economic challenges
technicians is a growing concern inBurlington County and throughout New Jersey. Manufacturers in the state of New Jersey employapproximately 345,000 workers, 10% of the private sector workforce [1]. In Burlington Countyalone, over 20,500 people are employed by manufacturing companies [2]. Although some areaswithin the manufacturing sector have declined in recent years, there continues to be a strongdemand for highly-specialized technicians who can bring critical technology skills to themanufacturing environment in order to affect operational efficiencies and cost reductions. Forexample, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (2004) [3] projectsthat demand for industrial engineering technicians (Associates degree holders) within
effects in aspects such as “academic performance,scientific baccalaureate attainment, acceptance into a scientific graduate program, andlonger-term scientific workforce participation” [13]. However, according to Pierszalowski andcolleagues [14], the obstacles to engaging in research as undergraduate students have to do withdifferent aspects including Institutional issues linked to 1) physical resource issues andlimitations, 2) lack of course-based research opportunities, 3) lack of institutional commitmentto undergraduate research opportunities, and 4) lack of advertisement regarding the benefits ofparticipating in research including networking, and skill development, and 5) lack of diversitywithin academic faculty. A second layer has to do with
Paper ID #16483Student Success through College of Engineering Freshman Year ExperienceProgramProf. John Ross Tapia, New Mexico State University John Ross Tapia has a focus on student engagement and success for all students in their coursework. John Ross is an assistant professor with the Engineering Technology Department at New Mexico State University. He teaches Civil Engineering Technology courses and is the faculty lead for the Freshman Year Experience/ENGR100 course. His research focus is engineering education. Prior to working at NMSU, John worked at New Mexico’s first Early College High school and helped develop the
., Promoting academic resilience in multicultural America:Factors affecting student success. New York: Peter Lang, 2004.[9] E. E. Morales, “A Focus on Hope: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory of AcademicResiliency Among At-Risk Minority Students,” Journal of at-risk issues, vol.14, issue 1, pp. 23-32, 2008[10] Y.S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, “Naturalistic inquiry,” Sage,1985.
support from A Scholarship Program to Increase Retention in Engineering (ASPIRE):Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the program was to increase retention ofsophomore and junior engineering students who show academic promise but are at risk of notcompleting their studies due to financial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. Inaddition to financial support, ASPIRE provided scholarship recipients with opportunities toparticipate in activities that contribute to persistence such as tutoring, faculty mentoring,conferences, presentations and career planning workshops. Sixty-one students have beenawarded scholarships in this five-year period.This paper examines the effectiveness of ASPIRE to help students alleviate financial
culturally relevant approaches could make adifference in the academic performance and future of the minoritized student college population.IntroductionEducational experiences in rigorous engineering programs are deeply influential on a student’slived experience and future in terms of identity, sense of purpose, and professional opportunities.Students experience engineering programs in several ways; one is to reward those who can scoregood enough grades in prescribed coursework thus proceeding in the program and the other wayreflects those who experience programs that support creative and innovative problem-solving.The author in [1] described the issues engineering programs face concerning the retention andgraduation of at-risk engineering students
Paper ID #25370Ethical Reasoning in First-Year Engineering DesignMr. Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico Amir Hedayati is an Assistant Professor at Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program at College of University Libraries & Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico. He received a Ph.D. in Human Resource Development from University of Illinois. He has a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology and an M.B.A. degree from University of Tehran. He has presented his research in past years at multiple conferences including American Society for Engineering
. Page 12.880.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Independent Student Design Competitions and the Assessment DilemmaAbstractOne of the most difficult assessment problems for faculty is student design competitions whereonly one or maybe two teams participate for independent study. Students are excited andfocused on the possibility of winning. The faculty is usually concerned with process andassessment in the context of a project and program not of their design. The issues are multipliedwhen you combine the problems of team assessment with a small sample pool of participants.This paper presents a case study in process and assessment for a single team of four independentstudy students that entered the 2005-2006 Airport Security
of this course since then. He is currently leading a multi-disciplinary team of faculty from TCNJ’s School of Engineering and the Department of Sociology forassessment of the Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE). Professor Sepahpour did his undergraduatestudies at TCNJ and has advanced degrees from New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He is therecipient of two (2) Best Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Divisions of Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies (DE-LOS). He has served as the Chair of the Divisions of ME and DELOS of the ASEE. Prof. Sepahpour isan active member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and ASEE and has publishedand
. In discussions with students and even with many faculty, the role of chemistry is oftenviewed narrowly in terms of the chemistry topics alone. The purpose of this study is to explorehow the number of chemistry courses taken and the performance in freshman chemistry affectsperformance in early engineering courses.Engineering students at the University of New Haven have different requirements for freshmanchemistry depending on their particular discipline. All engineering students are required to takeat least one freshman chemistry course. Students in chemical and civil engineering are requiredto take two, students in mechanical and system engineering have an option of biology or asecond course in chemistry and students in electrical and
help people andimprove society8.The Medibotics pre-engineering curricula incorporates grade-appropriate prototypes of roboticsurgeries into secondary school curricula providing students with hands-on experiences thatsimulate real-world problems to encourage their interest in engineering and informationtechnology and provide information on careers in these fields9. Curriculum modules that arealigned with the New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards (NJCCCS) and nationalstandards have been developed. Faculty and graduate students, along with the Center for Pre-College Program (CPCP) staff, worked with two cohorts of teachers from public and parochialschools in urban areas of North and Central New Jersey, to integrate the Medibotics
Paper ID #28265An Ethics Case Study for Engineering Technology StudentsDr. Barbara L Christe, State University of New York, Farmingdale Barbara Christe is a professor and the Dean of the School of Engineering Technology at Farmingdale State College, recently arriving on Long Island after 20 years at Purdue University in Indianapolis, Indiana. As a clinical engineer with degrees in biomedical engineering, she has authored several books exploring the branch of engineering technology that supports the safe and effective use of medical equipment in the clinical setting. In addition, Dr Christe’s research has explored the
research experience.1.2. The Grand Challenges Water Science Communication FellowshipThe Grand Challenges Water Science Communication Fellowship was developed to increaseundergraduate involvement in research pertinent to one of the leading geographical issues facedin New Mexico, sustainable water resources. Water shortages, inequitable distribution of thewater supply, and increasing water demand with a growing economy are all complex issuesfaced by the state. This issue has been designated a “Grand Challenge” by the University of NewMexico, meaning it is relevant on a regional, national, and global scale and requiresinterdisciplinary communication to implement solutions [9]. The Fellowship was designed toplatform research being conducted at the
arrangements permit high school students to take college classesdelivered by university faculty on the university’s campus. Neither of these options met therequirements of Purdue University. Concurrent enrollment with high school teachers was aconcern due to the level of education and experience required for teaching at Purdue University.Adherence to University-level course content, academic rigor, and faculty preparation wereimportant aspects in program delivery. Second, while an on campus delivery made PurdueUniversity courses a possibility for high school students, very few were geographically closeenough to campus to take advantage of the opportunity. The challenge was to create amechanism that would satisfy Purdue’s concerns regarding a high
State University Mr. Campbell currently serves as Senior Program Manager at New Mexico State University’s Engineering New Mexico Resource Network in Albuquerque, NM where he manages statewide pollution prevention, energy efficiency and recycling outreach programs. The Network provides information on pollution pre- vention and energy efficiency for New Mexico businesses, communities and Tribes. Chris has authored and managed sixteen EPA Pollution Prevention grants since 1999 (totaling over $2.8 million) providing outreach and training on rural and Borderland P2 issues. Chris implements on-site presentations and training for a variety of industrial sectors on pollution prevention, energy efficiency and Lean &
, ournext steps are to develop an action plan that gives voice to counternarratives and brings truthsabout student experiences to the forefront of departmental decision making and climate work. Inthis way, we will create social justice action from the applied research effort we report at ASEE.Some possible mechanisms for creating dialog with faculty in computing at the universityinclude a) sharing current counternarratives with faculty with opportunity for discussion in afaculty meeting, b) proposing communications changes to departmental staff and leadership toclarify opportunities in the CS department, and c) developing student climate survey instrumentsthat relate to concerns demonstrated in counternarratives. We recognize issues of power
research in speech technology.Prof. Christopher David LeBlanc, University of New Hampshire Christopher D. LeBlanc is currently the Program Coordinator and Assistant Professor for the Engineering Technology program at the University of New Hampshire Manchester campus. Prior to his faculty ap- pointment he spent 16 years at International Business Machines (IBM) as an Analog Mixed Signal design engineer.Prof. Theodore Sean Tavares, University of New Hampshire The author is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Program located at the Manchester campus of the University of New Hampshire. He has held this position since the fall of 2014 following more than 20 years of industry experience. His
decision support, and data analysis. She authored ”Objective-C and iOS Programming: A simplistic Approach”Dr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted