structures that are in the open atmosphere are subjected to self-weight and wind loads. Theinvestigation of an industrial pressure vessel can be vital from the security perspective based onits configuration such as its buttress at the base level and wind speeds. In this study, an industrialpressure vessel with a relatively low aspect ratio (height versus width) subjected to varying‘steady’ wind loads has been analyzed to check for its dynamic stability. The pressure vessel inthis current condition is standing on its three equidistant legs. The pressure vessel is assumed tobe filled with material to simulate critical condition in the case of static and strength analysis.SolidWorks and ANSYS software were used to compare the results of this analysis
]. Theoreticalcontributions may be made as part of the experimental research, but the primary focus is onexposing the students to a positive experience and allowing them to apply new knowledge, whilepreparing them for their future. Another program focuses on having students be involved infunded research projects [3]. In this latter case, students work on unanswered questions that arecrucial elements of research investigations currently underway [3]. In several programs, it iscommon for the URP student to have a peer advisor. In some instances, the undergraduate maybe assisting a graduate student on research and the graduate student acts as the advisor [6].The publish materials on assessment and evaluation of URP experiences primarily focus on the
to solve such a problem, we introduce MATH 101, an innovativeremedial mathematics course for first-year engineering students. The main objective of thiscourse is to reinforce the student’s mathematical background while taking into account hisparticular strengths and areas of opportunity. To achieve this, MATH 101 has two keycharacteristics: it is virtual and adaptive [4], i.e., the course platform designs a unique learningpath [5] for each student based upon a diagnostic test and constant assessment.In addition to the features mentioned above, it is important to note that MATH 101 is acombination of audiovisual material and teaching-learning activities. We selected each activitybased on our experience with active methodologies [6, 7] and the
" is accomplished by bringing computers into each of the remote WHETS and BENclassrooms before a laboratory session. In the following sections each one of these componentsis presented in detail.II.1. The WHETS systemToday the Internet is successfully being used by many institutions to deliver distance education,including environmental engineering courses3, a statics course4, construction education5, acomputer vision course6, an engineering materials course7, and a course on wave theory8.Laboratory classes such as ME 475, with specialized hardware requirements, can be taught at a Page 5.356.3distance if the students at the distant sites can
complex mathematical operationssuch as convolution integral and sum, Fourier series and transform, differential and differenceequations, Laplace transform and z-transform. The topic of how to use computer software suchas MATLAB and MATHCAD as well as hands-on activities involving hardware to enhancestudent learning in Signals and Systems has been discussed by many engineering educators [6][7] [8]. In as early as 2000, Aburdene et. al. proposed interactive laboratories using MATLABprograms linked to a Microsoft Word document (a “notebook”) so that formatted text, executableMATLAB code, and plots of simulation results were all integrated in one interactive document[8]. This idea can now be realized using MATLAB live script (released by MathWorks in
: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.Yang, J., Park, E., and Sang, A.L. (2019). “Associations Between Hand Hygiene Education and Self-Reported Hand-Washing Behaviors Among Korean Adults During MERS-CoV Outbreak.” Healtheducation & behavior, 46 (1), 157–164.Rachel Mosier © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceRachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University and has been with theuniversity since 2014. Mosier is licensed as a professional engineer in Construction Engineeringwith experience as a structural engineer consultant. Mosier worked as a project manager for theCity of Oklahoma City specifically on
site as well as administration of registration,travel arrangements, and reimbursement.The intended final products were enhanced hands-on experience and new knowledge of theundergraduate and graduate student participants in the areas of wireless communications,software-defined radio, cognitive radio, and spectrum sharing / spectrum access, as well as afoundation for an ongoing contest that will use continuously evolving tools to enable educatinggenerations of undergraduate and graduate electrical and computer engineering students inwireless communications using relevant scenarios.3.2 ActivitiesActivities related to the competition included development of an open-source, ready-to-runreference waveform implemented using an open source SDR
PolyFS: An Extensible, Underspecified, Pedagogical File System and Disk Emulator Foaad Khosmood and Phillip Nico California Polytechnic State University foaad@calpoly.edu / pnico@calpoly.eduAbstractIn recent years, teaching file systems at the undergraduate level has become increasinglychallenging. File systems, while essential to most computer systems, are almost never offered asan exclusive required course for a computer science curriculum. The topic is usually taught aspart of a course on operating systems (OS), along with other introductory topics such as processmanagement, scheduling, concurrency, deadlocks
Paper ID #32500Classroom Talking PointsDr. John Sangster P.E., Northeastern University Dr. Sangster is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the First Year Engineering program at Northeastern University. Prior to joining Northeastern in 2018, he served for three years as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Nebraska. He received his Ph.D. in 2015 from Virginia Tech in Civil Engineering with a focus on Transportation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Classroom Talking PointsJohn Sangster, PE, Ph.D
capacities including serving as learning coordinator for two international faculty learning projects, collaborating as an innova- tion coach to assist with scaling up innovations in technical education, developing curricular and learning materials based on learning science, and facilitating groups in a variety of settings. In addition, Mary is tenured faculty at Bellevue College where she chairs the Digital Media Arts program.Dr. Kenneth A. Walz, Madison Area Technical College Dr. Walz completed his Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin in Environmental Chemistry and Tech- nology, while conducting electrochemical research on lithium-ion batteries with Argonne National Lab- oratory and Rayovac. His studies also included
effectiveness of an engineering curriculum is measured by how well studentscan apply and integrate their technical knowledge to solve real life problems. The currentengineering curriculum has been designed to only to provide the theory, however, it doesn’tprovide the integration of how this knowledge can be applied. The courses that are taken aspreparation for system engineering students include standard mechanical studies such asstatics, dynamics, and structural analysis, but also, computer software and hardwarecourses that study C programming, circuit analysis and electronics. These types ofcollegiate engineering classes that are taken on a general level in all system engineeringdisciplines, are supposed to provide the theory that is needed to build
courses, which are commonin design-oriented fields, such as art and architecture [3], [4]. Similar in style and format to theflipped classroom [5], studios are now being used in science, technology, and engineering areas,as well [6]-[8]. During the freshman and sophomore years, the studio courses are one-credit hourofferings that focus on the students completing projects.While the goals associated with adding the studio courses are intended to benefit all students,some of these goals are of particular benefit to the older students, including military veterans.Although some new content is taught, these courses are “content light”; the main purpose is forstudents to apply concepts learned in the other courses taken during the same semester. When
given class time to brainstorm ideas for their designs and to begin sketching ideas. Each student wasrequired to create some rough sketches and ideas for the ideas on their own that they then brought to the group todiscuss and modify. Each group was then required to create a single set of drawings (by hand or using computer-aided design software) of their proposed structure, a physical model of their proposed design, and a presentation.Conceptual designs were presented during the third week of the course to a review board as well as to the class. Thereview boards included engineers from the community and other professors from the department plus the client (thepreschool teachers for the loft design, the head of the Organic Farm for the walkway
Induction Decay and Spin Echo. The sample used can be asmall container of glycerin. It is assumed that an oscilloscope and a bench power supplyare available.This module is was used in the form of a lecture demonstration of the Spin Echoexperiment in the Northwestern University Biomedical Engineering course BME 325,Introduction to Medical Imaging, during the Fall 2004 quarter. This course includesundergraduate and graduate students from both ECE and BME majors. We report ourexperiences and a formal evaluation of the effectiveness of the module.This work was supported in part by the Engineering Research Centers Program of theNational Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9876363.IntroductionMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most
, and M.S in Aviation and Aerospace Management from Purdue Univer- sity, West Lafayette. Mr. Gupta is currently working with Dr. Johnson on the PEGASAS Project 33 – Augmented Weather Information Project (AWIP) as research assistant.Ms. Caroline K. Marete, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ms. Caroline Marete is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Aviation and Transportation Technology at Purdue University. Her research focuses on airports sustainability and air transportation management. Caroline graduated with a Master of Science in Aviation and Aerospace Management from Purdue Uni- versity on a Fulbright Fellowship. American c Society for Engineering
Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain, New York, Addison-Wesley. 3. Bouillion, L.M., Gomez, L.M (2001). Connecting School and Community with Science Learning: Real World Problems and School – Community Partnerships as Contectual Scaffolds, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (8) 878-898. 4. Chen, H.L., Lattuca L.R., Hamilton, E.R. (2008) Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering, JEE Vol. 97 (3): 339- 353. 5. Clutier, A., Dwayer, J. and Sherrod, S.E. (2016). Exploration of Hands-On/Minds-On Learning in an Active STEM Outreach Program, Proceedings of
Research Experiencefor Teachers (RET) site grant titled “RET Site: High School Teacher Experience in EngineeringDesign and Manufacturing.” The goal of the project is to host 12 high school teachers each summerto participate in engineering design and manufacturing research and then convert their experienceinto high school curriculum. Given the experience from the first year’s operation and assessment,it was noted that the extant teacher self-efficacy surveys need to be further improved according tothe specific needs of RET site. As such, an updated set of assessment tools was developed toevaluate the impact of RET site on high school teacher participants. In particular, a new teacherself-efficacy survey was created from synthesizing multiple
Laboratory, given at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly). The coursesform the first quarter of a three quarter sequence of electronics courses during the junior year,following a year of introductory circuit analysis courses. EE 306 and EE 346 are requiredcourses for Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering majors. The general courselearning objectives are the abilities to • Model electronic devices and explain how terminal characteristics depend on underlying scientific principles; • Use semiconductor material theory sufficiently to explain the operation of PN junction diodes and transistors (FETs and BJTs); • Select and apply the appropriate circuit models to represent the behavior of diodes and
GC 2012-5608: AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO AN INTEGRATED DE-SIGN AND MANUFACTURING MULTI-SITE ”CLOUD-BASED” CAPSTONEPROJECTDr. Michael Richey, The Boeing Company Michael Richey is an Associate Technical Fellow currently assigned to support technology and innova- tion research at the Boeing Company. Michael is responsible for leading a team conducting research projects to improve the learning experience for engineers and technicians. His research encompasses, Complex Adaptive Systems, Learning Curves, Learning Sciences and Engineering Education Research focusing on understanding the interplay between knowledge spillovers, innovation, wealth creation, and economies of scale as they are manifested in questions of growth
Paper ID #39402Faculty Perceptions of Diversity Statements in STEM Faculty JobApplicationsDr. Torrie Cropps, University of Texas, Dallas Dr. Torrie Cropps is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Office of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion at University of Texas at Dallas. Her research there focuses broadly on strategies to promote equity for marginalized populations in engineering. Torrie earned her PhD in Agricultural Education from Pur- due University and served as the Educational Outreach Coordinator for the Mentoring@Purdue program. Mentoring@Purdue (M@P) an initiative aimed at increasing the numbers of
besides science-based fields. On the other hand, the results also point out some deficiencies of concept mapping, such as the less frequent interaction between students and the teacher, the difficulty of course content absorption for students, and the necessary to prepare more efficient and active course material for teachers. Furthermore, the physical learning environment is another important factor within students’ learning process through concept mapping instruction. Consequently, with positive feedbacks and negative shortages, students still agree concept mapping instruction did improve their learning performance, thinking abilities, and problem solving abilities as well. Students
. Abdelrahman’s research focus is industrial applications of sensing and control with major research fund- ing from the U.S. Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and industry. He has also focused on collaborative and innovative educational research. Abdelrahman is passionate about outreach activities for popularizing engineering research and education. His activities in that arena included NSF funded sites for research experience for undergraduates and research experience for Teachers. He has published his research results in more than 90 papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings and 30+ technical reports
Manufacturing since 2010 and International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Surface Engineering since 2007.Dr. S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, Idaho State University Dr. Hossein Mousavinezhad is an active member of ASEE, IEEE and is a program evaluator for engi- neering programs (ABET). Hossein is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Idaho State University and serves as IEEE Education Society VP, is the Founding General Chair of IEEE International Conferences on Electro Information Technology. Page 26.385.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Computer-Aided
Student ReactionsExperiential learning (Kolb, 1984) provides the framework for our learning environment, and itguides the design of the multimedia program. Cooperative learning is our engine to achieve thelearning objectives, which include mastery of statics in the solution of engineering problems, Page 3.392.31 We want to expand our library of trusses and include Quick TimeTM movies of engineering processes includingconception, design, and construction. Please contact us if you have any material to share (Holzer@vt.edu). 3improvement in teamwork, communication, and learning skills
research focuses on the use of virtual reality in facilitating learning in online environments.Morris Branchell Lee IIIDr. David M. Neyens, Clemson University David M. Neyens, PhD MPH, is an assistant professor of industrial engineering at Clemson University. He received his PhD in industrial engineering from the University of Iowa in 2010 and a MPH from the University of Iowa in 2008.Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye, Clemson University Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye’s research focuses on solving human-machine systems design problems and modeling human performance in technologically complex systems such as health care, aviation and man- ufacturing. He has more than 200 publications in these areas, and his research has been funded by
discussion, butthis discussion is focused on the desired knowledge in the area of ship structures. As with allmoving vehicles, ships must have adequate structural strength. If the structure is not adequate acatastrophic failure is possible with great economic loss and loss of life. On the other hand, ifexcess structure is incorporated, the ship will be larger than needed resulting in increased costand increased fuel consumption over the life of the vessel. This is a compounding problem asadditional structure requires a larger hull which requires larger engines which require larger fueltanks which require a larger ship which requires more structure, etc. This is a part of what isreferred to as the ship design spiral (an iterative approach to ship
based on ABET’s General Criteria 31. We focused on the followingstudent outcomes:(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context Page 23.636.2(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice.Course SyllabusThe
, hands-on experiential solutions to real life problems, and creativityand conceptual change. The technique known as the Undergraduate Cross-Class Research Project(UCCRP) has been applied with success in the Mechanical Engineering Program at Texas A&M Uni-versity at Qatar. Students from different levels (freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors) workedside-by-side to devise solutions, individually or collaboratively, to research questions set up by theinstructors. The UCCRP’s focus is on specific skill for specific student rather than on solution of aparticular problem as is the case in almost all project-based learning initiatives currently used inengineering education. Each task in the UCCRP is divided into well-defined skills with
laboratory experimentation and measurement in an interactive environment withreduced manual and repetitive data calculation. Several reported references [3 – 4] show thestrength in the practicality of not only using GPMS as an educational tool, but as a research toolthat is capable of analyzing sophisticated engineering applications. MatLab, MathCAD, andMathematica are the most popular GPMS. The most powerful program at the junior level isMatLab, which requires a long time to master. On the other hand, students can learn to useMathCAD and Mathematica in a short time and with little practice. In the case of MathCAD, theequations appear in a similar format as handwriting, which is an advantage at the junior level. An important advantage of
different components of the system worked together. • Interactive elements: Some participants noted that the interactive elements of the case study—such as the interface practice—helped them to learn in a more hands-on way and to test their understanding. • Clarity and simplicity: Participants found the case study to be easy to understand and follow, even if they had no prior experience with PLCs. • Breakdown of complex topics: The case study was also helpful in breaking down complex topics into smaller, more manageable pieces. This made it easier for participants to learn and understand the material. • Real-world application: Some participants noted that the case study helped them better