quo and assist in the university in its strategic goals. Christopher has is Bachelor of Arts in International Relations & History from William Jewell College, a Master of Public Policy from Pepperdine University, and a Doctorate of Education in Interdisciplinary Leadership from Creighton University.Mr. Kevin William Kuck, George Mason University Kevin W. Kuck is a dedicated and accomplished individual whose journey is marked by a passion for engineering, a flair for photography, and an unyielding commitment to academic excellence. Born and raised in Virginia, Kevin has always been driven to excel in both the technical and creative realms of his life. In 2019, Kevin graduated from Lake Braddock Secondary
probably go back to the time that I did the IT source selection for my unit that I was in. It was a $[large dollar among] contract; we were trying to award over 10 years. I think of it in terms of an engineering project because, it was obviously, it's an IT context, but that not alone doesn't make it engineering, but we had to engineer a solution, which was really complex, and had a lot of moving parts, and a lot of different people involved. We did the source selection at a classified level, but we were also, working with our internal partners to figure out what our requirements were. We basically assembled a team .... Oh, I should back up by
build effective international partnership networks.Overview of Engineering Education ProgramsThis paper uses four engineering education programs as exemplars in order to highlight differentapproaches taken by engineers who work in marginalized communities. The four programs arethe Design for Extreme Affordability course at Stanford University, the HumanitarianEngineering and Social Entrepreneurship program at Penn State, the Humanitarian Engineeringprogram at Colorado School of Mines, and the D-Lab at the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology. I chose these programs because they have been integrated into institutionalstructures, maintain a considerable online presence documenting various projects, and havedifferent philosophies of how engineers
appreciation for what they are learning, but I am also providing them with practicable skills which will help prepare them for life. Key words: education innovation, experiential learning, spreadsheet modelingIntroduction—the West Point Way Undergraduate cadets at the United States Military Academy are required to demonstrateproficiency in six domains of knowledge: engineering and technology, math and science,information technology, history, culture, and human behavior. To ensure they acquire therequisite skills in these six domains, every cadet takes a number of prescribed courses thatconstitute the core curriculum. While the academic program is very structured, it is intended toprovide cadets with “a broad liberal education
of innovations, NMIMS as the director Shirpur campus and at College of Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. Recently, his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of
. Swan (2010). Measuring the Value Added from Service Learning in Project-Based Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education. In Special Issue on Problem-Based Learning, 26(3):1-12. (I)13. Paterson, K.G. and V.J. Fuchs (2008). Development for the Other 80%: Engineering Hope, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 14(1):1-12.14. Parkinson, A. Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best Practices. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2(2): 1-15.15. Jesiek, B.K., Chang, Y., Shen, Y., Lin, J.J.J., Hirlemann, E.D., and E.A. Groll (2011). International Research and Education in Engineering (IREE) 2010 China: Developing Globally Competent Engineering Researchers. Proceedings of the
included Dan, Thuy, Jen, andDeepak.vi Each of these four students had come to engineering education with a distinctive takeon engineering science and/or engineering design. Page 7.1315.4While Dan valued design an attitude gained during fifteen years as a mechanical inspector, Thuywas fundamentally interested in engineering science, due to her father’s encouragement to applyscience and math, fields in which she excelled. Jen came to engineering not because of eitherscience or design but because, as an intern during her senior year of high school, she had greatlyenjoyed the daily life of an engineer at work. Finally, Deepak arrived with little idea of
Machine Learning modules in sophomore and junior undergraduate classes, in an effort to recruit students for our senior level classes (Current Topics in Machine Learning I (CTML-I) and Current Topics in Machine Learning II (CTML-II)). This paper focuses on discussing our experiences in teaching these senior level classes of CTML-I and CTML-II.1. Introduction Page 10.1031.1In the last decade there has been an explosion of research in machine learning. A contributingfactor is that traditionally independent research communities in symbolic machine learning, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
receiving high-quality mentoring duringour doctoral work, we ourselves did not receive the hidden curriculum we offer here, and weknow that doctoral programs in engineering and engineering education focus on training studentsto be independent researchers rather than to develop research agendas and manage researchgroups as faculty. We hope to support the next generation of faculty by offering practical adviceabout three aspects of earning tenure at a research institution that are rarely explicitly discussed:(1) developing and disseminating a compelling narrative about your work, (2) promoting theimpact of your work, (3) leading a research group, and (4) creating an internal and externalsupport team.We structured this paper to highlight both our
the overall course context, steps should betake in future work to obtain student perceptions of faculty autonomy. Additionally, future workwill include further analysis of the data to understand which constructs may be affected by thesechanges in the course by using a Repeated Measures ANOVA across survey results for eachyear.References1. Reid, K., D. Reeping, and E. Spingola, A Taxonomy for Introduction to Engineering Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2018.2. Orr, M., et al., Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first- year engineering, and post-general education models, in Frontiers in Education Conference. 2012, IEEE.3. Orr, M., et al. The Effect of Required
experiences of Blackand Latino students as well as student-athletes in engineering and related fields in STEM.Author 2: Several attributes of my identity inform my positionality as a researcher on this studyinvolving Black student-athletes in non-revenue sports and STEM. First, I identify as a straightBlack cisgender married man. Second, I am a first generation college student who utilized sport(i.e., a Division 1 football scholarship) to advance my educational aspirations. Third, I haveseveral years’ experience working as a tutor, learning specialist, and football academic specialistfor various Division I student-athlete support service offices. My aforementioned positionalityhas guided my research on Black student-athletes and student-athlete
the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3I instructors introduced inquiry-based learning into the laboratory during the Fall and Springsemesters of the 2011-2012 school year. Inquiry-based laboratory still introduces the students totechnical writing and the simple measurements required of all chemical engineers, but the newapproach also creates interest in chemical engineering by posing an engineering problem for thestudents to solve within the limitations set forth in the experimental description.Course StructureAs applied in Chemical Engineering Lab I, inquiry-based learning is a multi-step
EECS Department. His current research activities include nanomagnetics/spintronics, graphene electron- ics, nanophotonics, and nano-electromechanical systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Career Development Impacts of a Research Program on Graduate Student and Postdoc MentorsAbstract—This evidence-based practice paper explores how graduate students and postdocsbenefit from serving as mentors to undergraduate research interns. Utilizing three years ofqualitative data from 38 mentors, our findings indicate that mentors feel better prepared forfuture faculty careers as they gain skills in project management, supervision, andcommunication. This paper
the development of programs that assist entering freshman engineering students, including academically disadvantaged students, succeed during their first year. Of particular note are the highly successful counseling and cooperative learning programs for first-year stu- dents that he created within the freshman engineering programs at Purdue University and at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Budny has numerous publications and presentations on engineering education. He is widely recognized for outstanding teaching, receiving awards at both Purdue and Pittsburgh Universities, plus national and international awards. Dr. Budny is very active in ASEE within the Freshman Programs and the Educational Research and Methods
: 5 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 2018 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceThe milestones were originally created for 8-week online courses because face-to-face studentsdo not start on the project until near the middle of the semester and some waited until the end.Because online courses are shorter, procrastination would have been detrimental to the student’sgrade.Comments from students before milestones were implemented: For the food truck assignment, I would have liked to have had some more guidance as to the minimum requirements to be included in the Project Plan. At the end of Week 7 Slide had a list of what should be included in the Project Plan, yet
, pilot investigation of a service-Learning trip as a platform for growth of empathy. 2018 World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), 1-5.[12] Zoltowski, C. B., and Oakes, W.C., “Learning by Doing: Reflections of the EPICS Program”, Special Issue: University Engineering Programs That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, International Journal for Service-Learning in Engineering, 2014, pp. 1-32[13] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fourth Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.[14] Clark, M. A., Robertson, M. M., & Young, S. (2018). “I feel your pain”: A critical review of
Paper ID #33847CAREER: Learning from Students’ Identity Trajectories to ActualizeLatent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clem- son University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
Paper ID #36954Exploring the Influence of Students’ Perceptions of CourseAssessment on Retention and Professional Identity FormationLayla S Araiinejad I hold a Bachelor's of Industrial in Systems Engineering from Auburn University and am a future graduate student at MIT!Thomas Matthew Heaps Concurrent undergraduate senior in Mechanical Engineering and first year Master student in Engineering Education.Brooke Elizabeth CochranCassandra J McCall (Dr.) Cassandra McCall, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. Her research focuses on enhancing diversity
:if s1==2 & s2==6; nr=3; nc=0; br(1)=4;hr(1)=2;drx(1)=4;dry(1)=2 ;trx(1)=0; Page 8.739.4 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education br(2)=2 ;hr(2)=10;drx(2)=0;dry(2)=5;trx(2)=0; br(3)=4;hr(3)=2 ;drx(3)=-4 ;dry(3)=2;trx(3)=0;endif s1==1 ; nr=input('Number of rectangular portions='); nc=input('Number of circlular portions=');end%rectangular% Input your own datas:if s1==1; for i=1:nr br(i)=input('length(parallel to x axis)='); hr(i)=input('width(parallel to y axis)='); drx(i)=input('distance of c.g
/10.1109/ICOA58279.2023.10308834Apata, O. E. (2019). Predictive validity of school and student factors on secondary school students'academic performance in physics. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(5), 35-42.https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-9%20Issue-5/Series-3/B0905033442.pdfFrankford, E., Sauerwein, C., Bassner, P., Krusche, S., & Breu, R. (2024). AI-tutoring in softwareengineering education: Experiences with large language models in programming assessments. 2024IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Educationand Training (ICSE-SEET), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639474.3640061Bai, J., Marin, V., Jung, I., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2023). Future
indicated that they are excellent in operating computer applications (71%). Page 9.194.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education• I enjoy learning PSPICE using media-based instructionEngineering Male Female Score ScoreMajor Population Population 1 2 3 4 5 AverageComputer 100% 10% 30% 50% 10% 3.60Electrical 58% 42% 8
, Page 6.335.4item 12). Item 15 demonstrates further interest in courses in the same area (3.14). Proceedings of the 2001American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Table 1. Student Satisfaction With the Course Item Average (N = 22)1 I am satisfied with the semiconductor fundamentals I learned in this course. 3.142 The amount of coverage of semiconductor fundamentals met or exceeded my
citizenCouncil (1995); the National Academy of Engineering scientists in repositories such as My NASA Data; “advance(2002 and following); and the National Science Foundation. national education goals” by utilizing NASA resources that alignIn a Forbes Leadership Forum article by Rodney C. Adkins, with the Framework for K-12 Science Education; and “leveragingsenior vice president of IBM, Adkins stated, “When I efforts through partnerships” by drawing upon the strengths of thegraduated from college, about 40% of the world’s scientists collaborators who are part of this project. Each component furtherand engineers resided in the U.S. Today that number has contributes to NASA’s desired outcome
, Team Based,First-Year Design Projects,” in 31st International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, 2007, pp. 1–13.[10] J. L. Oplinger, M. Dickens, S. Jordan, and G. M. Contestchampionships, “Making and Engineering : Understanding Similarities and Differences Making and Engineering : Understanding Similarities and Differences,” 2010.[11] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Challenges to ensuring quality in qualitative research: A procedural view,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2012.[12] J. H. Kim, Understanding Narrative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2016.[13] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage
collaboratively.In this paper, we will describe an intervention measure that we developed to improvestudent success rates in Calculus I for engineering students at the University of Michigan.This particular initiative involves collaboration among an academic department andseveral student support services offices and is targeted towards entering first-yearstudents. We will also present the preliminary data that suggests the intervention has apositive impact.II. BackgroundAt the University of Michigan, students are admitted to the College of Engineering eitherdirectly as entering first-year students or through the transfer process (internally fromanother college on campus, or externally from another institution). Approximately 80-85% of the admitted
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”might encompass the ABET (a-k) Outcomes, and began to assess them in ISU engineeringstudents on co-op and internship experiences.MethodsIdentification and Validation of CompetenciesIn the Fall of 1999, we engaged a constituency of 212 ISU employers, alumni, faculty, partneringinternational faculty, and co-op and intern students, to assist the ISU College of EngineeringCooperative Education and Internship Program in developing performance assessment tools,ones that would be aligned with the ABET’s then new Engineering Criteria 2000. The Collegecollaborated with Development Dimensions International, Inc. (DDI), a global provider
chronic shortage ofengineers. Additionally, other programs have been developed recently to address this shortage2. Page 6.365.1Proceedings of The 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition© 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationTable I. Building Electrical Systems Design Specialty Coursework Lecture Lab Credit in Hours Hours Quarter Per Week Per Week
stumbled across a women in science and engineering listserve discussion just a few years ago that I suddenly realised why I was different from my colleagues and what my implicit exclusion meant for the profession.Caroline has been lecturing in materials science and engineering and education developmentfor six years now. When I began lecturing, I suddenly realised that there were hardly any girls taking the course. Funny that it hadn’t occurred to me as odd before, considering I had been one of only two in my own course. I guess I thought things were changing slowly but surely. However, it was becoming apparent that bullying girls into taking non traditional subjects in schools was not working. This forced me to
foundation to jumpstart the assessment and evaluation process for theET programs. Page 10.735.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education2.0 Objectives and OutcomesBased on the commonalities of the three program missions the engineering technology objectivesfor each program were defined with four statements measured by an in-house developed standardalumni and employer survey. The Mechanical Engineering Technology Program Objectives areoutlined as follows: (a-k reference ABET TC2K Criterion I
, DC, 2001.2. Bloom, B. S., ”Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification ofEducational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Cognitive Domain)”Longman, New York,1956.3. Sousa, D. A., “How the Brain Learns,” National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston, Virginia,19954. Zachary, L. W., “Project LEA/RN Applied to an Engineering Mechanics Course,” pp 410-413 in Proceedings ofthe 1998 International Congress on Experimental Mechanics, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel,Connecticut, 19985. Jenkins, M. G., "Standards and Codes in Mechanical Engineering Education: Confounding Constraints or HelpfulHindrances?," Standardization News, Vol 27, No 9, pp 20-25, 1999.6. "Initial Assessment