, 200623). The intent was to improve preparation of engineeringstudents to enter the profession. The study by Lattuca, Terenzini & Volkwein (2006) 24 indicatethat the EC2000 was having a positive impact on engineering education, including the teachingof basic science, math, and engineering science skills. However, the study did reveal that post-EC2000 students were experiencing ”somewhat chillier diversity climate” than pre-EC2000students. Notwithstanding, according to ABET (2005) 25, “accreditation criteria do not addressthe cultivation of a diverse learning environment, and its Board of Directors heard very clearlyfrom its constituents that it should not mandate diversity goals as part of its standards.” (p13) Assuch, the imperative to
his suggestions for my teaching, I asked Mentor to make another visit to my class in Mar., he agreed.• I visited a 400+ level class taught by Mentor. I got to see (from the students point of view) how some of the effective teaching techniques used by Mentor was working - e.g., engaging student in solving problems in a stepwise manner. As part of the class, Mentor provided tips to the students on the upcoming exam. This included review of problems, discussion on problem types/variations that could show up on the exam. This review class, in my view, was putting the students at ease and focusing them on the topics/contents they need to pay attention to for the exam.• It was good. Saw how my teaching can be improved, and
andcommunity service, while allowing undergraduates to take on a complex, real-world problemwith social, political and economical aspects. The goals of the first project will be discussed andrecommendations for achieving the most from this type of course format will be provided.IntroductionResearch has shown that experiential project-based learning provides context for materiallearned in the classroom and engages students in their own learning, resulting in enhancedunderstanding of technical material and its application. Allowing students to work together inteams and the opportunity to work closely with faculty and other professionals has also beenshown to improve learning and the desire to continue learning. 1,2,3,4,5 With this in mind, theCivil and
these requirements, each instructor varied the conditions of how the group was to interact with each other (i.e., no face-to-face communication, only communicating through drawings, over obstacles such as fall break) to vary the dynamics of the interaction.§ Case studies and ethics debates that instigate awareness of engineering ethics. Ethics is a key component in engineering practice; therefore, an ethics module that ended with a class-wide debate on current engineering/technology ethical issues was introduced. Ethics is forming an increasingly essential part of the engineering curriculum and exposing student to it early in their academic career helps to hone their ethical principles in better preparation for the
learning community. Thesummer bridge programs for incoming first-year students consist of 5 summer bridge programsacross 4 campuses in the University system. For the summer bridge program for risingsophomores, Engineering students from any campus in the University system go to the flagshipcampus. To assess the effectiveness of these academic enhancement programs for undergraduateEngineering majors, we examine math course grades, fall semester grade point average, andenrollment status for students who participated in our programs and a matched sample ofstudents who did not participate. To date, we are tracking the academic progress of two cohortsof first-year students from summer 2016 and 2017 and one cohort of rising sophomores fromsummer 2017
by Chinese-American,Anglo-Indian, or Latino writers [15]. Code-switching can take on various forms, but in this paper,we define it as the use of both Spanish and English in bilingual communication. This showcasesthe intricate linguistic dance that bilingual speakers engage in, which reflects a blend of linguis-tic choice and cultural narrative. This phenomenon is especially prominent in communities whereboth languages are woven into the social and cultural fabric, allowing individuals to fluidly navigatetheir bilingual identities [16], [17]. Beyond simple language mixing, code-switching incorporatesa sophisticated amalgamation of grammatical structures, cultural cues, and contextual relevance,highlighting the cognitive dexterity of bilingual
engineering community; and serve as successful rolemodels for some freshmen who may lack confidence and who may perceive engineering asdifficult and unattainable. Freshmen can relate better to upperclassmen who are their peers andwho more recently have experienced what it takes to “make it in engineering.” Upperclassmen,particularly those with a proven track record of academic achievement and leadership, are morecredible sources and powerful role models for engineering freshmen. This assumption formedthe basis for development of a pilot freshman retention program, “Fast Track to Achievement.”The primary strategy of this program is to engage teams of upperclassmen in dialogue withgroups of freshmen in a series of workshops focusing on three themes
innovative solutions.”Clough (2000) believes that civil engineers must take advantage of advances in other fields suchas the Internet, bioengineering, and materials. He stresses the importance of planting theentrepreneurial seed in the minds of young engineering students. He believes that tomorrow’sengineers must also be good managers and leaders.Bordogna (1998) calls the future civil engineer “the master integrator” because he/she mustunderstand civil infrastructure as a system. In addition to possessing up-to-date technicalknowledge, civil engineers must thus know “how to do things right” as well as “the right things todo.”In today’s world where fast communications made it easy to shrink distances and implementglobalization, one should also
Page 23.850.9whether you could simulate the video alignment by visually distorting the video images on asingle flat screen. I expected my RET team to implement the teleoperation (engineering studentand myself), design an experiment (whole team), run the experiment (teachers and student),analyze results (whole team), and write up our findings (whole team). I hoped to havedeliverables of experimental data, engineering-education or teacher-education conferencepaper(s) by the teachers, and research conference and/or journal paper by the student and/or me.There were some challenges working with the participants, as expected. For example, theteachers did not have the engineering background suited for designing communication, writingcode, wiring
survey included 10 technical questions to determine students' initialknowledge and a short-answer question requiring them to define MO and ML and theirsignificance in our field. Additionally, students conducted a self-assessment of their knowledge,and the CM instructor provided further evaluations based on the short answers. Participantswatched the educational video through EdPuzzle, facilitating engagement by tracking videocompletion.Results and DiscussionSurvey data were collected for both modules (MO and ML), with responses gathered for eachmodule across three different groups of students (two undergraduate and one graduate) and twoseparate samples (before and after video watching). The first survey’s responses were evaluatedto determine
applied civil engineering skills in a field environment while working under the guidanceof industry experts. The course covers multiple sub-disciplines of civil and environmentalengineering, and concludes with students constructing homes for a nearby community. Thehands-on learning experience in the course provides a practical framework for the analysis anddesign courses that are taken later in the program. This purpose of this paper is to discuss theassessment-based changes that have occurred throughout the course’s history and describe howthe “construct first, design later” philosophy has been successfully integrated throughout theprogram. It also serves as a potential model for other programs interested in developing a similartype
. Dr. Zapanta’s research interests are in developing medical devices to treat cardiovascular disease, focusing on the areas of cardiac assist devices and prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta is an active member in the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the American Society for Engineering Education. He is a reviewer for several biomedical engineering journals. Dr. Zapanta also serves as a reviewer for the National Institute of Health (NIH), Cardiovascular Sciences Small Business Special Emphasis Panel.Warren Ruder, Carnegie Mellon University Warren Ruder is a graduate student researcher at Carnegie Mellon University in
287 THE DISAPPERING ASSOCIATE DEGREE PROGRAM IN ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY Louis E. Frenzel Jr. Adjunct Professor, Austin Community College Technology Editor, Electronic Design MagazineEach year, fewer and fewer students enroll in Associate degree programs in ElectronicsTechnology. Most schools offering such programs know that the decline in interest andenrollments has been continuing for over a decade. The question every department asks is:why? On the other hand, the electronics industry and its employment have grown over thesame period. The use of all types of electronic equipment continues to expand and theincreasing equipment complexity would
dominant technologies; improve, innovate, and invent (technologies) to achieve sustainability. 9. Actively engage communities and stakeholders in development of engineering solutions.Post your sustainability analysis as a wiki or webpage, and email your url before class before class on _________. Yourwiki should clearly reference your design idea. Hint: read the assignment rubric and use the paramedic method.To submit your analysis to your instructor, send an email with the following content: 1. To: dbraun@calpoly.edu 2. Subject: EE 306F10 Sustainability Analysis for username@calpoly.edu 3. Message first line: Your last name 4. Message second line: Your first name 5. Message third line: username
design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Page 22.1010.9An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.An ability to communicate effectively.The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal
and facilities of a Center Bold yet achievable• Frontier investigations across and/or within disciplines (“Transformative”, “Grand Challenges”) Legacy• Promote organizational linkages capitalizing on cyberinfrastructure Partnerships• Integrative learning and discovery for (U.S.) students Broad set of career paths• Engage and develop nation’s talent, including groups underrepresented in STEM research and education Diverse STEM workforce• Foster science/engineering in service to society Knowledge Transfer, new research areas, instrumentation, technologies Example: I/UCRC Pre-‐competitive Research Portfolio: cooperative ly defined & funded on shared value Ideas, Industry
: Page 14.856.7STEP’s primary mission is to “Inspire students to pursue careers in math, science, engineeringand technology” through an innovative, proactive approach that engages students, teachers, andthe local K-12 educational system with high technology companies, universities/colleges, hightech government agencies and all of their collective resources to achieve its purpose ofincreasing and sustaining the high technology job sector in the Inland Empire. Through theformation of new educational partnerships between businesses, academia, and governmententities within the community, STEP seeks to pave the way to achieve a prosperous future for allInland Empire citizens based on the sustainable growth of a high technology industry.Specifically
STEMworkforce 17 , and how to promote computational literacy 18 . Though work-based learning (WBL)was a focus of the IWG-SP, one of the main takeaways from the roundtable events held regardingthis topic was that WBL opportunities are a successful way to engage more students fromunderrepresented groups in STEM. In general, the progress reports demonstrate that it was notuncommon for IWGs to cooperate in establishing best practices and guidelines, especially whentheir findings led to insights relevant to another IWG’s goal.The IWGs’ processes for establishing best practices often began with hosting roundtable eventswith majority agency representation as well as sending out surveys to gather knowledge of currentagencies’ standards and best practices
methods forassessing knowledge, design skills, beliefs/attitudes/interests [1]. While there are manysustainability assessment options available to engineering educators, the review revealedopportunities for rigorously validated assessment instruments and direct assessments, as opposedto self-report instruments, for capturing application of sustainable design skills [1].We are engaged in an ongoing effort to refine and validate a cross-disciplinary sustainable designrubric to promote learning during and assessment of student-level design projects. Our originalsustainable design criteria (Table 1) were based on the Nine Principles of SustainableEngineering [2] and were used in an initial pilot study of civil and environmental engineeringcapstone
identifies all potential failure modes within the outlined scope. During this part of the process, the students will analyze all feasible scenarios, considering all possibilities from the most frequent to the rarest occurrences, and analyze the accidents during HAA operations using the CAROL database. 3. Analyze the Effects: After identifying the possible failure modes, the students will identify and assess the effects of each failure. This analysis determines the impact on the system (severity), process, and stakeholders. Understanding the effects of failure modes will help the students prioritize the failures that require immediate attention based on severity or if the process needs to be redesigned to reduce
evaluate AI technologies through standards and benchmarks. Research and community engagement is needed to develop a broad spectrum of evaluative techniques, including AI standards, benchmarks, and testbeds. • Strategy 7: Better understand the national AI R&D workforce needs. Advances in AI will require a strong community of AI researchers. An improved understanding of current and future R&D workforce demands in AI is needed to help ensure that sufficient AI experts are available to address the strategic R&D areas outlined in this plan. • Strategy 8: Expand Public-Private Partnerships to Accelerate Advances in AI. Increased emphasis on benefits of partnerships, including strategically leveraging resources
ability to design a system, components, or process to meet desired needs.d) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams.e) An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems.f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.g) An ability to communicate effectively.h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global Page 14.843.8and societal context. 7i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning.j) A knowledge of contemporary issues.k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
engage in and benefit from higher education, and up until recently, its protectionsextended to support people of color, women, people with disabilities, veterans, and the LGBTQ+community (Ford et al., 2023). However, the United States Supreme Court’s 2023 decision ending race-consciousadmissions at selective institutions, in the case of Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v.Harvard College and the University of North Carolina, significantly altered the higher educationlandscape (Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, 2023). Although the ruling did notcompletely reverse the advancements in higher education gained since 1964, it limitedinstitutions’ capacity to promote a diverse student body via their admissions processes
understanding of the procedures and objectives. Inorder to keep students as engaged as possible, the labs are designed to only take ~ 1.5 – 2 hours,with efficiency increased by using prelab assignments to ensure that appropriate planning hasbeen completed prior to attending. In addition, a lab notebook is required to document allexercises with an emphasis on data integrity, and ethics of recording and presentation. Althoughanalysis associated with most lab exercises is done within the lab group, the analysis from fourexercises is done individually. Combined with individual effort from the lecture portion of thecourse, 50% of the grade is individual while 50% is team based. This helps to ensure thatstudents are not simply carried by their teammates.1
ASEE’s Committee on Scholarly Publications. In her research, she is broadly interested in developing critical understandings of the culture of engineering education and, especially, the experiences of marginalized undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Where are Women Engineering Faculty in Ethiopia? The Stubborn Gender Disparity in Engineering Faculty in Ethiopian UniversitiesAbstractIn developing countries, workforce diversity, such as faculty diversity in higher education, isimportant to drive key social justice and positively impact students’ academic experiences.Despite Ethiopia’s goal of transitioning to an industry
). Project deliverables were a functioning robot and complete designproject report documenting the team’s experience. The culmination of the project was a course-wide competition in which the students competed across all class sections for a grade bonusbased on their design objectives. Testing of the speed objectives was accomplished on a courseconsisting of several curves, and the endurance objective was tested on course designed as alarge oval.Both of the courses were established in the hallway. This is noteworthy in that it generatedsignificant interest among students who were passing through the building. These passersbywould typically stop and engage the EE students in conversation about the details of their robots.In fact, this phenomenon was
participating in the 5.88 11.76 29.41 47.06 5.88engineering lessons.Below are several comments given by the 2009 participants during the program and on the open-ended mid-year survey questions to further support the survey results and demonstrate thepositive impact the program has had in their lives, classroom and community:“I have implemented all the activities that we did during the summer training, such as thedesigning, the use of engineering notebooks, the sketching, the construction of models and mystudents really like them, specially that all the activities that they do are related to the lessons,their interests and their daily lives specially that most of my
videotaped. Atthe end of the semester, each student has a video record of his or her progress. This approachhas been very effective at building student engagement and passion, and development ofconscious competence.Course ContentThe two primary objectives of the course are 1) to teach the principles of relationship selling and Page 7.994.32) to teach how to give effective presentations. Students select two projects – one from their Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002,American Society for Engineering Educationworkplace and one from their
disciplines, and how to design educational initiatives that enable students from different majors to work collaboratively on entrepreneurial projects. • Student assessment and program evaluation – how to assess student learning and project quality, and how to evaluate program outcomes and impact over time. • Resource development – how to garner resources to support students’ entrepreneurial activities, e.g., funding, physical, space, mentoring and advising, legal assistance, etc. • Faculty support - How to develop communities of practice around teaching entrepreneurship in engineeringThe literature on professional development programs for engineering faculty that focus on
adaptive teaching: One of the system's most outstanding achievements was personalizing educational activities according to student profiles. This validates LLMs' ability to address complex challenges in online teaching, such as personalization and dynamic assessment. However, the long-term impact on student achievement remains to be assessed.Finally, based on the results and challenges observed, the following lines of research aresuggested:● Formalizing the use of LLMs: Develop a more structured framework for analyzing and generating educational content, integrating elements of YAWL or RDR into decision- making.● Exploration of emerging models: Evaluate new open-source models with shorter response times and improved