group was formed to further discuss the implementation of coastal engineering training asimplemented by the ERDC-WES Graduate Institute, which evolved into the Coastal EngineeringEducation Program (CEEP).The CEEP consisted of classes offered by the Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC), oneof the ERDC laboratories, and Texas A&M University (TAMU) towards a master’s degree inocean-coastal engineering for Corps employees. The program was designed such that Districtemployees took classes from TAMU and CERC over a 1-year period. Students spent onesemester on the TAMU campus in College Station, Texas, one semester at CERC in Vicksburg,Mississippi, and took courses and gained field experience at the Field Research Facility, a Corpscoastal
adaptivethan innovative. This “gut feeling” was the impetus for this study, and was based on observationssuch as students’ reluctance to tackle problems that are not completely defined or carefullyconstrained by the professor. Moreover, we feel that a heterogeneous group (with respect tocognitive style) of engineers will be more effective at designing solutions in a team setting in thelong term. Exploring this perceived skew toward the adaptive end of the cognitive stylecontinuum using the KAI was a primary motivator for the study.Assessing the cognitive style of students also presented an opportunity to determine if variouslearning preferences (such as the perceived reluctance of students to engage in open-endedproblems) could be correlated to
who were introduced to the topic in theanchored context of Indiana Jones performed significantly better on both tasks and gave muchmore specific information.Jones [6] investigated the impacts of an anchored career-focused curriculum on high schoolstudents who were at risk of dropping out. The anchored curriculum focused on improving careerdevelopment skills in 42 students. A control group of 32 students followed a traditionalcurriculum. The anchored curriculum included five lessons that scaffolded on one another,requiring students to use the information developed in previous lessons to complete subsequentlessons. Jones deployed 27 videos to anchor the lesson plans, which were shown to the studentsthroughout the curriculum. The videos included
must be a shift in student perspective from, “we are doingthis project because it was assigned to us towards, “we have identified customer needs throughconsultation with our client and we have developed performance specifications based on theseneeds.”Technical Communication: Students must be able to share ideas within the team as well asclearly articulate, justify and defend ideas with the team, external customers and reviewers.Multidisciplinary Engineering and Realistic Design Constraints: Students must incorporateengineering standards and design constraints that impact engineering solutions across alldisciplines. Thus, students gain an appreciation for how/why colleagues may be constrained intheir design solutions. For example, an industrial
technology programs have sought to establish the correct balance of theory andpractice to maximize student learning. It is often difficult to overcome preconceived notions thatstudents bring with them, such as the comparative speeds at which objects of different weightsfall under the force of gravity [1]. By engaging students through demonstrations, hands-ondesign and fabrication projects, and physical laboratories, misconceptions can be overcome, thusreinforcing the fundamental principles needed in engineering education [2], [3].Eight years ago, the School of Engineering and Technology restructured its undergraduatecurricula to include the PBL core in each program. Each academic year BSEE, BSECET, BSE,and BSET students experience one or more PBL
thousands ofacres of property. Waste Management Corporate began certifying its landfills with the WildlifeHabitat Council to develop habitat management programs on company sites to provide food, landand shelter to wildlife10.The benefits of this innovative program have engaged and energized Waste ManagementCorporation’s employees and the communities where the company operates. Employees andpeople of the local communities come on weekend to work on site programs for variousactivities such as clearing nature trails, conducing species inventories, and photographinganimals. In addition to promoting wildlife and the environment, the company’s program has alsofacilitated employee and community goodwill6
, including the educator, have a complete overview of their progress at any time, and they are able to annotate and exchange work. • 3D virtual models (4): The shared workspace gives access to the 3D models that can be used as primitive elements in the design process. These models may already exist in the physical world, or they can be 3D-printed to assemble the final system-of-interest. As illustrated by (6), students are able to interact with the shared workspace, both in 2D and 3D modes, depending on the nature of their task. • Collaboration (5): Using the collaborative virtual environment, students and educators can communicate and exchange through a chat or video-conferencing system.The physical environmentThe
driven, and often novel, educational practices.Dr. Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott Kaela Martin is an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univer- sity, Prescott Campus. She graduated from Purdue University with a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronau- tical Engineering and is interested in increasing classroom engagement and student learning.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts
utilized for the first time during the fall 2003 term, has provided a mechanism to track andmonitor long-term student progression. Further future assessment of student performance inspecific areas of the curriculum will have direct impact to curricular reform across thedisciplines. This will no doubt remain an important assessment and evaluation tool.With regards to technical writing, this report documents the first attempt on our campus to use across-disciplinary approach to assessment through the use of the campus writing rubric.Although this rubric originated in the Journal of Engineering Education, it was modified by theEnglish faculty for general campus use. Having good utility for this purpose, it failed toadequately provide the engineering
State University of New York at Buffalo since August 1995. In1998, he received a NSF CAREER Award that supports his research on GaN based optoelectronic devices and hiseducational activities. He is Associate Director of the Center for Active Learning of Microelectronics andPhotonics.PRATIBHA GOPALAM : Pratibha Gopalam is a graduate student in the Electrical Engineering Department at theState University of New York at Buffalo. She is a member of the group developing educational Java applets at theCenter for Active Learning of Microelectronics and Photonics. She received her undergraduate degree in Electronicsand Communication Engineering from Bangalore University, India, in 1997. She worked as a software engineer forHewlett Packard India
, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) An ability to communicate effectively (h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) A knowledge of contemporary issues (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (l) An ability to use engineering judgment to make decisions relating
KEEN network is optional and as such, not allinstructors received the same education on the foundational ideas of EML nor consistent instruction on how toencourage the mindset with their students. Due to the similar nature of our internal PLCs as optional, PLCparticipants articulated a need for consistent training and shareable content with their colleagues and TAs. Anecdotesand discussions from our PLCs have also led to a shift in how we define and approach EML. For these reasons, weaimed to create EM training that would be accessible to all members of the instructional team from the faculty to theTA level. Our goal was that this training would communicate the OSU College of Engineering’s unique vision of EMand better prepare instructional
inthis study. A two-plus-two approach avoids the need for an institution wide conversion of allrequired courses. Among other findings from a survey taken, the most salient issue facing facultycourse builders was the extraordinary time commitment needed to complete course certification.On the other hand, this teaching option has great appeal to working professionals in that itaffords a greater degree of flexibility by not having to meet and commute at scheduled timesduring the course of a week. The impact on the rate at which students matriculated has beenencouraging. Students are able to complete more courses over the summer resulting insynchronizing larger cohorts of upper-class students. Special care must be taken, however, toassess a
Reconfigurable Machining Systems at the University of Michigan. His work focused on developing software applications to assist manufacturers design and plan operations on advanced machining lines that could be rapidly reconfigured to meet changes to a product’s design or production volume. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia as junior chair of the NSERC sponsored research program in Virtual Machining. His work at this time focused on the mod- eling of cutter/workpiece engagement geometry to support process modeling for aerospace machining applications. In 2007 he joined the faculty of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Wash- ington
theplane at several resolutions so the simulation could be run for efficiency and accuracy. A secondary goal of the collaboration between Sozen, Kilic, and the Envision Center wasto be able to output the simulation in a meaningful way that would allow it to be visually realisticand engaging. Other participating faculty and graduate students of the Envision Center werebrought into the project in order to take on this second task as the simulations were beingexecuted. Dr. Voicu Popescu, of Computer Science and the Center, worked with Hoffmann tobegin developing a process for translating the FEA data into a 3D animation application to renderit in a realistic manner. Discreet’s 3ds max was chosen because it was familiar to Popescu
and undergraduate engineering and education teams as well as a popular Family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Parry is currently a co-Pi on two NSF DR-K12 Projects: the Exploring the Efficacy of Elementary Engi- neering Project led by the Museum of Science Boston studying the efficacy of two elementary curricular programs and Engineering For All, a middle school project led by Hofstra University. Other current projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching, culture change and pro- gram consulting for multiple K-8 integrated STEM schools across the country, serving as a regional Professional Development for the Museum of Science, Boston’s
supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. (NSF 1700581).1.0. IntroductionAdvanced manufacturing (AM) employers are challenged to find enough adequately trainedworkers. One reason may be that the K-12 educational system has failed to engage or exposestudents to technical application or workplace skills either early or extensively enough, orarticulate high school students to 2- or 4-year manufacturing programs [1, 2]. Another reason isthat institutions of higher education (IHEs) often produce too few graduates to fulfill AMindustry demands, and many engineering technology graduates are not gaining the right skill setsfor available positions [3]. Quite possibly, this misalignment may include skills that can be hardto manage and
transformations could occur in IVR for engineering faculty to temporarily transfer intothe student—veteran, person with disability, woman, woman of color, LGBTQ individual, lowsocioeconomic status or first-generation—perspectives to encounter firsthand some of themarginalized experiences that ‘inclusion privilege,’ power and implicit bias commonlycircumvent.IVR as a Tool for Training FacultyPresenting scenarios through IVR to create awareness of the marginalized experiences of othersas well as the impact of those experiences on those that have experienced them could return“altered” individuals to the real world—possessing a heightened awareness with the hopes ofshifting to be more inclusive. The natural question becomes, how might perception of
each day. After one year of the three year program, the feedback fromparticipants has been overwhelming.Eleven in-service teachers and one pre-service teacher from urban and rural areas of Texas werehosted for a 4 week summer research program on the Texas A&M campus. Combined, theseteachers work with approximately 1400 secondary public school children every year, who are80% Hispanic and/or African American. The teachers were placed in teams of two based ontheir school location so that they would be able to develop a supporting network. These teacherteams were matched with faculty research programs in power, water resources, smart materials,food engineering, space exploration, and mathematical modeling. They also engaged indiscussions with
the AEC students.Moreover, the credential can facilitate the student to know about how to use the Envision ratingsystem to support holistic, data-driven infrastructure projects that can advance the goals tosupport healthy communities, the environment, and the economy.Limitations and Future WorkThe authors acknowledge some limitations of the study. The framework to integratesustainability in the classroom is developed based on faculty experiences and insights that mightbe subject to faculty biases. Although the study discusses adopting sustainability education as ameasure to build equitable and sustainable infrastructure, there might be other means that canfacilitate achieving social equity in infrastructure systems.Based on the lessons
Homeland Security and the IE Curriculum Marlin U. Thomas School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue UniversityAbstractThe increased concern and awareness of threats to our homeland security resulting from the nine-one-one tragedy has changed our lives and altered our priorities in essentially all engineeringdecisions. While security is not a new design issue in engineering, this increase in socialsignificance and public demand will naturally impact the practice and curriculum in industrialengineering. This paper reviews the areas of industrial engineering where homeland security iscritical and provides some thoughts on integrating security and antiterrorism
industry-taught courses will helpthe faculty members to impact the learning experience of undergraduate students by providingthem with skills that are highly marketable and appreciated by industry. This industry-led facultytraining have resulted in digital logic design curriculum development in the electricalengineering technology programs. This curriculum revision incorporates the addition of two newcourses that added to the current course (Digital Electronics). As a result, the EET programintroduced two new courses (Digital Design Using VHDL and Topics in Programmable Logic).Each of these courses is three credit hours (2 class, 3 lab). The new curriculum development willprovide students with a hands-on educational experience well-respected by
and handheld computers will interact with custom, low-cost prototyping kitsintegrated with plug-and-play data acquisition units to offer a portable alternative to traditionalbenchtop work spaces. Six technical objectives support this goal:• Develop and replicate affordable, portable circuit prototyping kits useful either inside or outside of a traditional laboratory context.• Create laboratory experiences (hands-on protocols and software interfaces) enabling students to learn EE concepts in their preferred environment.• Develop lecture demonstrations with these prototyping kits.• Integrate these lecture and laboratory modules into four existing courses• Assess the ability of these modules to engage students, enhance learning, and
leads the Applied Research, Evaluation, & Engagement area of Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute.Dr. Yerika A Jimenez, Duke University Dr. Yerika Jimenez is a postdoctoral researcher at Duke University working with the Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). Her current research focuses on two primary areas: 1) understanding how to facilitate difficult conversations about diversity, inclusion, and equity (DEI) in computing and 2) understanding how upper elementary students (4th and 5th grades) learn how to debug in block-based programming environments. Specifically, she studies their debugging behaviors, challenges, skills, and ability to articulate their debugging process
a brief review on the disparities in technology transfer by gender, followedby responses from each of the panelists in the three later categories above. The goal of this paperis to archive the wisdom from this session for future reference.Disparities in technology transfer by genderGender gaps have been noted in the technology transfer arena 1. Stephan concludes that,“women are less likely to disclose than are men, less likely to patent, and less likely to engage inentrepreneurial activity, such as starting a company or serving on a scientific advisory board,”although rigorous quantification of the bias was left for future studies 1. In the medical schoolresearch community, women were as likely as men to report inventions although women
Advances in Engineering Education FALL 2017Teaching Ethics as DesignROBERT KIRKMANKATHERINE FUANDBUMSOO LEEGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, GA ABSTRACT This paper introduces an approach to teaching ethics as design in a new course entitled DesignEthics, team-taught by a philosopher and an engineer/designer. The course follows a problem-basedlearning model in which groups of students work through the phases of the design process on aproject for a local client, considering the design values and the ethical values in play in each decisionalong the way. Their acquisition of ethical thinking skills and moral imagination are assessed
teachers and researchers. Publications and funded research are Page 15.1088.2typically evidence of these activities. Obtaining quality information to acquire expertise in theseareas is necessary. Typically, educators use journals and conference papers in their writing. Thispaper focuses on standards, which are one of a whole suite of materials available to faculty andstudents.ABET accreditation impacts the curriculum, program outcomes, and facilities in undergraduateand graduate education. ABET identifies standards as materials that students should learn howto use. The paper discusses specific ABET curriculum requirements and outcome criterion
interpret data. 3. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. 5. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. 6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 7. an ability to communicate effectively. Page 10.291.4 8. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American
teachingschedules. To decrease impact on faculty time, lunches are kept to one-hour. Thefirst part of the hour is unscheduled, to provide participants with an opportunity toget their food, get settled, and socialize/network with other attendees. Theremainder of the session is used to give a presentation on a professionaldevelopment topic (leadership, communication, time management, lab management,worklife balance, negotiation, networking, administrative pathways on campus, usingteams or peer-editing in class) or a climate-related gender issue (stereotype threat,student-incivility, implicit bias, impact, respect, effectiveness). Participants areencouraged to contribute, share, and reflect during the sessions. All presentationsare posted on the program
that the programs are remedial learning. The National Research Council reports thatbringing real-world problems to classrooms have improved students’ abilities to work with oneanother and communicate their design ideas to real audiences. They report by use of modelingthat students learn to enhance their individual problem solving and increase their individualcompetence. In addition, even one year after engaging in activities, the students rememberedthem explicitly and discussed them eagerly with pride. The National Research Council, states,“What a child can perform today with assistance, she will be able to perform tomorrowindependently, thus preparing her for entry into new and more demanding collaboration”8.Conclusions and Future WorkThrough