, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke, Ph.D., has been involved in engineering design and teamwork for over thirty years as a professional engineer, university professor, and researcher. He is the current Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington and teaches engineering design and teamwork courses. His two research foci are how students learn design and teamwork and how understanding of learning can be used to create more effective pedagogies. Prior to teaching Dr. Zemke was a professional product designer for over twenty years with emphasis on mechanical packaging of microwave circuitry
developed four microfabrication based courses where students use a clean room facility to fabricate transistors, solar cells or MEMS structures. Dr. Kaiser’s research group is currently creating radiation sensors for a radiation tolerant computer system for space flights on satellites and in the International Space Station.Liz Kovalchuk, Montana State University Elizabeth Kovalchuk received her BS in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering (IMSE) from Montana State University (MSU) in 2017. Her research interests include engineering education, engineer- ing management, and narrative training. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Improving the Teaching and Learning of
Paper ID #27290Pushing and Shoving: Improving Student Understanding of Support Reac-tions with Hands-on DemonstrationsDr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she regularly facilitates pedagogical training for other faculty. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico.Dr. Laura Doyle, Santa Clara University Dr. Laura Doyle is a lecturer in the Civil Engineering Department at Santa Clara University where she teaches undergraduate courses in civil engineers. Before coming to SCU, Laura was a
by the project team, Table 3 (next page) summarizes thestudent-designed business plan.Assessment of Student Learning OutcomesIn addition to using a set of scoring rubrics to assess the quality of student projects, a Likert-typeand open-ended questionnaire was developed to assess if the project-based active andcooperative learning approach was effective in addressing those four competency gaps. A totalof 21 students in the class responded to the questionnaire survey. The following paragraphsprovide a detailed description of assessment results.The question to address the competency gap of “a specific manufacturing process” was: Pleasedescribe to what extent the team project helped improve your understanding of machiningprocesses
Through Sketch Training On A Touchscreen (Evaluation) AbstractThis paper evaluates an approach for training and improving high school students’ SpatialVisualization skills. Using touchscreen devices from home, 45 high school juniors and seniorsenrolled in an educational application consisting of nine lessons on drawing orthographic andisometric figures. As part of their remote instruction during the COVID 19 pandemic,engineering students downloaded the application onto their cell phone or tablet and completed aseries of auto graded exercises that were assigned in their high school course. The applicationincluded gamification features such as stars for rewards and hints to encourage studentpersistence
. Currently, MiguelAndr´es is validating his framework of a Blended & Flexible Learning approach that focusses on STEM courses and its practical adaptation to overcome barriers brought up by the COVID-19 pandemic.Vanessa Guerra, University of Virginia ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: TikTok Format Videos to Improve Communicating Science in Engineering Students Samantha Paucarina1, Josué Batallas1, Miguel Andrés Guerra2*, Vanessa Guerra31 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2
. Page 13.1343.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Using LEGO-based Engineering Activities to Improve Understanding Concepts of Speed, Velocity and AccelerationAbstractAnalysis of the educational research both theoretical and experimental indicates that traditionalteaching methods are not very effective in helping students to understand science concepts andtransfer the principles learned in the classroom to other situations. Innovative interventions areneeded to supplement science curriculum and to improve students’ comprehension throughactive engagement in the learning process. We developed several LEGO-based activities to beimplemented in the secondary schools and first year college science curriculum. LEGO
Page 11.735.7incorporated into a crop that has been genetically modified to benefit the farmer. Unfortunatelythe technology surrounding the gene enables farmers to grow their crops but not recover theseeds to be planted for the next growing season. The gene alters the crop so that the seeds cannot germinate, forcing farmers wishing to grow the crop to purchase new seeds every year inorder to continue growing the genetically engineered crop. This practice provides customers tothe companies, creating a “monopolists dream.”7 Instead of using the genetic modification of thecrop to produce an improved food supply, the gene increases the farmer’s dependence on theproducing company.BSE senior year: course implementationThis is a good opportunity for
experiences, learning communities,writing-intensive courses, collaborative assignments and projects, undergraduate research,diversity/global learning, service learning/community-based learning, internships, and capstonecourses and projects.7 Another study published by the California State University Chancellor'sOffice shows that "Participation in high-impact practices has been shown to improve both learningand persistence for all students, but especially for the historically underserved."8 This study alsoindicates that participation in more than one high-impact practice increases the benefits for thesestudents. Other specific strategies that have been proven effective in improving student outcomesfor minority students include mentoring programs,9,10
different documents could cause labs to take longer andmay cause student frustration. The literature does not include any specific studies on this,although cognitive load theory was discussed in the context of computer science andprogramming classes by Maczka and Grohs [19]. The hypothesis underlying this paper is thatdecreasing the number of documents that students need to work with in the lab will improve thelab experience by decreasing time pressure, decreasing the probability of students missingrequired items in the lab assignments, and decreasing the probability of students forgetting toupload one of their lab documents.2 MethodsAll mechanical engineering students at Kettering University take an introductory DynamicSystems course, focused on
students over the 3semesters are given next to each year. The data shows the pass rates tend to be higher in thespring and summer semesters compared to the fall. Typically, this is due to students who retakethe class feeling more comfortable with the material and being able to successfully complete thecourse on a second attempt. The percentage of students progressing onto advanced courses wererelatively constant for the fall and spring semesters. Overall, the pass rate percentage forremedial math students showed improvement over the 5-year period while starting at 55% in2014 and reaching a maximum of 82% in 2017. The percentage of students advancing remainedrelatively constant at around 48% over the five years.Figure 1: TMCC Remedial Pass Rates
like to see more discussions used in my courses. 1 2 3 4 52.12. The topic of food companies versus consumers interests me. 1 2 3 4 52.13. What could be done to improve this exercise?2.14. What did you enjoy about this exercise?2.15. What are some other ethical topics related to Bioprocessing Engineering that you wouldlike to learn about?BSE senior year: assessmentStudents were given two days to complete an informal written assignment having them considercontroversial ingredients in food products. Students were to write short answers to fivequestions designed to help them formulate opinions toward the topic. Students
. Thelaboratory course is used to give students hands-on experience in verifying some of the majortheoretical or physical concepts that they have used throughout their student careers. Theknowledge gained in a laboratory courses usually leaves a lasting impression on students asrelated to experiential learning concepts. However, from a practical point of view, there aremany factors that could hinder the effectiveness of the laboratory experience. Some of thesefactors are i) lack of familiarity of many students with procedure, ii) equipment availability andprocedure, and iii) lack of experience with objectives and the expected outcome of theexperiment. The purpose of this paper is to present the use of an interactive virtual laboratoryexperience
, the Learning Technology Center (LTC) http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/ctrs/ltc/ atVanderbilt University was contracted to assess the effectiveness of the case study approach intechnology education. Each of the SEATEC teams identified the courses where field-testing willbe conducted. Assessments are currently being performed at community colleges and four-yearuniversities across Tennessee, Alabama, and Kentucky. A National Advisory Committee wasalso formed to monitor the progress in meeting this objective.Initial field-testing instruments indicated that students often feel as if they are employees at thejob site in which the technical problem is taking place. Since case-based instruction is student-centered, students have more responsibility for
, neurosurgical, and pediatric devices. She teaches courses in design, biomechanics, and mechanics at University of Delaware and is heavily involved in K12 engineering edu- cation efforts at the local, state, and national levels. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Improving Scientific Writing Capability in an Undergraduate Population using a Fading Paradigm Scaffolding ApproachIntroduction The Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET) requires that engineeringstudents graduate with “an ability to communicate effectively”1, hence the need for problem basedlearning approaches that also foster scientific writing skills. This need is typically met throughstudent hands
clear that students are showing improvements onmeasures that are closely linked to the course emphasis and valued for their grade. Based on this, weexpect to see continued improvements in the project and case studies over the semester. That beingsaid, probably the best test of the effectiveness of this semester will be how the students perform nextyear in unit operations lab and senior design. Page 15.1062.13ReferencesAronson, E., N. Blaney, et al. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publishing Company.ETS. (2010). Retrieved 9-9-9, from http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem
the judging process the first time, the programmers generally knew what to expect in subsequent visits, allowing them to hone the description of their work via repetition.A survey sent to the judges after the science fair activity was conducted also yielded value.Among the points raised were a need to focus more on effective and appropriate ways tocommunicate to the targeted age groups and adding course material on gamification techniquesand concepts to improve the effectiveness of the applications.Assessment: Quantitative ResultsThe Community Service Attitude Scale (CSAS) survey, developed to measure college students’attitudes toward community service,15 was selected as the primary assessment instrument tomeasure the overall
during the lift off and in orbit. Professor Orabi has taught courses in both undergraduate and graduate level Mechanical Vibrations and undergraduate level capstone design courses, thermodynamics, Measurement Systems, Engineering Mechanics and Introduction to Engineering. One of Professor Orabi’s most recent projects involves the development of learning modules. These modules provide undergraduate engineer- ing students with improved learning of basic, conceptually-difficult engineering concepts in the context of a basic knowledge of finite element analysis.Prof. Kyle A. Watson, University of the Pacific Kyle Watson earned his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Villanova University and his M.S. and Ph.D
quality of the student writing and oral communication skills in the past. We have focused a greater portion of the senior plant design lab CM4851 and CM4861 as well as the technical communications course CM3410 towards improving students communication skills. We have seen an increase in student performance in the past few years. For example, student reports now discuss whether or not overall material and energy balance calculations close around the system or unit operation being studied. This was a result of industry input. · A final focus area does not apply to the chemical engineering curriculum but is in regards to one of the tools by which student performance is evaluated: the chemical engineering
. Jessica Resig is an instructional designer with Penn State World Campus. In addition to maintaining an online course portfolio, she currently supports research initiatives and technology pilots related to digital pedagogy. Dr. Resig holds a master’s degree in Instructional Technology from Duquesne University and a Ph.D. in Instructional Design and Technology from Old Dominion University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Program to Improve Manufacturing Learning Using Simulation and AutomationAbstractThis paper discusses an NSF RET program that focuses on improving manufacturing learningusing simulation and automation. The program participants are high
suite of instructional offerings, additional assessment methods were needed.While we have made significant progress in assessing our teaching effectiveness via rubricassessment of our students’ products, prior to the project described in this paper we had notconducted any assessment of our own skills as content developers, lesson planners, and teachers.In order to develop a more holistic narrative of the effectiveness of our education program,assessing ourselves, our peers, as well as our students, is crucial. While rubric assessment ofstudent work products benefits our course-integrated sessions, assessment of ourselves asteachers benefits the overall instruction program through improving skills and proficiencies thatcan be applied across all
elements: studentteams and moderators, course segments and focus problems, in addition to a performanceevaluation process and an Active Learning Performance (ALP) competition. Moreover, the OTRuses a number of tools including an active learning policy, moderators’ guidelines, an OTRrubric, a moderation form, as well as a rating table and a ranking table.The activation and regulations of the OTR are described in detail, and some of its results arepresented. These results indicate that the OTR helps improve the frequency of qualityassessments, in a highly ethical environment, while maintaining low requirements on financial,human, and time resources. These features are especially attractive for undergraduate, low-budget engineering schools, where
, and levels of expectation are similar. Given these variations in detail, regional accreditation of higher education institutions is intended to: 1. foster excellence in higher education through the development of criteria and guidelines for assessing educational effectiveness; 2. encourage institutional improvement of educational endeavors through continuous self-study and evaluation; 3. ensure the educational community, the general public, and other agencies or organizations that an institution has clearly defined and appropriate educational objectives, has established conditions under which their achievement can reasonably be expected, appears in fact to be
strategies conforms to the goals in the institution. IV. RESEARCH METHODS performance, improve forecasts, reduce operationalThis study employs a qualitative research paradigm with a expenditures, and improve the effectiveness of data-comprehensive review of scholarly journals, industry research driven decisions.studies, and case studies to examine best practice operational 3. Stoykova and Shakev (2023): Analyzes theanalytical data integration. An interpretive approach is applied management information systems function ofto put challenges of integration into perspective, to find artificial intelligence. The research sets
for analyzing the data. The average scores for thequestion about the positive contributions of the oral exams to learning in the courses under studyranged from 3.25 to 3.75. Although the average student ratings of the extent to which theyagreed that the oral exams positively contributed to their learning differed in the courses understudy, the results of the statistical analysis showed that with a 95% confidence level, there wasno statistically significant difference between those ratings. Overall, students reported a positivecontribution of the oral exams to their learning in all of the courses under study.The average scores of students’ ratings of the effectiveness of oral exams in improving technicalspeaking skills, increasing the
with an outcomes to assess each academic year. Data is collected in average of 4 or higher. An assessment and evaluation a variety of forms. of Student Exit Survey results will occur annually, at A major action for improvement was the requirement that the end of each academic year. students take core courses (two in each core area for Ph.D. students) before the Qualifying Exam. This directly Patents/Publications Criterion: 80% of graduate correlates to the Core Knowledge student outcome and the students must have at least one publication. An
University Program at https://www.altera.com/support/training/university/overview.html. 2010.[16] XilinxU. Xilinx University Program at http://www.xilinx.com/support/university.html. 2010.[17] M.D. Takach and A.T. Moser. Improving an introductory course on digital logic. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 1995, volume 2, pages 4b6.1 –4b6.2, 1-4 1995.[18] Yi Zhu, T. Weng, and Chung-Kuan Cheng. Enhancing learning effectiveness in digital design courses through the use of programmable logic boards. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 52(1):151 –156, feb. 2009. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4696063&tag=1.[19] Guoping Wang. Bridging the gap between textbook and real applications: A teaching
finding from Question (2) which indicates that across theboard students are overwhelmingly seeking ways to systematically solve problems.Admittedly, additional assessment needs to be done, a control and treatment group might be usedand a more rigorous study design. Nonetheless, the above preliminary data should be a helpfulstarting point for a more in-depth analysis.Discussion and Concluding RemarksThe familiar degrees of freedom concept taught in most chemical engineering sophomorematerial (and energy) balance courses could become a building block for improving ourstudents’ ability to set-up and solve problems across the major courses of the curriculum. Aprototype for doing this is being tested in select courses in in the Department of
course or equivalent is mandatoryfor many mechanical and bioengineering students. Just one course (10 weeks, in a quartersystem) is clearly not enough to learn to program effectively. To achieve true proficiency,subsequent classes should routinely exercise prior programming skills and techniques. This isespecially difficult since the current Matlab course is taken by most students in theirfreshman/sophomore year, while the required classes using Matlab are usually taken in lateryears. Students typically remember very little of Matlab and this leads to difficulties onhomework and class projects and necessitates significant amount of class time and office hoursfor reviewing programming concepts. The challenge is to maintain the curriculum for the
. Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy LTC Kevin Arnett is a fifth year Assistant Professor at the US Military Academy. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2001, his M.S. Civil Engineering from U.C. Berkeley in 2011, and his PhD in Structural Engineering from UCSD in 2019. He teaches structural analysis and design of steel structures, and is a licensed Professional Engineer in California and Missouri.Dr. Michael Gerhardt Oesterle, Naval Facilities Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center Michael Oesterle is a research structural engineer and the division director for the Capital Improvements Explosion Effects and Consequences (EE&C) Division at the Naval Facilities Command