faces a skillsshortage and lacks a workforce that is confident and prepared to take on the challenges of aclean energy future [2]. 60,000 new jobs in energy planning and management are expected toform in regional Australia alone by 2025, with the number increasing every year. By 2025, itis projected that the construction of generation, storage, and transmission projects necessary topower cities with renewable energy will require an additional 43,000 workers [2]. With verylarge energy targets to hit, an equally significant effort must be made by education systems toequip upcoming power engineers with the necessary skills and knowledge to tackle theproblems of an evolving industry. For the past 30 years, university engineering faculties have
Farmingdale State College, SUNY, New York. Dr. Aydin’s research is in the general area of wireless and mobile networks with a focus on transport layer issues including multihoming, SCTP, congestion control, and network coding. Dr. Aydin has mentored undergraduate and high school students on research projects that involve the use of Arduino boxes and Raspberry Pi’s in the context of Internet of Things, and the use of public testbeds such as CloudLab and FABRIC for WiFi and cellular networking research. Dr. Aydin has been a vivid supporter of women in computing and increasing diversity in computing. She has been the co-faculty advisor for Women in Computing club at Farmingdale, contributed in Grace Hopper Celebration as a
, and problem solving discourse among students, faculty, and practitioners. Dr. Olewnik is also the Director of Experiential Learning for the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Educa
working on leadership and teaming activities for engineers.Dr. Robert R. Klein, Western New England University Robert R. Klein, Ed.D., is a Professor of Education at Western New England University (Springfield, MA). He completed his doctoral work at Harvard and collaborated with the Center for Applications of Psychological Type (CAPT) to develop an assessment tool, the Klein Group Instrument for Effective Leadership and Participation in Teams (KGI). He trains people internationally in leadership and group skills and is a faculty member of the C.G. Jung Institute in Zurich, Switzerland. Page 26.1598.1
, he teaches Intro to Engineering, circuits I & II, senior lab, and embedded controls courses. His research interests are robotics, embedded control systems, and teaching methodologies and effectiveness.Dr. John J. Burke P.E., Western New England University John Burke received the B.S.E.E. degree from Northeastern University in 1984, and the M.S.E.E. de- gree from University of California at Los Angeles in 1986, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 1993. Dr. Burke joined the faculty of Western New England University (WNE) in 2000 and since 2004 he has been an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering. Dr. Burke’s primary teaching inter- ests are
leadershipprograms, Tonkay, G., and Zimmers, E.9 remarked that they “migrated their honors engineeringleadership program to the general engineering population because they found it was the middleof the class (who) tended to do quite well years after graduation, often advancing into positionsof leadership.”Although engineering leadership is viewed as important to a student’s professional skill set, thereare issues: limited room in engineering curriculums to dedicate time for a leadership course(s) 10;or engineering faculty may lack the background and training to effectively teach team skills tothe students11. These problems provide the impetus for new and innovative engineeringleadership programs.With leadership so closely intertwined with personal traits of
problem by deciding what to focus onabout the problem. This aspect also makes teaching design difficult, especially in the first yearwhen students have completed little to none of their technical coursework. To overcome thisissue, faculty sometimes reduce the complexity by making the design problem purely technical,removing social and policy factors. However, this approach can actually make the problem moredifficult for students, by obscuring the problem context and meaning. Another way facultyaddress the issue is by reducing the ill-structuredness, providing kit-based projects in whichstudents lack opportunities to frame the problem.We sought to investigate how first-year students navigated a complex and ill-structured designchallenge, guided by
-year course at a Hispanic-Serving Institutionthat is Carnegie-classified as a Very High Research and Community-Engaged institution. TheUniversity is in an urban setting in the American Southwest. Our School of Engineering includessix departments, serving approximately 600 first-year students. A longstanding concern theSchool has faced is the attrition of students, especially those students from minoritized racial andethnic groups and first-generation students. In particular, a majority of students arrive at theuniversity not yet ready for calculus, which can delay entry into core courses.As one part of addressing this issue, we designed and implemented activities in a new first-year,3-credit course for engineers, computer scientists, and
issues and then solve a problem athome, in school, or in the workplace [e.g., 17; 18]. Accordingly, literacy includes foundationcornerstone knowledge (information), capabilities (skills) and cognitive strategies (habits ofmind and decision making) that enable hypothesizing, designing, implementation,troubleshooting, conversation, evaluation, and analysis [e.g., 19]. Such proficiency can bedeveloped through innovative education that focusses on re-tooling the future workforce viapedagogy that supports new synaptic connections through the various thinking modalities ofSTEM.The section on thinking strategies in STEM describes various thinking modalities acrossSTEM fields. These include critical thinking, design thinking, innovative thinking
, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the
, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is
AC 2009-1157: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHPROGRAMS ON ENGINEERING STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARDGRADUATE STUDIESLinda Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology Linda S. Hirsch is the Program Evaluator in the Center for Pre-College programs. She has a doctoral degree in educational psychology with a specialty in psychometrics and a Masters degree in statistics. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for 15 years. Dr. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research studies and is proficient in database management, experimental design, instrument development, psychometrics and statistical programming.John Carpinelli, New
contained in the CCSSO report8: active learning, coherence, contentfocus, duration, and collective participation and a capstone session which provided the teachersthe opportunity to use their acquired skills and knowledge in a new application. Teachersattended an initial two week summer workshop and a one week summer workshop the followingsummer. Academic year follow-up included one day workshops and in-class support byuniversity faculty, staff and graduate students to work with and mentor teachers during theimplementation process in the classroom and program assessment. In addition, an electronic,peer-learning community was established, for communications among teachers and universitypersonnel, and for online professional development
Swivl-assisted classroom, given students’ preference for this as an alternativemode. This work will also investigate faculty reservations regarding Swivl and similartechnology, assessing the degree to which concerns for privacy, academic freedom, and remoteclassroom access impact faculty adoption of this mode. This report provides a snapshot ofstudent observations and expectations. Rather than relying just on intuition, this report functionsas an invitation for curious faculty as to what worked and what could be improved from students’perspectives.6. ConclusionsSome preliminary research suggests that while faculty and students both experienced an abruptchange in the teaching and learning experience as a result of COVID, students have been
dedicate time and effort to the training of their faculty who teach online. Though lack offunding is certainly an issue, there are practices which could be utilized with minimal funding.Peer discussions, observations of current online courses utilizing best practices, and a structured Page 12.1173.17mentorship program could send faculty members on the path to learning practices that promotestudent success and higher learning. It may be necessary for 2-year institutions to review trainingoffered for teaching online in order to address the issue of faculty members not attending trainingwithin the institution, whether it is implementing new types
place to go.[I5]”In addition, there seemed to be additional issues related to working with adjunct faculty who oftenteach survey classes:“And they are mostly – the faculty that teaches those students are mostly sessional or adjunctfaculty, so they might not be there next year… It's tricky. It's very hard for me to find who is there,and to track down who will actually be teaching that course, and who is new, and they are comingin August, and sometimes even the end of August, so I'm like ok, it's hard. It's tricky. But it'schallenging with that kind of sessional faculty, with that kind of sessional faculty that are heretoday and gone tomorrow.[I5]"Another interesting topic that came up is the growing number of international students inengineering
and machine design. Coordinator of the Undergraduate Program in Mechanical Engineering and Faculty Advisor if the PACE Global Vehicle ProjectMr. Brendan P. Sullivan , New Mexico State University Brendan P. Sullivan is a MS graduate student in the Department of Industrial Engineering at New Mexico State University (NMSU) where his research focuses on additive manufacturing and systems engineering. He holds a Masters Degree in Political Science with a concentration in international relations and security issues. Brendan has served as team lead for the NMSU institutional involvement in the Partnership for the Advancement of Engineering Education (PACE), is vice chair of the Institute for Industrial Engineers student
copyright, fair use, open access, and the public domain.” This is an importantconsideration as engineering educations continue to put emphasis on teaching technicalcommunication skills. While technical communication can take many forms, a common form inboth education and industry is the use of presentations. However, one component of thepresentations that can easily be overlooked by both students and faculty is ensuring the use ofimages that are obtained in an ethical manner. This area of instruction is a concern to bothlibrarians and engineering instructors as it will be a recurring task in the engineering field aftergraduation.This paper presents a study examining the ethical use of images by students in presentationsgiven for a Mechanical
, commuter students were especially receptive to andrequired in an online learning environment.Key results included recommendations to guide administrators and faculty in developing anonline learning environment that will enhance and promote urban, commuter student success.How best to facilitate a learning environment to support commuter students will be discussed.Finally, the minimum tools necessary to create a stimulating and valuable learning environmentfor commuter students in an urban setting are outlined.IntroductionTraditional four year undergraduate students have long had a “sense of community” within theircampus, school and department. They have enjoyed an information network within the walls oftheir institutions enabling them not only to
, ChatGPT identified 7 possible errors,as well as troubleshooting tips for each issue (RQ1 Transcript Lines 281-333). Overall, the use ofChatGPT in the process of lesson planning could save instructors a significant amount of time, aslong as the instructor is expert enough to ensure the provided content is accurate.The researchers also see a potential of using ChatGPT to save time on common logisticalroutines of instructors, like drafting course announcements (RQ1 lines 702-775), answeringstudent questions, creating new homework assignments (RQ1 lines 777-889), or drafting studentfeedback. When given a few bullet points of students’ strengths and areas for improvement,ChatGPT wrote a student evaluation (RQ1 lines 892-934), which would be helpful
Engineering Education, 2015 Development and Implementation of a Pathway Assessment Model for the ASPIRE ProgramAbstractThe University of New Haven received S-STEM funding for A Scholarship Program to IncreaseRetention in Engineering (ASPIRE): Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the 5 yearprogram is to improve retention, particularly in the sophomore and junior years, for engineeringstudents who show academic potential but are at risk of not completing their studies due tofinancial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. The ASPIRE program aims toaccomplish this by: providing scholarships for sophomore and junior level matriculated studentsbased on both financial need and merit; recruiting and
Paper ID #37405Board 150: AFRL Career STREAM Implementation at NMT (Work in Progress)Destiny J. Crawford, New Mexico Tech Mechanical Engineering Department Destiny Crawford is a current graduate student at New Mexico Tech studying Chemical Engineering for a Master’s of Engineering degree. She was a pathways mentor during the Summer 2022 AFRL Career STREAM apprenticeship program in the Mechanical Engineering Department.Jett C. Emms, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Jett Emms is a current Graduate student at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in Socorro New Mexico working towards a PhD in
published literature deals with establishing effective grading systems forteamwork, tracking the team’s efforts, and facilitating the creation of groups, our course hasalready addressed these issues to our satisfaction. Therefore, we were most intrigued by the UMgroup’s approach to teamwork. Many of our students already seem to have a negative attitudeabout team-based exercises because many of them have served on teams before. We knew thatone of our tasks was to initiate a conversation among students, TAs, and faculty about how tomake teams better. In addition, we wanted to demonstrate the professional imperative that leadsus to adopt a teamwork pedagogy.The Polytechnic School of Engineering is, of course, not alone in its effort to inculcate
Services at Brandeis University, where she oversees an initiative supporting 150 first-generation and low-income students. In her previous role as Educational Counselor and Adjunct Faculty at San Jose State University, she founded the GENERATE initiative which was featured in the Chronicle of Higher Education Diversity in Academe 2013 Issue. Her research on first-generation college students considers the role of stressful circumstances on academic success. Dr. Morazes earned her PhD in Social Welfare and MSW from the University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare. Page 26.1291.1
engineering courses and found that first-time freshmen performed betterthan transfer students, and additionally, that this trend persisted across multiple instructors andsemesters of the same course [5]. A number of possible causes for this have been examined;Laanan et al. found in a survey of transfer students that many felt less comfortable interactingwith faculty at their new institution, and some felt increased stress and received lower grades [3].Concannon and Barrow found that engineering transfer students have lower self-efficacy thanfirst-time freshman, which was theorized to be due to transfer shock [4].A systematic literature review [6] was unable to locate research on transfer students after theirfirst post-transfer year, although the same
New York Hasan Asif, is a graduate from the University at Buffalo in Data Science, possesses a keen interest in data transformation and gaining insights from data, includes expertise in setting up statistical tests, transforming data, and creating visualizations. He has demonstrated his skills by architecting systems to analyze the longitudinal participation of students throughout their studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Variance in Undergraduate Research Participation: A Quantitativeand Qualitative Investigation Among Students with Differing Levels ofInvolvementIntroductionThis research paper concerns undergraduate research, a high impact experience [1] that
and professional development that fosters reflectivepractice. When we first introduced this model, we intentionally did not preclude faculty fromparticipating as advisers. Out of the fifteen faculty previously involved in academic advising,two chose to engage in the new model as advisers. The remaining thirteen chose to be facultymentors.A third element of this advising/mentoring model was the use of the Student Service Team andthe Student Success Committee. The student services team (consisting of three staff membersand Faculty Director of Undergraduate Programs) meets weekly to discuss issues reported byfaculty mentors or from interactions with students, review information related to student successsuch as advising touch points, retention
given a school e-mail address upon enrollment. Studentsare currently informed of their web-based registration schedule, and course grades viatheir college e-mail address. The result is that most students expect important collegeannouncement through their college wide e-mail address. The GSOE has developed aGSOE student listserv that allows Deans and Chairs to communicate with the entireGSOE student body via e-mail. This medium is used to quickly inform students aboutdepartmental and school wide events and issues of concern to them, such as advisementand registration schedules, new academic procedures and career opportunities. Thestudent listserv is subdivided by major (e.g. Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering)and academic status (e.g
formation control, linear/nonlinear control, and mechatronics. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK 12 Fellows programs, funded by the National Science Foundation, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), he has conducted significant K-12 out- reach to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of several New York City public schools. He received Polytechnic’s 2002, 2008, and 2011 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award and 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-Poly’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included three edited books, six chapters in edited books, one
related to bias. Students will also be asked to use role-play to identify the main bias- related issues and concerns related to the case study. 2. Weekly responses to topics related to specific algorithm bias found in relevant readings, TedTalks, and news articles, etc. will be assigned to broaden students’ understanding of the effects of bias in today’s society. 3. Current events related to ethics on the whole and/or bias specifically will be posted on an online discussion board. Students will be encouraged to participate online by providing their insight related to the current event. 4. Guest lecturers/speakers will be invited to discuss the ethical concerns related to algorithm bias. They will be randomly