outcome focuses on the ability to use techniques, skills and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice. These benefits could not be attainedwithout implementing and using softwares with modeling and simulation capabilities as isdiscussed later based on the instructor’s observations before implementing DARWin 3.1.Fortunately, introducing students to such software is not time consuming and could be presentedin few lectures, in addition to extra tutorial as needed, without the need to remove any classcontent. In general, students had a good understanding of how to design flexible and rigid pavementsaccording to AAHSTO 1993 Design Guide. The design process is lengthy and of course timeconsuming with large room for mistakes
Paper ID #13673Interdisciplinary Design Course Structure: Lessons for Engineering Instruc-tors from a Capstone Design CourseDr. Karl Olsen, Washington State University Dr. Olsen has been a member of the WSU faculty since 2009 and is an committed to developing innova- tive and effective teaching methods. He has taught a diverse section of coursework and is very active in developing ways to improve the undergraduate education at Washington State University. He uses innova- tive teaching approaches and is extremely receptive to student feedback. His enthusiasm for engineering courses is contagious. Students witness a
AC 2010-1980: CURRICULAR DESIGN FOR 21ST CENTURY ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT: NEED, DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS, AND IMPLEMENTATIONJon Sticklen, Michigan State University Jon Sticklen is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State University. Dr. Sticklen is also Director of Applied Engineering Sciences, an undergraduate bachelor of science degree program in the MSU College of Engineering. He also is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education
analyze and interpret data C) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. D) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. E) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. F) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. G) An ability to communicate effectively. H) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. I) A recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. J) A knowledge of
, which are then evaluatedusing the problem specifications16. During the early concept generation phase, students oftenbecome fixated on their initial concepts, and may prematurely begin evaluation10, 17, 18. Thisresults in a need for pedagogical strategies to aid students in enriching their conceptual designphase. Instructors must understand how concepts are generated, and how tools can facilitate theexploration of potential design solutions.One challenge in teaching concept generation in engineering is that techniques proven helpful inconcept generation may be slow to be adopted by instructors19-21. Thus, in this study, weexplored how an empirically-validated idea generation tool, Design Heuristics, was integrated byengineering instructors in
back of the room is equipped with asmall load frame and tensile testing machine. The instructor uses active learning techniquesduring class lectures and consistently incorporates the use of visual aids and video clips todemonstrate key and difficult concepts in class. The content of steel design courses is fairly consistent among universities and generallyinclude topics ranging from material properties to beam-columns as previously noted. Theprerequisite material for steel design courses mainly includes civil engineering materials andmechanics of solids. Among the topics that students learn, the authors have noted particularstudent struggles with analysis skills that require deeper understanding and judgement. Some ofthe particular
AC 2011-1870: ALTERNATIVE ENERGY EDUCATION USING ALTER-NATIVE DESIGN AND DELIVERYStephen R. Fleeman, Rock Valley College Stephen R. Fleeman is an Associate Professor and Academic Chair of Electronic Engineering Technology and Sustainable Energy Systems at Rock Valley College in Rockford, Illinois. He has been at the college for 28 years and retired in 2009 from Hamilton Sundstrand (an aerospace company) after 31 years of working as an electrical engineer concurrently. Page 22.156.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Alternative Energy Education Using Alternative
Session 2793 An Effective Engineer Design and Teambuilding Experience for Non-Engineers Robert J. Rabb, John S. Klegka United States Military AcademyAbstractPart of the balanced core curriculum of the United States Military Academy (USMA) requiresengineering education for all graduates to promote their ability to be creative problem solvers.This core curriculum provides a fundamental understanding of physical systems for allgraduates. Although all graduates receive a B.S. degree in various disciplines, many will majorin a non-engineering area
2006-1888: A DESIGN-FOR-MANUFACTURABILITY WORKBOOKAlvin Post, Arizona State University Alvin Post, Ph.D., P.E., received a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the University of Hawaii. He has extensive industrial experience as a machine design engineer.Thuria Narayan, Arizona State University Thuria Narayan received a Bachelors degree in Mechatronics engineering from Bharathiar University, Tamilnadu, India in 2004 and is currently pursuing a masters degree in the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Department at Arizona State University. Her areas of interest are design and automation
Paper ID #29315An Integrated Teaching Method for Design CoursesDr. Scott A Civjan, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Scott Civjan is a faculty member at UMass Amherst where he has taught a wide variety of undergraduate and graduate courses over the past 20+ years. He has 4 years of consulting experience between obtaining his BSCE from Washington University in St. Louis and his MS and PhD in Structural Engineering from the University of Texas Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020An Integrated Teaching Method for Design CoursesAbstractDesign courses in the Civil Engineering
theiterative refinement of the synthesis of information.In our research we used the group space tools in CLEERHub.org, in an undergraduatescience course designed for non-science majors. CLEERHub.org (Collaboratory forEngineering Education Research) is an NSF-funded research project aiming to build anonline community of practice for engineering education researchers to foster interaction,collaboration, knowledge sharing and creating. It emerges from a growing cyberinfrasturecalled HUBzero with an open source environment originally designed to support researchcommunities’ ability to share resources. In this paper we consider the ways in whichstudents used the collaborative online group space to support their project work. Inparticular, we present and
considerations in computermodeling, (2) emphasis on manufacturing with an eye toward restoring a competitive NorthAmerican manufacturing base, and (3) handling the issue of intellectual property wheninnovation is desired as part of the project.Students in Industrial Technology and Engineering Technology may not be exposed to the samelevel of mathematical rigor as straight discipline-specific Engineering majors. However, theyoften use the same tools as the Engineer once they are in the workforce. Industrial designstudents should understand some of the background and implications of their designs that cancome out of the design programs that their employer may require them to use in order to avoidthe problem of designing in a vacuum. We address this by
the University of Kaiserslautern, Germany in 1997. He has exten- sive industrial experience and teaches courses in analog and digital electronics, embedded systems, and computer programming.Dr. Kerry R Widder, Milwaukee School of Engineering Kerry R. Widder received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Marquette University in 1983, and 1984, respectively. He also received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2011. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at Milwaukee School of Engineering. He has over twenty years of industrial experience designing embedded systems.Prof. Hue V. Tran P.E., Milwaukee School of
design of the DO vehicle is achieved through a 42-week collaboration (across three terms and 2 semesters) between the engineering and design faculty and students. The team synchronizes the design milestones where in the ideation phase a small team of automotive engineering students is assigned to one transportation design student to jointly generate a vehicle concept. This is the phase where the left-brain (engineering world) collides with the right brain (artistic world) and is a critical project phase where both worlds need to create an understanding for each other’s (rational/emotional) drive and motivation. The partnership allows the students to explore creative options and develop unique vehicle concepts that are
clinical needs are complex and require more timeand effort. Working with students to focus on a “feasible” project is ongoing. Vetting thepotential projects in class provides a unique, interactive environment to enhance student learningand the design process. Including representatives from the Technology Transfer Office withfocused lectures on intellectual property, patents and regulatory requirements facilitatesimproved background research and understanding of identified unmet needs. Adding studentsfrom the Miller School of Entrepreneurship fostered multidisciplinary collaboration. However,accommodating class schedules to integrate the engineering and business students tended to slowprogress and increase student anxiety near assignment due dates
means you should beable to answer the student who asks “so what”? You should have a response (orbetter yet, an activity) that explains how the concept described in your problem isuseful to an engineer designing real world products.For example in the bowling ball problem, as the ball begins to roll on the floor,the energy loss due to coulomb friction shrinks to a negligible value. What thismeans for a bearing designer is that you can reduce friction losses by designingbearing surfaces to “roll” on each other. An investigation of journal bearingsversus roller bearings could form a sideline activity. Also an investigation of ballbearings versus needle bearings can be useful in understanding the difficulty ofsupporting thrust loads. For a gear
a course for first-year engineering students to incorporate the concepts of race andsocial justice, and how they are critical in engineering design. The course is being offered as a pilotsection that will eventually be provided to all first-year engineering students across all sections ofthe Intro to Engineering Design course. In this course, the main learning goals have traditionallybeen to have students understand the engineering design process at a basic level and understandwhat good teamwork is within the context of engineering design. The re-designed course keepsthese goals, but also introduces the need to see, define, and communicate differences in your designand your team. To be an effective engineer, we believe you must
. Page 23.1235.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Structures – Design Studio Link Teaching structures to architects is a juggling act between the technical and the creative. It is not enough to teach statics and strength of materials. Architects are creators of space and as such they must also understand the inherent strength and weaknesses of the vast array of structural systems at their disposal. There are three topics often debated between structures educators. The first is the question of what should be taught first. Can one understand structural systems without first understanding the fundamentals of forces, load tracing
An important outcome of a mechanical engineering technology (MET) program is afundamental understanding of the mechanical design process, the development of solutions todesign problems with consideration of specific requirements and constraints. This study isconcerned with the idea generation phase of the engineering design process, specifically theideational practices of freshman mechanical engineering technology students. The ideageneration phase is a complex endeavor that involves defining the problem, generating potentialsolutions to the problem, the consideration of constraints of the problem, and converging on themost appropriate solution for the problem. The development of these skills is an essentialcomponent of future innovation
is an Assistant Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. His research interests include design education, fatigue and fracture mechanics, transportation safety, and energy efficiency.Leigh Weiss, Rowan University Leigh Weiss is an Associate Professor in Computer Science at Rowan University.Kevin Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He has received the 2002 ASEE PIC-III Award, 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award, 2004 Raymond W. Fahien Award and 2005 Corcoran Award for his contributions to engineering education
).RecommendationsFuture direction in this course would include raising the level of complexity on certain projectsand inviting additional practicing engineers to present design projects to the students. Theinstructors also need to work more closely with our local engineers so that they understand ourstudents’ background and can design and present projects accordingly which will challenge thestudents to a greater degree.ReferencesDutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magelby, S.P., Sorenson, C. D. A Review of Literature onTeaching Engineering Design through Project-Oriented Courses. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 2007Estell, J.K., Hurtig, J. Using Rubrics for the Assessment of Senior Design Projects.Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
objective of introducing the MATLAB projects was to encourage young mechanicalengineers to enhance their programming skills, because modern day engineers need softwareprogramming skills to be successful and have a professional edge in industry. The goal of theprojects was to provide a platform for improved understanding of machine design and emphasizethe importance of programming in mechanical engineering, specifically (1) the fast speed atwhich complex problems can be analyzed and (2) the ability it provides students to be able todevelop creative solutions. Such skills are expected to empower students to solve morechallenging open-ended and/or integrated design problems, and to conduct design projects for amore rewarding experience in machine
engineering students and identifiedfactors that helped students engage in a project. The first factor is that students need “interestingwork.” The second is that students must understand the structure of the problem with clearlydefined expectations. Thirdly, students work best when they feel connected to other students intheir groups.Maleki11,12 addresses many aspects of using industry based projects in the capstone design coursein Industrial Engineering. Many of the aspects of project selection and establishing learningoutcomes are well developed in his work. All of the projects are with local businesses. Schillingand Klamma13 also discuss the process of projects done with industry in a computer sciencecourse. The difficulties and successes are
two semester period. Each course is team-taught by professorsin all the engineering departments consisting of Civil, Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical.Depending on the type of projects selected, student teams could be interdisciplinary, or disciplinespecific. The capstone design courses are used to assess eight of the eleven ABET a-k outcomesconsisting of the ability to: design a system, function on multi-disciplinary teams, adhere toprofessional and ethical responsibilities, communicate, understand global and local impact ofengineering solutions on society, engage in lifelong learning, have knowledge of contemporaryissues, and use modern engineering tools for engineering practice. Students’ abilities in theseoutcomes are quantitatively
curiosity, making connections, and creating value via analyzing anddesigning multiple framing plans and selecting the superior design through NABC approach. Abeam design problem was given on the final exam, which was similar to the previous year whenthe students were not assigned any project. The comparison of the grades showed that theproject has improved the overall understanding of students on beam design. The directassessment was conducted by rubric evaluation and an anonymous survey was used for theindirect assessment of the project. The students’ feedback indicated that students enjoyed thesimplicity and open-ended, yet challenging nature of the project.IntroductionProject-based learning (PjBL) has been widely used in engineering education
Session 3425 Excellence in Product Design Jon C. Dixon Adjunct Faculty Programs in Engineering and Technology Management University of St. Thomas St. Paul, MinnesotaAbstractIndustry strives mightily to provide excellent products. No manufacturer is likely toproduce excellent designs without understanding what is meant in some way by“excellence”. However, it is extremely infrequent to find solid definitions of “designexcellence”.The University of St. Thomas (St. Paul, MN) has established a
employers as one of severalconstituencies. Others often include students, faculty, alumni, and parents.Designing PEOs to meet the needs of employers can be difficult for three reasons. First,obtaining detailed enough information on what employers want can be difficult; certainly usinginput from an industrial advisory board is crucial, but small programs like ours may havedifficulty obtaining board participation from large companies who do hire our graduates. Also,we want to design our program to meet the needs of potential employers as well as actualemployers. Second, some companies lack the understanding of what entry level engineers shouldbe doing, especially in fields like industrial engineering. Guidance from a pool of the wrongexperts could be
, etc.This paper will analyze which competence domains, a curriculum towards sustainablemanufacturing should have and how a certificate program in “Sustainable Manufacturing” can beaccomplished. This curriculum design is based on the experience of creating and teaching newgraduate level courses “Sustainable Manufacturing” at Texas Tech University and “EnergyEfficiency and Industrial Sustainability” at University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. All segments ofsociety must be educated to understand, environmental, economic and social connections withinmanufacturing systems engineering to facilitate sustainability. The innovations in technology andmanagement play a fundamental role in solving the global challenge in economic development,while simultaneously
supported by alocal qualified non-governmental organization (NGO). EWB-USA projects stress theneed for engineers to contextualize, i.e., to understand a project from the perspective ofthe host country and to “gain experiential knowledge about social, cultural andenvironmental issues by living the lives of the inhabitants in their work locations”[2].The challenge with EWB-USA international project design has been to reach the properbalance of student-led creativity and learning, collection of data, and adequate expertreview. This challenge has several major components. First, collection of data in a ThirdWorld country has logistical barriers that are sometimes frustrating and often prohibitive– language differences, difficulties in obtaining visas
Paper ID #16355Demonstrations in Large Enrollment Courses: Designing for ImpactDr. Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida Dr. Pamela Dickrell earned her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Florida, with research specializing in Tribology. Dr. Dickrell is Associate Director of Teaching for the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education within the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at UF. She designs and teaches large enrollment core engineering courses, and leads the teaching arm’s research into innovative educational methods for the delivery of curriculum to students across