technologyfacilitates the dual advantages of actively engaging students in constructivist learning andproviding real-time formative assessment for both the instructor and the students.Our successful use of this technology on campus is the foundation for an outreach program opento all Colorado educators, but targeting science and mathematics teachers. K-14 teachers cometo campus to learn both technical and pedagogical aspects of using classroom communicators.They return to their own classrooms with all necessary equipment. Three weeks later, theyreturn the equipment to campus and complete this professional development activity with sharedreflection and summative assessment. They are eligible for subsequent checkout of theequipment. We discuss the mutual
University of Michigan. Her research interests lie in assessing and amending curricula to help students transition from undergraduate to professional practice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Motivating factors that encourage rural students to pursue engineeringIntroductionThis complete research paper describes a qualitative study conducted at a large midwesternuniversity exploring the motivations rural students cite as reasons for pursuing engineering.According to the United States Department of Education, rural communities account for 32% ofpublic elementary and secondary schools, serving 24% of students in the United States [1].27.1% of rural students
pilot survey conducted by the Women inEngineering Programs and Advocates Network (WEPAN) in Spring 1998, college wide data isnot routinely collected to assess student views or perceptions.2 It was therefore necessary to firstdevelop methods for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data and information, and to establisha methodology for ongoing studies and program development.This paper describes the initial efforts of a study that was conducted to help the IndustrialEngineering Department understand factors that contribute to the relatively low enrollment offemales in the program, and to identify steps that the department can take to reduce thisdiscrepancy. The study, which began during Fall Semester 2000, embraces the concept ofcontinuous
Tuskegee University where she specializes in physical chemistry and computational chemistry. Her research interests have ranged from calculating transition states of small molecule reactions in solution to molecular dynamics of polymers. She has worked on two American Chemical Society Physical Chemistry Exam Committees and is an active participant in the Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Physical Chemistry Laboratory (POGIL-PCL) community.Carol A Handwerker, Purdue University Carol Handwerker is the Reinhardt Schuhmann, Jr. Professor of Materials Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Lessons learned from the NSF IGERT program
paid off. The research demonstrates that evenwith limited resources and space, one can create a centralized area designed to help studentssucceed in their first year of engineering. The purpose of this paper is to guide others who mightbe thinking about developing a first-year engineering learning center or questioning the value ofcreating a seemingly too-small space for their students due to limited resources. The paper willoutline adjustments made and lessons learned that can be incorporated into the planning processof other educators and administrators who may be looking to provide a modest “makerspace”and hospitable centralized community area for undergraduate engineering programs and perhaps
thereality of the interdisciplinary nature of the workplace. This reality frequently extends beyondengineering disciplines and includes colleagues from other backgrounds ranging from projectmanagers, marketing and sales, to assemblers, machinists, and technicians. Often, they are alsorequired to follow a documented or prescribed process that may resemble an engineering designprocess. To better prepare students for both engineering practice and internships along the way,we developed a semester-long design project that is bound by many of these constraints. ThisWork in Progress paper describes the project goals and constraints, periodic checkpoints thatreinforce the engineering design process, assessment methods, and project motivations with
various programs at NSF, NASA, and DoD. She also serves as referee to various journals such as Risk Analysis, Environmental Science and Technology, and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. She is a member of INCOSE, ASEM, ASEE, IISE and TOCICO. She has been named Top 20 Professors in Engineering Technology To Know, OnineEngineeringPrograms.com.Dr. Alice F. Squires, Washington State University Dr. Alice F. Squires has served in technical and leadership roles for over 35 years. After nearly 25 years in industry, Alice is serving engineering education as an Associate Professor in the Engineering and Technology Management department of Washington State University. Alice is Founder of the INCOSE Empowering Women as
Engineering Research Center for Revolutioniz-engagement with the students. ing Metallic Biomaterials, The Center for Advanced StudiesAs for data, the high school GPAs for both groups were in Identity Sciences, and The Testing, Evaluation, and Controlwithin 0.2 points. The average first-year retention rate of Heterogeneous Large-Scale Systems of Autonomous Vehi-(Table II) for the HOME Program participants was cles Center. These research centers provide an array of under-90% as compared to 81% for non-HOME participants. graduate research opportunities for current engineering andThe average second-year retention rate (Table III) for the computer science students. Equally
c Society for Engineering Education, 2020WIP: Motivations and Outcomes of an Undergraduate Teaching Assistantship ProgramAbstractThis work in progress paper poses the research question: what are the motivations andoutcomes that lead undergraduate electrical engineering students to volunteer as teachingassistants (TAs)? While graduate students have a long history of serving as TAs, the Electrical &Computer Engineering department at a large public university has replaced virtually all of theirgraduate teaching assistants with undergraduates. Many of this department’s courses are in thehybrid “flipped” format, wherein the in-class lecture is replaced with active learning time inwhich motivated teaching
an MEM degree.Respondents were affiliated with six of the nine schools comprising the Master of EngineeringManagement Programs Consortium. The study compares the motivating factors for U.S. studentsand International students, and draws on a similar study of graduate students at the University ofMichigan in 1995. The results suggest that while small gradations in factors exist between U.S.students and International students, both groups’ motivations to enroll in a MEM program alignclosely with their career goals.Introduction People considering graduate Masters of Engineering Management (MEM) programs in theU.S., whether U.S. students or International students, have clearer choices as competingprograms continue to differentiate themselves
programs.Thus, the challenge is to retain the large number of students entering engineering program whileremoving the students who have no interest in being retained. Enrollment management activitiesmust address these issues while addressing the pressure to grow the institution populationwithout compromising engineering program quality.To manage growth in the engineering college, an enrollment management system wasimplemented in 2012 and employs program admission requirements and student performance aswell as performance metrics. The enrollment management plan was developed by a committeeof faculty and staff advisors in the college of engineering. The plan addressed the increase innew admits to the college as well as strategies to remove non-completers
. As a result, students obtain job ready skills and project abilities in 2years that can greatly leverage their early learning and focus.In a multi-university collaboration, all participants gain in shared information including:articulation agreements, ABET start-up templates and shared consultant advice, summerinternships, legal forms, competitions, joint projects and other synergistic areas. Using acollaboration mesh network strategy coupled with hybrid technology and proven teachingstrengths, a more efficient program is planned for pilot testing for SCU consortiums towardfurther feasibility assessment.1.0 IntroductionMajor advances can be made at the undergraduate level in STEM education. Large gains areexpected in program quality and
, Morgan State University. He is also a graduate research assistant at the Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Smart Innovation and Resilient Engineering Research Laboratory also at the Civil Engineering Department. His research interests include UAV applications in high-rise and bridge infrastructures monitoring, Remote Sensing and GIS in engineering applications, engineering education, student success and hands-on engineering pedagogy for program enhancements. He is an alumnus of University of Nigeria (UNN), having earned his M.Sc. in Surveying and Geoinformatics (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System). He previously completed a B.Sc. in Surveying and Geoinformatics, at the Lead City University
when needed. After meeting at consultation, the author helped each teamchoose the most appropriate project topic. These consultations were necessary to provideguidance and making sure the project satisfies basic requirements. These included:1. Must be a mechatronics project, i.e. involve electrical, mechanical, computer and control engineering aspects.2. The scope must be such that it is neither too small nor too large so that it can be implemented in one semester!The teams were then asked to meet the instructor (the author) as needed outside class. Inaddition, based on his past experience [3-4], he used some Friday lab seasons to meet each teamto consult with them and check on their progress. Each team was required to submit a formalfinal
with their experience.ConclusionAn AutoCAD elective course was designed for managing and applying said software in earthsciences degrees, based on a collaborative process between directors, academic secretaries,teachers of shared subjects, and students. A program was developed from a syllabus out of whichactivities were generated in AutoCAD for integrating contents in line with the agreed goals of thegraduation profile.An assessment instrument is applied to mine engineering students in the AutoCAD course. Theresults of which are reported below: ● The reception seen from students in the use of AutoCAD as a tool to support design activities in mines, tunnels, ramps, frameworks, plants, and three-dimensional modeling of deposits, is
standard for the C programming language. This approach is a departure from the plethoraof code written by non-standardized coding schemes, so prevalent on the Arduino net basedcommunity. Another unique feature of instructions of the course is coding methodology. Theinstruction for the course is done following strict adherence to Structured Coding methodology.Most of the technology students prefer visualization activities and hands-on experiences in theirlearning environment. The SparkFun Inventor’s Kit [3] with Arduino Uno and other open sourceresources have become an effective tool for the entry-level microcontroller course. In this course,we teach necessary programming skills and knowledge of computer interfacing with input andoutput devices
cases. Our interviews probed for explanatory insights into student experiences, particularlywith regard to understanding how faculty and GTAs contribute to satisfaction of students’autonomy, competence and relatedness needs and student engagement in the course. The contextof the course, participants and data collection and analysis methods are described in greaterdetail in the following sub-sections. Page 22.785.4Classroom ContextThe research site is a large public university in the southeastern region of the United Stateswhere all incoming engineering students enter a general engineering program. They typicallyspend a single year in the general
atintersections, including the combination of ideas from multiple contexts9. However, returnersrepresent a relatively small proportion of engineering PhD students and the limited researchabout their experiences suggests they may face particular challenges in their doctoral studiescompared to their direct-pathway peers (students who pursue a PhD shortly after theirundergraduate education). In an effort to learn more about returners’ perspectives, experiences,research, and approaches to engineering problem solving, our team designed and implementedwhat is, to our knowledge, the first large-scale mixed-methods study comparing returning anddirect-pathway engineering PhD students. We draw on Eccles’ expectancy-value theory (EVT),which describes achievement
criteria for undergraduate engineering education, which is to develop “an ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams and an ability to communicate effectively” (ABET, 2016). Smith (1996) first introduced a cooperative learning instructional model to the engineeringeducation community cooperation as “working together to accomplish shared goals” andcooperative learning as ...the instructional use of small groups so that students work together to maximize their own and each other’s learning. Carefully structured cooperative learning involves people working in teams to accomplish a common goal, under conditions that involve both
programs that were evaluated in this study are discussed.Although it is recognized that collaborative research projects and global teaming with partnersabroad may be very different activities requiring unique collaborative techniques, they aregrouped here to remain consistent with the categorization scheme used in the literature (seeTable 1). In general, programs of this type take advantage of communication technologies toenable students or teams of students to participate in research or other teaming projects withstudents at other universities. These programs can be small, consisting of only a few students ata couple of universities, to large-scale projects coordinated through multiple universities.Through collaborative research and global
, etc. can becomposed with proper selection of Boxes and wiring them accordingly. The programs in FlowDiagram format can be directly sent to the NAO robot via WiFi. Figure 6 shows the FlowDiagram we developed for the forward kinematics experiment. Figure 6. Flow diagram in ChoreGraphe for forward kinematics. Page 26.659.7We developed a small library in the ChoreGraphe environment with four Boxes that perform thedesired robot motion and retrieve the joint angles or end effector coordinates: LArmSetJoint,LArmGetJoint, LArmSetCartesian, and LArmGetCartesian.As shown in Figure 6, the Boxes LArmSetJoint and LArmGetCartesian are
Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, and serves as the Program Director for the Electrical Engineering Technology Program. In the past she has worked for the University of Texas at Dallas, University of Texas at San Antonio, Rutgers University, and Politehnica University of Bucharest. She is a senior member of the IEEE, served as associate editor for IEEE Communication Letters, and has served in the technical program committee for the IEEE ICC, WCNC, RWW, VTC, GLOBECOM, and CAMAD conferences.Dr. Murat Kuzlu, Old Dominion University Murat Kuzlu (Senior Member – IEEE) joined the Department of Engineering Technology, Old Dominion University (ODU) in 2018 as an Assistant Professor. He received his B.Sc., M.Sc
with instructors, and intensepeer support systems that are established amongst students within the communities.6,22Most LLCs have the intended goal of making a large campus feel small.23,24 Living and learningcommunities are mainly characterized by their smaller size, their social intensity, and thepurposeful support provided to the students who participate in these communities.4 LLCs have Page 25.1088.3the ability to transform large, impersonal institutions in which students may feel like just anumber into small intimate peer groups within the residence halls.5MethodsA mixed media approach was used in the study presented here.25 Focus groups
unknown.The purpose of this study is to understand the experiences of international students whoparticipate in study abroad programs with the specific research question: How do international students in the U.S. describe their experiences from participating in an engineering study abroad program?To answer the research question, we used qualitative data gathered from journals of internationalstudents participating in a study abroad program at a single, large technical research university.Exploration of the LiteratureStudy Abroad in the U.S.The prioritization of study abroad has increased the number of study abroad programs acrossinstitutions [17] and students who participate in these programs. The study abroad experience isincreasingly
+ range and having taken mostengineering prerequisite math and science courses in her first year as a biology major, she wasacademically prepared to switch into an engineering major without difficulty.Because B-State has a very large and well regarded industrial engineering program, she had a lotof friends who were industrial engineering majors and heard from them about the courses shewould be taking. What attracted her most to IE though was the “broadness” of the major and howit fit in with her skills and interests. I can theoretically still go to medical [school] if I wanted to, or I can go to law school, or I can go to business school. So, I can do so many things with it and I appreciate that because I’m still essentially
Laurie K. Laird is the Director of Corporate and Alumni Relations and Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU. She received a masters degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. At ONU, she teaches primarily freshman engineering courses. In addition to freshman programs, one of her areas of interest includes outreach to K-12 students. Prior to teaching, she served as a design engineer for GE Aviation.John-David Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU, and serves as Chair. His Doctorate is from the University of Notre Dame. Research interests include education, controls, robotics, and
degreesawarded in civil engineering in 2020 [11]. Data on the top 50 environmental engineeringinstitutions was not available so only these programs were examined. Despite this limitation, civiland environmental engineering degree programs are frequently hosted by the same department, sostudents often use the same department-provided resources and guidance. Program websites were benchmarked to assess the accessibility of FE exam support onCEE department websites. This analysis does not include any in-person guidance that might havebeen available for students; Although this limitation means that the data might not truly reflectdepartment communications, the analysis serves as an important indicator for the online visibilityof available FE exam
categories is part of ABET’saccreditation process for engineering programs. Making offers a potential lens to highlight thoseareas which may be lagging in a more traditional engineering education. As part of ABETaccreditation criteria, universities are asked to demonstrate continuous improvement. For manythis means opening maker spaces and bringing project-based learning pedagogies and hands-onlaboratory experiences to their undergraduate engineering programs. There is a tension rooted inABET accreditation standards (current and proposed) for what is expected to be taught incomputing and engineering undergraduate programs, how to assess it, and what is valued aboutthe enterprise of engineering education. With recent proposed changes to ABET student
in 2016 [16][17] [18]. “YOLO” network allows multiple object recognition at high accuracy [19]. Multipleversions of YOLO networks are implemented, including version 4 (YOLOv4) on the darknetplatform, and version 5 (YOLOv5), which is integrated into ROS [20]. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 26-29, 2022 Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Chang, Y.YOLOv5 contains four types of architectures which are named with suffix s for small, m formedium, l for large, and x for extra-large, according to the number of residual units in CSP1_X,CBL in CSP2_X, and convolutional kernel number.Simultaneously localization and mapping
technology. Student andindustry assessments show that the certificate program successfully follows a pragmaticapproach that integrates theory with real world applications to prepare students for a career inthe diverse green energy industry.1. IntroductionThe world faces concurrent energy and pollution crises. Rapid population growth and an increasein the living standard in many emerging countries have led to a greater demand for fossil fuels.Over the next 25 years, the societal requirement for energy is forecasted to increase by 36% withthe bulk attributed to developing countries1. The demand for energy will eventually outpace theability to supply energy from traditional resources. Most industry experts believe that an energycrisis is likely for