engineeringscience is a more established introductory approach to teaching college students than human-centered design. Making may provide a new model for progressive, student-centered learningthat can match calls from industry for a scalable educational framework that encouragesinnovation and entrepreneurship among students. Making can be a potentially revolutionarylearning platform, with a unique blend of technological and interpersonal skill development andits applied context.Research Focus and MethodsWe are specifically interested in using our ongoing work to address “how the attributes ofMaking might translate to an engineering classroom context?” The basis for proposing suchguidelines for Making-Based Learning is in the synthesis of our findings from
. Page 9.1248.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe new Biomedical Engineering Department will provide a complete, in-depth BiomedicalEngineering curriculum to students already well grounded in the core undergraduate engineeringcurriculum. The program highlights an immediate introduction to the major, strong personalinteraction with faculty, strong partnerships with industrial participants and a signature laboratoryemphasis. It is rooted in the College’s historical emphasis on applied research, and in theCollege’s tradition of industrial interaction. Faculty will provide a curriculum that will
effectively support the goals of the program? Who can the team partner with internally and externally to increase the likelihood of success? How can we better integrate with the Colorado Community College system to provide a clear pathway for students seeking engineering degrees?V. Summary, conclusions, and future workThis paper introduced a new organizational and pedagogical model that is changing the waystudents learn electrical and computer engineering. Included was the process the department usedto implement the first phase of the project in the technical core of the curriculum, with provenstrategies that enabled collaboration among faculty and staff to transform their approach toteaching and learning. In addition to identifying the right
persistent misconceptions with first-yearengineering students. It addresses the following two aspects: (1) misconception repair strategieshave had weak results, and (2) a synergistic approach that focuses on preventing/eliminatingmisconceptions. This paper has implications for new direction and effort in studying studentmisconceptions and promoting conceptual changes, which is to focus on preventingmisconceptions from forming.IntroductionResearch shows that it may be too late to correct and repair misconceptions of fundamentalscience and engineering concepts by the time students reach core engineering courses. 1, 2 Forexample, it is quite common that engineering juniors and seniors have misconceptions related toconcepts in heat transfer, fluid
on real engineering challenges, (3) mastery-based learning and assessment, (4) and focused mentoring [1]. In Year 2, the project transitionedfrom a project-based learning to work-integrated learning model. In the second pilot semester,students will experience a 3-week pre-internship preparation session and spend 12 weeks in apaid internship while taking engineering coursework. With this transition, the team designed anew curriculum and created a new research plan to learn from the work-integrated learning pilot. The purpose of this poster paper is to describe the transition of an engineering programfrom a project-based to a work-integrated learning model. Based on this transition from Year 1 toYear 2 of the NSF grant, we discuss
, Thomas J., Thain, Jr., Walter E., “Innovative New Program in Telecommunications Engineering Technology,” Proceedings of the ASEE-SE 2003 annual conference, April 2003. 4. Thain, Jr., Walter E., Fallon, Thomas J., “A Comprehensive Telecommunications Degree or Engineering Technology,” Proceedings of the ASEE 2001 annual conference, June 2001. 5. Thain, Jr., Walter E., Fallon, Thomas J., “Choosing a Telecommunications Curriculum for Electrical Engineering Technology,” Proceedings of the ASEE-SE 2001 annual conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 24-27, 2001
‘manufacturing engineering’ curriculum emerged, the overalllandscape did not shift as substantially as the promise of C2002 and its companion eventsseemed to presage. During the ensuing decade, no widely applicable solutions emerged to thepersistent problems of the discipline.Substantive challenges that touch the fundamental integrity of ‘manufacturing engineering’ as adefinable discipline arose in slightly new form through the decade following the conclusion ofthe 21st Century series. The on-going identity crisis within SME intensified, largely due to a re-echoing of questions from three decades earlier in the broader socio-political environment aboutthe entire relevance of manufacturing as a valid social and economic influence and ofmanufacturing
replaced or the one (or two) of the DC power supplies couldbe made available for students to use to complete the exercise. The impact of the use of this kitto student outcomes has not yet been assessed and is planned in future work.1. H. Klee and J. Dumas, “Theory, simulation, experimentation: an integrated approach to teaching digital control systems,” Education, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 37, pp. 57-62, 1994.2. K. A. Connor, B. Ferri and K. Meehan, “Models of mobile hands-on STEM education,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.3. D. Millard, M. Chouikha and F. Berry, “Improving student intuition via Rensselaer’s new mobile studio
® Program.ConclusionSince 2013, the Femineer® Program has grown exponentially. With the innovative toolkit,personalized curriculum, in-person interactive teacher training workshops and mentoringopportunities, the Femineer® Program offers a modern way to encourage female students to studySTEM. Cal Poly Pomona College of Engineering is looking forward to the continued growth ofthe program and the opportunity to continue our research within the Femineer® Program. References[1] J. E. Jacobs, “Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in Math andScience career choices: What have we learned?” New Directions in Child and AdolescentDevelopment, vol. 110, p. 85-94, January 2005. [Online].[2] National Center
failures and the persistence offailures as students progress throughout the curriculum are presented. Validation of the errormodes has been conducted through inter-rater reliability studies and student interviews.Background In engineering education there are a number of central concepts and skills that formthreads which connect one content area to another within a discipline. These threads generallyconsist of basic or simple concepts and are central to a student’s engineering education becausethey form the scaffold upon which higher-order knowledge constructed. The recurrence of thesethreads throughout a curriculum or program of study is referred to as a trajectory. One aspect of these recurring concepts and skills is that they may
}@arizona.edu Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of ArizonaAbstractIn this paper, we first describe the Optimal Learning Outcomes Assignment (OLOA) problem,which involves assigning learning outcomes to courses during the backwards curriculum designprocess in ways that minimize the complexity of the resulting curriculum. An approximation algo-rithm for the OLOA problem is then described that yields novel solutions to important engineeringcurricular design challenges. Reducing curricular complexity, while maintaining effective learn-ing outcomes attainment, increases the likelihood students will complete a curriculum and earn adegree. The rationale for the approach
. • There will be 1-2 optional meetings per term for studio faculty to share innovative practices and work through persistent problems.Computations “Bridge” CourseIssues of student retention and course instructional stability with the current first yearcomputations course led to the development of this curricular innovation. A core problem wasthe unequal preparation of students for the first year course in engineering computations. Inshort, some students would fly through an activity while others struggled slowly through it. Thisvariation has led to several issues in activity design and course management.The School Curriculum Committee developed a new model to address first-year computation. Itwould place an intermediate course as an
curriculum • Department decline in US News and World Report national engineering program rankings for undergraduate only institutionsEngineering Retention Study RecommendationsMost of the recommendations from the Study Group follow logically from the risk factors.Faculty additions were needed to spread the workload around. This would keep classes smalland give faculty time for assessment, student interaction and involvement, research, professionaldevelopment, and course development/enrichment. Since the study was completed, fouradditional tenure track faculty and three part time faculty have been hired to reduce teachingloads to six semester hours each semester. However, increased research pressures are absorbingmuch of the available
and methods can assist the learningprocess. Many of the innovations in approach to engineering education and the decreasein emphasis on lecturing as the primary method of material delivery have resulted fromknowledge and appreciation of student learning style.Of the many diagnostic tools available to measure learning style, The Myers-Briggs TypeIndicator1 (MBTI) is probably the most commonly used. In 2002, the authors published aMBTI distribution study for University of Tennessee engineering graduates2. Thesestudents were educated in a traditional curriculum. This study provided us with insightsabout which personality types were ultimately successful in traditional engineeringprograms. There is now a sufficient number of our graduates that
criteria.One approach to formally incorporating the teaching of technological literacy in an engineeringor engineering technology degree program would be to add a required course in the subject to thecurriculum. Given the pressures on universities to limit the number of credit hours required fordegrees, addition of a new course is likely to be difficult. An existing course may need to bedeleted from the list of requirements to make room for the new course. Even if a course can beidentified for deletion, there is likely to be competition to fill this slot with other proposed newcourses that would meet other critical needs in the curriculum. Finally, even if a programdecides to add a required technological literacy course, either a current faculty
174modern work environment and to respond effectively to the rapid evolution of knowledge andthe ongoing iteration of problems in complex systems36, but such an instructional approach alsofosters the learning and participation of non-traditional and minority engineering students14, 15, 29,31 . However, based on the experience of the civil and construction engineering (CCE) faculty atCPSLO and feedback from their Industrial Advisory Board (IAB), a knowledge and skills gapexists in the CCE curriculum. This negatively impacts students’ preparation as well as theretention and the ability to increase diversity.While multidisciplinary project-based learning has been advocated in engineering for a numberof years, the initiation of the Accreditation
sponsor approval for project completion ahead of time has increased significantly.Future work is currently being conducted to develop additional modules and in-class exercises,based on this approach. Use of the Internet to offer the modules is also being considered. Inaddition, a new engineering lab building is under construction at GVSU. A portion of thestructure has been designed to include a senior capstone design area. The design bay, for use inbuilding projects, is surrounded by a mezzanine containing design team areas equipped withnetworked PC’s containing all of the interdisciplinary design and analysis software used in thePSE. The work areas have been designed to enhance the interdisciplinary team approach used inthe courses. In addition
addressing the societal needs posed by these grand challenges, our students mustunderstand the “needs” that require engineering solutions as well as the science and technologiesthat make engineering effective.While traditional engineering curricula are organized around scientific principles (e.g., signalsand systems) or technologies (e.g., imaging), our new curriculum will be organized around thephysician and patient needs (e.g, curing cancer or sustainable access to healthcare) thatnecessitate the science and technology. These curriculum revisions are being supported throughthe National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) program[EEC 1623141].In this paper, we will describe the threats (needs) that are driving our
a wealth of industry related experience and willingness to share it with students could teach at a Community College. Those more interested in research activities would be able to collaborate with a Four Year University focusing on research with potential teaching responsibilities limited to advanced topics, where audience interest is less dependent on pedagogic skills. This integration of professional and academic experience could help improve the complex relationship between engineering education and industry. A cooperative effort directed at building a unified approach for attracting and retainingstudents in engineering and the development of a seamless engineering curriculum for
engineering curriculum to integrate and balance instructionin technical topics, writing and communications, teamwork, creativity, and design methodology.The school’s focus is on engineering practice, which means that these technical and non-technicalskills must be taught in concert with each other, rather than in isolation. A natural step beyond teaching these topics in some degree of isolation leads to a moreholistic approach to instruction, which is what we suggest in this article. Engineering educatorsneed to become aware of and responsive to the more humanistic needs and desires of students. Ithas become a near cliché these days to say that engineering students are often ill-prepared for thecareer and, more importantly, the life they will
–341.13. Munson, C.C. (1995). “Elements of a new Electrical Engineering curriculum at Illinois: A shift from circuits to signal processing,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, Seattle, WA, vol. 1, pp. 1Sf–4Sf.14. Karweit, N. (1998). “Contextual learning: A review and synthesis”, in A.M. Milne (ed.), Educational reform and vocational education (pp. 53-84). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning.15. Caine, R.N., and Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.16. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated
duplicate the ABET criteria; the four new ones promote greater technicaldepth and breadth. This initiative is in response to the increasingly complex and broad civil engi-neering projects of the 21st century.Since 1996, civil engineering at the University of Oklahoma has also been undertaking a curric-ulum reform project, Sooner City, for many of the same reasons, i.e., to promote outcomes notnormally addressed in traditional civil engineering curricula, such as leadership, design, commu-nication, and critical thinking. Basically, the Sooner City theme unifies the traditional civil engi-neering curriculum by threading a common design project, civil infrastructure, throughout thecurriculum, beginning in the freshman year. To the extent possible, the
incorporatesome of our ideas into existing engineering management curricula.I. IntroductionThe Department of Organizational Leadership and Supervision (OLS), in the PurdueSchool of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI, offers a practical, hands-on approachto leadership development for students desiring leadership roles within any size/type oforganization. A large percentage of OLS graduates move into leadership roles inmanufacturing or electrical, mechanical or computer technology. To the end of servingthose students and the industries where they will ultimately be employed, the OLSprogram blends a hands-on applied management curriculum with a traditionaltechnology education.II. The new programFor the past year the authors have been reengineering the OLS
prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.366.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Design for Impact: Reimagining Inquiry-‐Based Activities for Effectiveness and Ease of Faculty Adoption Standard lecture-‐based educational approaches are of limited effectiveness in repair of
]. The expansion of this pedagogical approach has the support of the NationalScience Foundation as well as the involvement of several major manufacturers of electronicscomponents, instruments, and circuit simulation software. The number of institutions of highereducation that have incorporated the mobile hands-on pedagogical approach in teachingconcepts in electrical engineering in their curriculum has exploded, coinciding with the growingnumber of inexpensive USB-powered oscilloscopes, educational parts kits designed for low-power applications, and the availability of free instructional materials [references]. To furtherpromote its adoption, a number of workshops have been held to demonstrate how the hands-onpedagogical approach has been
analysis as soonas they are hired as product or process engineers. However, almost all new graduates and manyworking engineers have limited or no skill in these areas.Most undergraduate curriculums in engineering and engineering technology today incorporateseveral aspects of design, materials, manufacturing and cost but pay little attention toenvironmental, safety and reliability issues. This is true at RIT. A 1997 University of Virginiareport2 states that integrating reliability into engineering education is critical to implementing asystems approach in U.S. industries.Research also confirms industry’s need for new graduates with reliability skills. In 2001, theCenter for Research on Education in Science, Math, Engineering and Technology at
rather than on the curriculum as a whole and how that whole serves the profession.Vugts1 broke with this tradition by primitively defining the needs of a curriculum in terms of Page 9.829.1desired performance rather than courses. Indeed, courses - as such - were not even mentioned in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationhis document. This approach has been refined during the last decade. See for example: Vugts &Massie2, Vugts et al3 as well as Massie4,5. The methodology, now called
Paper ID #36378Community-Engaged First Year Learning CommunityDr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in
schoolteachers participate in an intensive summer research experience in engineering labs, buildcurriculum based on the laboratory research content that they learn, participate in lesson study,and implement new curriculum in their middle or high school classrooms. The program has thecombined intent of bringing innovative engineering research to middle and high school studentsand improving student achievement through scientific inquiry. The program’s design includes asummer intensive experience in which teachers fully participate in engineering laboratoryresearch and engage in an inquiry focused content-to-pedagogy teacher professionaldevelopment workshop, building curriculum from their lab research experience with foci onscientific experimentation and
engineering departments and vertically integrated through all fouryears. The program combines leading-edge computer and instrumentation technology withthe knowledge and confidence that comes with hands-on, project-based learning.The cornerstone of this new program is the 34,400 sq. ft. ITL Laboratory, which opened itsdoors in January 1997. The laboratory’s curriculum-driven design accommodates a varietyof learning styles and features two first-year design studios, an active-learning arena for 70students, a computer simulation laboratory, a computer network integrating all theexperimental equipment throughout two large, open laboratory plazas, capstone designstudios, group work areas and student shops. The building itself is even an