sometimes been described as a four month interview. Employers aregiven the opportunity to evaluate the “new hire” over a several month period rather than thestandard interview procedures. The company is not under any obligation to hire the student, andis therefore able to evaluate these potential employees virtually risk-free [20]. Work ethic,technical competence and attitudes can be more easily assessed over a semester or summer ascompared to a one hour interview. Employers are able to offer jobs to those that have proventhemselves to be a good fit for the company [21] and often at a greatly reduced hiring cost. “Theaverage cost of hiring a college recruit that has had internship experience is almost half that ofhiring an experienced individual
Paper ID #43957A Powerful Labs Environment for Computer Science CoursesDr. Chi Yan Daniel Leung, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Chi Yan (Daniel) Leung is the Content Software Engineer (Labs lead) at zyBooks. He oversees the content creation and maintenance of labs across different titles at zyBooks. Before joining zyBooks, he was a lecturer at the School of Engineering at the University of California at Merced. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Vision from the University of California at Merced.Joseph Mazzone, zyBooks, A Wiley BrandMs. Efthymia Kazakou, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Efthymia Kazakou is Sr. Assessments manager at zyBooks
quarter for all eight objectives arepresented in Figure 1. Out of 20 students, 19 completed the self-assessment of objectives. Table 1: Course Objectives for SE-3821 O1 understand the role of requirements engineering in a variety of software development models O2 be able to elicit requirements from system stakeholders and to overcome common obstacles to the elicitation process O3 be able to analyze and negotiate software requirements O4 be able to specify software requirements with use cases, formal methods, and other documentation techniques O5 be able to specify requirements that are verifiable, traceable, measurable and testable O6
describe theinterdepartmental assessment processes and how these two unusual courses show successfulstrategies for providing cross-discipline education.Background and the Five Course SequenceThe curriculums for the ARCH and CM students at Cal Poly have, for many years, includedstructural engineering courses taught by the ARCE department. In 2005 the ARCE departmentupdated the sequence of courses required for the ARCH and CM students. The earlier six coursesequence, which included three structural material specific design courses, was replaced by afive course sequence in which the three material design courses were replaced with two coursesfocused on small scale and large scale structures. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for
scale systems, such as a small elementary school library book management sys-tems, to large scale systems, such as military government information systems servicing severalinternational logistic depots. The right information is often needed to obtain real time situationalawareness, mission capability, damage assessment, and risk analysis. These issues affect alltypes of business and government organizations and may prove beneficial in business decisions,medical discoveries, advances in information retrieval and organization, environmentalmanagement, aircraft maintenance management and the like. The same principles apply ineducation. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for
assessment of 15-year old students, the United States ranked 28th inmath literacy, 24th in science literacy, and 20th among all nations in the proportion of 24year olds who earned degrees in natural science or engineering. (3) The good news is thateducators, business and industry leaders, professional groups, and policy makers areresponding and results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress report steadyimprovement in math and science and recognize the interdisciplinary approach is critical fortaking the nation’s STEM performance to the next level http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/03/27/30intro.h27.html. Moreover, several majorU.S. companies are investing large amounts of money into schools and colleges to supportand strengthen
Curriculum, or How to Build a Dog House Carl A. Erikson, Jr, Department of Engineering, Messiah CollegeI.A.4. The Design Science/Global Solutions Lab: Interdisciplinary Problem/Project-Based Research and Learning Medard GabelSession I.B. AEC 315 - Innovative experiences in local/global/community learningI.B.1. Supporting and Assessing Service Learning of Engineers Without Borders Student Chapters Joshua H. Smitha and David Brandesb Departments of aMechanical and bCivil & Environmental Engineering, Lafayette CollegeI.B.2. Design of Sustainable Hand-Powered Water Pumps for Burkina Faso Timothy B. Whitmoyer, Messiah CollegeI.B.3. Educating ECE Majors for a Global Environment William
• Legal- relative compliance with international lawThese functions led to objectives and ultimately weighted performance measures that could be used toassess the relative value of different design alternatives. Figure 1 shows the results of this process for the“Engage Target” function. Figure 1. Functional and value analysis for SSHCL.Given the objectives and measures of effectiveness from the value analysis, the design team was able toenter a values-based creative effort to develop design alternatives that achieved the stated objectives.These objectives and values further focused the team through development of screening criteria to ruleout infeasible designs and scoring criteria to assess design trade-offs
. Portable Intravenous (I.V.) Stand Design Tongji Hospital 3. Automated Packaging Machine Design Zhejiang Factory for Paper Clips2007 in USA 4. Assessment of roll forming practice CIS 5. Work Scheduling of Production St. Gobain 1. Lean Manufacturing Implementation Amphenol TCS2007 in China 2. Chip Recycling of BZZ grinding Processes St. Gobain 3. Signal Characterization of OD grinding St. Gobain 4. Evaluation of Industrial Robots Course WPI CIS
confirmed myfour teaching styles. I began to experiment4 with teaching methods measured by IDEA (specifically noindividual assessments, only aggregate assessments – the class of all errors, ideas for improvement, greatperformances…).F’02-S’03In F’02 I began to raise the notion that I could use what I had learned in the Web-based environment anddeploy it in the face-to-face classroom. This time, I requested the help of the course developer so that wecould uncover a mechanism to capture the students, a way to have them ‘use’ WebCT when NOT in theclassroom; I see this as ‘learning time’. It is not a single place, but, it is certainly in a time when ‘they’are ready.We designed a one week, two class meeting prototype. Students’ performances demonstrated
: Societal Impact Vending machines Technological Implications Example: Modeling of complex problems/computer simulation Relevance To Connections Present Day Figure 2.0: Example Course Structure -Schematics of Strategy for MathAt the end of each grade year, an assessment would be conducted to evaluate the level of capability,connections, confidence and cognition (4C’s) developed. This is the second level of the model and can beseen as taking stock of the quality and amount of imprinting already accomplished. It is to be noted
including 3D graphics and motion, and nearly real-time assessment mechanisms – and what is coming in the future. The evolution of computingtechnology and the desire for learning in the general populace has given rise to increased usageof online media as an instructional delivery mechanism. More people than ever before haveaccess to education and learning content due to this delivery mechanism. The online deliverymedium allows people the flexibility to control the following aspects of their learningexperience: their learning path, pace, location, time and contingencies of instruction 4. Page 22.39.2Current literature suggests that online instruction can
questions on topics to be taught. Questions are to be answered before theclass begins. The instructor can see student answers in a spreadsheet format in real time. Uponscrolling over student answers, the instructor can quickly adjust lecture content to topics signaledby the students as being more unclear or more difficult to understand. JiTT involves morestudent work, as students are guided to read anticipated lecture content in advance and to answerquestions. In order to assess the appropriateness of JiTT at different class levels and acrossdisciplines, the method was implemented in two physics, one software engineering/computerscience, and one composition classes. A common questionnaire was given to all students forcomparing results and student
2009 35% 37% 34% Benefit society (outside of 2005 5% 0% 8% STEM discipline) 2009 4% 11% 0%Analysis of the core, social, and external categories showed that the items mentioned mostinclude teaching style/pedagogy and a focus on core disciplines, such as fundamentals andtraditional course materials; both of which were mentioned in over 75% of proposals sampled.From the core, social, and external categories the least-mentioned items were: a) Student involvement with industry b) Assessment at the department level c) Assessment at the college/institution level d) Lifelong learning skills
the project.≠ Complete and thorough requirements traceability is a critical factor in successful validation of requirements.≠ Clear and unambiguous requirements will help avoid misunderstanding when developing the overall system and when making major or minor changes.≠ Document all decisions made during the development of the original design concept in the technical data package. This will make the original design philosophy and negotiation results Page 15.903.3 available to assess future proposed changes and modifications against.≠ The design solution verification occurs when an acceptable design solution has been selected
will help to foster the understanding amongst all students that a multiplicity ofapproaches exist and that the success of the proposals can be assessed using (equallyimportant) aesthetic and technical criteria.Through these collaborative projects, students will develop and harness their confidencewhen approaching open-ended challenges. Working in interdisciplinary designpartnerships will be crucial to the success of the project, and therefore, we hope studentswill develop a greater appreciation of their own as well as the other discipline. Learninghow to communicate with one another will be an important process throughout the Page 15.746.8semester
Inc. His research funding exceeds 2.9 million dollars. He earned his Ph.D. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, New York and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from BUET.Mohamed Seif, Alabama A&M University Dr. Mohamed A. Seif is a Professor & Chair in the Mechanical Engineering Department at AAMU. He joined AAMU in September 2002. His research experience includes Fatigue and Fracture Analysis, NDE, Health Monitoring of Structures, Quality and Reliability Assessment, Design Optimization, CAD, Robotics, and Laser measurement. He obtained his Ph. D. degree from the University of Central Florida in July 1988. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of
. Mechansim to toggle GPS switch Figure 2b. Aquabot in Chincoteague BayThe project team integrated and adjusted additional components so that it would fit onto a remotecontrolled boat without adversely affecting the balance and floatation of the craft. A boat with atwo propellers for forward motion and differential thrust capability for turning, and a largesurface area was used (Figure 2b). Page 15.558.5 In order to assess the reliability of the system, the Aquabot sensor data were compared to that of the more sophisticated and expensive multi-parameter
, Wyomissing) itis evident that there is an increased use of handouts, workbooks and worksheets in gradeschool education, which could be categorized as “all-note”1 method OR a minor variationof “Teaching-Note” 1. These implements are used for both in class learning and forhomework assignments. As described by Pytel, in the “all-note” method, the instructordiscusses his lecture notes after providing them in their entirety to the students for theclass period and the “teaching note” lies somewhere between the no-note and all-noteapproach. From the previous conversation with grade school faculty, it is also apparentthat for in-class assigned problems and some of the homework assessment, the teachersread out the answers and generally the students verify
Evaluation and Knowledge Modules Assessment Modules AM1: BioImaging AM2: Sensing AM4: Solid State Lighting AM3: Solar Energy & Solar Cells Pre- and post-module Introduction: assessment KM1: Relationship between photons and electrons
variety of unit “materials”, including reading materials, self-assessments, lecturematerials, lab manuals, discussion forums, etc. These are materials available to the students.They also represent a repository of materials selected by instructors for students and for otherinstructors. This is especially useful when multiple instructors – on site and remote – may usethe materials for different purposes and to integrate with different student backgrounds, learningstyles, and their own teaching styles. Figure 2 – Example of a typical web site map for a learning moduleTo utilize the unit materials, students only need an internet connection and access to a Webbrowser. The videostreaming software, MediaSite, allows for both the live
physical and PLC ladder logic whendesigning simple automation projects. Combined lecture and laboratory activities implementingthe Kolb experiential learning cycle for the PLC module are addressed. The success of themodule is assessed and evaluated through student performance tests in solving design problemsusing ladder logic and through student surveys. Results demonstrate an effective method forstudent learning when lectures and labs are integrated in a meaningful manner.IntroductionIn engineering education, depending on the material to be learned and the instructor’s style ofteaching, a number of teaching and learning methodologies and their combinations are used.Since engineering is considered an applied discipline, many of the methods revolve
required to develop a comprehensive work plan and training program for each of the research fellows under their guidance. Work plans must address the research goals and expected outcomes of the proposed research, and address how the research fellows will be provided with on-the-job hard and soft skills training to be prepared for the shifting industry mix in science and innovation. Semi-annual progress reports will be required of both the research fellow and the corporate mentors. Mentor reports are to be submitted to ASEE and should include a report on the interactions with the research fellows, address their assessment of the progress of the research plan, list the publications and presentations in process, and address how they
nanomaterials. Dr. Samaroo has mentored students through the Lious Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation and ACS SEED programs. She also serves on the college’s Undergraduate Research and Assessment Committees and is a task force member of the Black Male Initiative. Page 18.10.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems
students can complete a 5-year dual degree program of engineering and foreign language.5 Nearly 66 % of engineering graduates at Lafayette College (2104) studied abroad while staying on track to graduate in 4 years.6 Starting with the fall 2013 entering class, all undergraduates at Texas Tech University are required to have an international experience.7In this paper, we first provide the background for globalization initiatives within the ShileySchool of Engineering (Shiley School) at the University of Portland. We then describe theprocess we used to develop global learning outcomes for engineering and computer sciencestudents at the undergraduate level. We conclude with some ideas for how to assess theseoutcomes over
] Although the assessment criteria of future engineers’ training inuniversitiesareadjusted to include practice-oriented assessment, they still are shiftedtowards the assessment of knowledgewith a greater extent than needed. In all fairness,it has to be told that in recent years the so called “competence approach” includingdevelopment of future specialists’ necessary competencies is being usedwhendeveloping the curricula. However, when the competencies are interpreted as areadiness to demonstrate ability in solving these or that production problems, but not areal ability to solve them in real production conditions, employers’ expectations arenot met. Besides, nowadays bureaucratization of training processes has increasedsufficiently when implementing
significantly more comfortable and efficient mode of travel. Page 19.16.8 Figure 5: Student Project from 2014 that involved an Arduino (Hammock Rocker)Learning Outcomes:The changes (gain) in the self-assessed pre and post survey using the CDIO Syllabus7 are shownin Figure 6. Values are sorted from bottom to top, starting with the largest post survey value atthe bottom. Students report Engineering Entrepreneurship as the area in which they gain themost through the program; this is also the knowledge area that scores the lowest in the presurvey. This is followed by
Engineering), an organization that promote research in Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and other minority serving institutions (MSIs). His research interests focus on advanced detectors for nuclear security and medical physics applications. He was a 2002 and 2004 Stanford University SLAC Scholar, a 2012 ABET Insti- tute for the Development of Excellence in Assessment Leadership Scholar, and a 1998 R&D 100 Award winner for top 100 scientific/engineering products in Research and Development. Page 19.17.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
training. Within the EQF frame the followingdefinitions are given: Qualification means a formal outcome of an assessment and validation process which is obtained when a competent body determines that an individual has achieved learning outcomes to given standards. Learning outcomes means statements of what a learner knows, understands and is able to do on completion of a learning process, which are defined in terms of knowledge, skills and competence. Knowledge means the outcome of the assimilation of information through learning. Knowledge is the body of facts, principles, theories and practices that is related to a field of work or study. In the context of this framework, knowledge
POC design process as though the program were unfolding in realtime. The leadership teams were asked to assess the designs at each step, providing feedback asif they were technical leaders doing so in real time.At the end of this eight month simulation, the Technical Leadership class was asked, “Whathappened with the original designs? Why did they both fail?” They said that while both designswere clearly over-engineered, no one seemed to push back when it seemed obvious they wereheading for a cliff. “We do this all the time!”, added one the students. They also observed thatthe simulations helped point out to the students that leadership and communication acrossgeographically diverse teams is difficult and needs to be experienced to learn how