Model in Higher Education,” Emerging Trends in Academe, Drexel University, February 2005.[17] Orsak, G.C. & Etter, D.M., 1996, “Connecting the engineer to the 21st century through virtual teaming,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 165-172.[18] Ostermann, T., Lackner, C., Koessl, R., Hagelauer, R., Beer, K., Krahn, L., Mammen, H.-T., John, W., Sauer, A., Chwarz, P., lst, G. & Pistauer, M., 2003, “LIMA: The new e-Learning platform in microelectronic applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Systems Education, 1-2 June, pp. 115-116.[19] Uskov, V., 2003, “Innovative Web-lecturing technology: towards open learning environments
should be made inthe product. FIGURE 1: REVERSE ENGINEERING AND REDESIGN METHODOLOGY. Page 4.284.4 1. Investigation , Pred ictio n , an d H ypo th esis • D e v e lo p b la c k b o x m o d e l • U s e /E x p e r i e n c e p r o d u c t • G a th e r a n d o r g a n iz e c u s to m e r n e e d s • P e r fo r m e c o n o m ic fe a s ib ility o f r e d e s ig n • S ta te p r o c e s s d e s c r ip tio n o r a c tiv ity d ia g r a m • H y p o th e s i z e r e fin e d fu n c tio n a l d e c o m p o s itio n
6.521.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationSchool Faculty Development Grant descriptionThese ideas were formalized into a internal grant which was awarded for the School year of1999. With the support of this grant I could take my college students outside the classroom as anoutreach program to local High School drafting classes. This was achieved by providing studentsand professors from Residential Construction course ART 155 to act as jurors or possibly clientsfor high school residential design projects. My thought is that participating in critiques ofresidential projects, both the giving and
Session 1566 Local Industry Involvement in the Support of Capstone Design Projects Hosni I. Abu-Mulaweh, Nashwan T. Younis Department of Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USAAbstractThis paper discusses why the involvement of the local industry and its sponsoring of seniordesign projects is crucial to the students to be exposed to quality and real life design problems.Also, examples of some of the projects that the local industry has
authors would like to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation, Divisionof Undergraduate Education grants DUE 0717561 and DUE 0919248 that have enabled thiswork. Our respective institutions have also been supportive of TIDEE activities in our capstonedesign courses.!References!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 https://ideals.tidee.org2 Davis, D., et al. submitted to: IDEALS: A Model for Integrating Engineering DesignProfessional Skills Assessment and Learning. 2011. Vancouver, British Columbia.3 Davis, D., et al., Assessing Team Member Citizenship in Capstone Engineering DesignCourses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 26(4): p. 1-13.4 D. Davis, M. Trevisan, H. Davis, R. Gerlick
become a mainstay in most EE programs.Given our students’ familiarity with MATLAB, computer exercises that implement sonar theoryseem to be a natural approach. But where does the sensor array data come from to demonstratebeamforming? Shall our students generate MATLAB simulated array data? Even if this data isrealistic in nature, the time spent generating this data may detract from our primary pedagogical Page 6.955.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationobjective. Should the professor
.). Jansons has authored over forty peer-reviewed, engine-related publications, and is a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and on the Board of Associates of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Internal Combustion Engine Division (ICED). He is a 2012 recipient of SAE’s Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award, conferred in recognition of significant contributions to teaching, research and student development and a 2015-16 Fulbright Scholar. Jansons has twenty years’ experience working with optical engines, and leads a research group of qualified and expe- rienced graduate students. Jansons serves as the Director of Early Engineering Programs, administering the core group of STEM courses common to
. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008[2] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93(3), pp. 223-231, 2004.[3] S. Lal, A.D. Lucey, E. Lindsay, D. F. Treagust, J. M. Long, and M. G. Zadnik, “The Effects of Remote Laboratory Implementation on Freshman Engineering Students’ Experience”, 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Paper ID #22272, 2018.[4] J. Long, “Anywhere-anytime engineering education in a complete undergraduate program.” International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, 4 (1), 2020[5] J. Grodotzki, T. R. Ortelt, and A. E. Tekkaya, “Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0
to develop more student-led, co-curricular opportunities to cultivate studentleadership and provide essential academic support.References[1] R. Metraglia, G. Baronio, and V. Villa, “Issues in Learning Engineering GraphicsFundamentals: Shall we Blame CAD?” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference onEngineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 10: Design Information and Knowledge Management Milan,Italy, 27-30.07.15, pp. 031–040, 2015.[2] E. Osgood, R. MacIntyre, and E. Pollard-Feehan, “Shared ownership of an engineeringsuccess centre to support students and develop leaders,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, Jan.2023. DOI: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36039.[3] Giang La, Oliver Hannon, and Lisa Roisin Smith, “Success at university: The student ˜perspective
Paper ID #26824SciComm: An Oral Communication Professional Development Program forSTEM Graduate StudentsDr. Amy M. Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Assistant Director of Graduate Education for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate student recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in
design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods, innovations in construction process administration, engineering education, hybrid learning and online learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Usability of a Mobile Augmented Reality Application to Teach Structural AnalysisIntroductionStructural Analysis is an introductory course for structural engineering, which is taught in everyundergraduate civil engineering program at about 300 institutions in the U.S., and also in mostarchitectural and construction programs, as a core and required course. Structural analysisincorporates the fields of
, 1994.26. Reamon, D., Sheppard, S., “The Role of Simulation Software in an Ideal Learning Environment,” Proceeding of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sept., 1997.27. Regan, M., Sheppard, S., “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 123-131, Apr., 1996.28. Sheppard, S., Regan, D., “Bicycle Multimedia Courseware: Formative In-depth assessment Report,” Center for Design Research Internal Report, Stanford University, Dec., 1995.29. Tan, F. L., Fok, S. C. “Development of Engineering Courseware for University Undergraduate Teaching Using Computer Animation,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 3 (2), pp. 121-126, 1995.30
has taught a large variety of courses including statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, graphic communications, engineering economy, and construction planning, scheduling, estimating, and management.Candace E. Mazze, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Ms. Candace E. Mazze is a Research Assistant at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Her research interests include curriculum design and assessment of learning. She received her master’s degree in Elementary Education from Pfeiffer University and is currently enrolled in the doctoral program in Educational Leadership at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She has prior teaching experience in private and public school systems
becategorized into general, application, and training requirements [8].General Requirements • Must be at least 18 years old • Sea-Time of 12 months combined workshop and skills training and at a minimum six months approved sea time with the completion of TRB (Training Record Book) OR • Thirty-six months of approved training and seagoing service, of which not less than 30 months is in the engine departmentRegulation III/6 of IMO STCW (The International Convention on Standards of Training,Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers) 2010 Regulations outline the minimumrequirements for the Certification of ETOs. The following is section A-III/6 [12]:Training 1. The education and training required by paragraph 2.3 of regulation III/6
intellectual development,” AI Magazine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 2000.[18] S. Thiagarajan and B. Steinwachs, “Barnga,” A Simulation Game on Cultural Clashes, 1990.[19] P. Jamieson, L. D. Grace, N. Mizuno, C. Bell, and D. Davis, “A simple multi-player video game framework for experimenting and teaching cultural understanding,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 2016, pp. 422–425.[20] M. J. Lage, G. J. Platt, and M. Treglia, “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1183338[21] A. I. Rajkovic, M. S. Ruzic, and B. Ljujic, “Board games as
Engineering Partners, February 1999.24. M. R. DePoyster, J. F. Hoying and K. N. Majeed, “Rapid prototyping of chassis control systems,” Proc. of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Computer -Aided Control System Design, Sept. 1996, pp. 141 - 145.25. B. K. Powell, N. Sureshbabu, K. E. Bailey, M. T. Dunn, “Hardware-in-the-loop vehicle and powertrain analysis and control design issues,” Proc. of the American Control Conference, June 1998, pp. 483 - 492.26. W. Grega, K. Kolek and A. Turnau, “Rapid Prototyping Environment for Real-Time Control education,” Proc. of Real-Time Systems Education III, 1998, pp. 85 - 92.27. D. Maclay, “Simulation gets into the loop,” IEE Review, Vol. 433, May 1997, pp. 109 - 112.28. M. Ehsani
AC 2000-407: Manufacturing Technology Curriculum for the Twenty-first CenturyAndrew Hoff, University of South FloridaMarilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community CollegeRichard A. Gilbert, Page 5.439.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2000 Session 3586 Manufacturing Technology Curriculum for the Twenty-first Century Marilyn Barger, Richard Gilbert, Andrew Hoff HCC-Brandon and USF/ University of South Florida /University of South FloridaAbstractLike all engineering and technology educational fields, the manufacturing technology curriculummust
Paper ID #17610My Fifty Years of CalculusDr. Shirley B. Pomeranz, The University of Tulsa Shirley Pomeranz Associate Professor Department of Mathematics The University of Tulsa Research and Teaching Interests: Boundary Element Method and Finite Element Method, Numerical Methods, Engineering Applications of Mathematics, Applications of Mathematica, Women in Mathemat- icsDr. Peyton James Cook Ph.D., The University of Tulsa Department of Mathematics c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 My Fifty Years of CalculusAbstractAt the end of the fall 2015 semester
Orientation, for international students only and the General TA Orientation for bothinternational and national students. International Teaching Assistant TrainingInternational students have unique needs that should be met separately from other new TAs. These includecultural (particularly in the delivery of education) and language differences. These needs at Rensselaer areaddressed during a two day program that is run just prior to the General Orientation Program.There are two types of cultural differences: one is associated with the everyday activities of living (such aseating, mailing a letter, getting a checking account, etc.) and the other is associated with educational issues.These issues are dealt with in two
Paper ID #23694Learning in Academic Makerspaces: Preliminary Case Studies of How Aca-demic Makerspaces Afford Learning for Female StudentsMs. Megan Tomko, Georgia Institute of Technology Megan E. Tomko is a Ph.D. graduate student in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technology under the guidance of Dr. Julie Linsey. She completed one semester in her graduate studies at James Madison University with Dr. Robert Nagel as her advisor. Her B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering is from the University of Pittsburgh where she also worked as a Field Telecommunications Intern for
-sufficiency, persistence, and self-control and correlated the findings with the students’academic performance. The study also suggests some ways faculty and staff could help enhancethe resilience of future engineers.References[1] P. H. Carnell, N.J. Hunsu, D. F. Ray, and N. W. Sochaka (2018). Exploring the relationshipbetween resilience and student performance in an engineering statics class: A work in progress.Proceedings of 2018 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference andExposition, Salt Lake City, UT.[2] E. Akimova, R. Lazenberger, S. Kasper (2009). The serotonin-1A receptor in anxiety disorder.Biological psychiatry, 66(7), 627-635.[3] R. Jiang, M.A. Babyak, B. H. Brummett, I. C. Siegler, C. M. Kuhn, R. B. William (2017
later see these projects being demonstrated, but any person can attend demonstrations.(5) An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives: • (Assessment i) At the end of the 1199 course, a brief survey assesses the ability to Proceedings of the 2022 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 525 function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership and create a
AC 2010-1149: CAMPING THE WAY TO HIGHER RETENTION RATESSteve Rippon, Arizona State UniversityJames Collofello, Arizona State University Page 15.256.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Camping the Way to Higher Retention RatesAbstractFreshman retention is a top priority in nearly all engineering schools. Increased retentionoptimizes new-student recruitment dollars, decreases students’ time to graduation, impactsschool rankings, and helps to meet industry’s increasing demand for engineers. Most researchersand experts in the field agree on a number of basic tenants of retention. Topmost are the tenantsof creating community amongst freshmen, bonding
Education, 16(2), 58-61.20. Scane, M. A. (2010). Muggins Math: Tools for Student Success, Indiana Math Teacher, February 2010.21. Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 183-203.22. Carlson, L. E. and Sullivan, J. F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 20-31.23. Chen, K. C., Schlemer, L. T., Smith, H. S., Fredeen, T. (20110. Evolving a summer engineering camp through assessment. In: 118th ASEE Annual Conference and
producttolerance limits are six standard deviations from target. Since lean manufacturing is a production-throughput philosophy and six-sigma, a quality methodology, shouldn't they complement oneanother and be "friends" versus "foes?" As engineering educators, we need to clearly understandthe answer to this question in order to effectively teach either philosophy.To answer this question requires an historical perspective. Let's begin with "lean." A key metricto determine a company's degree of success in implementing lean manufacturing is inventoryturnover associated with the lean technique of just-in-time (JIT) delivery of raw materials andcomponents from suppliers to the manufacturer. (Turnover is best understood as the averagelength of time inventory is
to perform the sequential startup/shutdown of motors without computerlogic used all of the electrical engineering courses I have taken so far. In addition, therewere design aspects that required us to go beyond our current educational level” (Parker,1995).Facilities The traditional classroom space has proven to be problematic with the largenumber of students that concurrently participated in Engineering Design II and III. Thestandard lecture classroom that is rectangular and is composed of rectangular, 3-persontables limits the effectiveness of team meetings that require, at a minimum, round-tabletype facilities. Simultaneous small-group team meetings produced so much noise thatteams were unable to conduct meetings effectively. Even
was developed by amalgamating evaluation criteria from over two Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationdozen mechanical engineering programs around the US, and distilling them down to five keymetrics.Data were collected on 14 projects. We found that only two of the six client satisfaction metricsmet the internal consistency criterion, so our client satisfaction score is based on a total of sixquestions (two for the “quality” metric, and four for the “overall” metric). However, everyinstitution is different, and other course instructors could follow the same procedure and find thata different set
. [Online]. Available: Makezine.com: https://cdn.makezine.com/make/sales/Maker-Market-Study.pdf[8] L. Martin, "The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30-39, 2015, doi: 10.7771/2157- 9288.1099.[9] S. E. Blair, & Linsey, J. S., & Layton, A., & Banks, H. D. , "Bipartite Network Analysis Utilizing Survey Data to Determine Student and Tool Interactions in a Makerspace," ASEE Virtual Annual Conferense, 2021.[10] M. N. Cooke, & Charnas, I. C., "The Value of Data, Metrics, and Impact for Higher Education Makerspaces," International Journal of Academic Makerspaces and Making, vol. 1, no. 1, April 1st 2021
Engineering Education (ASEE)Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.10. Brooks, L. A., Yalvac, B., Economides, C. E., Ferguson, J., & Cryer, J., (2009). The influence of apprenticeshipsof observation on STEM recitation instructors’ practices and epistemological flexibility. Poster presentation at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), April, 2009, San Diego, CA.11. Kirby, J.R., Knapper, C., Lamon, P., & Egnatoff, W.J., (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelonglearning, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29,(3), 291-302.12. Deakin-Cric, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: the
Paper ID #38009Pushing the Boundaries of Interdisciplinary CollaborationNandini Sharma, Department of Communication Studies, Organizational Communication andTechnology, The University of Texas at AustinJeffrey William Treem, Department of Communication Studies, Organizational Communication andTechnology, The University of Texas at AustinMegan Kenny Feister, Communication Program, Organizational Communication, California StateUniversity Channel Islands © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com1 Pushing the Boundaries of Interdisciplinary