-observers’ learning.The study reported here was part of a larger a design-based experiment in which weimplemented an innovation aimed at improving middle school students’ ability to navigatecommunication challenges during collaborative engineering design activities. We introducedstudents to four types of communication challenges and assigned them one of two roles: designteam member or peer-observer. In this study, we focused only on the peer-observers, particularlyon their discourse during peer-observer debriefings that occurred immediately after observingtheir classmates engaged in design activity. We limited our analysis to investigating what peer-observers discussed when given the opportunity to compare their observations with each otherduring
her research focuses on inclusion in STEM education, communication in STEM education, user-centered design and user experience (UX), and the assessment of educational materials.Dr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Engaging STEM Studentsin Revising Technical Writing Assignments Abstract —The continued struggle to improve undergraduate student
course. The concept quiz has been administered three times: onceto students from the three sections taught without E3s and twice to include the students from thefive sections taught with E3s.Results of this work show that both student exam performance and material retention improvedas a result of using proven E3s regardless of gender. Course topics where the existing teachingmethods already resulted in solid student exam performance saw the least impact on exam gradesfrom the inclusion of E3s, but student retention in these topics was improved. This wouldsuggest that faculty would see the greatest immediate gains by including E3s in those areas wheretheir students have historically had poor performance. However, for long-term materialretention
sophisticated impact thatlanguage has on shaping perceptions and either reinforcing or mitigating barriers, academia isplacing greater emphasis on the adoption of more inclusive language practices. This studyanswers these calls by examining the current state and trends in language use within theengineering education research community, with a particular focus on the American Society ofEngineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Expositions proceedings. Through an analysis ofthe language used in these proceedings from 2020 to 2022 based on the keyword-based modelfollowed by the APA 7th language use guideline, the study seeks to determine the extent towhich biased language continues to exist and identify areas for improvement. The results of thisstudy
effective approaches for incorporatingsocial impacts into technical courses.ContextWe have known for a while that the time spent training to become an engineer is an importantand formative time for engineering students. Engineering education is the ‘causal relationship’that links education to the development of technology and products for consumer use andcompany profit [16, pg. 149]. To ensure students feel safe enough to learn in their programs andtruly engage in that formative process, engineering educators must communicate precisely andwith care to address the lack of positive student engagement. We refer to these communicationtechniques as rhetorical practices. Building on Perrault [10, pg. 64] who states that, “...rhetoricalknowledge is just
University of Notre Dame. Her interest in technology ethics relates to questions concerning how biotechnology shapes cultural understanding of what it means to be human. She is also working on research questions relating to the ethics of engineered living systems at the intersection of neuroscience and computer science. She teaches tech ethics courses and in the first-year engineering program. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reengineering ethics education for deeper student engagement through the creation of roleplaying and decision-making games WIP Paper, Student Experiences Shreya Kumar and Megan
University of Virginia’s Department of Biomedical Engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Evidence-Based Practice Paper: The Use of Virtual Design Modules in an Introduction to Engineering Course--Impact on Learning Outcomes and Engineering IdentityAbstractThe Introduction to Engineering course is taken by all first-year students in the Engineeringschool of an R1 university. The learning objectives of the course are 1) to introduce students tothe engineering design process; 2) to practice applying the design process to solve problems incollaborative teams; 3) to learn the importance of effective communications; and 4) to feelconfident in their capacity to be
, and project context. These changes appear to have hadan appreciable impact on student motivation, engagement, perceived impact on education, andperceived understanding of society.Looking first at the impact on motivation and engagement, it is anticipated that improvementscorrelated to each of the specified areas of change. The autonomy of selecting and choosing, notjust a topic, but also the sources (including the form and format), likely contributed to studentenjoyment and engagement. They were free to choose the topics and sources that they foundinteresting and relevant. It is also likely that the length of the sources was a significantcontributor as well. Students were able to find shorter, yet relevant sources, in contrast to readinga
alternatives”, butwere not asked explicitly to elaborate on limitations of their design solution (e.g., limitations inapplication, adoption, function). In the future, we will modify the final report requirements toexplicitly call for a discussion on the limitations of their design solution.Although these data provide valuable insights into the perceptions of industry stakeholdersregarding the skills of our students, one of the limitations of this study is that we are relying ontwo years of assessment. We plan to conduct an additional assessment in the next cycle, in orderto investigate any impacts of our curriculum interventions. We also plan to engage with evenmore industry partners across company types, so that we can increase the number of
transformative learning among our studentsbased on this model. One of these interventions was the opportunity to participate in a programcalled Communities of Practice (CoPs) for credit in our courses. In the first set of resultspublished, we found a statistically-significant correlation between participation in CoPs andprogress along the transformative learning process as defined by Mezirow. Based on support inthe literature for the CoPs to not only support transformative learning but also to potentiallyincrease engagement and sense of efficacy particularly among underrepresented students, wefocused the next stage in our research on investigating the impact of Communities of Practicefor our underrepresented student populations, specifically
instructor (M = 4.80) were viewed by the students as goodto extremely good. It is unknown how each instructional activity (i.e., readings, homeworkassignments, group discussions, self-assessments, and team project) over the 16-weeksspecifically affected each students’ learning and skill gains. However, the instructor believes theteam project made the largest impact on the ET students’ engineering design, problem-solving,communication, and group skills. Students’ comments about the project were generally positiveother than a few requesting that it be introduced earlier in the semester and that manufacturinglab space and equipment availability was limited. The project cannot be introduced any earlierthan the first day of class; however, the instructor
. Our profession’s lack of diversity cannot be separated from the systemicracism in our society; thus, addressing these societal ills and its impact on the engineeringprofession requires re-envisioning engineering education to be more inclusive and equitable.Creating a more diverse engineering workforce begins with increasing the diversity of engineeringstudents. Many attempts to increase the diversity of the engineering student population focus onrecruitment, but retention of students is also critical [7]. Many retention programs are grounded ina student affairs perspective and emphasize support and engagement outside of the classroom (e.g.,student affinity groups). Particularly at the graduate level, however, positive classroomexperiences are
impact of a collaborative group environment on thesense of belonging of a racialized and/or female student in the discipline of engineering,primarily regarding the extent to which their skills are built upon through the project work, thedynamic of their team, and the relationship they had with them.Communal Integration, Societal Impact, and Science IdentityThere are two crucial components to this project: exploring the societal impact of engineeringand engaging the community through course projects. Research has shown that a largemotivating factor for pursuing STEM-related careers is the potential positive societal impact theycan have at a large scale [16], [17]. Students’ engineering role identities and future career pathplans align closely
-relateddegree/careers. A total of eighty-one students participated through in the SummerAcademies. Program was successful in recruiting minority students, where over 60% ofstudents were African-American. STEM topics included engineering design project, sensorsand data logging, basic electronic circuits, renewable energy (solar and wind), and Arduinomicrocontrollers. Program team used multiple instruments to assess the impact of program.Evaluation data shows that 36-40 hours of hands-on engineering design project and otherSTEM activities resulted in significant gains in interest in learning Science and Engineeringtopics. The informal setting and activities were conducive for effective learning, increasingstudent engagement and increasing STEM content
proves to be an effective method forretaining interest in such fields and preparing them better for their future careers. Three casestudies from Mechanical Engineering students at NMT are included which express the impact ofAMP on their undergraduate studies and college careers.Introduction As the concept of a global economy becomes more real, the importance of science andtechnology is more apparent. Thus, nations must be more aware of their competitive position inthese fields. Such awareness is extremely imperative, given that science and technology arerapidly evolving as the Internet and other digital communications are making the world appearmore intangible. In such a situation, one cannot think of jobs as being strictly limited to a
. Thisfield of study serves as a unique arena for investigating the efficacy of ECP. Traditional lecture-based approaches have been the cornerstone of education, but there is an increasing interest inexploring alternative methods that engage students actively in the learning process.As the education landscape continues to evolve, assessing the impact of active learning pedagogies,especially the ECP, on learning, particularly within distinct academic disciplines, is imperative.Therefore, this study focuses on the comparative trend analysis of the impact of ExperimentalCentric Pedagogy on learning outcomes in Biology using various measures such as engagement,motivation, cognitive processes, and collaborative learning experiences.Research Objectives
2006-1629: USING DIVERSITY STATEMENTS TO PROMOTE ENGAGEMENTWITH DIVERSITY AND TEACHINGJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ professional identity. Email: jturns
engineeringstudents. First-year engineering courses serve as an introduction for students to the concepts,ethics, and the eco-system of the field of engineering. These courses also help budding engineerssolidify their engineering identities. Recent years have seen a greater call for developingengineers who are able to diverse and ambiguous real-world problems [1]. This call for reformcomes from the industry as well as the call from the Accreditation Board for engineering andTechnology (ABET) [2]. Engineering students often go on to becoming committed professionalsbut also leaders in their communities. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop studentengineers who are able to work collaboratively in interdisciplinary teams [3]; take on short- andlong
7 Foreign language and international study 7 Engineering 6 Health professions 6 Communications and journalism 5Engineering students face competing priorities and challenges, such as curriculum rigor,compatibility, apathy, perception of the value of international education, and an emphasis inengineering education on practical work experience, that can hinder participation in study abroad[12], [13]. High impact practices in international education such as internships, co-ops, andtechnical research conducted abroad has been shown to have the most significant influence onenhancing global
held up as an exemplar demonstrating the difficulties inherent in assessingthe graduate attributes, particularly the ones that reflect the professional or workplace skills ofengineers. Some consider lifelong learning an outcome best measured a priori: in other words, itis cogitated as an aptitude that students will best epitomize once they are graduated and workingas professional engineers. However, the knowledge, skills, behaviours, attitudes and values thatengender lifelong learning are indeed present in our students, and one of the most effective waysto activate and observe this attribute is to engage students in discussions regarding theirexperiences and perceptions of their learning. This paper presents the findings from a
their connection to the building of relationships with faculty members and fellowstudents and the development of knowledge and skills. As this study aims to investigate howgraduate student funding can relate to graduate student relationships and the research andlearning experience, a review on the current literature on those topics will first be discussed.Graduate Funding and Relationships with the Disciplinary CommunityMuch of the existing literature on the graduate student experience focuses primarily on therelationship of the graduate student to the larger community. Research specifically directedtoward assistantships and fellowships examines the nature of the faculty-student relationship andhow graduate departments aim to integrate each
the primary criteria in a research university.9. ConclusionThe workshop uncovered four major themes.1. Rethinking Engineering Education: Education for a Life of Impact. Participants reflected on the changes that have taken place in the last decade in engineering education particularly on appraising the growing interdisciplinary fields of engineering.2. Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Approaches and Frontiers: On this theme, the participants identified the opportunities to improve engagement of the students in their education. This theme also highlighted the Mechanisms of Integrating Service Learning and Social Innovation with a focus on how education science can articulate steps toward using community needs to meet experiential
example, we grew the size of the IDEA Scholars cohort, expanded Summer Prep to the Summer Engineering Institute, and transitioned our study center to the Engineering Learning Communities.5.3. Strategy-aligned capacity building ● Staff and systems for management, operations, and data will need to grow in concert with programs. Based on organizational lifecycle stages, consider the corresponding needs and current barriers to growth. Requests for resources should be made to leadership in order to address these. ● Demonstrating impact requires growing expertise and capacity to do evaluation and assessment. Professional development should be leveraged to grow staff expertise, and student metrics should be used in all
on the flight path ofthe vehicle during that attempt, the avoidance maneuver was repeated. Figure 3. DJI S1000 multicopter.III. Professional Development of ParticipantsFor the professional development, several workshops were conducted during the course of thesummer programs that included Ethics in Engineering and Science, Graduate School ApplicationProcess and Financial Support, Resume Building, Improving Oral and Written Presentation Skills,and Industry Careers [1, 2]. Students also participated in outreach activities and field trips toresearch labs or industry. These workshops had direct impact on the success of the participants.Figure 4 shows some of the summer 2019 participants engaged in outreach to local
-assembly plant. Students were engaged with these employees and their managersin order to get feedback on their designs and to develop an understanding of the unique problemsthat developmentally-disabled individuals face in performing their jobs.In our paper, we discuss the implementation of the pedagogical approach described above in thecontext of the course learning goals. We also present assessment results in the form ofevaluations of student work, post-course interviews, and student course evaluation data. Guidedby these assessment tools, we suggest improvements in future versions of this course.IntroductionIt is widely recognized that there is a need in engineering education for an increased emphasis onthe role of the engineer within the
like a human and maybe even pass the turing test. It’s odd because its impact is entirely dependent on how the academic community handles it! Those who embrace it will see universally higher scores as well as higher levels of understanding, however that is only if the said students use ChatGPT to learn and create solving strategies. Not to cheat.”The user outlines the current functionality of ChatGPT as a language model and anticipates itsfuture development towards AGI. The theme draws attention to the pivotal role of the academiccommunity in determining the impact of ChatGPT on education. It underscores the potential forimproved learning outcomes and understanding if students use ChatGPT as a tool for learning anddeveloping
understand what feedback shouldlook, feel, sound and be like to make its greatest impact.Methods for Investigating Use of Interactive (Audio) FeedbackTwo distinct but related investigations were performed to assess the impact interactive feedbackhad on learner engagement using the COI model as a framework. Both investigations were“housed” within a course taken by upperclassmen and first year graduate students. Thisparticular course, Effectiveness in Technical Organizations, is an elective course that addressesprofessional skills such as communication, team work and leadership. Assessment of studentlearning is measured in large part by reflective papers written by the students.The first investigation was completed during the 2013-2014 academic year
through gained knowledge in mechanicaltesting, apply proper manufacturing techniques through knowledge of manufacturing processes,and lastly fabricate, heat treat, and evaluate the final design through a technical report. Case studieswill involve mechanical components such as shafts, links, control arms, andStudent engagement, critical thinking, and effective communication are key goals for excellencein engineering education. The benefits of PBL have challenged the traditional methods of teachingespecially laboratory courses, where limitations of equipment limit laboratory engagement beyondthe hands-on experience of students. Engaging students with purposeful experiments is anticipatedto strengthen technical skills, allow critical thinking, and
outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he
engage in life-long learningmy knowledge of contemporary 4.00 0.71 5 3 4.00 0.76 5 3issuesmy ability to use the techniques, 3.67 0.50 4 3 4.25 0.71 5 3skills, and modern engineeringtools necessary for engineeringpractice The students in both classes rated ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science,and engineering; understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; and knowledge of Page 13.232.4contemporary issues at 4 or higher on average. The sophomore students also rated the broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global