Intelli- gence (AI), computational neuroscience, and AI for arts. She has published over sixty peer-reviewed publications, including two books on real-time three-dimensional graphics and one book chapter on Big Data computing with a new computational brain model. Dr. Liao earned her M.S. & Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Purdue University & George Washington University, respectively.Dr. Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University Ioulia Rytikova is a Professor and an Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the Department of Informa- tion Sciences and Technology at George Mason University. She received a B.S./M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Automated Control Systems Engineering and Information Processing. Her
complete some of these restoration goals.Future GoalsBecause this framework is in its nascent stages, and really only started in earnest with a couple ofcourses in the spring of 2022, many of the courses, project and dataset types, and the disciplinesinvolved are also only preliminary suggestions. As this collaborative PBL proves successful, it shouldhopefully attract other faculty and disciplines into its fold. Additionally, several of the disciplines that areinvolved are themselves fairly new to the college (Civil Engineering started in 2016, EnvironmentalScience and Environmental Horticulture in 2021). Therefore, these programs are still recruiting andformulating their own set of faculty expertise, as well as molding their student curriculum
Paper ID #15219Making History Active: Archival Interventions for Engineering EducationDr. Christopher Leslie, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Christopher Leslie is a Lecturer of Science, Technology and Media Studies at the New York University Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York, and he is codirector of the Science and Technology Studies program there. Dr. Leslie’s research considers the cultural formations that surround technology, science, and media in the 19th- and 20th-century United States. He is the head writing consultant for the Introduction to Engineering and Design course, and
leadership team of the Kentucky Girls STEM collaborative network. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Data Science Approach to Flagging Non-Retention in Engineering Enrollment DataAbstractThis research paper discusses a new, data-driven metric for measuring retention. First andsecond year retention and retention rates are now well established as metrics in theengineering education research landscape, with many research studies exploring the impact ofindividual performance, noncognitive, and preparation characteristics on retention inengineering. Researchers at the University of Louisville, a large Research Institution in theMidwest, have compiled survey results
engineer.Nidal Al-Masoud, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Al-Masoud, Associate Professor, earned his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University at Buffalo, The State University of New York in 2002. Dr. Al-Masoud has taught at both graduate and undergraduate level courses at University at Buffalo, he joined Central Connecticut State University as an Assistant Professor in 2003. At CCSU, he teaches courses at all levels in the three major areas in mechan- ical engineering, namely: mechanics, Thermo-fluid, and Control Systems and Dynamics. Dr. Al-Masoud research interests are in the fields of Control Systems and Dynamics, HVAC systems, and Engineering Education. He has numerous journal and conference proceeding
motivated by then-recent engineering accreditationcriteria revisions that integrated learning outcomes in nontechnical areas [11], while the program’sexperiential learning-based structure drew from a benchmarking report on global EL educationbest-practices [12]. As this curriculum was operationalized, efforts were concurrently undertakento design learning assessments that aligned with the engineering leadership capabilities (e.g., [13]).This initial approach did not enable long-term tracking of outcomes and its assessment scope wassubject to adjustment in the years that followed as the capabilities prioritized in the program’srequired core courses settled out (i.e., versus elective courses); nonetheless, GEL’s present methodof self-efficacy-based
CurriculumWhile integrating course materials and making changes in teaching methods can be implementedwithin a course, significant revision of course contents requires new efforts in curriculum designand development. Two major findings from the TAMU-SNL project and the IAC survey promptthe initiative to recommend curriculum change: 1) students are expected to have a strongbackground in engineering graphics, be proficient in CAD tools, and have a thoroughunderstanding of GD&T; 2) instead of only modeling and drafting, future mechanical designersare expected to perform design tasks that require in-depth knowledge and skill in certaintechnical areas. In response to the findings, two suggested changes are being developed: • Currently, AutoCAD, Pro
Session 1566 Integration of Instruction on the use of Multimedia Tools into a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Madara Ogot Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyAbstractMechanical engineering curriculums do not offer formal instruction in the use ofmultimedia tools in the areas of computer illustration, animation, and image manipulationnor the creation and editing of digital video, despite their prevalent use in industry fortechnical communication – written reports and oral presentations. In addition to
Chemical Engineering Division: Assessment of Teams, 3513 paper 832 An Approach to developing Student=s skill in Self Assessment Donald R. Woods and Heather D. Sheardown Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L7Abstract: Self and peer assessment can be vital parts to any team assessment. Theassessment can be of the overall team or of the performance of team members.Assessment is a judgment as to the degree to which a goal has been achieved. Instudent self assessment, the judgment is made by the student. In this paper the fiveprinciples of assessment are summarized. Assessment is about performance notworth; is based on evidence not intuition
growth does not arise just from addingmore labor to more capital but from new and better technological ideas. Approximately one outof every three of our engineering students earns a dual degree (BSME and MBA) in five years.More often than not these students select this path because they see the opportunity to enhanceeconomic growth through technology applications. In the Management Department of DU’sDaniels College of Business a new Entrepreneur program has been initiated to help students ofall disciplines study innovation models. Within MME we are seeking specifically to enhance theconcept-to-product realization innovation pipeline. The experiences of taking an idea fromconcept to product and participating in a unique multidisciplinary
Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective meth- ods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Prof. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Dr. Michael Thomas SmithDr. Sorin Adam Matei
Paper ID #43797(Re)visions: Approaches to Teaching Technical Communications and ProfessionalDevelopment in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone CourseLynn Hall, The Ohio State University Lynn Hall is a Senior Lecturer and the Associate Chair for Academic Administration for the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her Ph.D. in English from Miami University (Ohio). Her research interests include writing in the disciplines, technical communications, and diversity, equity, and inclusion.Mr. Bob Rhoads P.E., The Ohio State University Bob Rhoads currently functions as the
approach in their projects and promot-ing it to smaller entities [5] [3]. On the other hand, academic institutions and researchers, mostoften in collaboration with industries, investigate new paths to teaching SE. They are typicallyinterested in defining competencies which best characterize a system engineer, in order to de-sign an efficient pedagogical model and an appropriate learning environment. In addition tothese questions, the present paper particulary focuses on SE standards and on how they can andshould be used for SE learning purposes.The next section of this paper presents a state of the art introducing a number of significantworks related to SE education. The following sections convey our own vision of teaching SE,together with a
the students theopportunity to practice design, problem-solving, and professional skills such as teamwork andcommunication. The inclusion of introductory design courses in the engineering curriculum is afast-growing initiative that has been implemented in several universities across the US as part ofmultiple efforts to improve retention [1]. Still, current concerns about engineering retention andthe preparation that engineering students need, demand an examination of these courses. Oneway to examine these courses is by exploring how students use the content included inintroductory engineering design classes as they progress into successive phases of theirengineering education. In this paper, we are interested in examining what aspects of a
important factor in the development of curriculum for Page 22.347.12systems engineering, and these courses were not developed based strictly on a competency-basedcurriculum development approach, the findings from this research have a strong message for anyefforts involving competency-based curriculum development. Further research is needed tounderstand the differences in perceptions of what knowledge lies in which area of systemsengineering competency. Without a common base of understanding and consensus on this point,developing curriculum to support a specific systems engineering competency is problematic.Systems engineering instructors may require
. Rawlins Beharry, City College of the City University of New York c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Creating Institutional Bridges to Engineering for Underserved Populations:Examining Associate-to-Bachelor Engineering ProgramsAbstractA major challenge in K-16 education is a prevalence of students who desire to pursue anundergraduate engineering degree, but are unprepared for the rigors of a post-secondaryengineering curriculum. Many challenges with the high school-to-college transition inengineering are due to a lack of rigorous mathematical and technical education at thesecondary level. This issue is particularly significant in secondary schools that servetraditionally underrepresented and underserved
can be handled with relatively little prior knowledge.Furthermore, it relates to and uses tools of the first year curriculum: chemistry, calculusand physics. Other concepts could also be used, however this paper describes a coursecentered on pressure.The method of delivery of the course was designed to be innovative as well (at least forour engineering school). The principle of self-guided and group-guided inquiry was used.Many educational theories and data show that “... involving students in discussion fostersretention of information, application of knowledge to new situations, and development ofhigher-order thinking skills -- and discussions do this much better than lectures do.”8Freshmen experience the transitional education stage
AC 2007-346: DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT IN TEAM-ORIENTED,PROJECT-BASED COURSES: EVALUATING A LATEX/SUBVERSION-BASEDAPPROACHSandra Yost, University of Detroit MercyMohan Krishnan, University of Detroit Mercy Page 12.562.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Document Management in Team-Oriented, Project-Based Courses: Evaluating a LATEX/Subversion-Based Approach1 AbstractThis paper discusses a low-cost approach to the implementation of a document versioning systemfor technical reports. Several alternatives have been considered, including commercial documentcollaboration services such as NextPage 2™ (NextPage, Inc.) and SharePoint™ (Microsoft Inc.),open
education as a whole. Manyfocus largely or exclusively on teaching and learning topics (Cox, 2004) and are cross-disciplinary, yet FLC programs in the engineering discipline remain relatively new. As such,there is a growing need to establish empirical and theoretical understandings of thesecommunities and their impacts on faculty in order to better inform best practices. The current research takes a mixed methods approach to understand the participation,perceptions and outcomes of a New Faculty Learning Community (NFLC) program in theCollege of Engineering at a large Midwestern research university in the United States. Drawingfrom existing research on FLCs and theories in socialization and community practice, this studycontributes to the
number offemale students enrolled in engineering. As a new program, we had to demonstrate (1) suchtraining would be beneficial in the retention of our engineering students and (2) could be beoffered with minimal use of resources. Over 14 semesters TCC investigated several methods andformats to structure such a program (see Figure 1).The variety of methods reflects attempts to balance the two objectives above, with the politicaladministrative landscape at TCC toward adopting spatial visualization into curriculumrequirements. If the benefits could be shown, would spatial visualization become a required skillassessment tool, like existing math placement tests? Or would spatial visualization fit better arequired 1-credit course? Despite impressive
science. He received his B.S. from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 2009 and continued to pursue his Ph.D. with Professor Dauenhauer at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 2014 before completing his postdoctoral studies with Professor Jensen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2016. His primary research focus combines a multidisciplinary approach to process intensification with classical and new experimental techniques to uncover fundamental understandings in the fields of catalysis and reaction engineering for energy and pharmaceutical sciences. His pedagogical interests are focused on advanced laboratory and workforce training including the use of Augmented Reality and student-centric universal
Abstract This paper describes an innovative curriculum developed for a new LogisticsEngineering degree programs at the Faculty of Engineering Management of PoznańUniversity of Technology. The core of the program is based on a sequence of four majorcourses, which focus on the Product Development, Process Analysis and Optimization,Logistic Processes and Service Engineering, respectively. Each course is built around a practical team project. With the project effort as thebackground, the courses introduce students to key issues in global engineering competence,such as technical and cross-cultural communication, collaboration and teamwork,organization and management, engineering ethics, critical thinking and problem solving, andintegration
comparison during a 4-week engineering design curriculum unit focused on water runoff at their school. Data sourcesincluded students’ conceptual models before and after the peer comparison, field notes, andstudent interviews after the peer comparison. To understand how students described theirconceptual models and why any changes may have occurred, we interviewed twelve students andcoded these interview transcripts at the utterance level. Results show that peer comparisonactivities can increase conceptual model quality. Further, peer comparison contributes to adiverse set of additional representations in students’ conceptual models. The study suggests peercomparisons of conceptual modeling may support students in realizing their peers are a
. San Diego: Academic Press.11. Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile's consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children's musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234.12. The Engineering Place. Retrieved from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/theengineeringplace/summerprograms/high-school/. November 14, 2013.13. Cropley, A.J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. Runco and S. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity: Vol. 1. Academic Press.14. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.15. Gwet, K. L. (2008). Intrarater reliability. Wiley encyclopedia of clinical trials.16. Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Cole, J., &
International Programmes for Overseas Teacher sponsored by ITEC. Offered three SWAYAM MOOC courses – E-content Development, OER for Empowering Teachers and AICTE NITTT Module 1 Orientation towards Technical Education and Curriculum Aspects. Her areas of interest encompass Data and Text Mining, Cloud Computing, Technology-Enabled Teaching and Learning, Instructional Design, E-Learning, and Open Educational Resources (OER), as well as Immersive Technologies.Dr. Dinesh Kumar KSA Dr. K S A Dineshkumar, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai. He has been working in the domain of Student Assessment and Evaluation, Learned - Centered approach, Outcome
inventories to measure these effects arethe Lancaster Approaches to Studying Questionnaire, LASQ, and the CoursePerceptions questionnaire, CPQ. Data from the short version of thesequestionnaires were analyzed for a group of students concurrently registered intwo programs. Students were registered in a cross-section of disciplines inhumanities, social science, science and engineering where the method ofinstruction was primarily the conventional lecture. Those same students wereconcurrently registered in the “Theme School” program, an interdisciplinaryprogram of 33 credits where the method of instruction was small group, self-directed problem-based learning. These sophomore students who selected theTheme School program scored high on the LASQ on both
AC 2007-1032: A SOFTWARE-DEFINED RADIO PROJECT FOR FIRST-YEARECET STUDENTSPeter Goodmann, Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne PETER E. GOODMANN, P.E. is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at IPFW. He earned his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his MS degree in Electrical Engineering from Purdue University. He has worked for 28 years in industry and education, and is a member of the IEEE and the ASEE. Page 12.116.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Software-Defined Radio Project for
chair of the department to assistantprofessors and lecturers in engineering) and one educational research faculty (from thedepartment of chemistry). The course design process started with a literature review onengineering bridge courses to understand prior work, followed by surveying current engineeringfaculty to propose goals for the course. The designed team met weekly after setting the coursegoals over two semesters. The design process was initiated with backward design principles (i.e.,start with the course goals, then the assessments, end with the learning activities) and continuedwith ongoing revision. The work herein presents this new engineering bridge course’s goals,strategy, and design process. Preliminary student outcomes will be
engineering professionals; and/or they are unfamiliar with theteaching of 17-year-olds just out of high school. A rational approach to introductory computingis based on the real needs of students and professionals. These should be assessed throughsurvey, study and evaluation, and then used as the basis for curriculum design. We believe wehave done this.There have been tendencies across the US to go in one of two directions when it comes tointroductory computing for engineering students:1) The "tools" approach. Here, the focus is on the built-in capabilities of a number of software packages. Students solve a variety of engineering problems within the confines of the software’s menu options. The features of the software define the scope of the
industry. Thepaper proposes a problem-oriented and project-based learning approach to teach sustainability andalternative energy in today's engineering curriculum. The paper also discusses a series of projects includedin senior project design, power electronics, and renewable energy courses, and the structure of theseprojects, outcomes, observations, lessons learned, and future improvements [7].Similarly, due to the unprecedented growth of data-driven methods such as ML and in the interest of keepingstudents abreast of the current technological advancement and trends, it was important and timely todevelop content related to ML. The paper by Zhang discusses the use of Excel as a tool to teach ML concepts