from theiCollaborate approach. Finally, we built the Apps so that they will accommodate Page 23.1204.3different content by only switching out the data sets and data decks, thus, making themuseful beyond the materials engineering community. Finally, a carefully researchedproject that has been tested in “real” classroom environments may have a better chance ofbeing adopted elsewhere as the inherent risks perceived with change by others is wellunderstood and can be better controlled.STEM Research BaseThe iCollaborate project combines many known best practices in STEM education innovel ways and includes targeted, outcome based ICT support. Collaborative
Powered by www.slayte.com Overview of the megaGEMS AEOP Summer 2021 Research Apprenticeship CampAbstractGEMS (Girls in Engineering, Math, and Science) is a free STEAM and programming summercamp and after-school robotics club that focuses on educating girls about the fields of STEM.GEMS is divided into two main programs: miniGEMS for rising fifth through eighth middleschool students and megaGEMS for rising ninth through twelfth-grade high school students.This paper will provide an overview of a new program within megaGEMS called megaGEMSAEOP (Army Education Outreach Program) for rising eleventh and twelfth-grade high schoolgirls. The camp was initially piloted in the Summer of 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic
improvement of engineering design education at manyinstitutions nation wide. In this program, NASA funded design course teaching assistants andstudent travel at participating institutions. Funding ranged from approximately $25,000 peryear for institutions new to the program, to nearly $17,000 per year for institutions that hadbeen in the program three years or longer. Design projects undertaken by USRA ADP teamswere suggested by NASA-based engineers, associated contractors and university faculty. At theend of the academic year, each team presented its design work in a non-competitive conferenceheld at a NASA center.When the NASA/USRA ADP ended in 1995, the Texas Space Grant Consortium adopted themodel in order to sponsor its own statewide version of
UniversityMs. Briceland McLaughlin, Boise State University Briceland McLaughlin is an academic advisor at Boise State University. She graduated with an M.Ed. from the University of Kansas in 2011 and has worked at higher education institutions across the country over the last decade in both student affairs and academic support roles. Briceland is interested in the intersectionality of student development theory and curriculum design.Dr. Donald Plumlee P.E., Boise State University Dr. Plumlee is certified as a Professional Engineer in the state of Idaho. He has spent the last ten years es- tablishing the Ceramic MEMS laboratory at Boise State University. Dr. Plumlee is involved in numerous projects developing micro-electro
Paper ID #32429Making Teaching Matter More - The Making of a T1 UniversityDr. Tara E. Prestholdt, University of PortlandDr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Dr. Eric Anctil, University of Portland Eric Anctil is a professor of media and technology in
Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering, 2005.[2] "Educating Engineers for the 21st Century: The Industry View." vol. 2007: The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2006.[3] L. H. Jamieson, "Keynote of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2007," 2007.[4] L. Kohlberg, "Stage and Sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization," in Handbook of socialization theory and research, D. Goslin, Ed. New York: Rand McNally & Company, 1969, pp. 347-480.[5] P. R. Pintrich, "The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning," in Handbook of self- regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds. San Diego
important for undergraduate engineering programs to integrate cross-disciplinary learningactivities into the curriculum. Moreover, the emergence of “big data” across many engineering disciplines has led to the need for training and education related to the collection,management, and analysis of “big data”. We develop an interdisciplinary, active learning module for First-Year Engineering (FYE) programs that combines content from civil, electrical, andcomputer engineering while also familiarizing students with “big data” science. In this learning module, students compare and contrast the challenges of gathering comprehensive and qualitytransportation data through advanced technologies and traditional approaches. Students develop basic computer code
programs, which prepare students to leadsuccessful careers” (Kansas State University Polytechnic website 2017). The new nameformalized the historical signature approach of the campus to teaching and learning.In 2007, a unique faculty partnership was formed that underscored and supported the polytechnicteaching and learning model. In the spring of 2015, this partnership was further enhanced when afaculty member in Communication Studies chose to join the interdisciplinary group which hadbeen building and delivering an innovative rotation of four courses to encourage STEM studentsto step outside of their normal routines and experience technical topics from a broader viewpoint.The inclusion of Intercultural Communication and Interpersonal
Students will examine and assess safety conditions in the virtual wind turbine. o Students will select appropriate personal protective equipment. • Objective #2: Students will apply task-based hazard assessment with this learning action: o Students will examine a work plan and assess potential hazards for each task in virtual scenarios. • Objective #3: Students will create and follow a safety plan and correct safety procedures with this learning action: o Students will examine existing safety plans and develop new plans in the virtual scenarios. • Objective #4: Students will read engineering prints and interpret schematic symbols with this learning action
Dakota Mines, the team has made significant progress. STEAM integrationherein is being approached in various formats in different courses, see Table 1. This process beganin the Fall of 2021 with the integration of new relevant content into Structure and Properties ofMaterials Lab (MET 231) and Introduction to Metallurgical Engineering (MET 110) courses. Forthe MET 110 course, the first-year students completed a sketching module, which then translatedto crystal structure and 3D Printing modules. Students also participated in other kinestheticlearning modules that included creating glass pendants, learning welding techniques, and castingartistic aluminum pieces.In the Spring of 2022, the program integrated STEAM curricular activities in a junior
learning. Original PLTL workshops have six essential components26: (1) ThePLTL workshop is integral to the course; (2) faculty and peer leaders work together to prepareworkshops and train peer leaders; (3) peer leaders are well trained; (4) workshop materials arechallenging and at an appropriate level; (5) organizational arrangements promote learning; and(6) the department administration encourages innovative teaching. In the standard setting, a peerleader works with six to eight students during weekly workshop sessions. The peer leader meetswith the same students each week.Our approach to PLTL is modeled after a successful HP-funded project in the UTEP Departmentof Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) that targeted a gatekeeper course in the
-traditional students. This new learning environment utilizesand encompasses a variety of modern technologies that include World Wide Weband I.V.D.L. (Interactive Video Distance Learning). In addition, certaininstructors utilize a variety of well structured independent internet activitiesknown as “Research Reports” and “Tech. Topic Term Papers.” Basically, theprinciple has been to encourage faculty utilize modern technological innovationsin their educational methodologies to supplement, enhance and expand studentlearning beyond the boundaries of the traditional classroom. In this paper, theauthor tries to describe his accomplishments at the School of Engineering andApplied Science at Miami University of Ohio.IntroductionResearchers have shown that
computer, or with an immersive virtual reality (VR) headset. Videoswere published and distributed such that the instructional videos could easily be incorporatedinto a curriculum. Results of the project will be assessed for both immersiveness as well aspedagogical value.Keywords: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, 360o Video, Teaching with InnovativeTechnologyIntroductionMany engineering programs incorporate hands-on experience in manufacturing methods andfabrication. The experience levels of students prior to the training can vary widely, and it’s notunusual for some students to have no familiarity with the equipment, let alone its operation.Integrating a virtual, immersive, experience as the first step of the training process may serve tooffset
Electricity Generation, a second semester freshmantutorial course in the Plan II honors program at the University of Texas at Austin. This coursefocuses on the impact of technological development and is one of several "substantial writingcomponent" courses in the curriculum. Students in the Plan II program are purposefully chosenfrom a wide range of degree programs in Natural Sciences, Engineering, Social Sciences, LiberalArts, Public Policy, Languages and Performance Arts. The classes are intentionally composed ofmixed majors to provide a broad perspective in the discussions. I found the style of teachingrequired a refreshing change from my usual classroom experience. The standard engineeringlecture format is, of necessity, used very sparingly
Education, 2025Performance Unveiled: Comparing Lightweight Devices Testbed and Virtual Machines for Edge ComputingAbstractTechnological innovations are accelerating across fields like engineering, IT, environmentalscience, and agriculture, the convergence of education & research has emerged as a vital andconcerning issue. Although the research in areas such as edge computing holds a lot of potentialfor real-world applications, its integration into engineering education remains marginalized dueto lack of curriculum alignment, lack of resources for faculty training, and industry-academiadisconnect. This study bridges the gap by investigating the suitability of hands-onexperimentation with edge computing frameworks to enhance
-scada-systems-hacked-by-anonymous/19. Charette, Robert, “Stuxnet Successor Looking for New Cyber Targets?” IEEE Spectrum, Risk factor, October 2011, http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/telecom/security/stuxnet-successor-looking-for-new-cyber-targets Accessed March 201220. Nakashima, Ellen, “Water-pump failure in Illinois wasn’t cyberattack after all,” Washington Post November 25, 2011.21. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle (2010).22. Lunt , B. M., Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Hislop, G., Kamali, R., Lawson, E. A., et al. (2008). Information Technology 2008: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information
AC 2010-2188: FLEXIBLE CIS LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT EMPLOYINGMULTI-BOOT AND VIRTUAL COMPUTINGDawn Spencer, Colorado State University, PuebloNebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo Page 15.593.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Flexible CIS Laboratory Environment Employing Multi-boot and Virtual ComputingAbstractThis work describes an innovative flexible multipurpose laboratory environment designed tosupport a large variety of laboratory exercises in a Computer Information Systems (CIS)curriculum. The environment employs multi-boot and virtual computing. Although it may beideal to have separate labs for each course
elementsof a curriculum—available to everyone, anywhere. As part of a quarter to semester conversion atMTU a Dynamic Systems and Controls laboratory was integrated with the traditionally requiredtextbook course. The goal of the lab was to illustrate some of the abstract concepts of the courseusing "hands-on” experience. A secondary goal of the lab was to strengthen a student’sunderstanding of Computer Aided Control System Design (CACSD). The second phase of thedevelopment of this lab was to determine and overcome the challenges and barriers ofimplementing the lab remotely. This paper describes our approach to converting traditional on-site control system labs to remote versions. In addition, limitations inherent to remote experimentexecution are
controllers. Theeffectiveness of this approach, compared to other methods (Simulink, LabVIEW, among others)was tested with a pedagogical experiment that followed a backward design approach.Assessment techniques allowed instructors to evaluate course objectives and revealed studentacceptance of the proposed methodology.IntroductionThe Digital Control Systems (DCS) course is highly demanded in our undergraduate electricalengineering curriculum. The Introduction to Control Systems course, as well as basic knowledgeof electronics and signals and systems, are prerequisites. The topics covered in the DigitalControl Systems course include modeling of discrete-time control systems, using the Z-Transform to analyze discrete-time systems, stability criteria
reasonableness.The author has interviewed practicing structural engineers to determine the methods they use toevaluate structural analysis results. The data from the interviews have been blended into a newversion of the undergraduate structural analysis course. A comparison of syllabi from the oldand new versions of the course shows that teaching evaluation of results can have minimalimpact on the time spent on each topic on the syllabus.The methods being incorporated into the new version of the course focus on simplifyingsituations into problems that can be easily solved and on anticipating features of complexsolutions. This paper summarizes the methods incorporated in this course and provides severalexamples.In exit interviews, students in both the old
compared to the teaching portion of the Page 9.1164.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationP&T dossier, the time required to create a high quality portfolio was significant. Observation #3–Your portfolio will have many audiences from many disciplines.My major focus as I put together my one-year portfolio was articulating my existing teachingphilosophy, as well as showing how that philosophy affected my approach to teaching mycourses and the goals and objectives for the courses. In addition
. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. Currently, she teaches within the first-year engineering program at Ohio State while maintaining an active engineering education research program.Dr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and
curriculum constraints related to this, researchers highlight specific challenges toteaching creativity skills—assessment being one such challenge. To address this challenge, Shahet al. (2002) developed metrics for measuring one aspect of the creative process—ideationeffectiveness. Kim (2014) proposed a Creative Process and Outcome Assessment framework thatincludes rubrics to assess team projects in engineering design courses. To evaluate studentlearning outcomes in three core design courses taught in the first three years and a capstonecourse taught in the fourth year of a design-intensive undergraduate engineering curriculum,Plantanitis & Pop-Iliev (2010) developed evaluation rubrics. The rubrics were used to assessstudent performance on
majors, including Electrical and Computer Engineering students. Multiple factors contribute to retention issues, such as poor teaching and advising, the difficulty of the engineering curriculum, and lack of motivation resulting from poor connections to the engineering community. Statistics indicate a large drop in the continuation rate between the first and third years among Science, Technology, Engineering, Math (STEM) students. As students encounter increasing course difficulty in the early stages of their programs, they often lack motivation to persist because they have weak connections to their majors and potential careers in STEM. The Summer Interdisciplinary Team
. In addition, great sums of persuasive confirmation submits to the benefits of servicelearning and experiential methods, thus revealing that teachers yet depend on thetraditional practices of lecture and teacher-directed educational procedures—notappealing to all learning styles. Traditional practices should, in no way, be dismissed;however, it should include approaches where students are able to apply what has beenlearned in the classroom. Cohen and Brawer (as cited in Burr, 2001) stated the following: It is reasonable to assume that in an institution dedicated since its inception to "good teaching," new instructional forms will be tried. However . . . traditional methods of instruction still flourish. Visitors to a campus
students to model only the middle portion of their design. This results in whatMAESTRO terms a cut model, and it provides for weights and end moments to be added. Thisapproach makes it possible for the students to create and evaluate a structural model withreasonable effort. This approach also facilitates student comparison of manually computed mid-ship section stresses with the MAESTRO computed stresses. An example of a student cut modelis shown in figure 7. Figure 7. Student Cut ModelGraduate school use of MAESTROAt MIT, students in the graduate ship design curriculum take courses in naval architecture,marine engineering and ship structures as well as hydrodynamics, acoustics, materialsengineering, and design
1984 and 1987,respectively. Since 1992 he has been a professor at the Division of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines.Dr. Braun is very active in developing new approaches in teaching electronics. He can be reached atcbraun@mines.edu. Page 2.408.7 7
Session 1426 Modular Lumped Mass Experiment Bijan Sepahpour, Elton Clark and Loren Limberis The College of New Jersey Department of Engineering Ewing, New Jersey 08628-0718ABSTRACTA Lumped Mass Experiment is proposed for integration into multiple course curriculums. Thedesign of the associated apparatus has taken into account the factors of cost, safety, ease ofmachining, modularity, reliability, mobility, size, reproducibility and aesthetics. The systemincorporates adjustability for mass, spring constant(s) and damping
approach was presented by a faculty group at theUniversity of South Carolina. With NSF support they developed a pedagogical framework toassist students in deepening their conceptual understanding of new and challenging ideas. Thisframework, known as EFFECTs (Environments for Fostering Effective Critical Thinking Skills),was originally aimed at introductory civil engineering students, but has been extended to upperdivision engineering classes as well. The format intertwines multiple learning modules andwritten journal entries into a multi-session exploration of a large-scale physical problem. Oftenthe problem has multiple best designs rather than a unique solution. Critical thinking skills areenhanced through student reflection on the ideas
to taking the measurements lab isrestricted to cook-book style science experiments with fill-in-the-blank laboratory reports. Thesestudents are not prepared for an engineering experience where they must design, conduct andreport upon their own experiments. Therefore, a scaffolding approach is used throughout thesemester where the students aregiven increasing responsibilityfor developing experimentalprocedures and data analysisformats in successiveexperiments. For the finallaboratory project in the course,the students must design,construct, calibrate and use astrain-gage based load cell.The load cell must accuratelymeasure the weight of theinstructor. A representativefinished product is shown in Figure 1. Typical