becoming an intrapreneur as we have defined intrapreneurship above.The Intrapreneurship Study Team then grouped these responses into these nine competency areasthat are shown in Figure 3. : 1. Technical competence 2. Innovation 3. Anthropologist 4. Cross-pollinator 5. Experimenter 6. Communication/value proposition 7. Teamwork 8. Breadth (“T-shaped) 9. Confidence 30 No. of Times Mentioned 25 20 15 10 5
communitycollege with intent to transfer to a four year university to complete their Bachelor of Sciencedegree.1 Community colleges play a substantial role in the production of engineering graduatesin Washington State. Several community colleges throughout the state offer comprehensiveengineering transfer programs that include all the courses necessary for students to transfer atjunior level in most engineering majors. Transfer students who completed their prerequisitecourse work at a community college make up approximately one third and one quarter ofengineering graduates at the main campuses of Washington State University in Pullman andUniversity of Washington in Seattle respectively. More broadly 36% of 2014 college graduatesin Washington had completed
Paper ID #11488System Analysis Methodology for Teaching Algebra: A Foundation in Engi-neering EducationDr. Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University Jale Akyurtlu is Endowed University Professor of Engineering at Hampton University. She has BS and MS degrees in Chemical Engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey; and a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has research interests in chemical reaction engineering, catalysis, and the modeling of chemical reactors, mainly related to general energy and environmental research, undergraduate education in
generator, 16-channel logic analyzer, 16-channel digitalpattern generator, spectrum analyzer, network analyzer, voltmeter, and digital I/O.18 The ADBoards and supporting curriculum modules were piloted at multiple instructional/degree grantingHBCU setting in 2013-2015. The findings from this paper represented data from 623 studentsacross 13 institutions, 5 terms, and 32 separate course sequence numbers (e.g. introduction toelectrical engineering, electric circuits, and electronic circuits). Additional data includeobservations and interviews with faculty, administrators, and students at nine HBCU sites. Presented in Table 1 are the student demographics. The majority of students were male(77%); 75% self-reported ethnicity as Black, 5% as
understood to drive an increase in their representation in this labor market segment. With (1-3)minority groups currently accounting for the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population ,American global technical leadership and economic vitality will increasingly depend on minority (4)demographics succeeding in science and technology fields . However, minority and femalestudents face particular challenges in university settings, often finding themselves one among few,if any, in STEM courses . Freshman and sophomore “gateway” courses typical of STEM
," students will havecreated a tangible artifact, which represents the knowledge acquired during the activity.Students were supported through a four-stage process as they 1) conceived of the taskthey would like a robot to perform, 2) developed the steps needed for the task to beperformed, 3) decided how to implement the required steps, and 4) assessed whether theintended aims were achieved. At each stage of the process, the students were assisted inre-evaluating their goals. In this paper, we present a report of our participation in twoDrawing with Robots events. This experience report summarizes the design ofthe activity, the lessons learned in its execution and a description of the engineering skillstaught during these sessions. We found that the
evaluate the effectiveness of shifting to alternative grading, we discuss ourobservations and experiences as instructors, survey students about their experiences with the newgrading approach, and propose adjustments for future implementations along with a detailed planfor quantitative analysis.1 MotivationIn many courses and institutions, students prioritize achieving a certain GPA over exercising intel-lectual curiosity or truly engaging with the course material on a deeper level. This pressure is oftenfueled by the need to meet scholarship requirements, maintain academic standing, or satisfy futureemployers or graduate schools that emphasize GPAs as a key metric. Alternative grading systemsaim to acknowledge these constraints while
Belt Sander 2 EBM Grind Wheel 1 Binder Jet 0 Band Saw DED Drill Press Sheet Lamination Water Jetting Injection Molding Laser Cutting Casting CNC Figure 3: Averaged self-reported manufacturing experience by each condition and compared.As shown in Figure 3, while generally following similar patterns, the
nine laboratory sessions were usedfor heat transfer numerical projects using Excel, and solving heat transfer problems.Laboratory FeesEngineering and Science laboratory fees were approximately $35/student/ laboratory, then inlater years increased to $70/student /laboratory. Every year the author counted the number ofstudents enrolled in the Heat Transfer Laboratory, then multiplied the number of students by thelaboratory fees, the total ranged from $300 to approximately $1000. This money was used tofund projects and purchase the following equipment: 1. Thermocouple spot welder, crimping tool box, and thermocouple wire. Students learned to weld thermocouple wires and use thermocouples in projects. 2. Barometer, beakers, stands
General Labels from 2012 to 2014. Currently a PhD student at UTEP with expected graduation in 2016.Dr. Eric D Smith, University of Texas, El Paso Eric D. Smith is currently an Associate Professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), a Minor- ity Serving Institution (MSI) and a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI), He works within the Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering (IMSE) Department, in particular with the Master of Science in Systems Engineering Program. He earned a B.S. in Physics in 1994, an M.S. in Systems Engineering in 2003, and his Ph.D. in Systems and Industrial Engineering in 2006 from the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ. His dissertation research lay at the interface of systems
. “Don’t be a dick” [in regards to how to behave] 2.2. Decision making will be done by consensus but will be done by voting if consensus cannot be reached. The topic must be discussed before a decision can be made.Team 2 met once a week for approximately 1-2 hours in tutorial and focused their discussion onplanning and decision making; additional meetings occurred around course deadlines. Theycompleted their written deliverables virtually on Google Docs, however they had long in-personediting sessions in a university computer lab the day before each deliverable was due. Page 26.1573.95. AnalysisGrounded in an
familiarity with the technology (Asset 2) relationships among students –peerinteraction– (Asset 1). Through the consideration of these assets, we aim to create technical andscientific learning environments that fosters high quality experiences for multilingual andmultidialectal students in STEM. For example, programs such as STEMcyclist (NSF 2314260),integrate engineering-related activities where students apply design principles to rebuild bikes,explore the biomechanics of biking, and use the bike as a lens to uncover and interact with thebuilt environment in the students’ communities. Through this two-week summer program, youthengage in science and engineering activities by drawing on their multilingual and multidialectalresources to design safe
of teaching.1. IntroductionSkills such as communication, professionalism, ethics, and project management are notspecifically taught within the engineering graduate curriculum. These skills, referred to as softskills or professional skills, are often assumed to be acquired as a result of performing academictasks and “constant” communication with other graduate students and faculty members [1]. TheCanadian Association of Graduate Studies (CAGS) recognizes the duty and responsibility ofuniversities to train these soft skills. CAGS defines professional development as knowledge thatmust be provided along with practice and continuous coaching within the graduate programs [2].During their first year of graduate studies, many engineering students
Paper ID #16699Teaching with Graduate Teaching Assistants: Tips for Promoting High Per-formance Instructional TeamsDr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and applied pedagogy, and conducts engineering education research.Dr. Colin Cerretani
experimental results to analytical or simulatedpredictions, satisfying a major learning objective. The higher sampling rate of the MuddLog16had the effect of allowing students to be less-attentive to the potential of aliasing; future versionsof the course should examine means to ensure students acquire and understand aliased data.IntroductionExperimental Engineering at Harvey Mudd College is an intense multi-faceted sophomore-level,semester-long course. The stated learning objectives for the course are: 1. Demonstrate hardware and equipment skills: a. Demonstrate the safe and proper use of basic laboratory equipment: e.g., digital multimeter (DMM), signal generator, oscilloscope, breadboard, and analog transducers
the instructors exited the classroom and trained staff from UVA’s Teaching ResourceCenter elicited feedback from students about their learning in the course in a confidential andinteractive way. We found that LAWA increased understanding and development of independentlearning skills, and generated more interest and excitement about nanomedicine among thestudents.Course OrganizationWhile many university classes aim to teach a large amount of information each semester, wedecided to scale-down the amount of information we covered in order to allow for more time tocover each topic. Overlearning has been shown to be less dominant (yet helpful) in long-termretention, but essential to achieving a certain level of mastery.1 Therefore, we
all positiveadjectives in each pair to the right side of the scale, to avoid participant misinterpretation. Thesecond modification was to change the adjective used to anchor the scale from “mundane” to“uninteresting” in order to eliminate any reading comprehension issues for our participants. As a technical point, FIDES scores are calculated by: 1) first calculating the mean scalescore for each indicator, and then 2) averaging a sum of scores from all indicators on the surveyto produce scores on the 1 to 7 Likert scale equivalent. FIDES scores here do not representordinal phases in the FPMID, as is often done in research using this model. We are presenting ascale score for the interest as a measured construct. To avoid confusion
and was co-editor of the reports Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy (2006) and Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology (2002). In the late 1990s, Greg oversaw NAE and National Research Council reviews of technology education content stan- dards developed by the International Technology Education Association. He has degrees in biology and journalism.Mr. David R. Heil, David Heil & Associates, Inc. DAVID R. HEIL, President of David Heil & Associates, Inc. (DHA), and founder of the Foundation for Family Science & Engineering, is well known as an innovative educator, author, and host of the Emmy Award winning PBS family science program Newton’s
suite of expensive test andmeasurement equipment. While lecture instruction can be delivered at a distance using on-lineand other technologies, it is difficult, if not impossible, to reproduce the hands-on experience ofan electronics laboratory over the Internet. Nevertheless, an electronic engineering technologyprogram delivered on-line must include concurrent laboratory experiences.In recent years, a number of computer-aided simulation programs have become availablecommercially. Researchers have compared the effectiveness of some of these programs to theeffectiveness of traditional hands-on laboratory exercises 1-3. Most of these research effortsinvestigated the use of computer-aided software as a method to enhance, enrich, or
-classfootball captains, who received intensive leadership coaching, and the group of freshmen footballplayers who received more general training as part of the First Year Seminar course.With regard to the engineering captains, all of them retook the KGI and MBTI instruments inpreseason to obtain fresh results with which to work. This built upon the previous first-yeartraining. In the current situation, they had the experience of selecting new skills, practicing theseskills, and self-reflecting on the skill development process at a deeper level.During the football season, the captains received one-on-one coaching sessions with theKGI/MBTI model at three intervals: in pre-season, at mid-season, and toward the end of theseason. The sessions ran from 60-75
to make adjustments as necessary.(1)The purpose of the Delphi study was to define the important concepts that define engineeringgraphics. Page 26.627.2ProcessAn initial brainstorming session with a small group of faculty leaders in graphics education washeld in conjunction with the 66th Engineering Design Graphics MidYear Conference inGalveston, Texas. Topics in graphics education were listed and put into categories with noattempt to distinguish between “topics” and “fundamental concepts.” The idea was to be asinclusive as possible with “weeding out” to be conducted in later stages of the Delphi study.(2)These brainstorming activities resulted
collaboration and outcome aligned perfectly with what I had envisioned b. Some challenges included team dynamics, time management during the project, and low engagement from certain members. c. It provided a great opportunity to apply technical knowledge, collaborate internationally, and improve project management and communication skills. d. I am satisfied with the overall experience and would not change anything significant. I would just try to engage even more proactively from the very beginning. e. Have a physical interaction session with GMU students coming to India or Indian students going to US, would have been good and spend 1 or 2 weeks together and implement our ideas together so that
University at West Lafayette (PPI) Greg J. Strimel, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation and coordinator of the Design & Innovation Minor at Purdue University. Dr. Strimel conducts research on design pedagogy, cognition, and assessment as well as the pre ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Team Discourse of Middle School Girls in Collaborative Microelectronics Lessons (Fundamental)AbstractEngineering and technical activities are crucial aspects of education curriculum and standards.Substantial efforts have been made to increase the number of women in STEM careers and majors;however, they remain underrepresented. Even at the
groups: miniGEMS for middle school or fifth-grade through eighth-grade students and megaGEMS for ninth-grade through twelfth-grade students. GEMS offersafter-school programs for miniGEMS middle school students and summer camps for bothminiGEMS and megaGEMS.GEMS’ mission is to inspire and empower the next generation to be innovative with their futurein the STEM fields [1], [2], [13]-[15]. GEMS covers diverse topics of education that the studentswould not normally be exposed to, such as supporting each other, developing teamwork skills,learning how to better the community with their knowledge, being creative, and developing self-efficacy [3]-[8], [10]. GEMS’ goal is to increase the number of students interested in STEMcareers, especially in
• Faculty, grad students and staff to guide the activities • Food for breakfast and lunch • T-shirts for studentsFigure 2 – Middle School Students after they received their certificateAs stated, our goal is to introduce fundamental sustainability concepts to the students. In orderto assess the effectiveness this program, we developed a short quiz given to the students onthe first day of the program and again on the last. The quiz is titled “So What Do You Knowabout Sustainability?” and the results are compared to gauge how well students learned theconcepts presented (see Table 1). If students do poorly on a specific concept, that isreinforced in subsequent sessions. We also assess the engagement and input of the middleschool students during
Schools report [1] highlights that most graduate programs lacksufficient training in skills that are highly required in professional fields. Research urgesuniversities to combine internal consultation, external stakeholder feedback, and research toidentify critical competency areas for graduate skills development [2]; as a result, manyinstitutions have launched graduate professional skills training programs. However, developingimpactful and effective programs remains a challenge primarily due to a lack of institutionalresources and challenges securing faculty buy-in.While active learning is widely used in technical training, its application in graduate professionalskills development remains limited. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness
. Table 1. Types of representations and definitions Type Description Photographs, diagrams, schematics, and other images used to illustrate a concept or Images depict a design choice. Images do not include data. Plots, charts, graphs, and phase diagrams used to depict/explain pre-existing or Plots student-generated quantitative data. Tables Formatted tables used to organize parameters, results, and other project information. General equations (i.e. without values) used to relate relevant design parameters and Equations quantities to each other. Solved equations (i.e. with
2002, and has worked on many assessment, research, and evalu- ation projects, including the measurement of student learning outcomes in general education, longitudi- nal research on the effects of undergraduate engineering research experiences on minority enrollment in graduate school, and the evaluation of the Georgia Tech International and Research Plans. He is currently working on an upcoming evaluation of service learning and sustainability project as part of Georgia Tech’s Quality Enhancement Plan.Dr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge
identified a well-defined nation-wide engineeringdesign competition event as the first joint project to initiate the collaboration. A two-year planhas been drafted to ensure that student teams will not be overwhelmed by multi-tasks tocomplete all technical requirements, while mastering skills needed to organize a functionalvirtual team. This paper will discuss the challenges of executing such a project and how can wetransform the pilot program into a sustained collaborative team learning experience beneficial toboth programs.I. IntroductionOne of the primary outcomes for the engineering education is to train students for conductingengineering design and be a better fit for the industrial needs1, 2. The accelerating pace of theglobalization of
successful interactions and learning outcomes.1-3 One important challenge centers onthe interactions between students from groups negatively stereotyped as poor performers inengineering (e.g., women and under-represented racial minorities) and others. A body of researchin psychology indicates that students from these marginalized groups may have qualitativelydifferent group work experiences compared to others, which may contribute to their self-selection from engineering and thus their group’s under-representation in engineering fields.Recent research suggests that the negative experiences of people from marginalized groups onengineering student design teams can influence many factors that contribute to persistence andsuccess, such as development of