and Benefits Committee (2012-2015), founding president of the American Associa- tion of Physics Teachers, Mexican section. In the AAPT he is currently a member of the Research in Physics Education Committtee (RiPE) and elected member of the Physics Education Research Leader- ship Organizing Council (PERLOC). He is a member of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa (CONACYT) Network on Information Technology, and coordinator of the Science Education Community of the Corporaci´on Universitaria para el Desarrollo del Internet (CUDI). The main area of interest of Prof. Zavala is Physics Education Research in which he studies students’ conceptual understanding, designs and implements assessment tools in education
analysis of freeresponse questions in the internally developed Mentors Self-Assessment Survey (MSAS)indicates that the Pre-existing Personal Values concept is responsible for this motivation. Whileother motivations are also important to the Head Mentors, this study indicates that the clearestway to identify dedicated volunteers is through measurement of their values instilled sincechildhood. Additionally, results of the qualitative analysis indicate that Head Mentors placedhigh importance on the concepts of Skills Development, Awareness/Impact and Interactions allexperienced as part of their Head Mentoring roles. Most Head Mentors demonstrated increasedsatisfaction with their undergraduate education as a result of participation in DREAM
Paper ID #15578Taking the Role of Others to Increase the Success Rates of InnovationsProf. Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt Studied Administrative Sciences and Sociology at the Universities in Kiel and Bielefeld (Germany) as well as Lancaster (UK). Doctorate at the University of Bielefeld (1996). Worked from 1992-2000 with Academy for Technology Assessment in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany). Since 2000 professor for Technology Assessment and Social Science Innovation Management at University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt. From 2010 to 2013 Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer since 2012
measurement- improvement-benchmarking, performance-based contracting and specifications, traffic safety, warranties in contracts, public-private partnerships, condition assessment, road maintenance performance measure- ment/improvement, optimization models, sustainable infrastructure, project delivery, and construction contracts. He has been very active in state and federally funded projects related to transportation. His work has been published in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Transportation Research
Paper ID #11690A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Student Perceptions and ExperiencesRelated to Global ReadinessDr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working
(DFC) Technology Assessment REGULATORY AND POLICY DOMAIN 1. Energy efficiency 2. Environmental 3. Subsidies and tax 4. Financial
. Amelink is the Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering Virginia Page 26.506.1 Tech and affiliate faculty in the Department of Engineering Education and the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out-of-Class Involvement Abstract A large body of literature focuses on the importance of student involvement in all aspects ofcollege for achieving
are now LLCs at manyengineering schools.3 One of the earliest reported Engineering LLCs was formed at ColoradoState University in 1976.31 The vast majority of LLCs described in the literature are for first-yearstudents, and accordingly are specifically intended to increase freshman retention. Publishedstudies of Engineering LLCs have assessed student engagement,32-35 or engagement,performance, and retention.12, 36-39As our work focuses on performance and retention, we review the findings of a sample of Page 26.1098.3published work reporting these outcomes. It is not an exhaustive review, but represents typicaltypes of studies and results from
reach.Learning communities also reduced faculty feelings of risk and vulnerability associated withassessment. For example: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Collins ScholarsProgram, University of Michigan’s Teaching Circle, and University of Florida’s Junior-LevelFaculty Community of Practice each encouraged or required teaching observations of theirmembers. Observations are often fraught experiences for faculty. But embarking upon theseobservations within the framework of a group helped faculty to cast these assessments moreclearly as learning experiences that they’d share, rather than individual trials.In general, the observed risk mitigation rests upon the success of a learning community as a “safespace” for faculty. Within our profiled
assessment data collected so far.1 IntroductionThe goal of this project is to introduce a mechatronics experiential learning element intothe curriculum of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) at theUniversity of Texas at Arlington (UTA). This type of hands-on experience is known to moti-vate students, particularly those from underrepresented groups, in their study of engineering.Dr. Bowling became aware of this when he was faculty advisor for a team of students whoentered the Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts Academic Linkage (RASC-AL) Ex-ploration Robo-Ops competition. The students were required to build a Mars rover, whichwould be transported to the rock yard at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
appreciation of the values we bring to that understanding.[...] Its contribution to liberal education would be to give an insight into the way of thinking of engineers in order to enable judgments to be made about the value of projects and the risks associated with them. 2This definition is problematic, though, in that it fails to produce an actual definition. Instead, itprovides researchers with some ideas as to how to identify and assess engineering literacy,explicating what the research “requires that we understand.”Engineering literacy works to describe an informed citizenry, wherein the person functionseffectively in a society that values engineering, as separate from technology. The NationalAssessment
thoseperceptions and 4) the relation of those perceptions to their performance in the course. Asconclusions, we present the consequences for that practice and some recommendations forinstructors and course designers.1. IntroductionIn 2014, the institution in which this research was conducted had high undergraduate enrollment.About 43% of those students enrolled in a mathematics, physics or chemistry course on their firstyear at the university, and about 80% of all students got a score of less than 600 points out of 850on the standardized University Selection Test (PSU, after the acronym for Prueba de SelecciónUniversitaria)1.Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) results show that students in Chileaneducational institutions show
tools necessary for engineering practice.The objectives (primary and supplemental), successes and failures of this study are describedbriefly in the project assessment table 1. Objective Success Reason for Failure Comments Use of analytical equations and Yes n/a n/a symbolic solvers to solve the en- gineering problem Validation of results obtained Yes n/a n/a from FEM package with analyt- ical solution Validation of results obtained No Limited experimental Students need to start acquir- from FEM package with exper- data found by stu- ing data at earlier stage. imental results
summer camp designed to increase middle-school girls’ STEM knowledge, self-efficacy, and interests. Furthermore, the effect of theSTEAM education strategies on the STEM attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, interest, andengineering identities of middle-school girls are assessed. Considering the limited number ofprogram participants and the fact that self-efficacy is domain specific, a limited case studyresearch method will be adopted to provide insights into the extent to which educationalstrategies influenced the Sustainable Construction Engineering self-efficacy of minority middle-school girls. To this end, the research project will seek to answer the following questions: a. Research Question 1. To what extent did the STEAM ACTIVATED
assessed the same variables. Finally,participants completed a 45-minute phone interview in which they elaborated on theirexperiences in the program.Summer international research experience. Before departing to Durban, South Africa, studentsattended a three-day orientation in which they were introduced to research techniques, projectgoals, teamwork dynamics, and cultural sensitivity topics. The first week in Durban includedtrips to local shopping centers and attractions and visits to the university labs and field researchsite. Students received training in lab safety, analytic techniques, and field sampling protocols.Under the mentorship of the South African collaborators, the students were assigned toindividual projects and were trained to collect
or in teams? Is there an industry partner? Or faculty advisor? • Project content and goal: Is the project process or product focused? Is there cross discipline collaboration such as between computing and engineering? • Credit hours and accreditation requirement: How many semesters/credit hours? Is the Capstone course used for accreditation assessment purposes? • Outcome evaluation: What are considered “successful” outcomes? What are the reflections on the overall experience, takeaways pro’s and con’s? Are metrics tracked from the Capstone experience used for a continuous improvement process?Case StudiesThis section will present case studies that cover the different types of professional
ways: CTE students were more likelyto come from disadvantaged backgrounds and to be less academically prepared than non-CTEstudents. For example, students from the lowest socio-economic quartile and students whoscored in the bottom quartile of math assessment were more likely to earn three or moreoccupational CTE credits in one or more occupational fields.CTE defines "nontraditional by gender careers" occupations or fields of work in whichindividuals from one gender comprise less than 25% of the individuals employed in thoseoccupations. Persistently, CTE computer science and engineering programs have beennontraditional programs for female students, while education and human services have remainednontraditional for male students [7, 8]. In 2018
better ways ofteaching systems engineering, so that engineers require less on-the-job training before taking ontheir roles at their respective engineering companies. A first step in improving systems engineeringeducation is identifying and assessing the strengths and inadequacies in systems engineeringeducation. Here, we propose an approach based on an analysis of the types of errors systemsengineers make in practice. In our previous work, we analyzed a large set of systems engineeringfailures and identified “decision errors” in systems engineering—decisions made before theaccident that accident investigators identified as contributing significantly to the accident. Wedeveloped eight survey questions based on failures in our dataset, including
assessment of student learning.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has
- ductors for application in solution-processed photovoltaics and 2. completing environmental analyses including life cycle assessments and leaching procedures on these novel systems to identify areas of im- provement in the context of environmental performance. Joe was a Ross fellow upon entering Purdue and later became an Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) fellow supported by the National Science Foundation. He received his B.S. in physics from Marietta College in 2015.Mr. Matthew Korey, Purdue University Matthew Korey received his B.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Ohio State University (2011) where he studied the toxicity of various chemical compounds on hepatocytic cells. Matthew then joined
learning to design teaching and learning, program content and structure, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to introduce blended learning into the chemical engineering capstone design courses, and is the author of a number of recent journal, book, and conference contribu- tions on engineering education. Her research focusses on how to teach innovation and sustainable design practices to engineers and develop a curriculum reflective of engineering practice requirements. Recently she has taught a short course on how to design and teach process engineering courses to professors in Peru and workshops on Metacognition and
curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Depart- ment of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU).Ms. Jasmine N Patel, Georgia Institute of Technology Jasmine Patel graduated from Georgia Institute of Technology with a Bachelor’s in Biology along with a concentration in Business. In her last year at Georgia Tech, she had the privilege of conducting research in
have already been conductedon corn (our initial choice) using multispectral analysis. Much of the fundamental research workto understand where the highest money-saving payoffs for the farm has been initiated byuniversities in some of the large U.S. farming states. Hatfield et al. (2003, 2008, and 2010)published a large volume of work detailing the use of multispectral indices for crop evaluation.Lee et al. (2000) used a tractor outfitted with a multispectral camera to assess the nitrogen statusof corn plants and acquire real-time data from a sensor on the tractor. Nigon et al. (2015)demonstrated a strategy to reduce the loss of nitrogen fertilizer by administering the fertilizerafter emergence. Maresma et al. (2016) provided rankings of
need of control.Incremental improvements to the components and controller enable students to assess the impactof their changes and determine if the associated level of complexity is warranted. Moreover, thedeployment of “executable specifications” enables students to identify and rectify errors early inthe design process, whereby they may save dramatically on time and cost. Assessment data arebeing collected to qualify the academic impact of Model-Based Design.IntroductionGiven competitive pressures, and time and cost constraints, developing a product on time andwithin budget requires a systematic approach to design and realization. The systematic designand realization process in the aerospace and automotive industries is typically represented
), multidisciplinary thinking, building capacity in engineering education research, and strategies for connecting research and practice.Monica Cox, Purdue University Monica Farmer Cox is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, her M.S. in Industrial Engineering at the University of Alabama, and her B.S. in Mathematics at Spelman College. Her research interests include teaching and learning in engineering education; engineering faculty and student development; and assessment and evaluation of engineering curricula, faculty pedagogy, student learning, student
focus upon whystudents choose a particular major within a broad area, such as business, science, or engineering. Page 23.587.2Many social and cultural factors such as demographics, self-assessment and self-identifiedcompetence, stereotypes, and socialization (parents, peers and faculty) are underlying reasons fora student to choose a major. These may include personal beliefs, perceived barriers to success,personal interests in the field of study, and attainment values. Students are influenced by amultitude of external sources and environmental factors including socializers, general publicmedia, and targeted media and information. Research
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue Univer- sity. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First-Year Engineering Program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE
partnership programs. His expertise includes assessment in teaching and learning outcomes in k-12 and in higher education, diversity, leadership, community outreach, and curriculum development.Prof. David O Kazmer, University of Massachusetts, LowellDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Univer- sity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pierrakos is the director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer
all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE).Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Johannes Strobel is director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and Assistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at
a site-assessment trip to Cameroon andimplementation trip to Guatemala. The second round of data was collected through a discussionwith seven students leaders of projects based in Guatemala, Cameroon, Haiti, and Nigeria.The theoretical framework for this study is grounded in experiential learning theories and speaksto the fact that students enrich their knowledge, skills, and attitudes through direct experiences. While abroad students practiced engineering and project management skills while workingalongside community members to address specific needs. The international context oftenpresented language and cultural barriers and challenged students to work in remote orunderdeveloped environments. Recognizing this will allow more effective