European rankings in the share ofwomen in STEM [5],[6]. At the university level in German institutions, women constitute lessthan one-fifth of STEM majors, with alarming figures as low as 11% in electrical engineering,19.9% in computer science, and 17.2% in mechanical and process engineering [7].Global efforts to address this imbalance and close these gaps in STEM performancerepresentation and engagement have become an issue of international importance [9].STEM mentorship programs have emerged as a powerful resource and tool forempowering and supporting women in pursuing STEM careers [8]. Mentorshipprograms encompassing initiatives, policies, and networking opportunities have gainedsignificant momentum worldwide [3],[10].Studies show a direct
Paper ID #44271Building Research, Teamwork and Professional Skills in an Engineering SummerBridge Program: Reflections Towards an Allyship ModelProf. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Affairs and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success summer bridge and academic program for new engineering students, preparing them with research, communication and leadership skills. Her research
senior students from the School of Engineering at a prominent private Chileanuniversity. Out of the 140 valid responses collected, 70% were from men, 28.6% were fromfemale participants, and 1.4% did not identify with biological sex. Regarding age range,52.1% were between 19 and 21 years old, 31.4% were between 22 and 24 years old, and16.4% were 25 years or older. Regarding the distribution by major, 42.9% were enrolled inIndustrial Engineering, 25.7% in Geology, 17.1% in Computer Engineering and Informatics,and 14.3% in Automation and Robotics Engineering.It is important to note that out of all the questionnaire participants, only 23.6% wereemployed, while the remaining 76.4% were not. Almost half of the respondents, 45%, hadalready completed an
degree.Evaluation of the standards, implemented by means of student activities, proves that they areeffective.IntroductionSan Diego has an extensive technical and scientific base of aerospace, biotechnology,communications, and computer-related companies, as well as research institutes, universities, andmedical centers. San Diego also has a diverse ethnic and economic population. Currently there areindividual programs in San Diego, derived from the nationally-recognized Mathematics, Engineering,Science Achievement (MESA) Program, that assist underrepresented students to earn degrees inScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. The MESA mission is to enableeducationally disadvantaged students to prepare for and graduate from a four-year
AC 2011-2547: AN EXPERT SYSTEM TO TEACH ENGINEERING STU-DENTS SUTAINABILITY AND CREATIVITY DESIGN METHOD SELEC-TIONPedro Renato Acosta, University of Texas at El PasoRafael Gonzalez, UTEPNoe Vargas Hernandez, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Vargas Hernandez research focuses on engineering design creativity, ideation metrics, design innova- tion, ideation methods, cognitive psychology, TRIZ, use of smartpen, design education, computer aided conceptual design, design of neuromusculoskeletal rehabilitation devices and design for sustainability. Page 22.174.1 c American Society for Engineering
covered basic mathematics, algebra, andtrigonometry. The traditional engineering trigonometry course constitutes part of the requiredprofessional pilot program curriculum. Below is a short list of content topics covered intraditional engineering trigonometry courses that have little relevancy to an individual becominga successful pilot: • Trigonometry Identities, • The Addition and Subtraction Formulas, • Multiple-Angle Formulas, • Trigonometric Form for Complex Numbers, and • Page 15.1373.3 De Moivre’s Theorem and nth Roots of Complex Numbers
Page 7.1289.5course sections that used the laboratory data as the basis of the computer tool training component Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationfound the experience more interesting. Student comments noted that through the labs, theyactually got to see engineering principles in action instead of just reading about them.Although this paper discusses a curriculum approach still in its infancy, many of the initialfindings align with other introductions of creative work into freshmen engineering experiences.Results from the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition from 1992 through 1997 found
updating curriculum in our Fundamentals of Engineering class in the School ofEngineering and Computing. We had administered surveys as part of the program evaluation andassessment, and I was in the important, but time consuming, process of analyzing the student responsesfor the final report. After meeting Dr. Hangen, I realized that she could do a much better job, in half thetime. We had unused money in the grant for evaluation, and I was able to pay her a small stipend tocomplete these analyses. Following submission of the grant report, we had a meeting to discuss bestpractices moving forward and I realized that she was an ideal collaborator for not only the assessmentpiece, but also in development of theory grounded interventions for future
AC 2011-997: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT UNDERSTANDING IN PHYSICS:AN INTEGRATED QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHTeresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Educa- tion Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American
universities’ developments. As part of the challenge, a university must complete a Requirementsand System Definition Review, Preliminary Design Review, Critical Design Review, progresscheckpoints, acceptance testing, and final review and demonstration to NASA management.Texas A&M University ConceptThe Electronics Systems Engineering Technology (ESET) program at Texas A&M University has anexperiential learning-based curriculum that prepares undergraduate students for electronic product andsystem development jobs in the public and private sectors upon graduation [7]. While the actualcurriculum prepares students with background in analog/digital circuit design, data communications,embedded system design and topics in product development, an
Paper ID #9697Reinforcing a ”Design Thinking” Course by Restructuring Student-InstructorInteractionsDr. Ang Liu Dr. Liu is a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow and Manager of Viterbi iPodia Program at University of South- ern California.Dr. Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California Dr. Lu is the David Packard Chair in Manufacturing Engineering, Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science, and Industrial and Systems Engineering, and Director of Viterbi iPodia Program, at University of Southern California
Page 23.1297.2knowledge and makes it shareable”1. The authors argue for a change in engineering writingassessment that favors formative assessment (focused on writing comments that lead to bothbetter writing and better engineering) over summative assessment (which sees writing ability asseparate from engineering design).A recurrent issue in the program at this school is that the students spend little energy inbecoming better writers and that the curriculum promulgates this message. At the time ofgraduation, the students will have taken 20 courses in their major field of study, but they willhave taken only two writing courses. These two courses include a freshman-level rhetoric andcomposition course, and a technical writing course where
13 Chemical 8 6 7 21 Mechanical / Aerospace / 8 4 7 19 Materials Computer / Electrical 5 3 8 16 Industrial 4 3 8 15 Table 1: Student grades in entry-level engineering courses at Georgia TechTable 2 focuses on entry-level conservation courses in Chemical Engineering and BiomedicalEngineering at several peer institutions. The percentage of students who earn a D or an F or whowithdraw from the course justifies further research on these entry-level courses
involvement in academic and social activities beyond the classroom has been the topic ofmany studies.3,4,5 Zhao and Kuh show that participating in learning communities results in the outcomeslisted above.6 Edwards and McKelfresh, further, demonstrate the positive impact of linking theresidential life component.7The Watson School of Engineering and Applied Science at Binghamton University features a commonfreshman year for all engineering students. Mechanical, electrical, computer, industrial, and bio-engineering students are enrolled in the same freshman engineering courses. During the first semester oftheir freshman year, all engineering students take an introduction to engineering course (WTSN 111:Exploring Engineering I), a Technical Writing
University Ms. L. Noelle Brigham is a licensed Professional Engineer with over 20 years of experience in Sus- tainability and Environmental Engineering in the Consumer Products and Consulting industries. She is Professor of Practice for the Opus College of Engineering, where she connects industrial applications to program curriculum to respond to the needs of the practicing engineer. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Staying Connected – Interactive Student Learning during the COVID Transition to Remote Learning ABSTRACTBackground. How can we transition courses in one week, while
Paper ID #37215Impact of Communication Styles on Teaching EngineeringDr. Laura Wieserman, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Dr. Wieserman is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh at John- stown. She received her PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA in 2016. Prior to working at the University, she was a Systems Engineer focusing on elec- tronic design, RF analysis, antenna modeling, radar simulation, and renewable energy system design and management. Her current research interests include transient photovoltaic inverter
classroom environment. This furtherdemonstrates the crucial role of community when committing to pedagogical changes. In otherwords, a lack of solidarity has the tendency to create a stale culture which recycles antiquatednotions of teaching. The sentiments illustrated by P46 suggest that EBIP-awareness shouldperhaps begin in graduate school, which would proactively normalize the use of alternativeteaching innovations, as opposed to reactively finding a mentor after becoming an instructor.They further go on to state, “...that was probably the first time where I really felt like I reallyhad to build my own curriculum. I had to do all of the grading. I had to do thelecturing…and then, um, in, during my postdoc years, again, really didn't get
University of Leeds, UK, evaluating an institution-wide curriculum transformation initiative. He holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics from the University of Not- tingham, UK, prior to the undertaking of which he spent a decade teaching English as a foreign language.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the Uni- versity of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research fo- cuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judg- ment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strate- gies affect
) 138 59 197 Total 272 124 396 A standard hypothesis test for independence was conducted for each contingency table (4 total).This test assumes independence for the null hypothesis (i.e., student performance is independent of modeof teaching). Under the assumption of a true null hypothesis, frequencies for each of the six cells arecomputed and a χ2 test statistic is computed for the table using (ைିா)మ ?ଶ = σ ா (1)where O is the observed cell frequency in Table 3 and E is the expected cell frequency based on a
Paper ID #38510First-year Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging: Impact of COVID-19and Efficacy as a Predictor of GraduationBreanna Graven, University of Louisville PhD candidate in curriculum and instruction with focus on informal science education. Graduate research assistant for the First-Year Engineering department studying ways to improve student retention.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the
Paper ID #36881Position Verification in a GD&T Course: A Longitudinal StudyDr. Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University Dr. Branoff is a professor and chair of the Department of Technology at Illinois State University. He taught engineering graphics, computer-aided design, descriptive geometry, and instructional design courses in the College of Education at North Carolina State University from 1986-2014. He also worked for Siemens- Switchgear Division and for Measurement Group, Inc. Dr. Branoff’s research interests include constraint- based solid modeling strategies and spatial visualization abilities in
hasthe ability to represent complex forms that cannot be realized in physical models. The processcan also encourage students to explore dynamic and fluid shapes that are rooted in the parametricmodeling process with computational and iterative design logic. This not only helps thedesigners to visualize but to realize the forms through rapid prototyping with 3-dimensional (3D)printers. [5]While physical and digital modeling has various benefits for exploring design iterations, they donot provide an experiential aspect of architecture. The full-scale physical mockup or animatedrendering can offer the experience but it does not give an interactive understanding of thecomplete spatial design. Adaptation of VR, AR, and MR in design courses can
College Park. Mohammad is recipient of several prestigious awards, including the ASHRAE New Investigator Award as well as IBPSA-USA Emerging Technology Award in support of his early career research. Mohammad is a registered professional en- gineer (PE). Mohammad teaches several courses such as Instrumentation and Measurements in Building Science, Energy Conservation in Building Design, HVAC Systems Design, and Control of Building En- vironmental Systems. Mohammad is also the Co-Director of The Built Environment Research Group (BERG) at Illinois Institute of Technology where he leads research in the areas of building energy and en- vironmental systems, building automation systems, computational fluid dynamics
; Professional Communication andSeparation Processes, and ranged from sophomore to senior. Concept maps were scored usingtraditional scoring, a method that computes a numerical concept map score from the number ofconcepts, number of hierarchies, length of the highest hierarchy, and number of crosslinks(connections across hierarchies). Concept maps were also scored qualitatively by the instructor forstructure. For the most part traditional scoring correlated with qualitative analysis (a highertraditional score signaled a more complex map structure) but notable exceptions occurred. Theseexceptions typically fell into high traditional score/simple structure and were maps that includedmany concepts but did not synthesize connections between the concepts
49.7 % 30.6 % Terminology math questions 40.1 % 38.8 % Responders whose native language is not English (n = 14) Average Student Performance Standard Deviation No-term math questions 60.8 % 38.6 % Terminology math questions 37.0 % 36.9 % First-gen responders (n = 17) Average Student Performance Standard Deviation No-term math questions 41.7 % 29.4 % Terminology math questions 40.7 % 37.3 %Conclusions and Future WorkThe study intended to investigate whether vocabulary used in engineering curriculum canbecome an
analyses of exit tickets forthe teaching of engineers remain scarce.This study analyzes exit tickets employed in the Engineering Physics I course at the WentworthInstitute of Technology from the Fall 2020 to Fall 2021 academic semesters. This is a calculus-based introductory mechanics course geared towards future engineers at a primarilyundergraduate institution of approximately 4,000 undergraduates. Classes given these exit ticketsconsisted mostly of students majoring in one of several engineering fields, with a notableminority coming from computer science or applied sciences. Course capacity varied from 30 to36 students during the time of the study, with approximately 240 students across 8 sections ofEngineering Physics I responding to the exit
I have helped redesign the Electronics and Robotics theme and where I have worked to create a common Computing theme for all incoming students.Dr. Candace Auburn Rainwater, University of Arkansas American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Evaluating freshmen engineering students’ experience in a First-Year Engineering Program and lessons learned during Covid-19 pandemicIntroductionIn Spring of 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic caused great changes to the education system acrossthe country. Both universities and high schools were forced to quickly adapt to distancedlearning or cancel classes. Students were left confused and concerned about how their semesterwould
infrastructure, and community engagement. She teaches the introductory engineering course for all first-year undergraduate students in the College of Engineering at UD. Her undergraduate teaching experience includes foundational engineering mechanics courses like statics and strength of materials as well as courses related to sustainability and infrastructure. Her research interests are in foundational engineering education, sustainability in engineering curriculum, and green technologies in infrastructure.Prof. Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Buckley is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor’s of Engineering (2001) in Mechanical Engineering from the
attributes and their role in overall function (e.g.materials), and (5) engineers creativity (“how did people create this” type wonderings). Each ofthese codes were developed as described in the methodology section and derived inductivelyacross both authors using the journal entries. Each code is reflective to some degree of extant literature around the teaching of thenature of engineering and engineering design in K-12 settings. For example, code (1) theinteraction of science phenomena and engineering design or function of engineered technologiesis reflective of work that has examined the inclusion of engineering design in science classroomsand curriculum where design work has manifested students’ conceptions of science (see Chao etal., 2017
Master’s degree in Higher Education as a Fulbright scholar. Prior to Penn State, she earned a Bachelor degree in Political Science at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Her research focuses on campus climate and educational experiences of historically underserved and underrepresented higher education student populations. As graduate research assistant, she has collaborated in the co-evaluation team of the inaugural Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) funded Millennium Scholars Program at Penn State, and she also worked in the evaluation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded National Research Traineeship Computational Materials Education Training (CoMET) Program at Penn State.Leticia Oseguera