2006-2291: DEVELOPING A NEW PROGRAM IN MARINE ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGYAnthony Dean, Old Dominion University Anthony W. Dean is Assistant Professor of. He received a Ph.D. in Engineering Management and a B.S. in Engineering Technology from ODU and an MBA from the College of William and Mary. Previously, Dr. Dean was Director of Operations and Business Development for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS South Carolina and the USS EnterpriseGary Crossman, Old Dominion University Gary R. Crossman is Professor and Chair of Engineering Technology at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. Professor Crossman received his B.S. degree from the U.S. Merchant
classroom such that students areguided and mentored to skillfully utilize the search engine. The proposed change in this paper isbased on restructuring curriculum and learning outcomes to focus more on the verification of theability to apply skills in real life rather than spending the time on teaching the knowledge whichis already available in abundance at the tip of our students’ fingertips.KeywordsTraditional educations, technology in education, engineering curriculumIntroduction:It is fact of life that technology is in every aspect of our lives. Smart devices have become anecessity rather than a luxury or “per need” item. Most of our future engineers depend on thosesmart devices for their everyday needs. A generation or two back, people used to
, and wearable sensing.Holly Matto, George Mason University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section Conference Supporting creativity and innovation in STEAM undergraduate curriculum through extracurricular hands-on learning Nathalia Peixoto, Linghan Zhang, Padmanabhan Seshaiyer, Holly Matto George Mason University, Fairfax VA 22030Abstract Faculty from several colleges offered an intensive summer program with the objective ofimpacting student engagement in multidisciplinary research activities through specific curiosityand networking. George Mason University funded 10 undergraduate
for Engineering Education, 2023 1 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferenceto provide hands-on experience4. Concept demonstrations via software tools such as MathCAD© and Working Model© were used to enhance student understanding5. A computationlaboratory using MATLAB/Simulink was added to existing course6. Na Zhu modified the courselayout away from the norm. His class contained two tests and four open-ended projects7. Thepurpose here was to emphasize the problem-solving ability in real-world applications rather thanto spend time on rigorous mathematics. Vibration has been extended beyond mechanicalengineering as well. Luciana Barroso inserted vibration into civil engineering curriculum atTexas
chemicalengineering curriculum at a mid-sized, rural, public, four-year university. Specifically, we presentpreliminary findings from previous versions of CHE 3550, Transfer Science II (Fluids), a three-credit hour course with an additional one credit of laboratory work, that inspired the work done toredesign this course for the Spring 2023 semester. These redesign efforts will systematicallyincorporate the Engineering for One Planet (EOP) model into core components of the designprocess that uses the Renaissance Foundry Model (i.e., the Foundry) as a guided strategy, whereinstudent-teams develop prototypes of innovative technology to address societal challenges asrequired outcomes in this course. Intentional activities will motivate student-teams to leverage
of his years at Ford were as an Information Technology manager in areas of development, installation and support. His primary research and teaching interests are in scheduling, heuristics and process modeling. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Introducing Production Concepts – A Hands On Learning Experience Scott Schultz and Sinjae Hyun Mercer UniversityAbstractIntroducing production concepts to engineering students can be quite challenging. The highresource cost of setting up and maintaining a production
explore new skills and fields of knowledge. This supportmanifests itself at various levels, from university wide initiatives to department level resources and itconsists of physical resources, mentoring networks and innovation focused events. Each initiative,program and resource do of course, emphasize the types of support typically provided by the organizer.The graduate school stimulates innovation through its annual Research and Creative Achievement Week(RCAW) [2], the Research, Economic Development and Engagement (REDE) department is running NSFI-Corps [3] programs to stimulate entrepreneurship, while the College of Business is organizing a PirateEntrepreneurship Challenge [4].The availability of all these efforts to encourage and support
may be given to the fundamental sciences,that they may achieve as never before the spirit and results of research; that all courses ofinstruction may be examined carefully to see where training in details has been unduly emphasizedat the expense of the more powerful training in all-embracing fundamental principles.” MIT thenled the transition from an apprenticeship approach to engineering education to an applied sciencemodel. The transition was greatly accelerated by World War II, in which technology arguablyplayed the deciding role, and later by the federal government.As the War was coming to a close, engineer Vannevar Bush who headed the Office of ScientificResearch and Development, which supported almost all wartime R&D, saw continuing
the stakeholders. A committee can be formed to develop the metrics and periodically evaluate the outcome to ensure the metrics are met. • Building diverse U-I partnerships. Through the U-I collaboration, faculty can invite professionals from minority or under-representative demographics from the industry to give guest lectures. In addition, the university can support industry in recruiting students from those populations as well through scholarships, internships or mentorships. • Industry’s active participation in university partner’s curriculum development. Creating an industry advisory board dedicated to the academic program will ensure the partnered university prepares students for meeting
, theseskills are difficult to impart in a traditional engineering classroom. In order to address thischallenge and offer students a global experience, a foreign study program has beendeveloped for the bioengineering students at Arizona State University. The model wasdesigned to be easily adaptable with three key components – minor modification of flow-charts, identification of host institutions, and active student encouragement. To avoidcontroversy regarding accreditation, the curriculum was modified to allow for travelabroad during either semester in the second or third years during which the studentcompletes general engineering classes but would not have to take any major-specificcourses (here, bioengineering). International host institutions that
learning situations and problem-solving mathematically is a preferred and effectivemethod for engineering students.Despite the obvious fit that biomedical engineering programs and quantitatively-basedphysiology courses seem to make, quantitative courses in physiology are still quite rare.Biomedical engineering is a relatively young discipline. Undergraduate programs are in variousstates of development and a common core curriculum is still evolving. Many programs havelimited resources and faculty to teach their own departmental physiology courses. Takingadvantage of more qualitatively-oriented physiology courses is an economic necessity.Structuring Physiology Course ContentOrganizing course content requires at least two decisions – what topics to
between the first and the second timethe course was offered.IntroductionNanoscience offers fresh perspectives on and unexpected solutions to a wide range of unsolvedproblems in semiconductors, optics, sensing, and biotechnology. Nanomaterials promiseeverything from faster and smaller electronics to more effective and precisely targeted therapies.Much of the current excitement about nanomaterials involves biomedicine due to the fact thatnanoscale materials are the appropriate size to interact with important biological actors, such asproteins, DNA molecules, and viruses. For example, delivery strategies that employ polymericnanoparticles are currently being developed and used in the fight against diseases such asmalaria. The nanoparticles, which
curriculumwere developed to build on and basic engineering knowledge and give students courses in eachof the subdivisions. Figure 1 shows the tracks within the curriculum that illustrate this buildingof knowledge. Please note that prerequisite courses such as mathematics and physics are notshown. Also not shown are the physiology courses that are a pre-requisite to each biomedicalcourse.It can be seen in Figure 1 that the Biomedical Engineering knowledge builds on otherengineering disciples such as Computer, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering. After severalcourses in each of these disciplines, biomedical specific courses are taken. Please note that eachbox in Figure 1 represents the pre-requisite knowledge needed. Because the school runs on aquarter
2006-123: ASSESSING AN INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SCAFFOLD FORREINFORCING LEARNING OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICSKathy Schmidt, University of Texas-Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. In this position, she promotes the College of Engineering’s commitment to finding ways to enrich teaching and learning. She works in all aspects of education including design and development, faculty training, learner support, and evaluation.Mia Markey, University of Texas-Austin MIA K. MARKEY is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. The mission of her
2006-1162: NEW PATHWAYS TO EDUCATE FUTURE TRANSLATIONALRESEARCHERS IN MEDICINEAnn Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Director of Laboratory Instruction and Lecturer in the Bioengineering Department at Rice University. She received her B.A. in Chemical Engineering and Biochemistry from Rice University in 1990 and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign in 1995. She conducted research and provided technical support within Shell Development Company from 1995 to 1999.Michele Follen, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Dr. Michele Follen received her B.A. degree from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, in 1975, her M.D. degree from the
2006-1199: FACILITATING THE DESIGN OF DIAGNOSTIC LEARNINGMODULES WITH CAPELarry Howard, Vanderbilt University Larry P. Howard is a Senior Research Scientist with the Institute for Software Integrated Systems at Vanderbilt University. He is the developer of the Courseware Authoring and Packaging Environment (CAPE) and the VaNTH experimental Learning Management System (eLMS).Robert Roselli, Purdue University Robert J. Roselli is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. He has served as Director of Graduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Education Director for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Learning
virtuallysynonymous in most contexts, so “bioengineering” will be used in this article for simplicity.)Neural engineers self-identify as engineers/scientists interested in engineering challengesrelated to the brain and nervous system. It has been referred to as a “merger of engineeringand neuroscience” [1]. Many neural engineers work on clinically oriented challenges,including for example developing sensory prostheses for the deaf and blind or designingsystems to stimulate walking motion in the legs of spinal chord injury patients. But otherneural engineers are interested primarily in understanding how the brain and nervous systemwork, or are affected by disease.Although engineers and scientists have been doing this kind of work for decades, it is onlywithin
2006-1384: METHODS FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONALREFORM IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGThomas Harris, Vanderbilt University Thomas R. Harris is the Orrin Henry Ingram Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Medicine at Vanderbilt University. He is currently Chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from Texas A&M University and the Ph.D. degree from Tulane University in that field. He holds an M.D. degree from Vanderbilt University. His current interests focus on the development of learning science and learning technology for bioengineering. He is currently
covered in typicalgraduate business or technical degree programs.The program consists of 15 courses representing 37.5 credit hours. Courses are offered in theevenings to accommodate working engineers and are taught at both institutions. Students mayenroll as full or part-time students. Full-time students can complete the program in threesemesters.CurriculumThe program includes courses in Healthcare Technologies Management and Business andManagement. One technical and one professional development elective are also required. TheHealthcare Technologies Management core curriculum includes the following courses:• Survey of Biomedical Engineering Technology Review of technologies employed in medicine for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of
Copyright ? 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”• Selection of curriculum content• Retaining, with modifications, sustainability in our ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES course• Adding sustainability to design problems in required courses• Including sustainability in our capstone design courses• Developing civil engineering faculty buy- in leading to regular dialogue with students on sustainable development issues in existing courses freshman through senior yearWith most Civil Engineering departments adding more content to a fixed or decreasing numberof credit hours, the appropriate selection of sustainability curriculum content is critical. ASCEPolicy Statement 4181 on the role of the civil engineer in sustainable development states
areteaching” [2]. It was the goal of Purdue University’s Department of Building ConstructionManagement (BCM), through collaboration with the NAHB University of Housing, toincorporate the NAHB professional designation into the BCM program. “Providing studentswith professional development opportunities is an important addition to an undergraduateeducation” [2].There has been a push by many universities to incorporate green building into their curriculum[3] . While there are multiple green certification programs available for the residential market, thetop two recognized programs are the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) with theirLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Homes and the NationalAssociation of Home Builders
and instructional supervision (such as student thesis, project or intern supervision) equivalent to 36 hours per week, and • 3 WTU equivalences of indirect instructional activity such as student advisement, curriculum development and improvements, and committee assignments (4 to 9 hours per week).Thus Weighted Teaching Units are a measure of the weekly rate of faculty effort3.The breakdown of hours is the table below. Table 4 – Faculty workload established by EP&R 76 Course Mode WTU Faculty-Student Contact Hours 1 laboratory unit 2 WTU’s 3 hours 1 activity unit 1.3
that building construction projects include active and continuouscollaboration of all of these parties, learning multi-disciplinary strategies is a necessary acumenwith which students must graduate in preparation for professional practice. New technologiesand project development approaches such as building information modeling are necessitatingearly and extensive collaboration among the professions. Integrated project delivery methods aremaximizing this need for interdisciplinary team production. Feedback from industryrepresentatives and practicing professionals unanimously supports the concept of integration.This paper describes an effort to establish a multi-disciplinary first-year curriculum for designand construction freshman that includes
mathematicalrelationships. The microscopic definition of entropy is related to a summation ofvariances representing deviations from an equilibrium state (De Groot and Mazur, 1983).This definition is related to the Boltzmann definition of entropy in terms of thethermodynamic probability.De Groot and Mazur (1983) discuss the mass, energy and entropy balance from amathematically rigorous viewpoint. They provide equations for the entropy flux inprocesses with simultaneous momentum, diffusion, thermal and electrical transport.Entropy flux is the common denominator for the discussion. Entropy is the basis onwhich the Onsager coefficients are developed. The Onsager coefficients enable relationsfor example of simultaneous heat and mass transfer modalities in a quasi
worked closely with the facultyteaching Calculus and Physics in developing shared outcomes for all three courses. Previously,these courses were taught independent of each other and most students did not recognize theconnection between math and science and the design process. Even though group projects in thePrinciples of Design course promoted creativity and the use of systematic methods for solvingproblems, there remained a lack of understanding among the students of the linkages of calculusand introductory physics to engineering design. Working as a team, the engineering, physics,and math faculty incorporated the physics and calculus the students were learning that semesterinto the design projects. These projects were assigned in the freshman
on their offering time and peer-recommendations, not necessarily based on tie-ins with their civil engineering course.But how to educate contrarian leaders and thinkers, and how to incorporate the right amount of“gray” into a jam-packed curriculum? Engineering students are taking, on average, fewerengineering courses at a time when by almost universal estimation the complexity of the modernengineering project continues to mount (Allenby 2000/2001; Bordogna 1998; Clough 2000;TCFPD 2001). To confront the challenges of the 21st century, engineers need to polish their non-technical repertoire, and this includes developing closer ties with the liberal arts. As programsreform their curricula in response to ABET’s new outcome-oriented criteria, and
. In Fall of 2001, the course was re-structured and three sectionswere offered. During the course, student assessment was implemented to investigate oursuccess in achieving the course goals. Lessons learned from Fall 2001 were used tomodify the approach for the Spring 2002 semester.ENGR 120: Introduction to Engineering: Course History and OverviewFew elements of the undergraduate curriculum have been the subject of more discussion,research and disagreement than the first engineering course. The only consensus thatexists is that there should be such a course. Engineering faculty proceed from that pointin one of two ways. The historic approach might be described by the phrase: : “IfProfessor X is willing to do this job, than she/he should at
. Page 25.448.11 Lauderdale, FL8. Gould, F. (2011) Documentation: Curriculum Matrix, Coursework and “Closing the Assessment Loop.”. American Council for Construction Education 2011 Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN9. Slattery, D. K. (2009). Self-Study Workshop: Best Practices in Outcomes Assessment. American Council for Construction Education 2009 Annual Meeting, Schaumburg, IL10. Hauck, A. J. (1998). Toward a Taxonomy of Learning Outcomes for Construction Management Education. Journal of Construction Education, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 150-163.11. Hatipkarasulu, Y. and Smith, J. (2007). Development and Implementation of a Digital Data Collection Method for Graduating Senior Exit Surveys. Proceedings of the Associated Schools of
Internships: Lessons learned beyond the classroom. David Laxman, Michael Bright, Stephen Renshaw Information Technology, Brigham Young University1. IntroductionThis paper describes ways in which our internship taught us to use project development models,learn new technology, and communicate our ideas effectively with management. We provide alist of ten guidelines to effectively communicate as interns and describe how businesses canbenefit from internships.Our internship, provided by Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD), has helped usapply our IT education, gain real-world IT experience, and learn to communicate withmanagement. CUWCD hired us to produce a web-based
Mindstorms kit.Several programming languages or pseudo-languages have been developed for programming theMindstorms including languages containing components of ADA, basic, C, and Java.2 The AirForce Academy uses the Mindstorms to teach robotic programming using ADA instead of thegraphical programming language.16 While these languages can enhance the learning experiencefor students, agricultural systems management students are not required to enroll inprogramming as part of their curriculum, so the Robolab graphical programming language isused to program the Mindstorms for the tractor pull.The Robolab software used to program the RCX brick is a graphical programming languagebased on LabView from National Instruments. An infrared tower, included with