Paper ID #18061Engineering Students’ Misuse of Business Concepts: Understanding Prob-lematic Precursors to EntrepreneurshipMr. Todd Mathew Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Todd is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering education efforts.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, As- sociate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center
Paper ID #36527Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Project – Design andDevelopment of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Industry ApplicationsDr. Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University Adeel Khalid, Ph.D. Professor Industrial and Systems Engineering Office: 470-578-7241 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Project – Design and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Industry Applications Adeel Khalid, Ph.D
the mainchallenges in designing an APR-based speech therapy system are: first, how to maintain sufficientmotivation for children during long practice sessions at home, and second, how to providefeedback in a way that children can easily understand without the interpretation from SLPs orparents.These challenges provide a rich learning experience for engineering students involving not onlythe user interface design (UID) of a therapeutic system for young children but also cutting-edgemachine learning and speech recognition techniques. UID is the process designers use to buildinterfaces in software or computerized devices that focus on looks or style7. In our course studentsare introduced to design thinking and based on the school of thought we
, Diversity, and Inclusion for the College of Engi- neering at Kansas State University. She is also an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering.Shana Bender ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding the Impact of a LSAMP Scholar ProgramThis is a work-in-progress paper. Beginning in 2014, Kansas State University, a predominatelywhite, midwestern, land grant institution, was awarded a Louis Stokes Alliance for MinorityParticipation (KS-LSAMP) grant focused on identifying innovative pathways to recruit, retain,and graduate underrepresented minority students (including African American, Hispanic/Latino,Native American/American, Pacific Islander and Alaskan
“millennial generation”, we wondered whether the social andcultural values ascribed to this generation would be reflected in their understanding ofprofessional responsibility and ethics in the practice of engineering.As a part of a one-semester engineering design course at our public university in the westernUnited States, we conduct a workshop in engineering ethics with a discussion of the ABET Codeof Ethics for Engineers, followed by a case study of an ethical dilemma in an industrialworkplace. During the Fall 2012 and Spring 2013 semesters we included an assessment surveyof the workshop content and delivery, between one week and two weeks later, to determine howwell the students understood the meaning of ethical responsibility and could identify
AC 2012-4718: PROCESS EVALUATION: THE VITAL (AND USUALLY)MISSING PIECE IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHDr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc. Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in Cary, N.C. She is a faculty development and evaluation consultant for the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University and Co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute sponsored by the American Society for Engineering Education. Brent received her B.A. from Millsaps College in Jackson, Miss., her M.Ed. from Mississippi State University, and her Ed.D. from Auburn University. She was an Associate Professor of education at East Carolina University before starting her consulting
Paper ID #20290A Case Study Approach for Understanding the Impact of Team Selection onthe Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Capstone TeamsDr. Mark W. Steiner, University of Central Florida Mark Steiner is Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). He currently serves as Director of Engineering Design in the MAE Department. Mark previously served as Director of the O.T. Swanson Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory in the School of Engineering at Rens- selaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and
Paper ID #6824Assessing the design of a rapid product design cycle activity that develops stu-dent understanding of engineering design and professional practiceMs. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia Kristine Sheridan is a PhD Candidate with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc and MASc in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto. She is a member of the teaching team and a course developer for the Praxis cornerstone design courses.Dr. Robert Irish, University of TorontoMr. Jason A. Foster, University of Toronto
Academy of Engineering’s(NAE’s) Grand Challenges for Engineering are explicitly related to energy, and were ranked as Page 14.1030.2the most important based on a web-poll. 1,2 In a 2008 national poll of voters, the energy crisisranked third.3 Many students are interested in a career that will allow them to help solve theenergy crisis.A wide variety of engineering majors will be needed to address different parts of energy-relatedissues. Architectural engineers can design greener buildings to significantly reduce the energyconsumption from heating, cooling, and lighting. Electrical engineers design power conversionand energy transmission systems
thesuccessful realization, use, and retirement of engineered systems, using systems principles andconcepts, and scientific, technological, and management methods.” [4] In analysis, commonemergent themes of systems, system management, and transdisciplinary work arise in directcomparison of the INCOSE definition and the student generated themes in their definitions ofsystems engineering, suggesting some level of exposure to systems engineering. Additionally,the INCOSE term “successful realization” is indicative of a broader creation theme thatencompasses the emergent themes of design and build present in student supplied definitions.This parallel further supports student exposure to or understanding of systems engineering.Similar parallels are observed
-2006, we also collected pre- and post-assessments fromclassrooms in one district in Massachusetts that did not complete any EiE units. The purpose ofdata collection has been and continues to be twofold: (1) to learn more about what students Page 12.640.2nationally know about engineering, technology, and the engineering design process and (2) toevaluate the Engineering is Elementary curriculum in terms of its effect on students’understanding of engineering, of technology, and of related science topics.Previous research on young students’ understanding of engineering and technology concepts issparse2-4 though research to guide the growing field
and negotiateiteratively in the design process. The size of the teams can also be much larger than counterpartsin law or accounting. Exploration of engineering consulting firms builds on our understanding ofengineering leadership as well as extends our knowledge of how leadership is enacted withinPSFs.Conceptual Framework:To guide our exploration, we employ Empson and Langley’s framework on leadership withinPSFs [22] as our conceptual lens. This framework describes leadership as mechanisms ofinfluence applied in an environment where authority and power are sometimes contested andambiguous. They established this framework by reviewing practitioner-oriented texts aboutleadership within PSFs, and leadership theories from applicable contexts
-disciplinary perspective, including bringing together constructs from the fields of motivation, human development, and biopsychology. Her research is dedicated to understanding the links between students’ emotions, emotion regulation, attention, and future-oriented motivation with respect to optimal school performance and physiological well-being.Mrs. Krista Puruhito, Arizona State UniversityDr. Evan J Fishman, Stanford University Page 26.1622.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Understanding Engineering Students Stress and Emotions during an Introductory
project-based learning engineering programs located inMinnesota. In alignment with the goals of both the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), the faculty inthe program are working to improve the students’ understanding of ethics in the engineeringprofession. Criterion 3-f of the ABET outcomes calls for student attainment of an understandingof ethical and professional responsibility; since both program’s model of learning is to engagestudents in the practice of engineering, we seek to develop methods to improve understanding ofethics and ethical problems, which we believe should lead to increased recognition and processto best resolve ethical scenarios commonly
of students, faculty and staff who are interested in educating studentsin making environmentally responsible decisions. KIET received NationalScience Foundation CCLI Phase 1 Grant (DUE#051132) to design and teach theEnvironmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing class and start theGreener Engineering Organization (GEO), a student club, in Fall 2007. Since itsformation, GEO has improved environmental awareness, stimulatedenvironmental action, and enhanced the image of Kettering as anenvironmentally conscious university. They have improved the local anduniversity community by giving its members service learning, leadership, andnetworking opportunities. Furthermore, they initiated paper and beveragecontainer recycling programs, and
produce superiorresults. Cognitive diversity can take a variety of forms, but in this work diversity of personalitytypes is explored. The impact of cognitive styles on team performance was evaluated in afreshman environmental engineering (EVEN) course. The students worked on projects involvingcomparative analysis and some calculations, but no design or intrinsically “creative”requirements. Specifically, student teams in 2006, 2007, and 2008 evaluated solid wastelandfills. In 2006 and 2007 the project encompassed three or four periods of in-class directionand work time. In 2008, the project was modified to compare the energy and environmentalimpacts of landfills to waste-to-energy incinerators and included only two class periods withinstructor
when comparing maleand female students, or when comparing students from the United States (U.S.) with non-U.S.students. We observed a negative correlation between the number of high school math coursesand the average knowledge score. In addition, the authors investigated how the students’tolerance to change affected their prioritization of environmental issues and environmentalknowledge. High resistance to change scores indicate low perceived importance ofenvironmental engineering and low levels of understanding of environmental engineering issues,with the exception of issues related to policy/legislature where the relationship is positivelycorrelated. To translate the findings into practice, this research recommends to focus on
instruction on ethics in the undergraduate curriculum as mandated by the ABETaccreditation criteria.12 Likewise, critical thinking skills are generally seen to be an essential partof engineering instruction both at undergraduate and graduate levels. In this paper, rather thanevaluating writing for writing’s sake, we use it as a tool to understand students’ critical thinkingand ethical literacy with regard to macroethical dilemmas. This perspective is chosen with thepractical objective of understanding what kinds of deficits in critical thinking may be impairingethics instruction and the subsequent development of strong ethical literacy.Ethical Literacy among Engineering Undergraduates: Ethics issues in engineering haveincreasingly drawn attention in
The Impact of a Hybrid Instructional Design in a First-Year Design (Cornerstone) Course on Student Understanding of the Engineering Design ProcessAbstractEngineering is synonymous with design, and the interchangeable use of the terms is ubiquitousin society: see, for example, Quicken Loans’ slogan “Engineered to Amaze.”30 Design classesare therefore fundamental to an undergraduate engineering plan of study; the gains in studentperformance and retention due to involvement in design activities are well documented in theliterature. Design is also one of the criteria by which programs are evaluated for ABETaccreditation.6 Therefore, the issue is not “should we offer design courses”; the issues concerncourse
learning outcomes are attained in undergraduate engineering pro-grams is through the offering of courses that have have pre- and co-requisite relationship betweenthem. That is, learning activities are structured as courses that must be passed in sequence in orderto attain the learning outcomes. The general notion is that prerequisite courses contain learningactivities that must be successfully completed in order to understand the learning activities thatoccur in follow-on courses. In order to make this more concrete, consider the following curriculardesign pattern.Example 1 (Traditional Circuits I – Calculus Ready). This curricular design pattern is constructedso as to attain a set of learning outcomes that involve the ability to design, build and
forth their best effort. These issues will be addressed during the remainder of thisstudy. Future work will involve exploring whether students’ problem solving performance willbe improved by enhancing their spatial thinking abilities or understanding of key concepts inmechanics. In addition, we are planning on extending this research to other areas of application,such as engineering design or other disciplines and recruiting participants at various levels ofacademia (i.e. graduate students, instructors, and faculty members) to examine the impact ofexperience/expertise. Although eye-trackers are becoming more accessible and affordable, theyare not widely used and it requires trained personnel to manage every stage of the study. Inaddition
Paper ID #19829Work in Progress: Signature Pedagogies in Engineering - Surface StructureDr. John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental
, Benson, Potvin, Kirn and Godwin,2018; Satterfield, Rohde, Rodriguez, Ma, Doyle, Godwin, Potvin, Benson and Kirn, 2018), we aretracking these student attributes over time, from their first year in a civil engineering (CE) programthrough graduation. These data will be used for program design, program evaluation and to gain an in-depth understanding of how student attributes change and develop during their experiences in acurriculum that is drastically different from the status quo.Departmental Curricular and Cultural TransformationCurriculum transformation efforts that commence with industry and alumni feedback often involvecurriculum changes that increase project-based experiences (Kolmos and Holgaard, 2010). Comparedwith traditional lecture
. His wife Dawn is a 1997 graduate of the academy, and they raise five children. In his free time, Rhymer runs the falconry program at the Air Force Academy.Dr. Richard T. Buckley Ph.D., U.S. Air Force AcademyDr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dan Jensen is a professor of engineering mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (mechanical engineering), M.S. (applied mechanics), and Ph.D. (aerospace engineering science) from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of micro air vehicles
AC 2012-4514: LOW-SES FIRST-GENERATION STUDENTS’ DECISIONTO PURSUE ENGINEERINGMs. Michele L. Strutz, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michele L. Strutz is a 2009 NSF Graduate Research Fellow and will graduate this summer with her Ph.D. in engineering education and a secondary doctoral focus in gifted and talented education from Purdue University. Strutz’s research interests include stEm talent development and identification. Prior to completing her master’s degrees in gifted and talented education and in curriculum and instruction, Strutz worked as an engineer for 13 years in Laser Jet Printer product development and marketing at Hewlett Packard Co., computer systems design at Arthur Andersen & Co., sulfuric
vector have been explained in research work related to the FCAR [44,45].III. Specific, Generic PIs and Rubrics (Holistic, Analytic and Hybrid)In an OBE model, assessments related to specific PIs, measure the level of teaching and learningachievement, and help outline future actions related to course delivery, syllabus, teaching andlearning strategies for CQI [19,21,22,24,25,31,55]. By performing an exhaustive design and classificationexercise of several hundred PIs (90% specific) related to COs and ABET SOs for the ElectricalEngineering (EE), Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Civil Engineering (CE) programs, theFaculty of Engineering has observed that ABET SOs exhibit relevance and coverage of the revisedBloom’s learning domains as shown in Table
understanding the range of issues that NTSEface that we will be able to design interventions and support systems that can assist them. Recentwork in engineering education particularly argues that co-curricular support is a critical factor instudent success as it effects curricular progress but there has been no work looking specifically atco-curricular support for NTSE and their retention and persistence.Literature ReviewAccording to the most recent data from NCES (2015), nontraditional students’ (NTS) comprisedbetween 70% to 75% of the undergraduate student population between 1995 to 2012 [4].Although there are a range of ways in which NTS are defined Horn [5] has proposed acomprehensive definition that includes enrollment criteria, financial and
, and concurrently with Differential Equations. The reason for thechange in paradigm from the formula-based approach is to make students understand that being agood engineer involves more than just putting pieces of ‘Legos’ together and to desist fromthinking that the problems of the world are solved from formulas that are available throughsearch engines on the internet. The teaching approach described in this paper is designed to havethe students think critically (painful at times), and to guide them through a process in which theycan solve end of chapter problems without the need for a formula-sheet in homeworkassignments or during examinations. To make it fun and enjoyable while learning andunderstanding the course materials, the first law
AC 2008-1665: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE AND ITS APPLICATION TO ETHICSWilliam Birmingham, Grove City College Page 13.1294.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Towards an Understanding of Artificial Intelligence and Its Application to Ethics1. IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is a broadly defined discipline involving computer science,engineering, philosophy, psychology, political science, and a host of other disciplines. BecauseAI is so broad, it is hard to succinctly define; for the sake of brevity, we will use the handle of“thinking machines,” without commitment to depths of this thinking.The
AC 2012-4001: THE IMPORTANCE OF UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMICRISK IN ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT EDUCATIONDr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, Stevens Institute of Technology S. Jimmy Gandhi is a faculty member in The School of Systems and Enterprises (SSE) at Stevens Institute of Technology, as well as at Baruch College, which is part of the City University of New York (CUNY). His research interests are in the field of risk management, engineering education and globalization. He got a Ph.D. in engineering management from Stevens Institute of Technology, a master’s in engineering management from California State University, Northridge, and a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology. He is currently co