Education, 2024 An Ecosystem of Support Initiatives for Andrew Edmunds, PhD BIPOC, Executive Director for Recruitment & Outreach College of Engineering, Computing, & Applied Sciences Clemson UniversityCoNECD 2024 Women, and Melissa Smith, PhD Associate Dean, Inclusive Excellence & Graduate Studies Domestic College of Engineering, Computing, & Applied Sciences Clemson University Graduate Students in STEM
this problem when ratingstudent applications that featured essay questions. This program incorporated scholarship fundsand structural supports to help students successfully navigate their engineering undergraduatedegree program. These supports were chosen with specific target populations in mind, namelylow-income, first-generation, mathematically underprepared, and minority students. The projectteam chose to employ personas in an attempt to create a rubric that allowed for the holistic,subjective, “I know it when I see it” style of selecting students who showed a need for thescholarship program while having a shared vision of what “it” is. This paper presents the methoddeveloped to create this rubric using personas and the experience of the
nurture creativity and innovationfrom an early stage to excite and engage our second-level students towards thepursuing of these disciplines” 2,13.The report “Monitoring Irelands Skills Supply: Trends in Education/Training Outputs2008” was commissioned to provide an indication of the supply of skills to the Irishlabour market from the formal education and training systems 3. Contrary to thedesires of both the IEI and ACCI for a rise in graduates, there is a significant drop inthe number of second level students choosing to pursue a career within the STEMdisciplines, despite the growing number of students entering the third level system.Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) courses accounted for 20.6% of allcourse acceptances in 2007
funding for her research from the NSF, the US Navy, NASA, and the business community. She is currently Vice-Chair of the Committee on Technology Accreditation Activities (CTAA) at IEEE, and is an active program evaluator for ABET.Karen Tonso, Wayne State University Dr. Karen L. Tonso, an Associate Professor of Social Foundations in the College of Education at Wayne State University, uses approaches common to cultural anthropology to study the structure of schooling, especially everyday life in learning communities. She brings to bear 15 years of experiences as a reservoir engineer in the petroleum industry to her research in engineering education. Her research in engineering education received the
Paper ID #15829Improving Learning of Digital Systems Concepts Using a Video GameDr. Karen L. Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University Karen Butler-Purry is the Associate Provost for Graduate Studies and Professional Studies as well as a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Her research interests include computer and intelligent systems applications to power distribution systems and engineering education. She can be reached by e-mail at klbutler@tamu.edu.Mehmet Oren, Texas A&M University Mehmet Oren is a PhD student at the Department of
, chemical engineering, computer science engineering, as well as biology and chemistry programs at ASU. BME at ASU teaches a 8 semester wide medical device design tract that initiates the students in design, regulations, standards, IP and other aspects from day 1. Dr. La Belle has develop and courses and taught at the freshman, junior, senior and graduate level on these topics.Mr. Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University Aldin Malkoc, MS is a student in the School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Arizona State University. Aldin is enrolled in the 4+1 program to receive his Masters of Science in Biomedical Engineering from Arizona State University in 2017 and will pursue a doctoral degree in Biomedical En
complex and dynamic engineering systems. A simulation-basedteaching environment enables students to acquire experience and consider their previous results[1]. In particular, the gaming approach utilizing interactive media and/or simulation has beenshown to be effective in improving teaching and learning of various subjects [2]. By reducingpractical learning time for students, and for schools and programs, simulation reduces costs forpractice oriented educational methodology. The simulation-based training reduces the gap between learning environment and “real"environment, and making available training of “real world” situations that are difficult tosimulate in a hands-on lab environment. Traditionally for teaching technology-based courses
AC 2008-2811: EMBEDDED DESIGN IN A SOPHOMORE COURSEDaren Wilcox, Southern Polytechnic State University 1100 South Marietta Parkway Marietta, Georgia 30060-2896, USA +1 678-915-7269 dwilcox@spsu.eduSteve Wilson, Southern Polytechnic State University 1100 South Marietta Parkway Marietta, Georgia 30060-2896, USA +1 678-915-7246 swilson3@spsu.eduGerd Wostenkuhler, Hochschule Harz (University of Applied Studies and Research) Friedrichstraße 57-59 D-38855 Wernigerode, Germany +49 3943 659-322 gwoestenkuehler@hs-harz.de Page 13.480.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008
AC 2009-1464: AN ANALOG POWER SYSTEM EMULATOR AS A LABORATORYTOOL FOR TEACHING ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMSAaron St. Leger, United States Military AcademyAnthony Deese, Drexel UniversityChikaodinaka Nwankpa, Drexel University Page 14.175.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 An Analog Power System Emulator as a Laboratory Tool for Teaching Electric Power SystemsAbstractMost power systems courses incorporate both software and hardware components intolaboratories. Each of these technologies has strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, a novelanalog power system emulator is presented as a unique laboratory tool for teaching powersystems
). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Working Towards More Equitable Team Dynamics: Mapping Student Assets to Minimize Stereotyping and Task Assignment Bias Elisabeth (Lisa) Stoddard and Geoff PfeiferStereotyping and Bias on Student TeamsGroup-based learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs andinstitutions is common because it prepares students for STEM careers that require regular workin teams, and it allows them to develop skills associated with collaborative problem solving.These skills include communication, leadership, management, creativity, problem solving, andconflict resolution. However, research shows that stereotyping and bias are
further study.1 ABET Outcomes, Criterion 3. Retrieved 12/18/15 from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#outcomes2 Giesecke, F., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H., Hill, I., Dygdon, J., Novak, J., & Lockhart, S., (2009). Technical Drawing, 13th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.3 Ullman, D., (1994). The Mechanical Design Process, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA4 Zemke, S. & Zemke, D., (2013). Cognitive hindrances to learning mechanical design. International Journal of Engineering Education 29(2): 450-458.5 Eckert, C. & Stacey, M. (2001). Dimension of communication in design, International Conference on Engineering
AC 2009-1542: COURSE DEVELOPMENT IN DIGITAL SYSTEMS TARGETINGRECONFIGURABLE HARDWAREMuhammad Hasan, Texas A&M University Muhammad Zafrul Hasan received the B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1988. He received the Master of Electronic Engineering from Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherlands) in 1991 under a Philips postgraduate scholarship program. He subsequently held several faculty positions in an engineering college and in a university in Malaysia. He obtained the Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology. He was awarded the NJIT Hashimoto Fellowship in the academic year 2005-06. He is
, Boyd’s hobbies include back country camping and hiking as well as learning self reliance in the wild.Mr. Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems Eric Pearson is the Director of Cross-Sector Program Initiatives for Northrop Grumman Corporation. His has responsibilities for relationship building and cross culture leadership development. Eric has a BS in Education from Bowie State University and an MS In Technical Management form the Johns Hopkins, Whiting School of Engineering. Eric is best known for his development and leadership of the Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems New Graduate Engineering Rotation Program and the Recent Graduate Leadership Training Program (LTP), having selected and mentored
Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands-on learning. Luchini-Colbry is also the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering
critical reflection, ethical awareness,and systems-level thinking.The paper adopts a hybrid methodology that combines a review of relevant literature withreflective analysis based on extensive experience teaching design thinking and productdevelopment to engineering students, as well as facilitating futuring activities in community-based workshops and participatory design events. Key recommendations include leveragingmakerspaces as sites for exploratory learning, incorporating futuring tools into instructionalpractices, cultivating institutional support through communities of practice, and buildinginterdisciplinary partnerships.To evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches, the paper proposes preliminary assessmentstrategies including pre- and
educational equity.Dr. Jai P. Agrawal, Purdue University Northwest Jai P. Agrawal is a professor in electrical and computer engineering technology at Purdue University, Calumet. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from University of Illinois, Chicago, in 1991, dissertation in power electronics. He also received M.S. and B.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, in 1970 and 1968, respectively. His expertise includes analog and digital electronics design, power electronics, nanophotonics, and optical/wireless networking systems. He has designed several models of high frequency oscilloscopes and other electronic test and measuring instruments as an entrepreneur. He
designers and engineers (funded by NSF), developing instructional materials for 77 cards (funded by NSF), and designing innova- tion workshops for students without design or engineering background and teaching them design thinking methodologies (funded by Procter and Gamble). She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 Page 24.1194.1 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and a research faculty in Center for e-Design.Meisha Nicole Rosenberg, Iowa State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
education, and identity (including race, gender, class, and other demographic identities) in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and she is PI or co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, teamwork, design, identity, and inclusion in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her research explores examines the ways in which engineering education supports students’ professional development in a range of contexts across multiple dimensions of identity.Jessica Deters Dr. Jessica Deters holds her PhD in Engineering Education and a M.S. in Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech. She
Paper ID #33118The SUMMIT-P Project: Transforming Undergraduate Mathematics Educa-tionto Support Partner DisciplinesDr. Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves holds a joint appointment in the College of Engineering and School of Ed- ucation as Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Associate Professor of Teaching and Learn- ing at Virginia Commonwealth University. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests are in STEM education, biomedical signal and image processing, and machine
AC 2007-1027: THE STATE OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONScott Danielson, Arizona State UniversityTrian Georgeou, Arizona State University Page 12.1472.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology EducationAbstractIn response to a need identified by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers’ Education andResearch Technical Community, a survey was conducted to assess the health of ABET-accredited manufacturing engineering technology programs in the spring of 2005 and 2007. In2005, thirty-eight programs received the survey via email and twenty-two programs provided aresponse. Survey questions focused on
Nanoscience and Energy. She has taught chemistry courses ranging from Introductory Gen- eral Chemistry to Advanced Thermodynamics of Materials for graduate students. She has also frequently taught in K-8 classrooms as a guest scientist. She is advisor to the UNH Chapter of the National Society of Black Engineers. She is also the Director the UNH Tech Camp, a summer STEM camp for grades 5-10. Her previous research in materials science focused on the mechanisms of gas phase reactions that make thin films and nanotubes. Her research in the cognitive development of science learning requires collaborations with faculty in psy- chology, psychometrics, big data statistics, education, as well as teachers from K-13. Since a
an Associate Professor of Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education at MSU. She was the project and curriculum coordinator for an NSF Combined Research and Development Project. Dr. Amey was a team leader on an NSF project to identify best practices in undergraduate engineering, mathematics, and science education. She studies administration and leadership in post-secondary education, organizational change, and systemic reform.We use these brief case descriptions because they represent well do cumented case studiesdiscussed and analyzed in past national, state and local workshops moderated by the authors (seeBibliography for more details).Case I—Innovative Course DevelopmentA regional university has an accredited engineering program
Paper ID #19754An Educational Laboratory Experimental System for Teaching Chemical Re-action Process Dynamics and ControlMalia L. Kawamura, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Malia Kawamura is an M.S. candidate in Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the Alleyne Research Group. She is funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship Program.Prof. Andrew G. Alleyne, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Andrew G Alleyne is the Ralph & Catherine Fisher Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Illinois (UIUC). He received his
driven, and often novel, educational practices.Dr. Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University Nicholas Tymvios received a B.S. and M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Purdue University in 1999, and 2002 respectively. After working for four years in Cyprus in the construction industry, he was ac- cepted into the Ph.D. program at Oregon State University, where he graduated in 2013 with a degree in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Construction Engineering and Management. His area of concentra- tion is construction safety, and in particular Prevention through Design. Upon graduation, he worked for four years as an Assistant Professor at UNC-Charlotte. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil
now being accredited using the new criteria.Criterion 2 in TC2K is informally referred to as “a through k” and is very similar to theEngineering Accreditation Commissions’ Criterion 3. The following is excerpted from TC2KCriterion 24: Page 9.133.1An engineering technology program must demonstrate that graduates have: Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines, b. an ability to apply
Paper ID #37648Board 74: Work-in-Progress: Containing Design: Rethinking DesignInstruction to Support Engineering Device Development for Low-IncomeCountriesMs. Katherine Drinkwater, Duke UniversityCharlotte SendekAllison N Stocks, Duke UniversityPaula KworekwaJulius MugagaRobert Tamale SsekitolekoDr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in Biomedical Engineering and Director of the First-Year En- gineering Program. Since joining Duke in June 2017, she launched the new Engineering Design and Communication course. In this course, first-year students work in teams to solve community-based, client
professionals was a need assessmentsurvey conducted by CSTCC and NKU, with the support of the Advantage Kentucky Alliance.This paper will discuss in details steps taken to initiate the Mechatronics degree at NKU. We willlayout the courses in the curriculum and explain what courses will be selected among existingcourses in the associate degree programs at Cincinnati State Technical and Community College(CSTCC) and courses in the Engineering Technology bachelor degree programs at NorthernKentucky University (NKU). The paper will provide details of the curriculum updates and explainhow these courses will provide students with hands-on experience in mechatronics fields such as:industrial controls & manufacturing systems design, integration, and
. Aghayere has over 16 years consulting experience and he is a registered engineer in Ontario, Canada. Page 9.424.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationAppendix 1Dear ______________ As part of the preparation for the re-accreditation of our program, I’m trying to get some industry feedback on the Structural Loads & Systems course that I recently developed and taught for the first time this quarter. This is a 2-credit course (i.e. two 50-minute lectures per
, thermomechanical processing of steels and other metallic materials, microstructure characterization and structure – property relationships. He has conducted a number of technical failure investigations, consulted on various materials-related problems, and acted as an expert witness in the Court of Law. Page 15.39.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Hands-On Course Curriculum for Supporting Design Education for Manufacturing Students1. BackgroundIt is well established that both the breadth and rigor of the design content of thecurriculum is paramount in every undergraduate engineering
Page 26.634.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Leadership Education: A Review of Best PracticesAbstractIn the past, intellectually talented engineers with strong technical skills were sufficient for theneeds of society. In the 21st century engineers are now working in the corporate world, oftendisconnected from the hands-on aspect of engineering. Professional skills such as leadership havebecome critical for graduating engineers entering the workforce. A review was conducted ofcurrent engineering leadership programs’ goals and competencies to determine consistencies andvariations, and to suggest prominent themes. Five themes emerged for the fundamental goal ofengineering