Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evelyn R. Sowells, North Carolina A&T State University; Nina Exner, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University; Sherry F. Abernathy, North Carolina A&T State University; Rajeev K. Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University ; Brenda S. Faison Ph.D., North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

 Learning  Portfolio-building  Technology communities  Internship and events and  Symposia career activities  Course guidance experiences Undergraduate and Veteran cohorts participate in Support & Connect phases Assessment throughout will build future knowledge about successful tactics for recruiting technology and related professionals.Recruit-Support-Connect is a pipeline with three stages: 1) it recruits female high schoolstudents into technology programs and STEM in general, 2) it supports female students throughthe collegiate process

Conference Session

Service Learning Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cher Cornett, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

discussed.iiiAs students enter this course, most have worked on team-based projects similar to those they willencounter in industry, but have not had the opportunity to apply their skills toward a real-worldassignment in a professional environment. In a classroom simulation students do not face manyof the realities of a real-world project. They do not have to present to industry professionals, sodo not learn to cope with the stress of working in an unfamiliar situation, and presenting topeople they do not know whose responses they can’t anticipate. In a class, they may not have tocompete to win a bid or award in a proposal situation, so only the project itself is assessed andnot other aspects of a successful proposal that may make the difference in a

Conference Session

Course-Based Approaches to Entrepreneurship

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, is a Kern Fellow for Entrepreneurial Education, and serves as Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at LTU. His research interests involve academic integrity, assessment tools, and stream restoration. Page 13.343.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Creative Problem Solving Course – Student Perceptions of Creativity and Comparisons of Creative Problem Solving MethodologiesAbstractA new course in creative problem solving was developed and administered. The course exploresthe

Conference Session

Venturing Out: Service Learning, Study Abroad, and Criterion H

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Carol Barry, University Massachusetts Lowell; Linda Barrington, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; David Kazmer, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; William Moeller, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Cheryl West, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

students in whichstudent teams have designed and built moving displays illustrating various technologies for60,000 middle school students that every year visit a history center which is part of a nationalpark; sophomore kinematics in which student teams visit local playgrounds to assess safety usingthe equations for deceleration, forces, and impact from the course in a structured way; junior heattransfer courses in which analyses of heat loss and suggestions for heating system savings for alocal food pantry, a city hall building, and community mental health center as well as theuniversity itself were developed and presented to the stakeholders; sophomore materials in whichstudent teams presented findings to the staff of a local textile history

Conference Session

Metrology Laboratories

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Georgia Harris, National Institute of Standards & Technology; Christopher Grachanen, Hewlett Packard Company

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

and training are widely available and ensure a high level of awareness.6. Training Opportunities. Ensure development, implementation, and recognition of real-time (fast-response) metrology training.7. Training Assessment & Certification. Develop and provide an infrastructure for assessment (and certification) of metrology training courses.8. Knowledge Management. Ensure that critical infrastructure needs for ongoing knowledge management are in place and flexible enough to capture and widely disseminate metrology expertise.9. Technology Trend Analysis. Ensure identification of potential education and training needs in support of measurements and standards needed for new technology infrastructures.10. Collaboration. Ensure

Conference Session

International Initiatives, Partnerships, Teaching Strategies & Collaborative Networks (IUCEE, IFEES, LACCEI.... )

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivan Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University; Maria M. Larrondo Petrie, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

International

be respected• There is a high cost associated with pursuing substantial equivalence, and• There is a lack of Engineering program accreditation culture in most LAC countries, LACCEI sees its role as a venue to help• Design, propose, evaluate a model for assessment / accreditation for LAC nations that do not have an international recognized engineering accrediting agency,• Facilitate dialogue, homologation of courses/programs of double degree,• Facilitate access to best practices and experts from accredited programs,• Provide a venue for LAC organizations, agencies y councils can meet to promote and advance the number of LAC agencies that sign the Washington, Dublin and Sydney Accords and other mutual recognition agreements with

Conference Session

Engineering Education in Africa, Asia and the Mid-East Region

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

International

, collaboration enhances academic achievement, and student attitudes. It also reducesstudent attrition. (9)Cooperative Learning is a formalized active learning structure where students work together insmall groups to accomplish shared learning goals and to maximize their own and each otherslearning. The most common model of cooperative learning in engineering is that of Johnson,Johnson and Smith. (10) This model has five specific elements: mutual interdependence,individual accountability, face to face interaction, interpersonal and small group skills, andindividual assessment of group functioning.(10) Although different cooperative models exist,(10, 22)the core element in all of these models is the emphasis on cooperative incentives rather

Conference Session

Computer Education Innovations

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claudia E. Vergara, Michigan State University; Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University; Cindee Dresen, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Tammy Coxen, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Taryn MacFarlane, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Kysha Frazier, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University; Neeraj Buch, Michigan State University; Louise Paquette, Lansing Community College; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Jeannine LaPrad, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce; Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

AC 2009-1809: LEVERAGING WORKFORCE NEEDS TO INFORMCURRICULAR CHANGE IN COMPUTING EDUCATION FOR ENGINEERING:THE CPACE PROJECTClaudia E. Vergara, Michigan State University Claudia Elena Vergara. PhD Purdue University. Fields of expertise: Plant Biology and STEM Education Research Dr. Vergara is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Research in College Science Teaching and Learning (CRCSTL) at Michigan State University. Her research interest is in STEM education through research projects on instructional design, implementation and assessment of student learning, aimed to improve science and technology education.Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Mark Urban-Lurain is the Director of

Conference Session

Educational Issues in Civil Engineering

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anant Kukreti, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

enroll in graduate school at UC or at other graduate institutions,as compared to the enrollment rate of non-REU students in the College of Engineering. A thirdmeasure of success is the number of peer-reviewed papers submitted by faculty and students,both individually and jointly.Internal and external evaluation is provided by participants and judges. The students completetwo surveys on the last day with specific questions to assess their satisfaction with the Site. Adirect measure of the effectiveness of the whole REU Site is also obtained from the judges. Thejudges fill out a scoring form evaluating each team’s technical paper: their organization, methodof analysis, critical path followed, reporting and synthesis of test data, goal achievement

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nhut Ho, California State University, Northridge; Robert Ryan, California State University, Northridge

active 4. Introduction to Engineering experiential learning methods, and in assessing An introductory course that provides the framework for student learning engineering practice in product and system building, 11. CDIO Skills Assessment and introduces essential personal and interpersonal Assessment of student learning in personal, skills interpersonal, and product and system building skills, 5. Design-Build Experiences as well as in disciplinary knowledge A curriculum that includes two or more design-build 12. CDIO Program Evaluation experiences, including one at a basic level and one at A system

Conference Session

Best Practices in K-12 Engineering Panel

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacy Klein-Gardner; Michele Dischino; Manjit Khosla, HALS Academy; Patrick Foster, Central Connecticut State University; Carol Shields, Stevens Institute of Technology; Dan Fagan, Wallace Primary School; Martha Cyr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John Staley, Doherty Memorial High School

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

and teach original engineering lesson ideas that are specifically tailored Page 14.275.13to this age group and aligned with state standards for their grade levels. The course goals arelisted below: ≠ Define technology and what it means to be technically literate. ≠ Demonstrate familiarity with national and state standards for technological literacy. ≠ Identify technological concepts appropriate for children at different developmental levels. ≠ Identify engineering activities and opportunities appropriate for the teaching, learning, and assessment of K-8 students. ≠ Collect and assess information pertinent to K-8

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University; Peter H. Khost, Stony Brook University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

undergraduate engineering courses at Stony Brook University. We willdiscuss models for the various uses of narrative, and examine the results of the use of disasterliterature and science fiction (both reading and writing) to enhance the learning of engineeringethics, value sensitive design, and risk assessment. We will also discuss further roles for theconcepts of narrative pedagogy (NP) in engineering (for example, having students tell stories oftheir own relationship with technology, or productively repurpose features of existing narratives)and, in a broader sense, explore the potential for enhancing teaching and learning in engineeringand the humanities through seeing engineering designs as narratives themselves.Background:Merriam-Webster’s

Conference Session

The Big Picture in Engineering Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Donna M. Riley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

accreditation standards and their associated changeprocesses shaped the structure and value commitments of the profession? How do engineeringmindsets and corporate cultures shape engineering ontologies and epistemologies of assessmentand approaches to governance? How do global neoliberal trends in and beyond higher educationshape institutional values and cultures, and how are these embodied in assessment andgovernance practices? Through historical and organizational analysis we seek to trace changesin the governance structures of engineering education and accreditation, and the impacts of thedevelopment and employment of accreditation in higher education.In this paper, we will first provide a brief historical perspective on accreditation processes

Conference Session

Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Michelle H. Bardini, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Noah Robert Krigel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Monica Lauren Singer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

underrepresentedstudents in engineering. (3) From thisethnographic data, we create case studies Figure  1:  Articulating  a  Succinct  Description  Illustrationbased on the stories of real students. Thesecase studies, written as film scripts, illustrate accounts of bias faced by students based on gender,race, major, sexuality, and other identities. (4) The case studies are then used in the classroom toincrease awareness of bias in engineering and provide students with the skills to engage indiscussion about these issues and interrupt exclusionary behavior. In small groups, studentsengage in discussion guided by specific questions about the case study. The data gathered fromthe case study facilitations allows us to both assess the effectiveness of

Conference Session

Institutionalizing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Lague P.Eng., University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa; Richard Jean L'Abbé

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #18165Entrepreneurship Initiatives at uOttawa Engineering since 2006Dr. Claude Lague P.Eng., University of Ottawa Dr. Claude Lagu¨e, P.Eng., ing., FCAEMACG, FECFIC, is a tenured Professor in the Department of Me- chanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa. An agricultural engineer holding degrees from Universit´e Laval and from the University of California – Davis, Dr. Lagu¨e specializes in the engineering of agricultural machinery and manure management systems and in the assessment and mit- igation of the environmental impacts of agricultural activities. He is a registered Professional

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University - Engineering Education; Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University; Kyle Patrick Vealey, West Chester University of Pennsylvania; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

teams upon graduation3.In light of the rise in popularity and need for teaming skills, researchers seeking to improvestudents’ teaming skills have found successful ways to assess team member effectiveness andhelp develop skills to work in teams4,5,6. These tools and pedagogies are important becausedeveloping teaming skills improves students’ academic performance, motivation and theirattitudes towards learning7,8.Despite the emphasis on developing students’ teaming skills, little research has been conductedon how students develop sensitivity to students from different cultures and backgrounds withindiverse teams in undergraduate programs. Research findings regarding working in diverse teamsare mixed, depending on what differences constitute the

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Schar, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Angela Harris, Stanford University; Beth Rieken, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

mediator relationship is consistent among important sub-populations ofengineering students such as females, underrepresented minorities and first generation collegestudents. While not a substitute for a full multi-factor innovation assessment tool, the ISE.5 canserve as an important indicator of innovation self-efficacy among an undergraduate engineeringstudent population.1.0 IntroductionIn recent years, there has been increasing national and international attention directed towardpromoting both innovation and its practical companion, entrepreneurship among engineeringstudents. University campus-level programs such as VentureWell (2017), the KernEntrepreneurship Education Network (2017) and UnternehmerTUM in Munich, Germany (2017)are actively

Conference Session

Engineering Design Process Activities with Secondary Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew J. Traum, Engineer Inc.; Sharon Liz Karackattu, Oak Hall School

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

high school science classroom, each student 1)located and drilled holes in metal and plastic, 2) tapped a threaded hole in metal, and 3)assembled a completed working pencil-top fidget device.Cycling a classroom of ~25 students through a safety talk and all fabrication process steps todevice competition took four 45-minute class periods, and these activities were repeated acrossmultiple periods each day. To assess indirectly the activity’s impact, students (N = 79) filled outan exit survey with questions posed against a Likert-like response scale. 35.44% and 65.82% ofrespondents respectively reported never using a drill press or threading a hole prior to thisproject. Reflecting on the project, 89.87% agreed or strongly agreed it demonstrated

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 23: Courses and Research on Communication

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darren L. Linvill Ph.D., Clemson University; Meghnaa Tallapragada, Clemson University; Nigel Berkeley Kaye, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

classes thanthose in the TPS classes. Overall, comparing IEPS and TPS classes revealed that attitudestowards communication, motivation, and engineering identity improved significantly more forthose in the IEPS classes compared to those in the TPS classes. The paper concludes bydiscussing future directions for research in engineering instruction/communication.Introduction:This research paper assesses outcome differences between a traditionally taught public speakingcourse and one integrated with engineering specific content. Communication underpins theevolution of every field of science [1], [2], and plays a central role in the process of science—notonly in sharing the findings upon which scientists build knowledge, but also in

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.; Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.; Michelle B. Sabick, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

technical skills studentsalready learn in their courses and revolves around the 3 C’s: Curiosity, Connections, andCreating Value. KEEN defines each of the 3 C’s. Curiosity is the ability to “demonstrateconstant curiosity about our changing world and to explore a contrarian view of acceptedsolutions;” Connections is the ability to “integrate information from many sources to gain insightand to assess and manage risk;” and Creating Value is the ability to “identify unexpectedopportunities to create extraordinary value and to persist through and learn from failure.” Thehistorical focus of KEEN has been on engineering programs, but many engineering and STEMstudents lose interest in their majors while enrolled in foundational STEM courses, where

Conference Session

Engineering Design for Elementary Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University; Ming C. Tomayko, Towson University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

would be based upontheir plans. We aimed to answer two broad questions about their plans and their physical first try: 1. What do kindergartners drawn plans look like? 2. How do their plans relate to their first tries?Additionally, we developed rubrics to assess: plan quality, plan-first-try relationships, and firsttry quality, and to explore the relationships among these variables and between each of them andmeasurements of students’ visual spatial thinking.MethodsThis study utilizes an exploratory sequential mixed methods approach [34]. We collectedqualitative data which included the drawn plans, explanations of plans, images of first tries, andexplanations of those first tries collected during a video-recorded interview

Conference Session

Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Greses Pérez, Stanford University; Patrick Marcel Danner, Technical University of Munich; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Carol B. Muller, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, engineers need to consider the widerange of needs and wants of those involved, which may not all be the same. Second, the dynamicnature of conditions surrounding and integrated with most engineering problems demandsadaptability from engineers. The technological, economic, social, regulatory and politicalchanges create what engineering scholars have referred to as the VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain,Complex and Ambiguous) world [7]. VUCA results from rapid changes in what people want aswell as in the sociopolitical landscape of societies. Under such circumstances, engineers need toadapt continuously to changing needs by remaining in contact with project stakeholders andassessing relevant changing conditions. For engineers, assessing relevant changing

Conference Session

Embedding Sociotechnical Systems Thinking I

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natasha A. Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

consisted of two in-class days with several assessments. Inpreparation for the first day of the activity, students were provided with an article that presentedexamples of socio-technical thinking41. On Day 1 of the activity, instructors led a discussion on the socio-technical system articleand modeled a stakeholder mapping activity (Table 1). Students read five articles about ElectricVehicle (EV) adoption42,43,44,45,46. The articles provided students different stakeholderperspectives along with information about infrastructure needs, economic considerations,environmental concerns and benefits, and social issues. Students prepared a table with 10-20different stakeholders involved in EV adoption, the potential issues for the stakeholders

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Institute, studying the intersections of engineering cultures, peace and ethics, educational power structures, and the experiences of disabled, queer, and trans engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Ethics Education as Enculturation: Student learning of personal, social, and professional responsibilityIntroductionThis paper explores how engineering students understand the meaning and role of ethics withintheir own life experiences, the context of their education, and their projections of professionalpractice. While the majority of work in engineering ethics educational research seeks toimplement and assess new educational activities, approaches, or paradigms, this

Conference Session

Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Strategies: Problems of Alignment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.; Chris Swan, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design

Conference Session

Imagining Others, Defining Self Through Consideration of Ethical and Social Implications

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tina Lee, University of Wisconsin-Stout; Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin-Stout; Elizabeth A. Buchanan, University of Wisconsin-Stout

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

research assistant were able totravel with the chapter (described in more detail below) to a county in Latin America. On this trip,we observed all activities undertaken by the team (splitting up to make sure as much as possiblewas covered), interviewed all members of the team, and assisted with project tasks includingtranslation, the construction and administering of a house-to-house survey and a physical surveyto collect assessment data for the team’s next projects (a river restoration/wash station project, afoot bridge project, and a potential water distribution system in a neighboring town), and evenperformed manual labor (moving rocks for the foundation of the sedimentation tank, and helpingto grade a road to move construction equipment). In

Conference Session

Mentoring Practices and Project Teams

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Olivia W. Murch, Purdue University ; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Program [IPRO] and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and interventions aimed at improving learning objective attainment. Prior to his University as- signments he was the Founder and CEO of The EDI Group, Ltd. and The EDI Group Canada, Ltd, independent professional services companies specializing in B2B electronic commerce and electronic data interchange. The EDI Group companies conducted syndicated market research, offered educational seminars and conferences and published The Journal of Electronic Commerce. He was also a Vice Presi- dent at the First National Bank of Chicago [now J.P. Morgan Chase], where he founded and managed the

Conference Session

Middle School Students' Engineering Identity, Efficacy, Attitudes, and Perceptions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeremy Lingle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeffrey H. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Technology Dr. Jeremy Lingle is a Senior Research Faculty at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathe- matics, & Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Edu- cational Policy Studies in Research, Measurement, and Statistics in 2010 from Georgia State University. His primary research focus is upon STEM integration in K-12 education and program evaluation.Dr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni Newton is currently a Research Associate II at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educational

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Steve Robert Harrison, Dept of Computer Science, Virginia Tech; R Benjamin Knapp, Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology; Luke F Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Thomas Martin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Annie Yong Patrick; Matthew Wisnioski, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

mathematics, education, and engineering honor societies: Kappa Mu Epsilon, Kappa Delta Pi, and Tau Beta Pi respectively. He has extensive experience in curriculum development in K-12 and creates material for the Technology Student Association’s annual TEAMS competition. David has co-authored two texts related to engineer- ing, Principles of Applied Engineering for Pearson-Prentice Hall and Introductory Engineering Mathe- matics for Momentum Press. His research interests include first year engineering course articulation, assessment, and P-12 engineering policy.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where

Conference Session

Life After Graduation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bernhard Schadl, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

member or educational own for-profit non-profit organization professional in a K-12 professional in a college organization school or universityIn the current study, Q20 was used assess a student’s career certainty. The eight questionoptions were designed to cover the following career characteristics: size of the company,organizational orientation (i.e. for-profit vs. non-profit), type of the organization (private vs.public vs. educational institution) and employment status (i.e. employee vs. founder/self-employed). Only 21 survey respondents marked “Definitely will not” on every one of theeight items, suggesting that 1) these students did not find their appropriate career planrepresented in Q20, and 2