, LaBanca’s eight-item rubric primarily targeting high school science teachers8, Barney’s study on the effects of student self-assessment of their learning outcomes when using an oral presentation rubric9, Anderson and Anderson’s description of elements of oral communication for students in the workplace, that should be modeled by instructors in their lectures10, Battacharyya’s use of a research-based approach to identify four key traits that industry looks for in technical presentations: technical competence, effective delivery skills, IT competency, and cultural awareness11, and Morton and Rosse’s research focusing on identifying characteristics related to the use of personal pronouns in
Chancellor for Strategic Initiatives.Dr. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch Dr. Terri Talbert-Hatch is the Assistant Dean for Student Services in the School of Engineering and Tech- nology, IUPUI. In this position she is responsible for recruitment of undergraduate students, scholarships, career services, and the schools residential based learning communities which include two apartment buildings on campus and one floor in the newest residence hall on campus – IUPUI Tower. She is the faculty advisor to the school’s Student Council and the Society of Women Engineers student organization but, also supports all the school’s student organizations. Dr. Talbert-Hatch
Paper ID #43909Methodologies for Evaluating the Impact of STEM Outreach on HistoricallyMarginalized Groups in Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review (Other,Diversity)Jessica Nhu Tran, University of British Columbia Jessica Tran is an oncoming graduate student pursing a master’s degree in engineering education at the University of British Columbia (UBC). They are interested in exploring justice-oriented pedagogies and praxis, decolonization, and EDI (equity, diversity, and inclusion) within engineering education spaces, particularly within K-12 STEM outreach.Jessica Wolf, University of British Columbia Jessica Wolf is a
game-based elements such as dice games, peer competition, and Kahoot quizzes wereincorporated into the curriculum of a probability and statistics course for civil and constructionengineering at The Citadel. Probability and statistics is a crucial knowledge area for futurepractice engineers, and therefore, very important to increase student comprehension on the topic.The impact of the use of gamified material was examined via student surveys and instructorassessment of student engagement and enthusiasm for the subject among multiple studentsections.KeywordsGamification, Gamified learning, Probabilities, Statistics, EngineeringIntroductionEngineering courses for sophomore and junior students usually require the students to start think-ing on
Session 2793 Engaging Engineering Students in Learning – A College-wide First Year Seminar Program Andrew S. Lau, Robert N. Pangborn College of Engineering, Penn State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes the inception, design and implementation of a First-Year Seminar Programin the College of Engineering at Penn State. Emanating from coincidental activities of a college-based colloquy and working group on the engineering curriculum, and a re-evaluation of thegeneral education program by the University Faculty Senate, the new first-year seminars
preparedness, compromising theirability to succeed and progress.This study introduces a new strategy to enhance retention by implementing a structured,proactive advising model that emphasizes early, personalized engagement between students andfaculty advisors. This advising framework prioritizes frequent and clear communicationregarding placement and academic progress through personalized emails, one-on-one Zoommeetings, and in-person advising sessions. Mathematics placement, given its foundational role inengineering curricula, serves as the centerpiece of this advising model. The framework providesstudents with academic planning support, fosters meaningful student-faculty interactions, andcultivates student ownership of their educational
using the Engineering Design Process (EDP)within the context of the accomplishments and mindset of Da Vinci. The course exploredengineering mechanics and design topics concurrent with applying physics topics in anengineering laboratory. A qualitative analysis was performed using a new reflective tool,PhotoVoice. The purpose of the assessment was to better understand the impact of the course onthe student vision, the operation of the course relative to what they have encountered in theireducational careers, and student-perceived learning outcomes. Analysis of student reflectionsrevealed themes of “Changed Perspectives,” “Engagement in the Classroom,” and“Brainstorming Benefits” when describing the impact of the course on their career visions
workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Health Equity: Perspective and Pedagogy of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning and Impact on Learners’ Social IdentityAbstractThis research explored the beliefs related to the health disparities, systems, and innovation ofhonors/engineering students enrolled in a course on Health Equity. This course aims to bringtogether undergraduate students across disciplines from engineering, public health, pharmacy,anthropology, sociology, and other social and basic sciences to learn from each other throughco-designing solutions to address health disparities. The
one of the core areas in several engineering disciplines, includingmechanical engineering. At the TJ Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University,Materials Science is a required course for mechanical and civil engineering majors and anelective for other engineering majors. This course is offered in both fall and spring semesters fora total of 160 students annually. Typically, mechanical engineering students enroll in MaterialScience during their first year, whereas students from other majors enroll during sophomoreyear. Maintaining student motivation and engagement is challenging since these students havelittle engineering background. Moreover, Materials Science is a highly interdisciplinary course.The course content spans many
Scholarparticipants are required to register for one of three cohort-based courses, which are intentionallyincorporated to explore the non-academic side of the engineering discipline and to diversify theirexperience. In these courses, participants engage in topics such as engineering professionalism,engineering research, and interdisciplinary engineering projects.Methods This research is the pilot phase of a larger project aiming to understand the impact ofsummer programming on student success, including: (1) grade point average, (2) retention, (3)pathway changes, and (4) sense of belonging. While summer bridge program success is generallymeasured via GPA and retention, due to the goals of Summer Scholars, we aim to measurequalitative attributes to
engagement with the UNR and Northern Nevada STEM Education communities, he studied student motivation, active learning, and diversity; developed K-12 engineering education curriculum; and advocated for socioeconomically just access to STEM education. As a Ph.D. Candidate with the STRiDE Research Lab at Purdue University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a socioeconomically just engineering education.Mr. Matthew
, peer-recommended, and expert evaluated• Develop a menu of practices that focus on high-impact inclusive classroom practices that align with the arc of the course• Evaluate the menu of practices by implementing and monitoring the recommendations in three diverse engineering programs• Create and pilot inclusive learning communities• Assess both students and faculty to create succinct, high- impact recommendations on creating inclusive engineering classrooms 17 “Inclusion is not bringing people into what already exists; it is making a new space, a better space for everyone." George Dei 18Alamy.com
local pizza place during final exams.Plans for the spring term are to bring two to four speakers from TLP internship partners to recruitthe TLP students for summer internships, engage the TLP students in recruiting the next cohortof students, and continue to reinforce connections between their sophomore electricalengineering course and systems engineering course.Moving ForwardIn this paper, we have presented an evaluation of the first year of the Technology LeadersProgram and reported on three core second-year tasks necessary to implement the TLP –recruiting students, building courses, and developing a community. Student recruitment duringthe first year was successful in attracting a diverse mix of fifteen students. A community hasbegun to
. This work on the unit lessons included reports ofsuccesses and failures of lessons that they had field tested. This was an iterative process withcharacteristics of the Japanese lesson study. The unit included a statement of need, literaturereview, standards, a week or more of lessons, assessments and a report of the impact of the uniton students.Three students in the class who were in a science education masters program agreed to be studiedin-depth. The first was Alice. She was an elementary teacher with more than five years ofexperience. She taught 3rd grade at an alternative school that gave teachers great freedom indeciding on the curriculum. The school’s philosophy was constructivist and student centered.Textbooks were not used and
overall fabrication process [1]. A more engaging learning method identifiesa critical need to maintain student interest and encourage young minds to seek/pursue a STEMfield of study and, ultimately, a career [2].Morgan State University (MSU) is one of the renowned Historically Black Research Universitiesin Baltimore, established in 1867 with more than 7,000 enrollments in both undergraduate andgraduate programs. MSU offers 60 distinct undergraduate degrees concentrated into 51 majorswithin 23 broad fields of study. Across all areas of study, MSU awarded 970 undergraduatedegrees in 2017-2018. Despite the continuous enrollment, the university still lags the few otherHBCUs in the country that offer Aerospace Engineering Program until the year 2018
the real world by an overlay display ofthese objects. Moreover, collaboration via AR can be realised by using smartphones andtablets. This comprises the advantage of using devices which the students do not need to learnthe operation of since they are in everyday use. However, there is still a lack of research onthe impact the use of AR has especially on team communication, learning processes, and thegeneral outcomes of collaborative teamwork.Against this background, a prototype of a collaborative AR app was developed as well as astudy design was set up for investigating the effects of AR on the teamwork in collaborativelearning processes. The study comprises a pre-post-test design in combination with anexperimental setting. While the pre- and
experience bases and abilitues all needto be engaged. Fourth, colleges with small engineering staffs need simple, yet engaging projects.Fifth, interest in engineering needs to be fostered among children in every community. To address all these factors, I implemented a ten-week project that is simple, yet profoundlydeep in its ability to motivate, focus, and prepare first-year engineering students for futurecoursework. It is also a project that can engage local elementary school students with STEM. Idivided the project into 6 phases: Research (two weeks), Brainstorm and Analyze PotentialSolutions (two weeks), Develop Models (three weeks), Test Models (two weeks), Implement andCommercialize (one week), and a Competition at the end of these ten
-framed question, “When am I ever going to use this?”Students can be insufficiently motivated to work consistently in their Calculus courses in pursuitof undefined educational or life-long goals. Consequently, they can under achieve in thesefundamental STEM courses and possibly leave their STEM field. Too often, this STEM-attritionscenario disproportionally involves women, underserved minorities, first-generation collegestudents, and community-college transfer students [2]. They may be less knowledgeable abouttheir career options and less prepared for the rigors and pace of college mathematics. Theauthors believe that one benefit of using medical applications in applied learning environments istheir appeal to a broad range of students, as most
Page 25.886.2discovery based approach and a hands-on robotics program will improve students‟ STEMattitudes, math performance, and intentions to pursue STEM education and careers. The theoryof planned behavior5 was used to guide the measurement of students‟ STEM educationoutcomes.A Guided Discovery Approach to STEM EducationTraditional approaches to STEM education can result in disinterested students who may notpursue college-level STEM education and a competitive and hostile educational environment.6We propose that a guided discovery approach is more effective in engaging diverse students inlearning STEM concepts. This engagement will result in increased STEM knowledge andacademic self-efficacy among diverse elementary students.Bruner‟s7
explain the research methods we adopt given our context and participants andpresent our findings and discussions. The research team divided the discussions into the themesof 1) broadening the perception of engineering 2) humanistic perception of engineering, and 3)male-dominated perceptions of engineering.Background Engineering has emerged as a critical post-secondary education and profession for thesuccess of the US and nations throughout the world. Recently, the US has placed increasingemphasis on engaging students in engineering before college with hopes to attract more studentsinto engineering majors and professions 11,12. The publication of the Next Generation ScienceStandards 13 and pending adoption across the US creates a timely
Teaching and Learning Office Science Department in Baltimore City Public Schools (City Schools).Our center works hard to learn what City Schools’ needs are and focuses our outreach efforts on those needs. For example, the annual Hopkins Robotics Cup came from a need identified by a science specialist in City Schools Central Office who wanted to grow the VEX robotics teams in middle and high schools by having a college site for the qualifying event. We also worked very closely with City Schools’ Teaching and Learning department and faculty from both our engineering and education schools to jointly write a proposal for a Math Science Partnership which developed elementary STEM teachers in school and out of school and engaged the community in STEM
), communicating effectively (g) and engaging in life-long learning (i).Since 2007, the engineering department at Messiah College has been pioneering a multi-yearplan known as the Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC) that involves a four-semester project-course sequence, with students working on multidisciplinary teams, typically beginning in theirjunior year. Details of the IPC as a curriculum modification have been previously published,including benefits over the traditional senior capstone project course, portfolio evaluation ofstudent project work, structure of the course sequence, and the place of Group Orientation (GO),a one-credit course normally taken by our engineering students in the Spring semester of theirsophomore year, preceding the project
Sashank_Narain@uml.edu Kelilah_Wolkowicz@uml.edu Abstract— This work focuses on the “Tic-Tac-Toe AI Game”, and enhance student engagement [1]. Studies have shown thata key exhibit at a recent educational technology exhibition, AI-driven educational environments increase studentdesigned as an interactive introduction to the capabilities and motivation and improve retention rates compared to traditionalapplications of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning instruction methods [2]. However, traditional AI education still(ML) systems. The interactive game engaged K-8 students in largely depends on abstract theories, text-heavy explanations,strategic gameplay, helping them develop a
technical workforce. Using actual critical engineering design challenges toinspire and engage students in design solutions to real problems is the path to achieving a highdegree of student engagement. Sustainability, living better on less, and team projects that directlyimpact people’s lives speak to this generation of engineering students. Energy usage is one of themost critical engineering challenges we face today. Global warming due to harmful emissionsfrom burning fossil fuels and rising gas prices as well as national security issues have drivenpeople to look for new ways to reduce their fuel consumption and to live better on less. It hasbeen known for some time that streamlining vehicles can dramatically improve their fueleconomy and in
SettingsWhile each team’s learning environment centers on project-based and simulation approaches toteaching complex disciplinary practices, they span educational levels (secondary,post-secondary) and scientific disciplines (environmental science, biology, engineering), andnational contexts. This diversity provides a unique opportunity to develop potentiallytransformative and generalizable new understandings of engagement and how to support it inSTEM. The secondary contexts include urban, poverty-impacted schools in the US and highschools in Finland with significant numbers of immigrant students. The post-secondary contextsare targeted at capstone students in professional programs (engineering and veterinary) who maybe at risk for disengagement from
electrical technology and other aspects of culture. Page 25.1255.12Summary & ConclusionsThis paper has presented methods of teaching a course on Electrical Science andTechnology for upper divisional undergraduates based on guidelines in the literature andexperience of the instructor. Appraising the distribution of disciplines represented bystudents in the class helps the instructor engage students more effectively, by adaptingillustrations and emphases of course content to those present.As the faculty member and students become more aware of each other’s majordisciplines, they grow as a community in the process of establishing
water resources engineering from the University of Texas at Austin (UT-Austin), and her PhD in STEM education from UT-Austin. Before graduate school, she worked for an industrial gas company in a variety of engineering roles. Her research in engineering and STEM education focuses on career pathways within engineering and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Teaching Equity throughAssets-Based Journaling:Using Community Cultural Wealth to Guide Student Reflections Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, Jessica Deters, Maya Denton 1
have difficulty becoming engaged inthe university.4 To that end, we have been conducting an on-going assessment of ourlearning community, the results of which we will report in this paper.The ABE LC at Iowa State UniversityIn our department, the umbrella term Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering LearningCommunity (ABE LC) has evolved to now encompass two complementaryundergraduate programs available to our first- and second-year students who aremajoring in agricultural engineering or agricultural systems technology: the ABElearning community, which is created by having students co-enroll for specially selectedlinked courses, and the ABE living learning community, a reserved portion of a specificresidence hall. Other features of the ABE
share how we use existing best practices to create andsustain innovative retention programs for undergraduate women, assist ourgraduate students in becoming well-rounded engineers through networkingprograms, and support our women faculty through continued professionaldevelopment. This process engages university constituents as well as K-12administrators, teachers, counselors and students, alumni and Board of Advisorsby utilizing tools, resources, and best practices for student success. 3 Background: Why focus on women? Undergraduate Students Graduate Students T/TT Faculty (Enrolled) (Enrolled
ongoing work related to integrating socialjustice content into technical courses in mechanical engineering. Understanding of social justiceissues and the ability to engage in sociotechnical thinking are vital aspects of engineers' skill setsin the 21st century, but many engineering programs present content in ways that obscure orminimize these critical links. It is well-understood that student motivation is critical forengagement and learning to take place in the classroom. In our case, achieving participation andengagement in discussions and projects related to social justice requires motivated action on thepart of both students and faculty. Without understanding the specific elements that support orinhibit student motivation to engage with