End Datethe national average with slight negative trend.UT Martin’s goal is to have students Figure 1. Comparison of UT Martin testconsistently score at or above the national results with national averageaverage on this exam. This goal was not beingmet in this subject area.UT Martin uses data from the FE to assess whether or not some program outcomes are beingmet. Core Curriculum Committees are responsible for reviewing the assessment data for groupsof courses and determining whether or not changes in course content is needed. The CoreCurriculum Committee responsible for the materials course determined that the textbook,prerequisites, and content covered in the course was
application server software. 3. e-Learning Digital Content. The e-Learning digital content for engineering can be sub- divided into the following five categories: ‚ e-Content. Deals with the subject matter similar to a textbook in the form of an e- Book. ‚ e-Lecture. Represents virtualized version of traditional lectures. ‚ e-Assessment. Replaces traditional tests and surveys with the web-based ones. ‚ e-Computation. Stand alone and web-based numerical and symbolic computational tools. ‚ e-Simulation. Represents/imitates real life problems within engineering.The focus of this work is on the e-Lecture category of e-Learning digital content.A timeline sampling of e-Learning digital content using ICT
Analysis MethodologyThe post-test scores for each unit taught were recorded for each student in the comparisonand treatment group and entered anonymously into a table of scores for that group. Thepost-test is the standard test used by the MCC DET department as an assessment tool forthe units of curriculum being taught. The DET department uses the test to evaluatestudents who wish to test out of a class for high school or work experience articulationpurposes. The post-test consists of multiple choice written questions, short answer, andperformance sections. Performance CAD modeling assessments were not used in thisstudy, because the performance involves a very time intensive CAD project for which thehigh school students were not sufficiently
acquired a wealth of abilities and perspectives. Thisskills inventory assessment uncovered many skills including “planning, scheduling, organizing,exploring, controlling, mentoring, communicating, and leading. Other skills … pertained tomanagement … incorporating budgeting, administrating, and allocating scarce resources”(Loendorf1, 2004, p. 2). In order to obtain a similar list from an educator’s point of view, foursenior faculty members in the department were asked to list the skills required of an engineeringprofessor. The results of their skills inventory were actually quite similar. While reviewing theirperceptions they used slightly different terms to describe the skills, however they matched almostexactly the assessment made by an
understand how people learn. A recent report by Bransford2 Page 11.1392.2discusses what principles of knowledge organization underlie people’s problem solvingcapabilities, how people transfer learning in one setting to another, and how these results can beused to design new and better learning environments. His team recommends three facets of asuccessful learning environment: center on the learner, center on assessment, and center onknowledge.WarmUp ExercisesWarmUp (also called “Preflights” at this institution) exercises are the heart of JiTT. Before theclass period, students are required to complete short web-based exercises from their
people with physical disabilities and in developing countries. Topics include the design of affordable transportation, training engineers to design for marginalized populations, needs assessment in frontier design environments, assistive devices for persons with disabilities, and remote power generation. Contact: MatthewGreen@letu.edu. Page 11.875.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Learning Journals as a Cornerstone for Effective Experiential Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Design Courses Carolyn Conner Seepersad,* Matthew G. Green,† and Kathy J. Schmidt
in the project as investigators. They could be paid with money out of the project (if it is externally funded). They could also be paid with a grade in a special topics or independent study type class.• Have some of your research be educational, where the research project is the creation, teaching, and assessment of the class.The first two authors followed this up in 2003 with a paper that dealt with the broader issue ofhow to balance personal and professional life1. A number of strategies were developed. As withany effort to balance the many activities in life, it is important to differentiate between needs andwants. Of course, this will vary from person to person. The key is to understand thisdifferentiation and to ensure that
wasused to assess team performance. This scale consists of three items, each with the team as thereferent. Participants were asked to rate the overall performance of the team; an example of asurvey item from this instrument would be “the team has been effective in reaching its goals.”Reliability for this scale is 0.82. Group project grades were used a second measure ofperformance to ensure that the project, once completed, met the requirements as set forth by theinstructor. In effect, just as in the business place where a manager must review the team’s outputor the end user reviews the product or service, someone beyond the team’s boundaries wasresponsible, in part, for judging its level of effectiveness.Data Analysis and ResultsFifty-three
virtual measurements and instrumentation into the lecture andlaboratory, (ii) coupling the lecture and laboratory more closely through an on-line coursemanual, (iii) providing additional course resources through WebCT to enhance student learning,and (iv) updating and/or developing several new laboratory exercises to demonstrate key courselearning objectives. An outline of the course before and after the course revisions will bepresented, significant course changes will be summarized, the impact these changes have onmechanical engineering undergraduate education at ISU will be assessed, and lessons learnedwill be outlined.1 Background Mechanical Engineering Measurements and Instrumentation, commonly referred to asME 370 at Iowa State
shownincreased interest in advanced degrees in the area of UAS technologies including for PhDdegrees. Many of the graduates have joined the companies involved in the unmanned aerialsystems. More than 50% of the Community College Students who were involved in theProgram transferred to Cal Poly Pomona and continued their interest in unmanned aerialsystems.I. IntroductionUnmanned aerial systems or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been used or have potentialto be used for many applications such as search and rescue missions, remote sensing,surveillance of disaster-hit areas, aerial photography, aerial mapping for geotechnical survey,crop dusting, precision agriculture, assessment of topographical changes, and power lineinspection. UASs have also been
studies to beconducted assessing the usability of various low-cost commercially available VR platforms. Datagathered will be used by stakeholders and decision makers to aid in the purchasing of VR hardwarefor academic classroom use. The ultimate goal is to continue studying the interaction effectbetween routine classroom instructor-led teaching (i.e. lecture-based multimedia instruction) andimmersive VR teaching (i.e. VR-based multimedia instruction) in terms of learning. Theexperimental study used a convenience sample from a freshman course (two sections) at a land-grant university. Observations include a general overall excitement by participants to use VR nomatter which system offered. This study has quantified the usability of the systems
) tends to focus on disciplinary problemsolving with emphasis on deductive and rational processes [8,9]. Assessment methods andlearning taxonomies are build on cognitive metrics that can be measured and the affective-emotional processes are left un-assessed [10]. This study does not try to solve the complexand interconnected system of cognitive-rational and affective-emotional learning. The aim isto shed light on the learning outcomes that are acknowledged by the literature to be ofsignificance in terms of higher-order thinking and transversal skills. The same skills arewidely seen as important in solving global grand challenges [10,11,12]. In this work the focusis placed on learning about alternative starting points for the design process from
Paper ID #17996The Double Bind of Race and Gender: A Look into the Experiences of Womenof Color in EngineeringDr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in the Engineering Education department at Virginia Tech in 2015 and worked as a post-doctoral researcher with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. At UIUC she has collaborated with mul- tiple teams of engineering faculty on implementing and assessing instructional innovation. Dr. Cross is currently a Research Scientist in the Department
disciplines. How can we attract more students into engineering fields? Expose students toengineering early in their education. This paper focuses on “The Tour of Engineering” which isone class at a summer science program for rising 8 th and 9th graders at the South CarolinaGovernor’s School for Science and Mathematics. It describes the preparation, execution, studentperceptions, and learning outcomes for a week-long (30 hour) class. This class exposed studentsto the world of engineering by doing hands on activities and learn about different types ofengineering, improve problem solving and goal setting skills through team-building exercises,and self-assessments. The activities could be accomplished separately or progressively integratedinto a final
mathematical thinking are characterized as analytical skills, in this study. Engineersutilize these analytical skills to develop and assess solutions for feasibility, efficiency, andcorrectness. Schoenfeld 3 defines mathematical thinking as a culmination of an individual’s“mathematical knowledge, their ability to apply mathematical problem solving strategies, theeffective use of cognitive resources, having a mathematical perspective, and engaging inmathematical practices.” See Appendix A for a list of observable mathematical aspects.Engineering curriculum is largely designed around a core mathematics curriculum, whichtypically begins with Calculus and concludes with Differential equations. Therefore, it isimportant to understand how engineers apply
the U.S., villagers have participated actively overseas, and more than150 nursing students in India have directly benefitted from these projects. Collectively,the overall impact of these educational activities has been profound for a large cohort ofmultidisciplinary individuals.Results of Assessments for Two CoursesTable 2 presents partial results of anonymous surveys conducted at the end of eachsemester offerings of CEE600 MDG7: Ensuring Environmental Sustainability. Theresults indicate an overall high quality experience, but with some significant variationamong different cohorts. For example, the scores for the course offering in the Autumnof 2009 were significantly lower as compared to the scores for the course offering in theAutumn of
performing a search usingwildcards/stemming, and both a video tutorial and a Guide-on-the-Side tutorial with the sameinformation to help solve each task. We counterbalanced each combination of tutorial format andtask so that each combination was presented to the participant pool with an equal chance.Students’ performance was measured by time spent on each task and correctness. Both videotutorials and Guide-on-the-Side tutorials were assessed by ease of understanding conceptspresented in different formats, overall satisfaction with tutorials, ease of completing tasks andpreference for which tutorial format.Results from this study suggested that both video tutorials and Guide-on-the-Side tutorialseffectively helped the undergraduate students learn
, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of 2 NSF-funded S-STEM programs and program evaluator for 2 NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence, identity formation, and career develop- ment in the STEM fields.Salih Safa Bacanli, University of Central Florida Salih Safa Bacanli is PhD student at Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida (UCF). He received his MS degree in Computer Science from UCF and BS degree in Computer Engi- neering from Bilkent University, Turkey. His research interests include opportunistic networking routing, wireless
experimental methods in the Mechanical EngineeringDepartment at The University of Texas San Antonio. Presently, it is being employed in abachelor’s level course in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program at the University ofNew Hampshire at Manchester.Key aspects of experimental testing that can be studied using this experiment include: 1. Pre-test assessment of experimental uncertainty and planning of test to meet uncertainty goals. 2. Practice in executing tests and developing an appreciation for unanticipated circumstances that can compromise the quality of the results. 3. Post-test analysis to see if the quality of the data is consistent with that was anticipated in the pre-test phase.These are the principal aspects of
printed using the current filament material (e.g. Polylaticacid (PLA)) with a default setting of process parameters, and were evaluated according to theASTM standards designated. Additionally, the results from the ASTM mechanical and thermaltests were compared to the published data for the analysis. In the paper, we report theexperimental results of the 3D printed specimens by the ASTM standard tests and presentfindings from the assessment and evaluation of the laboratory session developed for a materialslaboratory course for undergraduate programs.Material Extrusion (EM) in 3D Printing Processes 3D printing encompasses a wide range of additive manufacturing technologies. There aremany different printing technologies on the market today
Paper ID #19301Development of a national survey focusing on the relationships between race,class, and gender on the persistence of women engineering facultyDr. Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is Professor and Chair in newly created Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Prior to this appointment, she was a Associate Professor in the School of Engi- neering Education at Purdue University, the Inaugural Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor, and the Director of the International Institute of Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she
achieved if the pre-laboratory exercises had not been incorporated intothe course instruction; further studies would have to be conducted to assess the role of the pre-laboratory exercises versus the laboratory activity alone on student learning.In terms of the perceived learning experience of the students and the effect of performing thepre-laboratory exercises on their views of research, the results are more mixed. All of therespondents felt that it was a worthwhile learning experience. They agreed that it challengedthem to think more deeply about the subject matter and to think like an independent researcher.However, forty percent of the students also found the pre-laboratory exercises to be frustrating.This frustration has also been seen in
university. Studentsreported this language to be English or different from English. Students’ performance in the class was assessed by quantitatively comparing averagegrades in individual and team activities. Individual activities consist of two exams. Teamactivities consist of a design project and an exam. For team activities, students were placed in teams of 3 or 4 people in the second week ofclass and worked with the same team throughout the semester. Team formation was done usingthe CATME Team-Maker tool 10. We intentionally teamed together students with a different self-reported language of previous instruction. Other criteria for teaming included not outnumberingstudents based on gender or race. After the teaming process, all
, Cleveland State University Xiongyi Liu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Foundations at Cleveland State University, USA. She obtained her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA. Her research interests include technology-facilitated teaching and learning, self-regulation, and assessment and evaluation. Her expertise in research methodology has led her to serve as evaluator of multiple federal and state funded projects for preparing students of various levels for career paths in Science, Technology, Engineering, and math (STEM). Dr. Liu has been actively involved in academic community by publishing in peer-reviewed journals such as Contemporary Educational
adopted in ET curricula spanning variousdisciplines by many institutes. 1, 2, 3 Prolific literatures discussing numerous projects successfullycarried out by students with various engineering and technological backgrounds have beenpublished with technical details. 4, 5 Since ET programs focus more on the application oftechnologies, emphasis on developing projects with industrial partners is becoming a trend andstudies have shown great success in many cases. 6, 7 Teaching methods and assessing mechanismsemphasizing different aspects that modern engineers and engineering technologists are facingsuch as time management, team work, communications, and ethics have also been developedand incorporated in these courses to resemble experiences in practical
be morechallenging. However, the two paper authors co-teach a module on Engineering CorporateSocial Responsibility. As a result of the Great Expectations Project, the learning objectivesassociated with this module have been amended so as to better emphasize the need forindividual and organizational social and ethical awareness. The assessment for this modulehas been altered to encourage graduate students to use their engineering and analytical skillsto work with non-profit heritage sites within the UK.In considering the individual and employment related drivers, one of the paper authors hasdeveloped and introduced a new graduate learning strategy which has been disseminatedacross the School of Engineering. Within this strategy, priority is
of prototypes or pre-production models. This review is conducted to evaluate the design against the detailed requirements. It has many of the components as a PDR including the provision of assumptions and calculations used in the design, project progress and risk management. A production assessment is often included. (p. 3)AssessmentOverall, the students were graded on a weighted scale for the semester (see Table 1). Theprofessor used a self-created rubric to evaluate each team’s PDR and CDR (see Figure 2). Table 1. Course Evaluation Frequency Total Points Grade Weight Category
components of the faculty job application with the tangible goal of each participanthaving a peer-reviewed application packet at the program’s conclusion. The 2014-2015 program consistedof six seminar topics, four peer review sessions, and three assessments (see Figure 1). The program startedshortly after the midpoint of the Fall semester and carried over for two sessions into the Spring semester.The cohort was equally divided into peer review groups. Participants were given approximately two weeksto self-arrange peer review sessions of their materials.The first ever participants noted varying peer review experiences depending on the organizational levelof their review group. Although participants were given two weeks to self-organize, we were told
from the outcomes assessment plan that he helped devise and implement as ABET Coordinator. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Turabo, PO Box 3030, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, 00778. Tel. 787-743-7979 x 4182 E-mail: jcmorales@suagm.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Language or problem-formulation difficulties? An FE Exam experiment in a Hispanic Setting Juan C. Morales, Ph.D., P.E. Universidad del TuraboAbstractThis paper describes and discusses the results of an experiment that was conducted by the authorin a course that trains mechanical engineering
. Students then analyzed Energy ManagementOpportunities (EMOs), Green Energy Opportunities (GEOs) and life cycle costs and stated theirprioritized recommendations, including an evaluation of installed and possible future greenmeasures. Finally, during an oral presentation, the buildings, EMOs and GEOs were compared.Results were assessed through both student feedback and project quality. Students appreciatedthe realistic project and being able to look at energy efficiency and the economics ofsustainability. Projects were assessed by the instructor and 78% of the class had a B+ or higheron the project, exceeding expectations. The oral presentation had similarly positive results.IntroductionIn modern engineering design, green engineering and