associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Introduction and Assessment of iNewton for the Engaged Learning of
being engineersand places the faculty member in the role of facilitator. A description of the design projects, thechanges made in the spring 2014 semester based on the student and faculty feedback from spring2013, and the results of data collected in the 2013 and 2014 spring semesters are reported.Introduction When student facilitated learning is the focus of a team project students must manage theirown learning, if they are to succeed. In the Engineering Communications class, a two hourcomponent of the required first-year core course, the semester long conceptual engineeringdesign project is designed to generate inquiry through project-based learning. The structure ofthe first-year program includes a two hour per week Engineering
to create this sought-after learning environment in the context of a single-semester laboratory course?Students in engineering laboratory courses experience hands-on, open-ended, inquiry-basedlearning. This type of learning is pedagogically favorable to the passive learning that sometimesoccurs during lecture-based content delivery. The problem with labs, however, is that studentsmust often invest much time in data collection, reduction, and analysis for the sake of learningwith no tangible outcome, artifact, or external benefit. Contemporary student populations valueand engage better with learning activities that have some impact complimentary but external totheir own learning [1].Project-based educational laboratory courses can be
occurs when the behavior is motivated by external rewardsor punishments, and amotivation refers to behavior that has no perceived value. A more detaileddescription of Self-Determination Theory can be found in Ryan and Deci [11]. In SDT,internalization, i.e. movement toward more self-determined behavior, is a process [12]. Manybehaviors are not initially intrinsically motivated, but they can become more so if their valuebecomes internalized. “Choice, acknowledgement of feelings, and opportunities for self-direction” all enhance intrinsic motivation [13].Problem-based learning (PBL) is one approach to engaging students more actively. Findingsregarding the impact of PBL have been varied. Sungar and Tekkaya [14] found PBL had apositive effect on
. Additionally, ECX could serve as a mechanism for ASCE to continue to engage theover one thousand ETW graduates worldwide and grow the community of people impacted byExCEEd programs. Being an ETW graduate was not required to attend an ECX event, althoughthe ideas shared and topics discussed in many of the ECX sessions build on elements of theExCEEd Teaching Model [16], which is covered in depth at the ETW.ECX 2020: The First Iteration of the ExCEEd Community Exchange (ECX)The initial iteration of the ExCEEd Community Exchange (ECX) sessions in summer and Fall of2020 were focused on providing a platform showcasing how instructors responded to thetransition to emergency online teaching earlier in the year, highlighting best practices and lessonslearned
student has taken advantage of the outside events,the ones that have supplemented the course readings and lectures with community events havegained a perspective offered from experts participating in the global discourse around water. It isclear the students engaged in these outside activities are improving their ability to communicate Page 22.272.12with a much broader audience than found in the classroom.Although collaborative multidisciplinary teaching is a great idea, it is difficult to execute. Theembedded assessor noted the professors demonstrate team teaching in way that makes it appeareffortless: “The expertise of both
was it directly addressed in thecourse. Instead, the course explored the question “What could citizen engineering be?”—relatingengineering to its broader impacts in the lives of citizens.The demographics of the interviewed students revealed some variety, though not as wide avariety as is present university-wide. Two students were first-year students, both intending tomajor in engineering fields. (Note: These students enrolled as students in “University Studies,”the catch-all major for those who have not formally declared a major course of study.) Threestudents were in their final, senior year, with one each majoring in Physics, Biology, andMathematics and Statistics. Three of the students interviewed were male; two were female. Wedid not
environmentaleducation, an 8.6% increase in knowledge was retained compared to the initial knowledge wherethe female and non-white demographics increased the most but retained the least. Resultsregarding environmental attitudes suggest that a focus on learning about environmental issuesdecreased positive attitudes toward the environment, whereas focusing on solutions toenvironmental issues increased positive attitudes toward the environment. Evaluating changes orsustainment of improved environmental attitudes over three semesters demonstrates the potentialfor an environmental engineering education to have a multi-year impact on the values andenvironmental ethos of students across many disciplines.Background and IntroductionThe environmental problems of today
years, the University of St. Thomas School of Engineering has offered STEPScamps which stand for Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer camp 1 2 3. Thissummer camp is aimed at introducing middle school students from various backgrounds to basicaspects of engineering with hands-on, engaging materials and methods. At the 2015 STEPScamp, participants were a mix of rising 7th-grade male and female students who expressed aninterest in learning science and/or engineering concepts on their application form. At each of thefive 13-hour camp sessions offered, 20 students worked in two small groups learning aboutcircuits and vector drawings, this was followed by a trip to the University of St. Thomasengineering labs. The camp educators and
critical threshold value could be identified from a broader perspective of coursewithdrawals.We will continue to study the number of withdrawals and take the results to the UndergraduateScholastic Affairs committee of the Faculty Senate should a recommended maximum number ofwithdrawals be determined. Previously, one of the authors presented analysis to the FacultySenate that contributed to the NC grading policy being overturned. Further, we will work withthe Student Success Center to offer Peer Assisted Study Sessions in the classes in which studentsare at the highest risk of non-success.References1. Olson, S. and D.G. Riordan, Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology
students use their social, cultural and transfer student capital, in the context of institutionalefforts, to transfer from one institution to another.The orientation process is important to students at any level in their educational careers, but isespecially important for transfer students who generally enter the receiving institution at anatypical time compared to the native students. As Grites12 contends “transfer students need anorientation to the culture of the new campus, the academic and social impacts of the newenvironment, the academic advising structure, and the support services, activities, andorganizations that are available to them” (p. 126). However, more energy and resources aredevoted to organizing and delivering orientation
faculty educators, and staff professionals connected to student advisingor student success. Stakeholder interviews are not a novel means of collecting data, but theabsence of literature on this type of multi-level engagement around STEM education suggeststhat the team’s approach was innovative.Race, racism, and feelings of exclusion/belonging factor prominently in higher educationlearning environments, including in STEM, and have an outsized impact on students fromUR/US groups. The team considered very carefully considered ways to gather information aboutthe experiences and perspectives of persons from UR/US groups [18], [19]. In particular, theteam weighed the importance of hearing directly from persons from UR/US groups about theirexperiences
grouped into 4 recurring themes: 1) Engineering can be largely trial-‐and-‐error and not necessarily math-‐intensive. 2) Engineering is highly demanding in terms of attention to detail. 3) Engineering can have a very large impact on society 4) Engineering can be an isolating discipline for the practitioner. Suggestions on how this insight might be used to attract and retain more female students to engineering are provided. Page 24.463.2Introduction
instructorswondered how it was impacting student exam performance.Literature ReviewHomework has long been thought to aid students in preparing for exams. Instructors assign andgrade homework to help students learn the material for better overall exam performance. This isthe conventional belief in most of the academic community. It is only logical to think thatpractice improves performance in academic studies as it does in many other endeavors.In 2002, Peters et al.1 studied the correlation between homework and exam performance in anOperations Management course. The study was designed with two treatments: one treatment wasassigned homework and it was collected while the other treatment was assigned the samehomework but it was not collected. This study
College of Engineering and hosts a comprehensive series of pre-engineering outreach, recruitment, and community building programs in support of this vision.In the past year, WE@RIT has hosted over twenty programs and over 2000 students (K-16 andgraduate) and K-12 educators participate annually. Pre-engineering outreach programs targetfemales in grades 4-12 and include [program name] (one day program, grades 4-5); [programname] (two day program, grades 6-8); [program name] (one day program, grades 8-10);Everyday Engineering Summer Camp (multi-week day camp series, grades 5-12); [programname] (9-week online course, grades 10-12); SWE Sleepover and Shadow Program (two dayprogram, grade 11, hosted by SWE Student Section); Student to Student
forEngineering and Technology (ABET) introduced Engineering Criteria 2000 a decade ago.2 Thisexpansion has produced a variety of approaches to teaching communication to engineeringstudents, many of which include a number of collaborative variations between communication Page 22.1687.3departments and engineering departments. These collaborations between departments requiredstrategy and flexibility, enacted in the form of lecture schedules, task formulation, and gradingprocedures. While this exchange impacts our students and the supervisors who will one day hirethem, it is of interest to the writing across the curricula (WAC) community as well, because
hurdles, research points to theimportance of reaching middle school students to establish fundamental QISE skills and cultivateengagement and interest in QISE-focused degrees and careers.Teaching students about emerging quantum technologies may offer potential solutions to addressthese challenges. Quantum technology, which applies the principles of quantum mechanics tocreate innovative solutions, has driven advancements in computing, secure communication, andmaterials science by harnessing the distinctive properties of quantum states. In this study, wedeveloped a middle school science curriculum that was infused with QISE concepts and alignedwith Next Generation Science Standards. We assessed its impact on the science learningoutcomes and
student’s score. After the individual exam, there is a group component, whichcan either be a required part of the exam (evaluation goal) or considered a bonus (learningenvironment goal). Groups of 3 to 4 students collaborate on the group test. Larger groups reducethe impact of individual voices, and groups of two often suffer from a dominant (but notnecessarily stronger) partner. The group exam can be given in the same class period, if time isavailable, or in the following period. Providing a gap between the two exams can be beneficialbecause students can shore up weaknesses in their understanding brought to light by theindividual exam. However, not too much time should be allowed, since more misconceptions inunderstanding will be uncovered by the
negative impact on students' mental and emotional health. (reversed) 6. At my school, I feel that the campus environment has a negative impact on students' eating and body image. (reverse scale) Feelings of Safety 4 1. How do you feel on your campus during the day? 2. How safe do you feel on your campus at night? 3. How safe do you feel in the community surrounding your
, there is room for substantial innovation in better motivatingstudents, improving their performance, and helping them succeed. This paper describes two interventions consisting of cinematic meditation and online books.We utilized them to improve student engagement while developing important skills includingconscientiousness and communication. In cinematic meditation, we engaged students in goal-directed and guided viewing of films concerning important technological developments. Weadministered this exercise during the first week of class, which helped to motivate students andstimulate classroom discussion. We asked students to write an essay describing their responses toquestions related to the films. Online books help to log student activity
important to ensure an adequate amount of STEM graduates. Mathematics and scienceclasses that do not focus on applications can lead to decreased motivation and interest forstudents.Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) are being used increasingly in K-16 level classes for studentsto focus on applications of math and science in an engineering structure. MEAs are engineeringbased, interdisciplinary problems set in a realistic context with a client. MEAs allow students towork through a form of the engineering design process that is the hallmark of understandingengineering.2 To be used effectively and to maximize the impact that they have on students, toolsthat can be used for instruction and assessment with MEAs are needed. Cognitive Task Analysis(CTA) is
Engaging Freshmen Women in Research – Feedback from Students and Best Practices for FacultyIntroductionIncreasing the participation of diverse populations in engineering and technology fields is achallenge for many universities. A significant means to address this issue is to increase theparticipation of women students. However, this can prove to be challenging. In a studyconducted by Marra and Bogue,1 it was found that although women engineering students enterthe university with high levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, those levels decline quicklyduring the first year. They also found through their research, that the initial levels were neverregained. One method to help retain diversity in engineering and technology
communication problems in the documents (e.g., grammar, quality ofpictures). These differences may be a sign that students are not thinking deeply about the designwork they are reviewing. Alternatively, they may not know how to engage deeply, may notunderstand what an appropriate level of engagement is, do not have design ideas to contribute, orare choosing not to engage deeply29.In light of the many differences between the educators’ and students’ reviews – both in terms ofthe quantity of comments but also the nature of the content – we might further consider the valueof peer reviews. Other research on peer reviews suggest that students expressed liking to seeothers’ work as it gave them insight into their own work29. At the same time, one of the
Content: A means to learn engineering principles more effectively, the service is linked to the course content and study requirements. • Partnerships and Reciprocity: involving students, faculty, the community and possibly companies, and when done well, all partners contribute to the work, receive benefits from the work and learn from the work. Page 25.255.3 • Mutual Learning: Based on mutual respect, students learn from expertise and knowledge in the community partners, as the partners can learn about engineering and technology. Deeper levels of learning can be gained as they work together and impact each
Paper ID #37583Supporting Faculty and Students with DisabilityCali L. Anicha Cali L. Anicha, PhD, is currently a Research Associate with NDSU ADVANCE and has worked as a teacher in the public schools and as a university adjunct instructor. She is engaged in a range of community and education-based equity and justice efforts, and has worked with the NDSU ADVANCE team since 2010.Cecilia Aragon ( Professor) Professor, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, University of WashingtonCanan Bilen-Green Canan Bilen-Green is Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs and Equity at North Dakota State University. She
engineers use in professional practice15. Professional Development – Student development in ethics, etiquette, interviewing, presentations, “dress for success”, and interpersonal skills is an integral part of the EPD sequence. Graduates of the program frequently refer to the positive impact the professional development activities had on their experiences as interns and ultimately in the careers. Citizen Development – Students learn that engineers are servants to society through presentations, reading activities, and a minimum of 70 of hours of community service that they complete while at Itasca. Examples of the activities include road-side clean- ups, recreational trail maintenance, local
order to meet these Wisconsin 53201-1881, Hyunjae.Park@marquette.edugoals of the two-semester long courses, the entrepreneuriallyminded learning (EML) pedagogical method along withothers has been explicitly implemented. It should be noted that the development of disruptivetechnologies is not tied to one discipline within engineering.Rather, it is a universal approach to technology developmentthat has potential to be both exciting and ground-breaking inits impact on the mindset of emerging engineering students. The primary outcomes obtained by implementing a six-week long disruptive technology design challenge activityshow that many new engineering students are able to use
associate professor of Educational Psychology and the Director of the Center for Research, Evaluation, and Assessment (CREA) at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Dr. Marchand received her doctorate in 2008 from Portland State University in Systems Science: Psychology. Her re- search investigates the development of student engagement from a complex systems perspective, focusing on the interaction of individual and contextual factors. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Complex Systems Research and Evaluation in Engineering Education Abstract The purpose of this theory-to-practice paper is to discuss complex systems
-being of poor and marginalized communities aroundthe world. Several other colleges and universities, including Dartmouth [3] and OhioState [4], also have Humanitarian Engineering programs. Stanford University [5]introduces a student-led course in learning sustainable design through service. Thisprogram’s goals are to (a) develop students’ iterative design skills, project managementand partnership-building abilities, sustainability awareness, cultural sensitivity, empathy,and desire to use technical skills to promote peace and human development, (b) helpdeveloping communities ensure individuals’ human rights via sustainable, culturallyappropriate, technology-based solutions, and (c) increase Stanford University’sstewardship of global
camp organized and run by the Autonomous Vehicle Systems (AVS) ResearchLaboratory at the University of the Incarnate Word for middle school girls during the week ofJuly 6 to July 10, 2015. The primary goal of the camp was to introduce more females into thefield of engineering through robotic projects and competitions, guest speakers, and field trips.The camp had an additional emphasis on providing learning and research opportunities for girlsfrom underrepresented communities. miniGEMS was the first free camp in San Antonio, TX formiddle school girls with a special focus on engineering. Despite being held for the first time,there were 25 middle school students from various school districts in San Antonio. The campwas planned, coordinated, and