score was lower by 5 points.ConclusionsEnvision provides a “free-standing assessment tool for comparing sustainability alternatives or toprepare for a more detailed sustainability assessment” [8]. Methodologies laid out in thePMBOK or Agile focus too much on project management skills, like scoping, risk assessment,and scheduling. Discipline-specific bodies of knowledge, like the ASCE BOK, which focuses oncivil engineering, is not relevant to computer or mechanical engineering capstone projects. Evenif the project directly addresses sustainability, e.g. green infrastructure, solar energy, instructorsneed shared, streamlined, and ubiquitous criteria on which to evaluate students.Selection of UN SDGs allowed the design teams to address
also and founder and principal of Quality Evaluation Designs, a firm specializing in research and evaluation for K-12 schools, universities, and government and non-profit organizations nationwide. He specializes in entrepreneurship education, research and evaluation methods, and STEM retention.Kelsey Watts, Clemson University Kelsey Watts is a fourth year Ph.D. student in Bioengineering at Clemson Univerity. She is currently part of the EER Peer Review Training (PERT) research project team to investigate how EER scholars develop the schema for reviewing manuscripts and proposals. She is also developing Systems Biology outreach modules focused on computational skill development for Clemson’s Emerging Scholars
experience as a part of their curriculum, specifically students pursuing thestructural engineering subdiscipline. An introductory course in reinforced concrete designtypically focuses on analysis and design of primary members. Students learn how to select beamor column dimensions and an appropriate amount and location of reinforcement to satisfy shear,flexure, and/or axial demands. Students may also learn how to calculate deflections ofreinforced concrete beams to meet serviceability requirements. Because a good design meetscode requirements and preferences ductile failure modes, students need to develop a foundationalunderstanding of the behavior of these members. Mastery of the course material also requiresstudents to successfully aggregate and
States, interest in advancing curriculum and pedagogical practices date back to the late19th century [2]. However, the acknowledgement of engineering education as a formalresearch field is relatively new [3, 4]. It is a global movement where research on engineeringeducation, and creation of associations, conferences, graduate programs, and even newacademic departments for engineering education research (EER) are happening worldwide [5,6].In order to advance EER, researchers have investigated many aspects of the field itself, includingefforts to legitimize engineering education research [3, 7], introducing new research methods anddesigns [8], increasing methodological rigour [9, 10], investigating successful collaborations[11] and resolving
expertise of their teachers andfaculty.Zhu and Liu looked at teaching during COVID at Beijing Normal University in China but alsolooked to long-term visions [21]. They stated that there should be continued focus anddevelopment on open educational platforms and that additional training is needed for teachersand faculty to provide the best quality online education. Toquero also looked to the future ofhigher education in a post-COVID world, on how to “strengthen practices in the curriculum andmake it more responsive to the learning needs of the students even beyond the conventionalclassroom” [22]. It is interesting yet perhaps not entirely surprising that much of the COVID-19scholarship focused on both academic libraries and higher education in
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Examining the Changing Perceptions of Graduate Students’ Role as Teaching Assistant with Online and Hybrid Labs during COVID-19” (Instruction)Abstract The transition from traditionally face-to-face “in-person” courses to hybrid/onlinelaboratory courses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered how theselabs are delivered in the mechanical engineering curriculum at Clemson University. This paperseeks to capture the graduates’ and undergraduates’ changing perceptions of the roles andresponsibilities that graduate laboratory assistants (GLAs) have in the delivery of course materialwithin the
next steps in the process; that of designing and conducting an online survey was completed.It was decided to implement this project by assimilating it with the curriculum in the form of aproject based activity. The project-based learning activity18 is a hands-on project-based series ofcourses implemented at Rowan University called the Engineering Clinics. The EngineeringClinics is an 8-semester sequence of courses offered by the College of Engineering thatreplicates industrial work environment by engaging the students in laboratory hands-on activitieson projects that are often sponsored by industry partners with a focus on solving real worldproblems.Assessment MethodThe instrument for this study was designed to be (i) an online survey sent to
white institutions,” Action Teach. Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 223–237, 2015, doi: 10.1080/01626620.2015.1048007.[39] N. Ramsay-Jordan, “Preparation and the real world of education: How prospective teachers grapple with using culturally responsive teaching practices in the age of standardized testing,” Int. J. Educ. Reform, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–24, 2020.[40] P. Chinn, “Preparing science teachers for culturally diverse students: Developing cultural literacy through cultural immersion, cultural translators and communities of practice,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 367–402, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11422-006-9014-0.[41] J. Leonard et al., “Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through
, and ASEE Campus Repre- sentative. Dr. Miguel is also a member-at-large of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Heads Association (ECEDHA) Board of Directors. She has been a member of the ECEDHA Annual Conference Program Committee since 2013.Dr. Jean M. Jacoby, Seattle University Jean Jacoby is an Associate Dean and a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering in the College of Science and Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Jacoby joined SU as the Clare Boothe Luce Pro- fessor of Environmental Engineering. Since 2010, she has served as the director of the SU Project Center and coordinates the college’s undergraduate research program. Dr. Jacoby is the co-Principal Investiga- tor on an NSF
. Carrillo, "I always knew I was gifted: Latino males and the Mestiz@ Theory of Intelligences (MTI)," Berkeley Review of Education, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013.[20] Z. Leonardo and A. Broderick, "Smartness as property: A critical exploration of intersections between whiteness and disability studies," Teachers College Record, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 2206-2232, 2011.[21] T. Carroll, A. Kramer, and E. Dringenberg, "Intelligence and Smartness in Engineering: A Gatekeeper to Diversity and Inclusion," presented at the The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Crystal City, Virginia, 2019.[22] C. Morris, A. Ramaswami, A. Kramer, and E. Dringenberg, "A preliminary study of how undergraduate
activities, we plan to use the Framework for P-12 EngineeringLearning [25] as our guidance in building meaningful engineering activities. The learningactivities will be aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards [31] for middle schoolengineering design while meeting the Pennsylvania Academic Standards for Science andTechnology [32] that currently govern curriculum and expectations of learning in PennsylvaniaK-12 schools. We plan to develop engineering learning activities with career connections to theengineering careers in the building industry. The three dimensions of learning used to cultivateengineering literacy for all are introduced in the framework as follows [25]: Engineering Habits of Mind are the traits or ways of thinking
-21] its Collegiate Leadership Institute. She previ- ously completed a co-op at DuPont Titanium While igniting interest in new engineering students is Technologies, and is doing research in Dr. Katsuyo Thornton’s Computational Materialsimportant for improving student retention and outcomes, group at the University of Michigan duringequally so is promoting cooperation among students. As rapid the 2017-2018 academic year.and rich communication becomes less costly, more reliable
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering
each person’s individual skillsets. Emily often takes on a lot of the more communicative tasks, like emailing professionals and conducting interviews, while Amir and I often take on a lot of the more technical tasks like computer work or analyzing data. This system allows us to keep all of our tasks in check while also ensuring that each team member has something valuable to be doing at any given time, thus allowing us to hear each other out and take each other seriously.Teams can also use their asset chart to assign tasks based on member’s desires to grow ordevelop in certain areas, with the support of their teammates. A white female student explains
point of contact for the UAH students regarding product requirements,ergonomics, safety, and curriculum requirements, to name a few. In addition, numerous otherwomen provide supporting roles via WID fundraising, and acting as CDC design reviewers andmentors.BackgroundIn 2009, the WID TVC decided to take an active role in supporting primary and secondaryeducational needs via the donation of STEM tools to K-12 schools. Since WID is a US defenseaffiliated organization, the effort was specifically targeted towards encouraging young people topursue careers in US national defense and national security in order to, eventually, replace theaging DoD workforce. WID TVC realized that the aging technical workforce in the Huntsville,Alabama (AL) area
andimplement a signature assignment across both a core curriculum Critical Thinking and Writingcourse sequence and an Introduction to Engineering course to help students connect writingconcepts across disciplines and toward different purposes. In particular, we have noted thatstudents tend to view writing assignments in writing courses as ‘creative writing’ and writing forother (often technical) courses as ‘technical writing’ when in fact, the writing principles are thesame across contexts. By focusing on common core ideas in communication including attentionto audience, ethics, analytic summary, and design, we can help students visualize and understandthe communication concepts and skills they will use to complete future coursework andultimately
B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She then transitioned into the engineering education field by completing a post-doctoral appointment at Oregon State University investigating technology-aided conceptual learning. She is currently doing research on team dynamics and students’ changes in engineering self-efficacy in project-based learning.Dr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Faculty Director for Engineering Education Research at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineer- ing (CRLT-Engin) at University of Michigan (U-M). She earned B.S.E.E
, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 117–128, 2007.[2] J. A. Leydens, “Novice and insider perspectives on academic and workplace writing: Toward a continuum of rhetorical awareness,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 242–263, 2008.[3] “ABET Accreditation Criteria,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering,” Washington D.C., 2013.[5] P. Zemliansky and L. Berry, “A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Faculty Development Program: An Experience Report,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 306– 316, 2017.[6] S
overlooked; Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict management; Monitoring progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals. They need also to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes when needed, and solicit advice
Space Day,their specific group schedule and activities, the presenting astronaut’s biographies, andeducational space activities to take home. These books were printed and put together by thevolunteers in the days leading up to Fall Space Day. The student participants found themselvesengaged in three activities over the course of the day after attentively listening to presentationsby two astronauts, Don Williams and Gary Payton. One session for the 9-12 graders wasdevoted to learning about Purdue and the Engineering Curriculum allowing for dialogue between Page 12.738.5an Aeronautical & Astronautical Engineering Professor, numerous
the associatedreal-world equipment1,2. Unfortunately the relevant educational research and literature is clear inthe belief that greater student impact, understanding, and retention can only be achieved withgreater student engagement3. In part, this engagement must come by presenting material andproblems in the context of concrete applications or requirements and by connecting problems tothe student’s pre-existing knowledge. As part of a NSF Course, Curriculum, and LaboratoryImprovement (CCLI) grant new educational material is being developed for the thermodynamicscurriculum. This material is being offered under the name “Engaged in Thermodynamics”. It isintended to combine real world scenarios, problems, and solutions in a way that promotes
are a lawyer and two environmental engineers. ̇ Energy and Water Usage Monitoring Interface. This project has carried over from the Sutton Building project (described above) but expanded to the entire campus. A student is working closely with the campus Energy Manager and a computer programmer to design a template to collect and effectively disseminate water and energy usage data from campus buildings and facilities to not only provide essential data for operations staff, but also to provide key information to instigate behavior change of the campus population.Several key changes were made to the course execution in spring 2008. One that has had thegreatest impact thus far is the creation of Project Advisory
accounting for this success? What are someof the challenges that we continue to face? This paper will discuss accomplishments andchallenges faced by institutions seeking to outreach to underrepresented constituencies.IntroductionThe under representation of women in the field of engineering is not a new phenomenon toresearch. The imbalance of men and women appears most dramatically in computer science,information technology and engineering [1]. In the case of Massachusetts, “with respect togender, the state reflects the national trends with 58% of young adults in college comprised ofwomen. However, on a national scale only 12% of students choosing to major in computerscience/IT were women, while in the state of Massachusetts this was 9%” [2]. “In
teacher’s request, we would have most likely left with the notion that providing power to that school was a good candidate for a future project, with the expectation that electricity would be used for more practical applications such as lights or a computer. Further discussions with the community indicated that the water table could be high in this area, causing pit latrines contaminate groundwater supplies during the rainy seasons. In these situations, the villagers were forced to drink directly from the contaminated river. Thus, a thorough participatory method of community decision- making will bring to light any needs, such as those outlined above, that would not necessarily be
involved in the projectagreed or strongly agreed with the statement that the new experimental module coverscontemporary topics. This finding encourages us to develop modules that would incorporate newapplications. The majority of the students in the class (71%) were in agreement with the need toinclude polymers and colloidal science in the chemical engineering curriculum. Thisdemonstrates that most students are aware of the new fields involved in the chemical engineeringpractice. It also shows that most students are interested in the addition of modules thatincorporate topics in polymers. In the questionnaire we also addressed the students' response to the new teachingapproach and the use of an open-ended project. Two thirds of the students
field. Academic programs are formulated with a required course structure and generallyprovided with a degree or certificate. One can argue that a higher level of educational outcomeand usefulness of courses offered in a program are very essential for universities1; however, notonly academic programs, but also the course and the curriculum, must align with program Page 14.1136.3objectives2. Programs differ greatly in terms of their aims and objectives, structure, availableresources and degree or certificate offered for different universities. Such factors are actuallyindicative of varying standards and levels. Typically, teaching facility
commonly for each specialty. Students are advised by faculty members in theirdiscipline. In the mechanical engineering specialty, we commonly have two students per project,but when appropriate, as in this project, we will have three students. The student learningoutcomes, associated ABET outcomes, and performance criteria for the course are listed in Table1. In addition to fulfilling the departmental objectives, this course also incorporates thefollowing university core curriculum (UCC) objectives:A. Enhancement of Cognitive Abilities- composition, speech, and math,B. Enhancement of Individual Development- ethics,C. Enhancement of Cultural and Natural Awareness - environmental, economic, health and safety, sustainability aspects of projects, as
Computer Integrated Construction Research Program at Penn State. He teaches courses in construction engineering and management; Building Information Modeling; and virtual prototyping. He recently led a project to construct the Immersive Construction (ICon) Lab, an affordable, 3 screen immersive display system for design and construction visualization, and is developing an interactive virtual construction simulation application for engineering education. He can be reached at jim101@psu.edu.Thomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has
AC 2009-231: USING A REAL-WORLD, PROJECT-BASED ENERGY MODULETO IMPROVE ENERGY LITERACY AMONG HIGH-SCHOOL YOUTHJan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters, PE is currently pursuing a PhD degree in Environmental Science and Engineering at Clarkson University, with a focus on energy and environmental education. She has several years of experience as the curriculum coordinator for Clarkson's Project-Based Learning Partnership Program and directed the Partners in Engineering Program that provides mentoring and engineering activities for eighth grade girls.Susan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers, PhD, PE is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Associate Dean in
.V. Project ScopeThe initial step in the architectural design process was the development of a list of the types offacilities required to support the functions of the school and provide the necessaryaccommodations for the student body. Once this list was compiled, a required size needed to beassigned to each category of building. The size was determined from the requirements of thespecific task the particular building needed to support and the number of individuals intended touse the building.The technical college is intended to provide training in computer science, auto mechanics,construction, and hotel management. Each of these areas requires space for classrooms,shops/laboratories, a library, storage, and faculty offices totaling