and the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inven- tory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. In 2019 Dr. Cornwell received the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award from the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Matthew SnyderDr. Michael Anderson, P.E., United States Air Force Lt Col Mike Anderson is Associate Professor and Deputy Department Head of Engineering Mechanics, US Air Force Academy. He has been researching autonomous systems for fourteen years, authoring several papers relevant to the field including design of
the integration of project-based learning in undergraduate curriculum.The College of Technology at the University of Houston incorporates the framework ofproject-based learning into the undergraduate courses in order to dramatically improvethe quality of technology education.The College of Technology at the University of Houston approach to project-basedlearning in the telecommunications course involves a basic or fundamental overview and Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Educationtwo “Hands-On” phases as represented in Figure 1: “Basic” introduction
Thinking via Pictures: Getting Students Started through Graphing Stephen A. Dyer Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 USAAbstractVisual languages are among the most important to the STEM disciplines, but most students en-tering a STEM curriculum seem to have little ability to think or converse in any visual language.Further, there are few curricula that include a formal course in either basic graphics or the art ofapproximation. One foundational visual language is that of two-dimensional presentation of quan-titative information and mathematical relationships. This paper offers some topics to
SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION, JUNE 2020 3Fig. 1. Our Community-Engaged Scholars outside the SF Exploratorium (left) and inside the AutoDesk Gallery (right).D. Engaging with the outside community In order to help students who were new to the USF community and the San Francisco area, we organized off-campus events(such as field trips) as well as on-campus events that informed them about ways in which they could be engaged in off-campuscommunity events. Mission Bit is one such local non-profit that trains software engineers to teach in the local schools andprovides them
2002.[5] Bilimoria D, Liang X. Gender equity in science and engineering: Advancing change in higher education. New York: Routledge; 2012.[6] Bilimoria D, Joy S, Liang X. Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Hum Resour Manage. 2008;47: 423-441.[7] Center for Health Leadership and Practice, “Mentoring Guide: A Guide for Mentors,” Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA., November 2003. Available online at https://www.rackham.umich.edu/downloads/more-mentoring-guide-for-mentors.pdf[8] S. Blake-Beard, “Mentoring: Creating Mutually Empowering Relationships,” Stanford VMware Women’s Leadership
M.S. in Chemistry from Southern University and A&M College and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science from the University of New Orleans. She is Associate Dean for Accreditation and Assessment in the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University, a Program Evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, a reg- istered Professional Engineer in Louisiana, a former Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation, and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Dr. Pearson currently chairs ASCE’s Formal Engineering Education Committee, and is Vice Chair of ASCE’s Committee on Diversity and Inclusion.Logan C. Prickett
to fulfill our educational objectives, my personal opinion is thatour effort should be directed towards cultivating and increasing the ability ofstudents to think. That the ability to think is more important than the simpletransfer of knowledge is obvious: Even if a student learns everything by the timethe B.S. degree is awarded, a short time after graduation that engineeringprofessional (a) will have to obtain new knowledge, probably on their own (b) it is very probable that a few years after graduation, the young engineer will be the head of a group that involves persons from various disciplines; in that capacity simple, dry knowledge of facts will not be at all helpful; the ability to think, however, will be
vol. 1.[10] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2002, pp. 16–19.[11] D. Broman, K. Sandahl, and M. Abu Baker, “The Company Approach to Software Engineering Project Courses,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 445–452, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2187208.[12] N. Correll, R. Wing, and D. Coleman, “A One-Year Introductory Robotics Curriculum for Computer Science Upperclassmen,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2220774.[13] E. Bütün, “Teaching genetic algorithms in electrical engineering
approaches to a broader audience.Dr. Edwin van Hassel, University of Antwerp Edwin van Hassel is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Transport and Regional economics, Antwerp University where he is also teaching three courses. He has an engineering degree in naval architecture and he has a PhD in applied economics. His main research interest and expertise is in inland navigation, port hinterland transport, ship design and transport modelling. He holds a PhD with a topic in the field of inland waterway transport. More recently the scope of his work has been extended to maritime cost chain modelling. He also is involved in several research ranging from logistics projects to infrastructure cost benefit analysis and
and conference papers in these and related areas. He has also published two books: Adaptive Nonlinear System Identification: Volterra and Wiener Model Approaches, published by Springer, 2007, and Princi- ples of Speech Coding, co-authored with Dr. Madihally (Sim) Narasimha and published by CRC Press, 2010. He is a Senior Member of the Institution of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), a member of Sigma Xi (the Scientific Research Society), American Association for Engineering Education (ASEE), and a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He is on the edito- rial board of IEEE Signal Processing Letters and Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing. He is the Chair of the
report survey information on learningoutcomes from individual courses. This work includes tracking relationships of these courseoutcomes to departmental and program outcomes in the support of continuous qualityimprovement. The paper describes the design of the web-based course-exit survey and the datacollection and analysis processes supported by the tool.IntroductionThe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Gannon University has developed aweb-based course-exit survey in support of its EC2000 evaluation efforts. The department hasrecently completed a major effort in restructuring and refining its departmental goals andobjectives, catalog, and operations in preparation for its next ABET visitation using EC2000criteria [1]. This
redundant array of independent disks (RAID) controllers. His research interests include engineering education, robotics, and literate programming. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A framework for automatically verifying students’ assembly-language translations of C functions1. AbstractAssembly language instruction represents a core required skill for many computer science andelectrical and computer engineering curriculums. A common approach in assembly languagepedagogy involves teaching students to translate from C to assembly. Unfortunately, the typicalapproach to verifying the correctness of these translations lacks rigor. This paper presents a com
. (2002). Efficacy of interactive internet-based education in structural timber design, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), pp.371-387.[8] Cooper, M. (2005). Remote laboratories in teaching and learning – issues impinging on widespread adoption in science and engineering education, International Journal of Online Engineering, 1(1), pp.1-7.[9] Swearengen, J. C., Barnes, S., Coe, S., Reinhardt, C., and Subramanian, K. (2002). Globalization and the undergraduate manufacturing engineering curriculum, Journal of Engineering Education, April, pp.255-261.[10] Burgess, L. A. (2003). WebCT as an E-learning tool: A study of technology students’ perceptions, Journal of Technology Education, 15(1).[11] Esche, S. K. (2001). Remote
. Page 26.231.2In 2011, Karimi et al. investigated the effects of solution manuals on student learning bycomparing grade distributions in thermodynamics courses. They reported that the percentage ofstudents who earn lower grades (D, F, and W) in thermodynamics courses increases whenstudents have access to solution manuals6.Though there are a number of reports concerning negative effects of solution manuals on studentlearning, there are few reports which emphasize the positive effects. For example, Georgievaproposed a new method of teaching undergraduate mathematics in which the students areallowed free access to the complete solution manual7. The philosophy behind this approach isthat homework should be used as an opportunity for students to
simulation results.Past research projects, such as the work from the professors of engineering in San FranciscoState published in 2012 which develop a probabilistic approach for reliability assessment of real-time hybrid simulation results2 especially when the true structural response is not available. Alinear elastic single-degree-of-freedom structure is used to determine the statistical distributionof actuator delay values corresponding to certain accuracy3. Nonlinear structural behavior isconsidered through the Bouc-Wen model4. The Bouc-Wen model is used in modeling thehysteresis phenomenon in the dynamically excited nonlinear structures it is used to help further Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV
to uti-lize their prior pedagogical knowledge and experiences to create integrated curricular modules.The approach of integrating computing concepts into existing instruction through authentic educatorexperiences and creation-focused pedagogy, fostered by educators has been established in the literaturethrough NSF-supported work (Borowczak and Burrows 2018; Burrows et al. 2021; 2018).As an educational community, and especially in science and engineering education, we understand thatexposure to authentic advanced topics serves as one mechanism for students, educators, and our commu-nities to gain interest, knowledge, and entry into available high-demand and high-paying STEM occupa-tions (Labor Statistics 2018). However, for educators to adopt
, especially those who commute or live off-campus. The creation of study groups isencouraged, as well as supervision of students to ensure completion homework [7]. Within theselearning-centers, effective retention initiatives that supported student diversity in learning thatmay require different approaches to college teaching, even in math and sciences [10]. Preliminary evaluations of students found that while most students prefer the new approaches tolearning, women and some minority students demonstrated differences in preferred learningstyles as assessed by the Myers-Briggs Inventory [5]. Additionally, when considering theexternal obstacles and characteristics of NT students, it cannot be assumed that students arelargely isolated from worldly
Paul andElder model of critical thinking specifically, the University of Louisville adopted it specificallyas the core of their Quality Enhancement Plan for undergraduate education, e.g. [10] As far aswe have determined, the present work is the first to apply the Paul & Elder approach to theteaching of critical reading and writing to engineering graduate students.The Course 1/Course 2 sequence was originally implemented in the University of South CarolinaCollege of Engineering and Computing (CEC) as part of the graduate curriculum in BiomedicalEngineering, which was established in 2008. Since that time, the courses have evolved into theircurrent form and have been taken by students in all CEC PhD-granting programs. The CT modelis, of
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Examining the Changing Perceptions of Graduate Students’ Role as Teaching Assistant with Online and Hybrid Labs during COVID-19” (Instruction)Abstract The transition from traditionally face-to-face “in-person” courses to hybrid/onlinelaboratory courses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally altered how theselabs are delivered in the mechanical engineering curriculum at Clemson University. This paperseeks to capture the graduates’ and undergraduates’ changing perceptions of the roles andresponsibilities that graduate laboratory assistants (GLAs) have in the delivery of course materialwithin the
technologies.It becomes more and more vital as people spend more and more time connected to the networkfrom anywhere anytime. Many areas of wireless networks demand highly trained personnel tosolve the new challenges such as site survey, wireless security, etc. There is a great demand oftechnicians and engineers who can maintain and secure the wireless networked environment.While electrical and computer engineering and computer science curriculums offer students fewwireless networking courses; this may not enough to train network professionals with the properbackground on the newer wireless technologies. Although many courses on computer andwireless networks have been developed in these programs, they are primarily focused on in-depth mathematics
. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Ms. Brianna Healey Derr, Bucknell University Brianna is an Instructional Technologist specializing in Video at Bucknell University located in Lewis- burg, Pa. She received her certificate in Digital Storytelling in the Spring of 2014 from the University of Colorado Denver in partnership with The Center for Digital Storytelling now called StoryCenter. She partners with faculty to integrate multimodal storytelling into the curriculum and to aid in the discovery of new innovative ways to educate. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
primary purposes of an engineering or construction management curriculum is toprepare students to enter the workforce upon graduation, ready to engage in a variety ofresponsibilities as a part of a multidisciplinary team. The transition from student to professionalmust occur quickly – often in as little as four-to-five years. Central to this transformation is thestudent’s ability to translate the theories and principles introduced in the classroom into tangibleskills appropriate to their particular discipline and work effectively with a variety of people frommultiple disciplines. While there are many pedagogical approaches that seek to accomplish thisgoal, project-based learning explicitly presents students with the opportunity to put theory
education applications, research has been presented on the development ofvirtual CNC simulators that can be used in training. These include work by Ong et al.,10 Wang etal.11 and He et al.12. These simulators are developed using building blocks that in most caseshave been created and integrated by the authors. In some cases they provide unique capabilitiessuch as allowing users to measure cutting forces during machining10. However, these papersfocus mostly on describing the development and capabilities of these tools. Little is reported inthese cases on the deployment and impact in the curriculum. Djassemi13 does report on anexperience in developing a hands-on approach to CAD/CAM instruction that does includeverification. While he presents some
subject matter requirements listed in many state sciencestandards. One example from the New York science standards is given below. New York Standard 4-Physical Science. Energy and matter interact through forces that result in changes in motion. Use simple machines made of pulleys and levers to lift objects and describe how each machine transforms the force applied to it1. Page 7.382.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Concepts of mechanical advantage, particularly force, motion, and
SPECTRE’s broaderscope and the entry situations it creates for new participants. SPECTRE students practiceincremental design in an existing complex system, rather than starting with a clean design slate.The day-to-day level of complexity is greater than most student projects can address. Testingalso becomes more sophisticated and deals with more subtle measurements and interpretationsthan in shorter smaller efforts. Upon entering a legacy project the new team must master quicklytheir predecessors’ technical plans and implementations before they can start their own work.This must be done critically, and may involve immediate testing, because the preceding designscannot always be trusted. Fresh perspectives reveal new problems or new approaches that
Sensor-net Self-Organization and Control (SenSOC) and other next-generation capabilities within a broad rangeof potentially unanticipated operational contexts”9 which aids improved mission planning andrehearsal.9-10 Modeling and simulation environments such as AUV Workbench present engagingPBL opportunities to introduce students to interactive simulations based on vehicle test data andphysics based models thereby supporting science and technology research and education.The Introduction to Electrical Engineering course at Texas A&M University-Kingsville wasrecently replaced by a new freshman seminar course. Under the new course format, studentshave less time in the lab, as the new structure has two contact hours in the lab/class versus
Paper ID #37433VEX V5 Workcell: Industrial Robotic Arm Model for STEMEducation (Other)Arif Sirinterlikci Arif Sirinterlikci is a university professor of industrial and manufacturing engineering at Robert Morris University. His teaching and research interests lie in manufacturing engineering, specifically in industrial automation and robotics, CAD/CAE/CAM, 3D scanning and printing, medical manufacturing, and entertainment technology. In addition, he has recently developed courses in different areas of Industry 4.0 including Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Mixed Reality (MR) for Industry.Jason
audio for courses or limit their use of two-wayinteraction to informational sessions or small group interaction. Further, we found thatspecifically engineering-related courses available in a distance format seem to be limited to lowlevel math or computer science courses or engineering courses that do not have a lab component.Our conversations indicated that a) each school must consider what is best for its constituenciesand b) that interactive distance learning is gaining traction, but must be approached carefully,including careful coordination with administration and supporting departments.Our approach uses web conferencing software (Adobe Connect) as the primary course deliverymode for remote students, but remote students do come to our
need to develop a global awareness and theability to operate effectively in different cultural settings; settings where members potentiallyfrom various countries and regions with different traditions of work and personal relationswill endeavor to effectively collaborate. For undergraduate institutions and specificallySchools of Engineering, Design and Technology intending to respond to the challenges ofthese increasingly important global contexts, a key emerging question is how best to preparestudents for such settings while continuing also with engineering fundamentals and theincreasingly complex technological subject matter.Clearly there can be several approaches to develop students for multi-disciplinary,international collaboration settings
majorgoal of American democracy. Present day action towards that goal is the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science Technology Engineering and Math (S-STEM)program. Each year, new student success programs guided by educational theory and evidence-based practices are funded and developed to provide critical support to low-incomepostsecondary students in STEM. The Endeavour Program at the University of Houston is one ofthose programs. In the fall of 2018, Endeavour recruited its first cohort of STEM freshmen.Since then, two cohorts have completed the two-year program with the third set to complete theprogram in spring 2023. This paper presents data for what would have been the 3rd-year mark ofthe program. However, due to two program