. Gordon Kingsley is an Associate Professor in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Gordon is the project evaluator for the STEP NSF grant, and PI on the Alternative Approaches to Evaluating STEM Education Partnerships NSF grant. His area of research interests are the interactions of public-private partnerships to harness developments in science and technology, and the nature and assessment of educational partnerships.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marion C. Usselman is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Marion received her Ph.D. in
of staff positions included in the survey, the engineering academic deans valuedpractical experience: I would like the individual to have several years experience past the award of the degree before entering into any of the first six jobs. Most candidates would be considered primarily for their experience, rather than such training without experience.Many deans were satisfied with the education, psychology or counseling graduates they havehired in the past for these types of positions and did not expect engineering education graduatesto be more desirable. Some respondents pointed out that a curriculum focused on pedagogywould not adequately prepare engineering education graduates for the varied demands of
, chemical engineering, computer science engineering, as well as biology and chemistry programs at ASU. BME at ASU teaches a 8 semester wide medical device design tract that initiates the students in design, regulations, standards, IP and other aspects from day 1. Dr. La Belle has develop and courses and taught at the freshman, junior, senior and graduate level on these topics.Mr. Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University Aldin Malkoc, MS is a student in the School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Arizona State University. Aldin is enrolled in the 4+1 program to receive his Masters of Science in Biomedical Engineering from Arizona State University in 2017 and will pursue a doctoral degree in Biomedical En
College of Engineer- ing’s K-12 outreach programs, and the college’s summer programs. Specking is actively involved in the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management divisions and is the current Chair-elect of the ASEE Diversity Committee. Specking received a B.S. in Computer Engineering and a M.S. in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Arkansas and is currently working on a PhD in Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Transforming Outreach Education: Implementing Industrial Engineering Classroom Activities as Outreach ProjectsAbstractOutreach is vital to increasing pre-college interest in
University, Nagel has helped to develop and teach the six course engineering design sequence which represents the spine of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Mr. James Deverell WatkinsDr. Melissa Wood Aleman, James Madison University Dr. Melissa Aleman (Ph.D. University of Iowa) is Professor of
development sessions. Additionally, we wanted todetermine if faculty beliefs about student-centered learning strategies correlated to actualimplementation of active learning practices in the classroom.ResultsBeliefs towards Student-Centered & Teacher-Centered Learning StrategiesIn order to assess beliefs towards teaching strategies, teacher-centered and student-centeredscores were constructed for all ATI respondents. These scores were computed for both pre- andpost-ATI assessments. Total points possible for TC and SC dimensions were 40, with a totalnumber of 80 points possible on the overall ATI score. A summary of these scores is presented intable 2, below.Table 2. ATI Pre- and Post-Assessment Mean, Standard Deviation, & Change
provide evidence of significant integration and cross-pollination between STSand what has come to be known as TELPhE. In their historical overview of “EngineeringPractice as an Emerging Field of Inquiry,” Williams and Figueiredo provide a representativetimeline depicting major contributions to research on engineering practice between 1911 and2014. Many of the authors and works included on the timeline would qualify as canonical, or atleast easily identifiable as, works in STS, for example, Latour’s Science in Action (1987), Law’s“Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion” (1987), Downey, TheMachine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers (1998), and Mukerji’sImpossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on
overlooked; Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict management; Monitoring progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals. They need also to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes when needed, and solicit advice
, special education and engineering education.Ms. Yuxin Xu, University of Washington Yuxin (Ziva) Xu is a second-year undergraduate student at University of Washington, Seattle. Her research areas of interest include reflection in engineering education, equity in engineering, and human-computer interaction. Address: 746 1035 NE Campus Pkwy, Seattle, WA 98105 Phone: 206-209-6202 Email: yxxuziva@uw.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Students’ engagements with reflection: Insights from undergraduatesIntroductionIn this research paper, we situate our work in an understanding of reflection as a form of thinkingthat involves stepping out, thinking about, and connecting forward [1
. Meetings with relevant private (companies) and public (universities) stakeholders,focus group with HEI managers and use of the tool with students from the partner universitieswill be done to develop and validate the toolkit.3. Develop innovative and effective teaching and training strategies for students in highereducation, focusing on curriculum design and making better use of the many already existingopportunities for embedded mobility and collaboration. The output will be a guidebook toenhancing global competence building at HEIs. This guidebook will contain general strategiesfor HEIs, as well as specific suggestions for staff and students, drawing on theory and currentbest practices, in line with the competencies identified above (Objective 1
during their firstyear of college, and apply it to their habits for critical thinking and metacognition. Thisknowledge could inform our guided practice in reflection through essays and other prompts. Ourfirst-year engineering design course at a research institution in the southeastern United Statesalready includes practice in certain professional skills, such as ethics and integrity, teamwork andtechnical communication. It is evident that reflective judgment is another important professionalskill that should be initiated early in the engineering curriculum, both for solving ill-structuredproblems and for retaining knowledge.Our research question is as follows: How well do first year students develop higher level thinking skills through
behaviors such as identifying the problem andunderstanding the goals, identifying constraints, and familiarizing themselves with availablematerial. In addition, Watkins and her colleagues [19] provided evidence of fourth gradersengaging in three phases of problem scoping as naming, setting the context and reflecting.Finally, Haluschak and her colleagues [22] investigated problem scoping in young children (K-2grade) during an implementation of a STEM+C+Literacy curriculum. They found that childrencan participate in meaningful problem scoping in all three phases mentioned by Watkins and hercolleagues [19, 22].While these previous studies provided evidence that children in different elementary grade levelsare capable of engaging in problem scoping
cooperative learning experience –which is part of active learning- to be successful, it isimperative that the following be integrated into the class activity: [9, 12, 13, and 14]. Interdependence- Students should perceive that they need each other to complete the planned activity; Interaction- Students should work together in planning, executing, and arriving at conclusions. They should share the work load equitably and share the credit; Accountability- Students should be accountable individually & as a group. Keeping track of knowledge gained by the individual (through the group) should not be overlooked; Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills
. At times, this results in students dropping out of projects. The students also havefamily, financial or health challenges that may prevent them from continuing their participation.For example, a student’s lack of research experience can lead to underestimating the time requiredfor a project, resulting in missed deadlines and at times, creating real conflicts with students’classes, family commitments, and outside employment. Research projects can have a negativeimpact on a student’s GPA if they are not properly advised and projects are not effectivelymanaged. Finally, community college students do not get any curriculum credit for theirundergraduate research as students do for Senior Design Projects at 4-year institutions.How to Develop an
STEM pedagogy, design thinking, project-based learning and educational entrepreneurship.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of
collected as part of a larger NSF-funded project thatexplores the link between motivation and conceptual change.The project participants self-selected by responding to an invitation disseminated to instructorsof the identified courses in a partner institution. Requests for participation were also sent to thefollowing ASEE divisions: Biological & Agricultural Engineering, Chemical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Educational Research & Methods, Electrical & Computer Engineering, EngineeringPhysics, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics, Minorities in Engineering, and Women inEngineering. Recruitment sites were purposefully selected to ensure that instructors from avariety of institutions, and, consequently, teaching and learning experiences
curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second
ashort definition for each level, a reduced set of key works for each level, and two examples ofactivities that could be assessed. The work in the cognitive domain by Bloom and his colleaguesserved as a seminal work in curriculum development for many years, with a number ofresearchers either developing refinements to the implementation of the taxonomy or deriding thetaxonomy as having only limited benefit in assessing intellectual development, (see the work ofOrmell, Roberts or Seddon [10][11][12]), to mention a few. Major revisions to Bloom’staxonomy did not occur until 2001 when Anderson and Krathwohl proposed a revision to thehierarchy (i.e., by reversing the order of synthesis and evaluation), added a new dimension whichdescribed cognitive
degrees in mathematics at The Ohio State University and her MS and PhD in operations research and applied science from the College of William and Mary. Diane received her Black Belt in Six Sigma in 2011 from Purdue’s Technical Assistance Program. Her current research and teaching interests are in probability, statistics, quality control, and Six Sigma. She has published journal articles in the areas of probability, statistics, statistics education, quality control, and Six Sigma, and has published a book in computational probability. Diane won Rose-Hulman’s Dean’s Outstanding Teacher Award in 2007, was named in Princeton Review’s 300 Best Professors in America in 2012, and was selected as one of Microsoft’s 365 ”Heroes
majors. At thispoint in the semester, the students are to complete the assignment, called Requirements ForEngineering Majors Assignment.The design of the assignment itself was meant as an active learning assignment in the hopes thatstudents would be able to learn where to find degree requirement information on their own, gaina true understanding of course pre-requisites, how pre-requisites fit into the curriculum ofvarious engineering programs, and begin thinking about what the importance of transferringcredits. In essence, we hope to teach the skills they would need to gather the information theyneeded to have meaning interactions with their advisers, or to be able to research and createrealistic educational plans for themselves.The
, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26454 and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Prashanta Dutta, Washington State
developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self.Dr. Amir H Danesh-Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Danesh-Yazdi is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Good Strategies to Avoid Bad FBDsAbstractDrawing a good free-body diagram (FBD) is generally acknowledged by mechanics instructorsas a critical step in solving mechanics problems. In this paper we will summarize recommendedprocedures and mnemonics that have been
engineering degree increasedfrom 29% in 2006 to 33% in 2015. The six-year graduation rates were 20% to 25% higher thanthe rates for students who attained a degree in four years. Retaining students in engineeringprograms remains a challenge to all engineering educators. Many institutions are increasinglyfocused on improving retention rates through various programs and services. In 2012 ASEE [3]reported strategies implemented to improve student retention rates in some engineering schools:focus on student learning through tutoring/mentoring, student programs and financial aid, studentacademic enrichment programs, student research/work experience, curriculum and classenhancements, institutional/educational research, and changes to institutional
called TRESTLE.The TRESTLE network includes the two institutions that developed the original SEI model andconvenes a course transformation institute each year as well as a series of online colloquia andconversations across the year and offers course transformation models and resources on itswebsite (https://trestlenetwork.ku.edu/).School of Engineering Context The School of Engineering encompasses 6 departments: Aerospace Engineering (AE),Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering (CEAE), Chemical & Petroleum Engineering(C&PE), Electrical Engineering & Computer Science (EECS), Engineering Physics (EPHSX),and Mechanical Engineering (ME). The School is home to approximately 130 tenure-trackfaculty and 2500
maximize diversity in gender, race and STEMsubject areas. We also considered whether two applicants taught at the same school and whetheran applicant was applying to participate for a second year, as these characteristics were valuedboth by us and by NSF. The choice of research project was not considered in the selectionprocess, except in one case where a particular skill in computer programming was required.Despite this, almost all selected applicants received their first or second choice of project.We note that while there were forty-one positions opened over four years, only twenty-sevenindividuals participated. This is because fourteen of these twenty-seven teachers participated inthe program for a second year. The demographic information
those comments.References [1] G. Pahl, W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K.-H. Grote, Engineering Design: A Systematic Ap- proach, 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag, 2007. [2] C. L. Dym, P. L. with Elizabeth J. Owen, and R. E. Spjut, Engineering Design: A Project- Based Introduction, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2009. [3] R. L. Nagel and M. R. Bohm, “On teaching functionality and functional modeling in an engineering curriculum,” in ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Con- ferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011, pp. 625–636. [4] M. S. Erden, H. Komoto, T. J. van Beek, V. D’Amelio, E. Echavarria, and T. Tomiyama
national STEM initiatives have shifted research focus from the development ofinstructional innovations to the examination of change processes and implementation of researchbased instructional strategies. Emphasis has been placed on adoption of instructional strategiesand how they are implemented, especially in engineering science courses at the core ofengineering curriculum. Unfortunately, little has been done to examine the multivariaterelationship among instructional strategies, active and interactive learning, and studentengagement in post-secondary engineering energy science courses. Successful implementation ofinstructional strategies hinges not only on the how, but also the why and for what purpose. Thecurrent study provides evidence for the
possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict management; Monitoring progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals. They need also to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes when needed, and solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the
” aspects into the studies of applied science,computing, engineering and engineering technology. ABET’s Engineering AccreditationCommission (EAC) is explicitly linked to acquiring a global skill set, by teaching the “broadeducation necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global economic,environmental, and societal context”. Similarly, ABET’s Technology Accreditation Commission(ETAC) requires “a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societaland global issues”4. The EAC and ETAC’s student learning outcomes based on the criterion ofglobal competency are that the students:a) “will demonstrate substantial knowledge [or factual understanding] of the similarities and differences among engineers and
, may result in fewer minority studentsas well [1], [6].Fear of racism – research suggests that students who are susceptible to stereotype threat(potential interpretations of ones’ actions through an existing negative lens) often respond byadjusting behavior patterns to minimize or avoid similar situations [11]. Students of color andmore often African American college students at predominantly white institutions are oftenalready vulnerable to such negativism. Since study abroad is rarely required as part of theundergraduate curriculum, they are more likely to decline the opportunity even in the presence ofother incentives [11], [6]. Studying abroad is often marketed as a means to improve ones’ crosscultural experience. For the minority student