Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 141, no. 2, p. C5014003 (13 pp.), Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000219.[57] C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, “Seeing the big picture: The role that undergraduate work experiences can play in the persistence of female engineering undergraduates,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23, 2013 - June 26, 2013, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA, United states: American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.[58] A. Huynh and H. L. Chen, “Exploring how innovation self-efficacy measures relate to engineering internship motivations and outcomes,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, 2020.[59] K. J. B
-Horenstein, K. W. Roberts, and A. C. Dix, “Mentoring undergraduate researchers: An exploratory study of students’ and professors’ perceptions,” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 269–291, 2010.[13] E. Wenderholm, “Challenges and the elements of success in undergraduate research,” in Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 2004, pp. 73–75.[14] D. L. Knox, P. J. DePasquale, and S. M. Pulimood, “A model for summer undergraduate research experiences in emerging technologies,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 214–218, 2006.[15] R. L. Hirsch and A. Kachroo, “What to do when the lab closes? managing an interdisciplinary, undergraduate
reading. Directory of teaching innovations in psychology, pages 64–65, 1976. [6] David A Wilder, William A Flood, and Wibecke Stromsnes. The use of random extra credit quizzes to increase student attendance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(2):117–117, 2001. [7] James L Groves. Students’ perceptions of extra credit. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 12(1):27–62, 2000. [8] John C Norcross, Linda J Horrocks, and John F Stevenson. Of barfights and gadflies: Attitudes and practices concerning extra credit in college courses. Teaching of Psychology, 16(4):199–204, 1989. [9] G William Hill IV, Joseph J Palladino IV, and James A Eison IV. Blood, sweat, and trivia: Faculty ratings of extra-credit opportunities
Design Award for having an innovative mechanismfor scoring rings onto the high goal branch posts. The team which emerged as the TournamentChampion (matches) and the Robot Skills Challenge Champion also earned the ExcellenceAward. Spectators were allowed and teams invited friends and family.Lessons Learned Second YearDuring the second year using the VEX U robotic project, students did not show much interestand enthusiasm for the project during the fall semester. The spring scrimmage practice sessionssignified a turning point. Adding milestone events which foster student engagement are neededfor the fall semester. Several early design reviews are needed to get students to design theirrobots sooner. Proposed for next year was a mandatory robot
interest includes blended learning, flipped classroom, gamification, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and the integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering courses.Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Comparing Weekly Reflection Surveys and a Midterm Survey: Insights on Formative Feedback in Graphical Communication EducationAbstractThe authors report on a pedagogical feedback strategy employed in a first-year engineeringgraphics course, which implemented a flipped classroom model for self-regulated learning. Classtime was reserved for activities and
users interact with Black lives matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931Khazan, Olga. (2020, June 2nd). “Why People Loot” The Atlantic.Kim, Catherine. (2020, May 31st). “Images of police using violence against peaceful protesters are going viral” Vox.Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., & Woodward, S. (2017). institutional uses of Twitter in U.S. higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42(2), 97-111.Linvill, D. L., McGee, S. E., & Hicks, L. K. (2012). Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public Relations Review, 38, 636–638.Lockard, D. T., Baker, D. J., & Blissett, R. S. (2019). Student and administrative
was so cool that he decided to come to UT for nuclear engineering and that I get to be his TA." 8Middle school exposure alone is not sufficient to encourage persistence in STEM. Under a diversity office's leadership, the office's first pre‐college summer program for middle school students was founded in 1997. Bridging upon this program’s success and need for ongoing enrichment programs for coed groups, our college of engineering expanded its programs to engage high school women, underserved, and underrepresented populations in STEM activities since additional inventions, breakthroughs, patents, and innovations would be discovered if there was
from the advisor’s perspective,” Innovative Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 297–315, 2009.[10] W. Lyons, D. Scroggins, and P. B. Rule, “The mentor in graduate education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 277–285, 1990.[11] S. T. Charles, M. M. Karnaze, and F. M. Leslie, “Positive factors related to graduate student mental health,” Journal of American College Health, pp. 1–9, 2021.[12] J. Posselt, “Normalizing struggle: Dimensions of faculty support for doctoral students and implications for persistence and well-being,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988–1013, 2018.[13] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and
education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 34, pp. 299–306, 2009.[11] A. Baisley, K. Hjelmstad, and E. Chatziefstratiou, “The accuracy of self-assessment in engineering mechanics,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[12] K. Shagitha and A. K. Hadiyanto, “Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions toward Self- Assessments,” SAGA J. Engl. Lang. Teach. Appl. Linguist., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–124, 2022.[13] J. H. Nieminen, “Beyond empowerment: student self-assessment as a form of resistance,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1246–1264, 2021.[14] J. Biggs and C. Tang, EBOOK: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw- hill education (UK), 2011.[15] B. J. Zimmerman, “From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A
Paper ID #38106Narratives of Identity Coherence and Separation in the Figured Worlds ofUndergraduate Engineering EducationGabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying cognitive load theory in the engineering classroom. He is currently working on an NSF project attempting to improve dissemination of student narratives using innovative audio approaches. Gabe has a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Utah State University
while in personDBL is ideal, a hybrid DBL contributes to easy access to learning while still enablingparticipation and creativity. Best practices for supporting a collaborative hybrid learningenvironment for CAD based projects are provided.1. IntroductionThe maker movement combines creative makers and advanced technologies such as the Arduinomicrocontroller and personal 3D printing to drive innovation in manufacturing, engineering,industrial design, hardware technology and education [1]. Through the process of making,students learn deeper. 3D printing and rapid prototyping allows students to practice the iterativedesign process [2] to produce a functional, aesthetic, and viable product [3].Hands-on projects provide students with a “real
University of Adelaide," Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 27, pp. 20-27, 2019/04/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.12.002.[12] J. L. Craig, N. Lerner, and M. Poe, "Innovation Across the Curriculum: Three Case Studies in Teaching Science and Engineering Communication," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, pp. 280-301, 2008.[13] R. J. Bonk, P. T. Imhoff, and A. H.-D. Cheng, "Integrating Written Communication within Engineering Curricula," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 152-159, 2002, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052- 3928(2002)128:4(152).[14] S. Hawkins, M. B. Coney, and K.-E. Bystrom, "Incidental Writing in
includes all real numbers (finite numbers) aswell as all nonfinite numbers such as infinites and infinitesimals. This is a closed numbersystem. As a result, this software tool, the basic errorless infinity calculator, is capable ofperforming error free arithmetic computations, and this will serve in the future to help make anddevelop more comprehensive and robust studies using advanced mathematical models involvingcomputations and analyses that use a complete spectrum of numbers. Improving ourunderstanding of nonfinite numbers in the nature of mathematics, such as in applied fields ofstudy, including but not limited to science, technology and medicine, will lead to greaterunderstanding and innovation in these areas.AppendixThis section provides
.[3] J. Fredericks Volkwein and W. G. Lorang, “Characteristics of Extenders: FulI-Time Students Who Take Light Credit Loads and Graduate in More Than Four Years,” Res High Educ, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 43–68, 1996.[4] M. Hall, “Why Students Take More Than Four Years to Graduate,” Seattle, WA: Association for Institutional Research Forum, 1999. [Online]. Available: www.selu.edu/Administration/Inst-Research[5] G. L. Donhardt, “The Fourth-Year Experience: Impediments to Degree Completion,” Innov High Educ, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 207–221, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10755-012-9234- z.[6] E. Dunlop Velez, T. Lew, E. Thomsen, K. Johnson, J. Wine, and J. Cooney, “Baccalaureate and Beyond (B&B: 16/17): A First
implement with avery small teaching center. Cook and Marincovich recommend teaching centers at researchuniversities focus on innovation, cutting-edge teaching techniques and leadership’s priorities [4].They encourage developing programs that are time efficient for faculty such as withindepartments, or focused on specific faculty ranks, or specific skills or technologies. Themapping described in this paper doesn’t preclude that focus but rather provides a counteringbalance to also be sure to include programs and support that addresses faculty where they are inteaching skills. Austin describes how to support faculty members at different stages of theircareers [5] whereas the teaching levels approach focuses on where faculty are in their
that “the solution for many pressing challenges requires engineering innovations that areguided by a keen awareness of human goals, needs, abilities and limitations” (pg. 404) [13]. Thisis echoed by other researchers who affirm that these skills are not innate but must be intentionallyintegrated into the curriculum for students to practice engineering from these perspectives [9, 11,13 – 16]. While humanitarian projects for engineers, such as the work with Engineers WithoutBorders, Engineers in Action and other project-based learning applications have shown themselvesto be effective in increasing awareness of cultural dimensions and skills of communication andteamwork [6, 7, 11, 18, 19], to achieve user-centered systems, a formalized approach
/s40594-020-00241-4.[3] W. Faulkner, “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759–792, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005.[4] E. O. McGee, Black, brown, bruised: how racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press, 2020.[5] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students,” Eng. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.545065.[6] M. Jennings, R. Roscoe, N. Kellam, and S. Jayasuriya, “A Review of the State of LGBTQIA+ Student Research in STEM and Engineering Education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference
systems; and (3) advanced engineering strategies for developing in vitro models and culture systems. Dr. Gomillion is committed to the integration of her biomedical interests with education research endeavors, with a specific focus on evaluating classroom innovations for improving biomedical engineering student learning and exploring factors that facilitate success for diverse graduate students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction of Virtual Reality Laboratories in a Tissue Engineering CourseIntroductionThe biomedical engineering (BME) industry is a highly practical field that involvesspecialized expertise in biomaterials, cell
] G. L. Downey, The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1998.[6] W. Faulkner, “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[7] D. Vinck, Ed., Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.[8] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994.[9] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–195, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135.[10] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T
. Transp. Eng., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 301-313, 2002 [9] Y. Mehta, Innovative Techniques to Teach Transportation Engineering, Proc. of ASEE 113th Annual Conference, June 18-21, 2006, Chicago, Illinois. [10] C. Meyers and T. Jones, Promoting active learning. Strategies for the college classroom, Jossey-Bass, 1993. [11] S. Freeman, and S. Eddy, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, Vol. 111, No. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014. [12] A., Rodrigues da Silva, N. Kuri, and A. Casale., “PBL and B-learning for civil engineering students in a transportation course,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., pp. 305-313
. A. Erdener, and R. C. Knoeppel, “Parents' perceptions of their involvement in schooling,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2018. doi:10.21890/ijres.369197.[4]. K. N. Vela, R. M. Pedersen, and M. N. Baucum, “Improving perceptions of STEM careers through informal learning environments,” Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 103-113, 2020.[5] National Academy of Sciences, “Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places and Pursuits,” Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2009[6]. K. Hamilton, K., A. van Dongen, and M. S. Hagger, “An extended theory of planned behavior for parent-for-child
makerspace, creatingimages for safety training that included REM and women faces, and adapted safety policies to addressneeds of diverse communities (e.g. headdress options for Muslim women). The second approach was toinitiate a student group made up of REM women and white women to lead BUILD (BuildingUndergraduate Innovation and Leadership through Design) nights. These BUILD nights targeted REMstudents and women by creating fun, informative, build sessions, where these groups could gather withothers who shared similar lived experiences, and gain confidence in building and making in theuniversity’s makerspace environment. The group was named Maker Ambassadors and it served todevelop confidence and self-efficacy in REM and women students in utilizing
Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 6–27. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x.46. Martin, Julie P., et al. “Developing a Survey Instrument to Characterize Social Capital Resources Impacting Undergraduates’ Decision to Enter and Persist in Engineering.” Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011.47. Maskell, Peter. “Social Capital, Innovation, and Competitiveness.” Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, pp. 111–23.48. Massey, Douglas S., and Mary J. Fischer. “Stereotype Threat and Academic Performance: New Findings from a Racially Diverse Sample of College Freshmen.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 45–67
Science. New York: Pergamon Press.Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind,experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press.Danielak, B. A., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2014). Marginalized identities of sense-makers:Reframing engineering student retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 8-44.Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. Wiley.EiE (2010). Available on-line at www.mos.org/eie/.Ellis, G. W., & Thornton, K. (2011). Using cognitive tools to engage the imagination and framelearning in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Applications and Practices in EngineeringEducation, 2(1).Ellis, G.W. & Thornton, K. (2011). Preparing Engineers for Innovation
. R., Lewandowski, H. J., & Stetzer, M. R. (2017).Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting ofelectric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020116.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020116[7] Mataka, L. M., & Kowalske, M. G. (2015). The influence of PBL on students’ self-efficacybeliefs in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 929–938.https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00099H[8] Adams, B., Jorgensen, S., Arce-Trigatti, A., & Arce, P. (2020). Innovative CurriculumDesign for Enhancing Learning in Engineering Education: The Strategies, Principles andChallenges of An Inquiry-Guided Laboratory. 8127–8135.https://doi.org/10.21125
mechanics, structural engineering, and introduction to engineering courses and enjoys working with his students on bridge related research projects and with the ASCE student chapter. His research interests include engineering licensure policies, civil engineering curriculum development, and the use of innovative materials on concrete bridges.Dr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, Northern Arizona University Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an associate professor of structural engineering at Northern Arizona University. ©American Society for Engineering
; Jaugietis, Z., Developing peer mentoring through evaluation. Innovative HigherEducation, 36(1). 41-52 (2011).[8] Astin, A. W., Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of CollegeStudent Development, 40(5), 518-529 (1999).[9] Chester, A., Burton, L. J., Xenos, S., & Elgar, K. Peer mentoring: Supporting successful transition forfirst year undergraduate psychology students. Australian Journal Of Psychology, 65(1), 30-37 (2013).
Model Something Old “Go-to” people and the Traditional people who possess organizational knowledge and respect. People who lead initiatives in their field. Something New You will have to move out of Non-Traditional your traditional circles to find these mentors. They are people who are extremely innovative and do things in ways that appeal to you although you
engineering practices may be taught effectively [12]. Informal STEM education may serveas a model for traditional classroom structures since instructors in informal settings havepioneered ways in which engineering design might be adapted for formal science teaching. Theseinclude interventions designed and taught by university engineering faculty to promote interest inengineering among middle and high school students [13-18]. However, just as classroomteachers may struggle with implementing STEM integration [19-20], university engineeringfaculty and instructors also encounter challenges in their instructional innovations that requirerevised approaches [21]. The present study examines the nature of instructional decision makingin response to students