career ambassadors led twofirst-year-specific resume workshops early in the semester to build confidence and developresumes that could be used for participation in career fairs and networking events. Using an MSTeams virtual student community for the course, student career ambassadors sent out remindersfor career fairs and announcements for upcoming engagement activities.Evaluation MethodThe program is evaluated through an end-of-semester quantitative tool that informsprogrammatic implementation. Qualitative data, such as student feedback and reflections, arecollected to assess the impact of the program on students' career engagement and professionaldevelopment. The tool and procedure for this effort are ongoing and will be completed over
. The research group has expanded access to systems research to a broader group of students, many of whom have continued in the field. The assessment revealed that students are benefitting from the knowledge acquired and exchanged within the research group. This report is designed to share approaches we have implemented thus far, outcomes, and a reflection on areas for future improvement. KeywordsUndergraduate research, diversity, inclusion, computer systems, practical skills, high impactpractices. 1 IntroductionThe field of computer systems has a woefully low representation of women and people ofcolor. Our research team is designed to broaden participation in computer systems byproviding a positive undergraduate research experience. Early
; accomplishments by the teamand partners (including growth of the project’s PI); and lessons learned throughout the project.The fidelity and impact of Project COMPLETE’s efforts were assessed by an external evaluator,AROS Consulting. The primary intended outcomes were to a) develop and market twopost-secondary academic and career pathways for instrumentation technicians in ruralcommunities of North Louisiana, b) reach a total of 26 high school teachers/counselors and their500 students, increasing awareness of engineering technology career pathways, and c) expandthe student pipeline into Ruston, Louisiana’s two post-secondary instrumentation technologyprograms, thereby increasing enrollment in each program. Results and evaluation of the projectare
manufacturing needs within the supply chains and remove barriers between academia and industry.Camryn E Reitz (Undergraduate Student Researcher)Winifred Opoku Engineering Education PhD Student | The Ohio State University Research Assistant | Ohio Manufacturing Institute © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Impact of the Industrial Advisory Board on the Governance of Engineering Technology ProgramsAbstractAn assessment of engineering technology bachelor’s degree program governance models hasbeen initiated to determine rules of operation and engagement in the development and operationof these degreed programs. The
physical therapy and rehabilitation, developing the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering pedagogy, and performance assessment alternatives. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Enhancing Student Engagement in Engineering Materials Science using KEEN Mindset in Laboratory ActivitiesAbstractThis paper describes modifications made in a Materials Science course at Ohio NorthernUniversity to incorporate six collaboratives, KEEN-based, active-learning techniques. Theformat of the modules structures the course to improve student understanding of the four aspectsof the material science tetrahedron: structure, properties
by following continued student participation, and attainment ofthe technical skills described above. Student comments also illustrate how curiosity in the subjectmatter grew, greater self-discovery by working with a diverse team emerged, and strengthenedconfidence through effective problem-solving. In combination, these reflections are earlyevidence that the experiential learning platform created by this partnership will better preparestudents for collegiate engineering programs. The impact of different structured experiences willbe assessed by exit interviews of the high school and college students to determine whether thepartnership effectively met the stated objectives.Our next steps are to introduce students to additional technical areas
) • Favorable benefit/risk analysis: With inherent internal and external risks, as well as ethical considerations, associated with most cybersecurity research projects, the risk-to-rewards must be assessed and deemed acceptable. (Policy 2.6.1, 2.9.2, and 2.10, Application I.6 and II.12) • Appropriate training: The principal investigators, including faculty of record, need to be aware of the expectations of the policy and its implications for them. To ensure cybersecurity-related research studies, projects, and course assignments comply with the RELLIS Academic Alliance Cybersecurity Policy, applicable laws, and System regulations, all participants are required to successfully complete training for
actionable consensus. We designed arole-play scenario that places students on a university task force that is evaluating the adoption orrejection of facial recognition technologies (FRT) to track and identify the COVID-19 reportingstatus of students, faculty, staff, and visitors. Students were asked to prepare and then participatein role-play discussions which were then assessed for learning. The data supporting this researchcomes from the role-play discussion transcripts of 86 first-year engineering students whoparticipated in four sections of an undergraduate engineering concepts class during Fall 2020.Our findings show that students successfully identified a breadth of ethical issues, dilemmas, andtopics related to the use of FRT on campus. In
engineering and computational thinking is formalized in ‘TheTaxonomy of Engineering Education Research’ in which these skills are included in the studentoutcome category [14,15]. In a recent study, Diaz et al., 2020, employed the EngineeringComputational Thinking Diagnostic to assess the development of computational thinking skillsin one course for first year engineering students that included computational thinking topics. Theauthors found that the first-year engineering course did result in engineering studentssignificantly increasing their computational thinking skills. This study suggests the importance ofcomputational thinking in undergraduate engineering education. Therefore, we also argue thatthe integration of CT is relevant for pre-college
purposes of this study, onlypost-semester data was used. Questions from post-surveys that were analyzed include: ● Engineering Identity: Adapted from the Engineering Identity Survey developed by Chachra et al., which assesses the degree of participants’ group identification with engineers (source of 8 items) [15] ● Engineering Team Satisfaction: Developed by course faculty to assess the degree of students’ satisfaction with their team (5 items)For Likert-style questions, data was aggregated and analyzed into three categories (Strongly Agreeand Agree; Somewhat Agree, Neutral or Somewhat Disagree; and Strongly Disagree andDisagree) for comparison purposes. Percentages and number of respondents are used to illustratestudent attitudes
connections, create value, and ignite curiosity.EML focuses on students' mind and skillset development, preparing them to identify problemsand solve them in innovative ways. The overall goal of implementing EML in engineeringcourses is to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. This is essential in entrepreneurial education asthis mindset of personal success coupled with engineering skills generates unprecedented valuefor others. Research indicates that academic goals can be assessed through learning outcomesthat measure academic and individual development [8]. Literature assessments have dividedlearning outcomes into three measurable categories or learning domains. Category one isconcerned with cognitive characteristics or the ability to evaluate
interest.A third example that parallels the work of PTE changes is a group of faculty senate committeescharged with revising NDSU’s policy on assessment of teaching to require that information beconsidered beyond student course evaluations. While student input provides importantinformation, additional sources of data from peers and the instructor themselves were deemedessential for a holistic understanding of teaching effectiveness. These efforts also led to twoadditional committees during the eight-year process to revise the campus-wide courseevaluations to further decrease bias in the assessment of teaching.A fourth, and most recent, example of our active engagement in policy work is an ad-hoc committee that developed recommendations for support
, graduate school enrollment,post-graduation employment, community engagement, positive campus climate, and supportprograms as indicators of a Latinx-serving identity (Garcia, 2017). Figure 2: Garcia’s HSI organizational identity typology (Garcia, 2017) Garcia’s evaluative framework has been widely used to assess the efforts of HSIs as theycontinue to emerge across the nation. However, literature is limited in its application ofservingness to other types of universities and to specific departments/colleges. Garcia’s studyproved that a Latinx-serving identity includes community engagement, however, communityengagement has also been found to be pivotal in STEM education across the board (Jamieson,Oakes, & Coyle, 2002
students. Approximately 700 students take the second-semester course, Introductionto Computing and Problem-Solving, annually across fourteen sections. Course deliveries rangefrom face-to-face, online synchronous, hyflex, and hybrid. Students learn to problem-solveusing MATLAB©. Additionally, the successful implementation of auto-graded assignmentsthrough an integrated Zybooks© and MATLAB© Grader environment provides real-timefeedback for students and supports a mastery-based assessment approach to learning weeklycontent. Because of a significant support structure integrated into the course by undergraduateteaching assistants (UTA), additional student success workshops had not been needed. However,in response to a significant drop in student
, college course for STEM students. Ifthe book or course included programming, the approach relied on existing simulators which donot necessarily challenge students to grapple with the underlying theory. We are choosing a morepractical approach in our courses by having students learn the theory and concurrently code theirown quantum computer simulator from the ground up.At Loyola University Maryland, undergraduate students have the opportunity to do researchduring the summer and academic year. During Summer 2021, the authors collaborativelymentored two undergraduate students, one majoring in physics and the other in computerscience. Our observations and assessment of this summer research effort served as the genesisfor the proposed
which we attempted to capture the effect ofthe intervention on all students, including male and female students. We first conducted aone-way ANOVA to assess if our manipulation was effective and if the relatability differedamong the two conditions. One-way ANOVA was also used to see if the three entrepreneurialself-concepts (entrepreneurial intrinsic motivation, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, andentrepreneurial identity aspiration) were different between conditions. Second, following thepreregistration, we conducted an OLS regression with robust standard errors. The independentvariable (relatable condition) is set to 1 if they watched the relatable video and 0 if participantswatched the unrelatable video. Lastly, we conducted an additional
effectively communicate the results of the design effort through a professionalengineering report and oral presentation. The design project will include material within andbeyond the curriculum as well as technical and non-technical considerations. Design projectsoften result in a deliverable prototype. As part of the course requirements and assessment of thestudents in the course, each student must: • Submit their engineering notebook weekly for assessment. • Attend weekly project meetings. • Provide evidence of completion of various design, construction, testing, and system integration milestones throughout the semester. • Participate in and develop content for presentations and poster sessions. • Submit a summative technical
Paper ID #37449Active Duty and Veteran Pathways to Engineering Higher EducationDr. Robert J. Rabb, P.E., Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focuses on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curric- ula, and educational outcomes veteran and active duty students.Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S
Professoriate. MiguelAndr´es’s research includes sustainable infrastructure design and planning, smart and resilient cities, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice is a concept that should always be involved in discussions on infrastructure. Related to STEM education, Miguel Andr´es is in developing and applying contemporary pedagogies for STEM courses, teaching empathy studies in engineering as a tool for innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently, MiguelAndr´es is validating his
meetings were in addition to the regular weeklymeetings attended by all students in the biomedical engineering REU program, and in whicheach student presented every week.Data Collection MethodsTo assess changes in participants’ self-efficacy due to the REU program, all REU participantswere asked to complete a pre-program survey and a post-program survey. Both surveys had thesame set of questions, which had Likert scale responses [3]. For example, students were asked,“How confident are you in the following skills as a scientist?” and given a list of skills alongwith the choices “not at all confident”, “a little confident”, “kind of confident”, “confident”, and“very confident”. The survey was administered by the University of Nebraska
learning tools that are provided to students to allowhands-on learning experiences at students’ own chosen environment and time. Problem- andProject-based Learning approaches are utilized to achieve student learning outcomes and equipthe students with the problem-solving skills necessary to succeed in STEM fields. Team-basedprojects engage students from multiple disciplines and demographics to collaborate on projects,make individual contributions, and integrate their work with that of their team members. Generalfeedback from students has been positive. Assessment of student performance also demonstratesthe effectiveness of IoT-based learning in engineering and computer science disciplines.IntroductionInternet of Things (IoT) based projects and
of the changes made in senior senior growth survey design as well as other parts of the curriculum on students’ professional thinking and skills, a pre-post assessment was developed [3], [4]. Product - senior growth To be disseminated. survey Support student clubs Supporting student group activities was important to keep Enhance the community connected [5]. extracurricular Offer social events (with Social events help
person and remotely is to usean online virtual environment [6]. This project combines Internet accessible written materials,videos, and a virtual industrial control system (ICS). All materials are available free of chargeand the virtual ICS can be downloaded and run locally or used as cloud hosted service.The training scenarios included in this project have successfully been taught to high schoolstudents, two-year college students, four-year college students and professionals currentlyworking in advanced manufacturing organizations. The training has been delivered as remoteindependent learning and in a traditional instructor led lecture format. Collected assessment datahas shown that students’ knowledge of the learning outcomes has increased
to engage in undergraduate research.• Monthly cohort meetings to build community, while providing information on academic opportunities, campus resources, and health and well-being.• Interventional advising to provide advice and counsel for students having any acute problems.• Social opportunities to build friendships and generate a sense of community.Based on the program assessment:• Three cohorts of students have been admitted to the PTG program for a total of 38 undergraduate students (58% rural, 68% underrepresented minority (URM), 40% female). The recruitment goals were met and URM and rural students were much more heavily represented than the general UA STEM population (URM 68% vs 19%, rural 58% vs. 15%).• In
) mentoringthrough partnerships and peer groups. Connected social and cultural experiences were designedto connect students with new educational possibilities, enhance student perspectives, build apeer-support community, and provide students with a chance to explore options for theiracademic and career pathways in an intellectually supportive and culturally enrichedenvironment. Opportunities and experiences for students were designed to encourage interest andexcitement about the engineering field and to help students see themselves as engineeringstudents.Methods Program training effectiveness and student experiences were evaluated through studentskill assessments, student engagement observations, formative and summative participantsurveys, training
: Mechanical engineering and product design undergraduate studentsparticipate in two experimental sessions. In the first session, they complete multiple behaviorallearning tasks and individual differences assessments; in the second session, they undergo afunctional magnetic resonance imaging scan (fMRI) while completing a computerized learningtask, as well as two design tasks using a drawing tablet compatible for the brain imagingenvironment. Participants’ thought processes are also captured through concurrent verbalprotocols during the scan that are obtained using an MRI-compatible noise-cancelingmicrophone.During the first session, participants’ learning preferences are recorded by means of the FunctionLearning Task. During the second brain imaging
Likert-type scale in the MSLQ. On the other hand,the Littman and Spielberger assessment tool evaluates the level of curiosity in students (11). Thistool consists of two categories: Epistemic Curiosity and Perceptual Curiosity. Epistemic Curiosity(EC) is motivated by the desire to learn, gather knowledge, and fill gaps in one's understanding. Incontrast, Perceptual Curiosity (PC) results in enhanced perceptual experiences for the individual.The assessment tool utilizes a 4-point Likert-type scale. A 6 items 5-scale Likert was used tocollect responses on perceptions of the use of devices, a 4 items 5-scale Likert was also used tocollect responses on perception of learners about the pedagogy. A descriptive analysis is performedto determine the
Paper ID #39562Board 342: Moving Toward Transdisciplinary Learning Around Topics ofConvergence: Is it really Possible in Higher Education Today?Dr. Greg J. Strimel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Greg J. Strimel, Ph.D., is an associate professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation and program lead for the Design and Innovation Minor at Purdue University. Dr. Strimel conducts research on design pedagogy, cognition, and assessment as well as P-12 engineering/technology teaching and learning.Douglas Edward PruimDeana LucasDr. Todd Kelley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd R. Kelley is an Associate Professor in Technology
administers its own exam assessing pre-Calculus concepts at the beginning of the spring semester freshman year, and again at the beginning of thespring semester sophomore year. The results of the assessment exams are used formatively to advisestudents to improve their math skills by getting tutoring help and alerting EE instructors about whichstudents may need extra math help.Self-efficacy through project-based hands-on learning: Studies [2, 13, 14] have found that project-based, hands-on learning, when done correctly, increases self-efficacy. All but one BFCIT EE class has alaboratory component where students perform, either individually or as a team, hands-on exercises andprojects that engage students in understanding the theoretical concepts
where all teachers presented theirdeveloped learning modules and lesson plans. Mentors and teachers were able to ask questionsand share ideas to help improve each module development.Challenges and OpportunitiesThe pandemic posed challenges of in-class observation during academic-year follow-up, whenschools are closed to outside visitors. We observed a few of the lesson delivery virtually andprovided feedback to the teachers. However, we were not able to fully assess studentengagement. Teachers has found it challenging to disseminate the developed lesson plans via theTeachEngineering website due to their template requirements not being the norm for mostparticipants. However, we can share completed lesson plans via our website, and plan to