Paper ID #34016Using Motivational Theory to Implement S-STEM Activities SupportingStudent SuccessDr. Tris Utschig, Kennesaw State University Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is Director for Scholarly Teaching in the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) and is Associate Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Kennesaw State University. For- merly, he was Assistant Director for CETL and the Office of Assessment at Georgia Tech, and prior to that was a tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig consults with faculty across the university about bringing scholarly teaching
student’s progress, and support employer partners, allowing the educator to be an active partner as the virtual internship unfolds.In addition to the technology enhancement, the intervention includes an employer project library,four virtual internship structures that educators can use as a baseline and customize, a resourcelibrary that includes marketing materials, template syllabi, assessment outlines, rubrics, and aprofessional development program.The employer project libraryIn the early stages of the research project, it became evident that the design of the project thatstudents worked on during their virtual internship was critical to the success of the virtualinternship for educators, employer partners, and students. If the project did
wide-band noise interferers will be created to assess noise-mitigation strategies.2.2.2 Collaboration on Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) at VTThe WSU and VT PIs, as well as an WSU IT professional and non-traditional MS student, arecollaborating to organize an undergraduate project around the range and related topics, withmuch-appreciated but limited support from the Virginia Space Grant Consortium and volunteerstudent effort. Over 50 students responded to the initial announcement of the project, whichcurrently involves over 20 VT (VT) undergraduates. These students are taking initial steps tobuild, test, and enhance an antenna range based on the design developed by faculty and studentsat WSU. Initial work at VT is building on a second
rule-based approach wouldbe in identifying the most common misconceptions found in a writing exercise requiring a studentto speculate on the change in the power in the elements of a resistive circuit with a change to asingle resistor value. An open-source NLP rule-based matching engine within spaCy [3] was used.The corpus consisted of one hundred and eighty-five unique responses to the question. Precision,recall, and F1-score [4] were used to assess the effectiveness of the rule-based NLP pipeline incomparison to that of a subject matter expert in identifying responses exemplifying sevenmisconceptions. Should this NLP pipeline be used in a system in which feedback is to be given tothe student, a Directed Line of Reasoning (DLR) approach [5
University Dr. Ruth S. Ochia is a Professor of Instruction with the Bioengineering Department, Temple Univer- sity, Philadelphia, Pa. Her past research interests have included Biomechanics, primarily focusing on spine-related injuries and degeneration. Currently, her interests are in engineering education, curriculum development, and assessment at the undergraduate level. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Introduction:There has been much work on the development of entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students.[1,4,5] These studies emphasize the needs to train our students to be innovative and entrepreneurialminded to meet the changing technological
: The Role of TerrapinSTRONG in Fostering a Sense of Belonging and Sociocultural Competence in New Engineering StudentsAbstractThe purpose of this work-in-progress paper is to describe the development and assessment of anew onboarding program designed for all incoming first-year and transfer engineering students atthe A. James Clark School of Engineering (Clark School) at the University of Maryland.TerrapinSTRONG has the following overarching goals: ● Cultivate a sense of community, sense of belonging, and connectedness amongst students in the Clark School; and ● Develop an appreciation for and understanding of diversity and inclusion.There are several components and attributes of TerrapinSTRONG in which incomingengineering
, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)analysis performed as part of a self-study conducted in December 2020. The study included H-AGEP fellows, CCNY and UTEP participant faculty, dissertation advisors, and CC facultymentors. The lessons learned provide important feedback for program improvement as well asinformation to teams who may be interested in developing alliances and collaborations with similargoals. A key result of the assessment is the value that CC partners bring in supporting teachingtraining and in providing a positive perspective on careers at community college to theparticipating doctoral students.The paper presents a brief summary of the H-AGEP model. Then it summarizes the findings fromthe self-study and concludes with the lessons learned
skillset to accomplish educational outcomes. The entrepreneurial mindset is basedupon the 3C’s: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value, and the engineering skillset includesthree categories: opportunity, design, and impact. The skills included within the opportunitycategory are identify an opportunity, investigate the market, create a preliminary business model,evaluate technical feasibility, customer value, societal benefits, and economic viability, testconcepts quickly via customer engagement, and assess policy and regulatory issues. The skillsincluded within the design category include determine design requirements, perform technicaldesign, analyze solutions, develop new technologies, create a model or prototype, and validatefunctions. The
engineering design teams. We use ExperientialLearning Theory and Social Cognitive Career Theory to assess the proposed intervention. Wepredict that the improv intervention will increase psychological safety and sense of belonging onthe team and in engineering, which in turn will impact student expectations of success in theengineering and intent to remain in the field; this may lead to increased persistence in the field ofengineering. This work has implications for creating positive engineering team dynamics,building more effective engineering teams, and increasing persistence in engineering, especiallyamong groups traditionally underrepresented in the field.1.0 IntroductionTeamwork has been increasingly used in engineering education to develop
agentsand lets researchers assess the agents’ effects on the system as a whole. Creating a model capableof simulating student and group interactions means researchers can introduce various factors intothe model and assess how the group dynamics alter as a result. Such results would provideinsight into what factors are beneficial or detrimental for group progress. The authors haveidentified several key components considered influential on student success in the IBL course:group size, time devotion, project connection, team citizenship, and learning outcomes. Theseinputs were randomly assigned to agents within the modeling system. Simulations were thenperformed, data collected, and team progress assessed.To determine the model’s accuracy, core
Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education division at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in prac- tice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering dis- ciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and Communica- tion Engineering from India.Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan Jacqueline Handley is a graduate student at the University of Michigan, in Science Education. Her back
design projects. A third area was strong evidence that more emphasis onworking collaboratively was needed – including teamwork as well as a focus on ensuring lessprepared students had the same learning opportunities to contribute to labs and projects. Thefourth area was data from students indicating communication, especially writing, in engineeringcontexts needed more emphasis. Upon reflection, these various areas were seen to convergearound engineering systems, particularly how they are designed and evaluated.These areas were identified from multiple program assessments that included direct, rubric-basedassessment in capstone design which indicated a lack of understanding of the systemic nature ofdesign. A program-wide survey adapted from James
Paper ID #32920Alumni Reflect on Their Education About Ethical and Societal IssuesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students
Engineering educationAbstractThis paper falls under evidence-based practice analyzing the effectiveness and usefulness ofAugmented Reality (AR) in engineering education practices via a mobile device and includes thedesign and implementation rationale of the AR-based mobile tool and its assessment through asurvey. Researchers have claimed that traditional education needs to be supplemented withinnovative tools and suggested that AR-based education enhanced learning. AR can beparticularly helpful in learning about the structures of complex models. The use of complexphysical equipment/replicas poses a challenge in teaching due to their cost, limited quantity,accessibility, and safety issues. Therefore, AR app-based learning using easily
Management and an M.S. in Public Administration. She completed her Ed.D. in Educational Leadership and Innovation focusing on broadening STEM participation amongst underrepresented populations. Her interests include advisor development and assessment along with student retention and persistence. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Common and Uncommon Characteristics of Engineering Student Retention after the First Year in University Nong Ye, Ting Yan Fok, James Collofello, and Tami Coronella Arizona State UniversityAbstractThis paper presents new research and findings about common
may lead to experimentation outside the classroom. This approachalso proved very helpful when all classes were held virtually online due to the COVID-19pandemic. The author hopes that this information will help faculty and staff from otherinstitutions take a similar approach to measurements, DAQ, and experimentation in order to helpstudents learn about computer interface, programming, and GUI development.2. SyllabusThis course is offered at several campuses in PSU as part of the BS in EMET degree program. Afaculty curricular committee with two representatives from each of the four (now five) campusesmeets once a month to discuss curricular changes, assessment, etc. as related to the BS in EMETprogram. The committee considered a major
students at the start of the semester and participates in the presentationand critiques of the design. Real-world considerations for the project include: • Code analysis (e.g. IBC, FGI, NFPA, etc.) and allowances, zoning and parking evaluation • Program and methods development building square-foot vs. construction type • Fire protection planning: egress, emergency lighting and signage • Plumbing fixture count • ADA considerations • Stormwater management • Life cycle assessment (embodied carbon) • High performance envelope performance requirements • Resiliency (extreme weather events) • Flexibility, versatility, and diversity • Prefabrication Objective 4 utilizes the healthcare focused
could be used not only in EEG studies, but also for demonstrations in coursesor other educational purposes. One of the ways that EEGs have been used in educational studies is in the assessment ofstudents’ attention. The results of these experiments could be used to provide feedback toinstructors during remote learning activities, or to test the efficacy of new teaching methods.EEG signals can be divided into 5 frequency domains: delta (0.5 – 4Hz), theta (4 – 8Hz), alpha(8 – 14Hz), beta (14 – 30Hz), and gamma waves (> 30Hz). Ko et al. [1], Talalay et al. [2] andRihs et al. [3] were able to demonstrate that measurable changes in brain wave patterns occurduring periods of attention. Ko showed that during sustained attention tasks
in the course. Students’ success will be evaluated using the grades onindividual assessments and the overall grades in the course, and students’ satisfaction will bemeasured through a survey.Introduction:Additive Manufacturing via 3D printing has been a focus of curriculum development for years.Many colleagues within ASEE have published works on the value of incorporating AdditiveManufacturing into our coursework [1], [2]. This paper will discuss the development of ME 424Additive Manufacturing Laboratory. This is a 1-credit laboratory elective that meets thelaboratory requirements for the Mechanical Engineering program at Penn State Behrend. Thiscourse was developed by the authors of this paper, and this paper will include a review
Newton is currently a Senior Research Scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2013, respectively.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of
freshmen and sophomore years, students completedan adapted version of the Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE) andthe Student Responses to Instructional Practices Instrument (StRIP).Results - Students reported higher levels of engagement and persistence than students at otherinstitutions. These patterns were consistent for both men and women. Gender did not predictpersistence to the beginning of sophomore year, even when controlling for differences in self-efficacy between women and men upon entering the program. Student engagement, as measuredby StRIP, also did not predict persistence.Conclusions - Utilizing an active learning pedagogy in an undergraduate engineering programmay promote equitable persistence to sophomore
conceptualization of engineering design and engineering ethics from differentperspectives. For example, Feister et al. [12] showed that ethics, competency, and knowledge areinterrelated and they are the distinct components of design works. This intercorrelation ofcomponents has been investigated in-depth as to how ethics is combined with engineering designas well as what is covered in ethics (micro/macro ethics), how ethics is assessed and taught inengineering design courses. Leone [13] emphasized the importance of covering professionalethics broadly in design projects that professional engineers would serve as mentors and facultymembers would serve as technical supports. Others have argued that assigning credit or pointsfor an ethics section in design
, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2009.[4] E. A. van Es and M. G. Sherin, “The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 155–176, 2010.[5] D. Levin, D. Hammer, A. Elby, and J. Coffey, Becoming a Responsive Science Teacher:Focusing on Student Thinking in Secondary Science. Arlington, VA.: National Science Teachers Association:, 2013.[6] J. Watkins et al., “Data-based conjectures for supporting responsive teaching in engineering design with elementary teachers,” Science Education, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 548–570, 2018.[7] K. B. Wendell, “The video case diagnosis task: Assessing pre-service teachers’ knowledge of engineering
industryadvisors; these volunteers from industry found it more convenient to connect with studentsvirtually than traveling to meetings. In addition to traditional course assessments, studentscompleted an inclusion survey at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the term.Students felt a greater sense of belonging and inclusion with both their teams and the Departmentat the end of the term.2. Data acquisition courses. The Department combined the electrical engineering andinstrumentation courses into a single two-course sequence in the third year of our newcurriculum. In the old curriculum, students took a circuits course in the winter quarter of theirjunior year and an instrumentation course the following spring quarter. When surveyed, studentswho
the Faculty’s goals and interests. To that end, the committee must propose wherethese programs should be administratively located, guide the development and implementation of theprograms, and assess students’ admissibility to programs when asked. Lastly, the committee is taskedwith planning and facilitating collaborative activities among the Faculty. After the bylaws getapproved for our most recent amendment, we will post them on http://ieei.tamu.edu.Step Seven: Form a representative and balanced executive committee and select a chair and vice-chair. The bylaws state that “The executive committee would consist of seven elected Members ofthe Faculty of Engineering Education (but excluding any faculty member who is enrolled in a degree
hyperplane where all data points lie inside the decision surfaces at adistance 𝜖 from the hyperplane (Smola & Vishwanathan, 2008). Flight Simulation Data RepeatabilityTo assess the repeatability of the flight simulation data, three consecutive flights were performedwith the same UAV model. The test flights were consecutive and used the same flight path fromMission Planner. The flights were conducted at the same location under the same environmentalconditions. Once plotted together, the flight curves should overlap since the simulated flightconditions are identical between flights and no variation due to these simulated conditions isexpected. Once the model is found to be able to provide repeatable results, flight
key inputs for a capital project justification (CJP) proposal 9. Identify project evaluation techniques to include NPV and IRR 10. Assess, calculate, and apply the time value of money 11. Investigate, present, and discuss industry investment alternatives 12. Prepare and present a persuasive oral and written Capital Justification ProposalWhile items 1, 4, and 5 above are course specific, item 10 is the cornerstone of engineeringeconomy, and it is hard to imagine an engineering economy course without items 6 and 9. Items3, 7, 8, and 11 are items which should be most engineering economy courses, and items 8 and 12are why we offer the course. At the awarding of the degree this is where the graduate will usewhat he/she learned. This is
, and monitoring department-level ABET assessment. Her current research interest focus on creating new learning tools to enhance student engagement.Dr. Eric Marsh, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Eric Marsh is the Arthur L. Glenn Professor of Engineering Education and Associate Head for Un- dergraduate Programs. He has worked with departmental colleagues to introduce several new required courses in the mechanical engineering program. He is an ABET program evaluator and leads the ME accreditation effort at Penn State.Dr. Stephen Lynch, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Stephen Lynch is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering and the director of the Experimen- tal and Computational Convection Laboratory at
includes examples of curriculum, discusses case studies of specific studentwork, and analyzes engagement level with various projects with attention to the value of problemsolving and real-world applications to classwork. This paper also includes observations onstudent skill-building, both in terms of technical skills and students’ communication, and data onstudent self-assessment of skills. The paper makes recommendations for future research andinvestigation and proposes methods for implementing similar coursework at other elementaryschools.IntroductionNumerous programs are currently underway to get K-12 students interested in Science,Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM). Some of these efforts are regional and targetlocal community
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The ‘Typical Particle’ Approach to Learning Rigid Body DynamicsAbstractRigid body dynamics is a foundational course in all engineering curricula based upon themechanical sciences. It is one of three courses that make up The Mechanics Project, an effort at alarge R1 university in the southwest, to reimagine the learning experience in the sophomore-levelengineering mechanics courses (statics, dynamics, and deformable solids). The conversion ofthese courses to an objective-based system to assess mastery launched a reconsideration of thefundamental strands—the DNA—of the courses. The design objective of