graduate studentsenrolled in mathematics and computer science were international students [1]. Moreover, thenumber of international students, both at graduate and undergraduate levels, has been increasingannually since 1950 with few exceptions [2]. Besides contributing to the ongoing research and development work at the universities,adding to the cultural diversity on campuses, and contributing to university’s finances throughtuition and other fees, international graduate students play an important role in the undergraduateeducation at US universities by serving as teaching assistants (TAs), especially in STEMdisciplines [3]. These international teaching assistants (ITAs) serve as laboratory assistants,graders for assignments, and
the South- ern Alberta Institute of Technology in 2012. He has been a sessional instructor at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary, where he completed his MSc. in engineering researching engineering education. His roots in industry aided him in the development of curriculum for 3 new courses by aligning industry’s desired competencies for new grads with accreditation criteria and facility constraints. The result was applied education: practical learning activities and hands-on labs that prepared students for the real world and accelerated their time-to-competency once on the job. Connect with Brendon on LinkedIn to start a conversation. c American Society
University of Washington. His research interests include design education and Human-Computer Interaction.Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design Intentions: Engineering students looking ahead to their future design behaviorAbstractIn this paper, we present findings of what students declare as their intention to engage in a designbehavior after they have participated in a classroom exercise. Specifically, we analyzed datafrom 73 students from two different classes in a college of engineering in a large public research-intensive university who participated in a classroom activity that took approximately 50
provides funding 1 for between 12 and 16 students to conduct intensive casestudy research in the Netherlands. Between 2016 and 2018, 42 U.S.- based students participated in theProgram. Each year, 12 to 16 graduate and undergraduate students from participating U.S. campusesare chosen from a diverse applicant pool. Students backgrounds cover a variety of disciplines, includingengineering, planning, economics, hydrology, biology, architecture, and computational hydraulics.Participating students are placed in interdisciplinary research teams composed of 5-6 students: 1-2 PhD,2-3 Masters, and 2-3 undergraduate students, guided by project faculty from both U.S. and the Dutchpartner institutions. Each research team is focused on once case study, which
MIT’s mens et manus (mind and hand) motto and more recent Mind, Hand and Heart wellness program. Makerspaces can be viewed as social worlds with varying degrees of newcomers and old-timers who are engaged in continually shifting relations through their everyday practice ofdesigning and making. Traditional pedagogy is less common in academic makerspaces than inother academic spaces. The norms and practices more closely exemplify Lave and Wegner’sdescription of learning: Learning itself is an improvised practice: A learning curriculum unfolds in opportunities for engagement in practice. It is not specified as a set of dictates for proper practice. […] In apprenticeship, opportunities for learning are, more often than not
currently teaching the undergraduate classes of Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering and Computer Methods in Civil Engineering as well as a newly developed graduate course on Numerical Modeling in Geotechnical Engineering.Dr. S. Immanuel Selvaraj P.E., University of Evansville Dr. Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer.Dr. Dennis J. Fallon, The Citadel Dennis John Fallon is presently Distinguished Professor of Engineering Education at The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BSEE from Old Dominion University (ODU) with honors in 1970, and his MSCE and PhD
-oriented Disciplines (>50% themes classified as Intellectual Merit) (>50% themes classified as Broader Impact) Agricultural and Biological Engineering Chemical Engineering Biomedical Engineering Civil/Environmental Engineering and Ocean Electrical and Computer Engineering Engineering Engineering Physics Materials Science Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering Systems (incl. Industrial) EngineeringFigure 1
thebreakdown of the tasks and subtasks as well as through the information sharing between the tasks.Recalling the earlier definition of design as stated by Gerson (2004), coordination involves bothconnecting two items while also keeping them distinct. Thus, the DKC model should incorporate a levelof distinction between design tasks while also recognizing the interdependent pieces that are required tocontinue toward the workflow. This level of distinction can be maintained by viewing the aircraft as adiscipline-centric system. In creating curriculum for aerospace engineering design, the aircraft is dividedinto disciplines and courses are structured to teach material from within the disciplinary boundary. Forexample, at one institution students complete
receivedassistance.) I did try to clarify that Muddiest Points was for misconceptions in lecture, and evenused examples. Well, it was to no avail. Response was still poor and the students responding ‘allclear’ or ‘no questions’ stopped responding. By mid-semester response was sporadic, yet Idiligently invited students to post! Another note, I had the least amount of email or personalrequests for homework help in many years.How did it affect my teaching? Honestly, I am not sure. The computer survey method was on aworkload level that I could handle and easily integrate into my class. Questions posed inmuddiest points were ‘misconceptions’ I have been aware of and most I had brought to theforefront in class lecture, but going over them in the muddiest points
. Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (examples: computer skills, laboratory skills, data reduction skills, presentation skills) should be willing to pass it on, and/or share it with their group members. Collaborative Skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. These skills include leadership, decision making, trust building, and conflict management. Monitoring Progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals; they also need to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and
the results are those of the group (and for the group). Keeping track of the contribution and knowledge gained by each member could be monitored, as well, by either testing each and every student in the group, or by randomly selecting a group member (or members) to be tested and thus proxy for the group. Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (examples: computer skills, laboratory skills, data reduction skills, presentation skills) should be willing to pass it on, and/or share it with their group members. Collaborative Skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some
. Mr. Groenewald was the CPUT capstone design class coordinator for many years. His main interest, apart from managing his department, is the promotion of STEM education in South Africa and developing sustainable off-grid electricity supply micro-grid models for rural towns in South Africa.Mr. Rhyme Kagiso Setshedi, Cape Peninsula University of Technology Rhyme Setshedi is a physics Phd Candidate and a qualified educator/lecturer in the Department of Elec- trical, Electronic and Computer Engineering (DEECE) at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology in Cape Town South Africa. He has over a decade of teaching experience at tertiary levels and a deep pas- sion for Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM). His
Paper ID #11763Inclusion or Exclusion? The Impact of the Intersection of Team Culture andStudent Identity and Pathway on Team DiversityDr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is an Associate Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Stud- ies at the University of Oklahoma. Her main research focus is diversity in engineering education and introductory software engineering education.Dr. Rui Pan, University of OklahomaMs. Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma Cindy E. Foor is the Associate Director/Research Associate for the Research Institute for STEM Ed- ucation (RISE) at the
Philosophical History for EngineersAbstract Ethics education in the engineering curriculum is required by ABET. This paper presents anunconventional approach to meeting this requirement as surveyed and tested in the aerospaceengineering department of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, with theintention of having a lasting impact on engineering graduates throughout their working career.All professions have common codes of competence, integrity, and intended good will towardshumanity. Often these codes presume internal regulation and constraint to guard against humannature’s self-serving inclinations and proclivities. Here, in addition to relying on studentexposure to and knowledge of a particular
student in the group, or by randomly selecting a group member, or members, to be tested and thus proxy for the group. • Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (examples: computer skills, laboratory skills, data reduction skills, presentation skills) should be willing to pass it on, and/or share it with their group members. • Collaborative Skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. These skills include leadership, decision making, trust building, and conflict management. • Monitoring Progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are
the lives of eight African American middle school aged boys [42], fivethemes emerged relating to contributing factors of success in mathematics: early educationalexperiences, recognition of abilities and how it was achieved, support systems, positivemathematical and academic identity, and alternative identities. Berry [44]reports that Bilal (one ofthe participants) attributes his love of mathematics to experiences he had with his father. Bilal’sfather played and challenged him with mathematics games and puzzles. This support is notunique to fathers, another participant responded that their mother also tested and challenged themmathematically. Other types of tools used by parents include magnetic letters and numbers,educational computer games
Paper ID #17117Tips & Tricks for Successful Implementation of Reflection Activities in Engi-neering EducationDr. Lauren D Thomas, University of WashingtonMania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering Mania Orand is a researcher in the field of Human Computer Interaction at the University of Washington. Her research interests are on using reflection in designing web and mobile technologies, user experience, and digital media.Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of WashingtonDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the
.” Beyond an increase in self-confidence, a few participants expressed increased confidenceand identification with the university administration. For example, after being asked if the NFLCcontributes to his personal and/or professional life, Jerry, an associate professor of practiceresponded, “Yeah. It also gave me confidence in all of our various deans and administratorsaround here.” He continued to explain this confidence came through the organizer’s empathy“towards the new faculty. They already iterated that their desire was for the success of all newfaculty.” Similarly, Karl, an assistant professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering noted thegood intentions of the program development when he stated it “seemed like people who weregenuinely
from the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA. 5. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43 (2), 16-23. 6. Turns, J., Sattler, B., Yasuhara, K., Borgford-Parnell, J. L., & Atman, C. J. (2014). Integrating reflection into engineering education. Proceedings from the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 7. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press. 8. Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic
case can be understood to be those new to a discipline, such as undergraduates.Expert and novice readersPearson, Roehler, Dole, and Duffy [6] focused on developing a curriculum to create expertreaders in any discipline. They compared expert and novice readers with a goal of improvingcomprehension. They noted expert readers: Made connections between new and prior information. Learned to distinguish important from less important ideas in the text. Were able to synthesize information within and across texts. Asked questions of themselves and the authors as they read. Made inferences during and after reading.Brown, Roediger, and McDaniel [5] concurred with these characteristics, noting these types ofactivities
RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project and a CAREER project, FRAME. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, sci- entists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Chen Qiu M.Sc., University of New Mexico Chen
this idea can be found by comparing the statisticson the number of bachelor’s and Master’s degrees awarded in civil engineering (Table 1based on ASEE data, [40]). This ratio has averaged 41% over the previous 10 years(comparing the number of Master’s degrees awarded in civil engineering to the number ofBachelor’s degrees awarded two years prior). By comparison, the average percentage inchemical engineering is 23% (although many students go straight to a PhD), mechanical is32%, and electrical plus electrical/computing has increased from 64% in 2007/08 to 95%in 2015/16 [41]. However, a large percentage of Master’s degrees are awarded tointernational students (who don’t continue to practice in the US) as compared toBachelor’s degrees; across all
: Overwhelmingly, representatives from colleges in Cohort 1 indicated the needand desire to educate students for local and regional workforces ranging from the automotiveindustry to information technology and computer science, to chemical engineering, to name but afew examples. This was often a significant motivator for faculty and college leadership to applyfor NSF-ATE grants. With respect to Cohort 2, interviewees at more than half of the collegesspecifically discussed the needs of local industry or other economic drivers as primary reasonsfor the programmatic expansions pursued as a result of their involvement with the ATE program.The communities in which several of the institutions were located had experienced a shortage ofskilled or specialized
grade just because the engineering schools tend to be smaller and classes are only offered one semester especially if your higher up in the department. So if I would’ve taken a semester off it would mean taking a year off school… the sports medicine said I was getting better and that he thought that taking a leave of absence would be a premature decision….Miranda’s discussion brings in the structural aspects of engineering curriculum and courses thatmade her hesitant to withdraw from the semester after her injury. She goes on to discuss somelevel of continuing challenges in the following term: …moving into the spring semester, I was still a little nervous and I was getting headaches still very frequently. I had an appointment with
Engineering R1 Male Jordan Robert Mechanical Engineering D/PU Male Jordan Frances Biomedical Engineering D/PU Male Jordan Jennifer Secondary Science Education BCD Female Charlie Thomas Mechanical Engineering R1 Male Jordan Adriana Mathematics and Electrical & Computer M1 Female
selecting a group member (or members) to be tested and thus proxy for the group. • Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (examples: computer skills, laboratory skills, data reduction skills, presentation skills) should be willing to pass it on, and/or share it with their group members. • Collaborative Skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. These skills include leadership, decision making, trust building, and conflict management. • Monitoring Progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals; they also need
replied…. “The technicians need a constant supervision and direction because we don’t have standards for each aspect of production for ensuring the quality levels at various stages …..I work out most of the things from my head and from my experience. The technicians are poor in communicating with production and maintenance and they don’t have any previous experience in handling sophisticated equipment and computer. Anyhow we are training them now and they are good learners. We send them to vendor’s exhibitions to know more about the quality and calibration equipment. They do all basic steps in inspection and then I sit with them to make decision and write report and communicate with internal
; Exposition.3. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why undergraduates leavethe sciences. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.4. Brainerd, S. G, & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduatewomen in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369-375.5. Ohland, M. W., Yuhasz, A. G., & Sill, B. L. (2004). Identifying and removing acalculus prerequisite as a bottleneck in Clemson’s general engineering curriculum. Journal ofEngineering Education, 93(3), 253-257.6. Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineeringeducation,” Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.7. Felder, R., Felder, G., & Dietz, E. (2002). The effects
. Page 23.89.7 For this next interview, our focus is on learning more about “who you are” and the experiences that have shaped the way you think, act, and see yourself in the world and in relation to others. To do this effectively we will use pictures, that you own or collect from another source, that represent something important to you. These pictures may be in any form – self-portraits, graphic images, computer generated images, pictures of friends, family, homes, co-workers, projects, favorite places, etc. There are no right or wrong pictures. The pictures we will ask you to provide for this next interview will be held confidential and viewed only by the researchers of this study. The pictures will be used solely for the
-Reference (FERM) Handbook inorder to prepare students for the Fundamentals of Engineering Examination. The reasons for notusing the Supplied-Reference Handbook in the introductory course were two-fold: 1) theSupplied-Reference Handbook provides much more information than the course’s instructorswould like to provide to students in terms of definitions and explanations; and 2) during the fallsemester, the course is taught primarily to non-engineering majors, taking the course to satisfycore curriculum requirements, that have no further use for the Supplied-Reference Handbookafter the course as they will not take the Fundamentals of Engineering Examination.For instructors of Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design, use of the reference