here with reference to these three categories.2.1 Learning Goals for the Design CourseDesign plays a central role in engineering education, giving a capstone experience to integrateand apply prior learning to a large-scale project. A typical process design course achieves a setof learning objectives, including the following components. Attitudes Knowledge Skills • Design is goal oriented, • Process synthesis • Defining and the result must satisfy a • Flowsheeting completing an open- student-prepared • Engineering economics ended project specification • Equipment sizing and
on-going research, only the conceptfor the expert system is presented. The idea is to ask few simple questions to the engineeringstudent while the system takes this information and presents the matching methods. Such anexpert system has various objectives: (1) practicing engineering students can use it as an aidwhen selecting sustainability or creativity design engineering methods, (2) the expert system canalso be used to teach students on how to select methods; this is possible since the expert systemis not only intended to show a final result (i.e. a selected method) but also a summary of theselection reasoning, this is key to educate engineering students as well as practicing engineers,(3) the expert system internally maps methods to
complex systems perspective to investigate how students’ competence is formed through the interaction of learning activities and other influences from the wider educational environment. Prior to this Joachim graduated from the Technische Universität Darmstadt (Germany) a “Diplomingenieur” in Mechanical Engineering. His master’s thesis investigated cognitive aspects of engineering design. This work in collaboration with engineers and psychologists comprised of an analysis of engineering design methods from the point of view of cognitive psychology.David F. Radcliffe, Purdue University DAVID RADCLIFFE is the Epistemology Professor of Engineering Education in the School of Engineering
received a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Kansas State University in 2005. Dr. Yao joined East Carolina University as an Assistant Professor in August, 2005. His research interests include wearable medical devices, telehealthcare, bioinstrumentation, control systems, and biosignal processing. His educational research interests are laboratory/project-driven learning and integration of research into undergraduate education. Dr. Yao is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education and a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Page
Paper ID #43564An Exploration of Conflict Asymmetry in a First-Year Engineering DesignProject TeamVictoria Kerr, University of TorontoDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingMs. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Professor Sheridan is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) and
Learning During aSophomore Design Problem-based Service Learning Experience” International Journal ofService Learning in Engineering, Special Edition, pp. 1-28, Fall 2018.[9] D. R. May, “Student Perceived Value of Intensive Experiential Learning”, InternationalJournal of Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and SocialEntrepreneurship, Vol. 12. No. 1, pp. 1-12, Spring 2017.[10] ABET Engineering Change, An ABET Issue Brief Fall 2017 [Online] Available:http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ABET_Engineering_Issue-Brief_final_web.pdf[11] D. R. Woods, R. M. Felder, and A. Rugarcia, “The Future of Engineering Education III.Developing Critical Skills”, Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 34(2), pp. 108-117, 2000.[12] A
Paper ID #29409Kindergartners’ Engagement in an Epistemic Practice of Engineering:Persisting and Learning from Failure (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple formal and informal settings. As a K- 8 pre-service teacher educator, she
employment practices. I participate in onsite FHWA and FTA EEO Compliance Reviews and serve as the Department’s ADA/504 Coordinator. I conduct/supervise/review internal investigations for all complaints of discrimination filed by Department staff, consultants, and contractors filed against the Department to ensure non-violation of agency policies and procedures. I facilitate mediation sessions to resolve com- plaints at the lowest possible level. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Integrated Approach to Promoting STEM among High School Students (Evaluation) Dr. Bin (Brenda) Zhou, Central Connecticut State UniversityDr. Zhou is an
of Engineering, University of Georgia. She is also a graduate research assistant in Dr. Beshoy Morkos’s Model Group. Xiaoou Yang got her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering in May, 2019 at Florida Institute of Technology and now she is doing her Master’s program at UGA. Her research field is Engineering Education in Design Manufacturing, and she is looking forward to make some friends and collaborate with researchers in the field in the future.Dr. Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. His lab currently performs research in the areas of system design, manufacturing, and their respective education. His
AC 2011-2655: ANALYZING SUBJECT-PRODUCED DRAWINGS: THEUSE OF THE DRAW AN ENGINEER ASSESSMENT IN CONTEXTTirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Arizona State University’s Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. He has bachelors and masters degrees in Computer Science and Engineering and a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction. His research interests include educational research methods, communication of research, and k-16+ engineering education. Ganesh’s research is largely focused on studying k-12 curricula, and teaching-learning processes in both the formal and informal settings. He is principal investigator of the Information Technology
Paper ID #37110Accredited Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Education at PUIsDr. Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel Stephanie Laughton is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. She received her Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. Her bachelor’s degree, in the same field, is from Duke University. Laughton’s research interests include environmental nanotechnology, sustainability, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Accredited Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Education at PUIs
Paper ID #16789Social Consciousness in Engineering Students: An Analysis of Freshmen De-sign Project AbstractsMaya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at
Head in the Drexel University Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, and an Associate Dean of the College of Engineering, Co-Director of the A. J. Drexel Nanotechnology Institute, an affiliated member of the Materials Engineering Department, a member of the Center for Educational Research, and his research focuses on the area of nanophotonics. He is the recipient of a NASA New Investigator Award, the Drexel Graduate Student Association Outstanding Mentor Award, the Drexel University ECE Outstanding Research Achievement Award and the International Liquid Crystal Society Multimedia Prize. In 2003, he received a NASA/ASEE Summer Faculty Fellowship to research NEMS/MEMS adaptive optics in
? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education 94, 41-55 (2005).2. Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T. & Volkwein, J.F. Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000, (ABET, Baltimore, MD, 2006).3. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. Understanding the Millenials: Updating Our Knowledge About Students. Reference Service Review 32, 356-366 (2004).4. Brophy, J. & Bawden, D. Is Google Enough? Comparison of an Internet Search Engine with Academic Resources. New Information Perspectives 57, 498-512 (2005).5. Denick, D., Bhatt, J. & Layton, B. Citation Analysis of Engineering Design Reports for Information Literacy Assessment. in 2010 American Society for Engineerin Education Annual Conference &
. Sanjeev Bedi P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Sanjeev Bedi is the Director of the Engineering Ideas Clinic. He earned his PhD from the University of Victoria in 1987. As a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, his research focus is machining, and he is well known for developing innovative 5-axis tool-positioning and flank- milling techniques. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Design Days: Engaging Students with Authentic Problem- Solving in an Academic HackathonAbstractThis paper describes the evidence-based use of a hackathon model to address student learningoutcomes in first-year Engineering programs
products will be used to look at studentmisconceptions about the engineering design process and student design learning processes. Asa result of the alpha test, pilot study, and student input, future plans include adding an equationeditor and a mouse drawing tool for sketches; there will also be continued module development,adding more online content each semester.Bibliography1. Starfield, A.M., K.A. Smith, and A. L. Bleloch, How to Model It: Problem Solving for the Computer Age, (Burgess International Group, 1994).2. Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M, “Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes.” Journal of Engineering Education (April 1998), 87, No.2, 121-132.3. Sobek, D.K., “Preliminary
- tivities. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. In addition to his doctoral work, Robert is also a Graduate Facilitator with the Center for Socially Engaged Design and an Engineering Teaching Consultant with the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education
andInformation Literacy, Design, and Designed World [18]. The latest version, the Ohio LearningStandards in Technology (2017), was evolved from various phases as it was passed through anAdvisory Committee, Working Group, and the Ohio Education Department. Using resourcessuch as the International Society for Technology in Education Standards (ISTE), theInternational Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA) Standards, theAustralian Curriculum Technologies Content Descriptions (ACARA), and Ohio’s LearningStandards, the current Ohio standards seek to “instill in students a broad, rich understanding oftechnology and its effective use and role in their world -- an understanding they need to becometechnology-literate citizens” [19].Contrasting
. Competence in mathematics – more than mathematical skills? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 38(7), 2007, pp. 881-890.15. Du Preez, J,; Steyn, T & Owen, R. Mathematical preparedness for tertiary mathematics – a need for focused intervention in the first year? Submitted to Perspectives in Education, 2008.16. Auck, C., Place, R. & Sansing, M. A first course in programming. The Logo Foundation, NY 1990.17. Lawson, A.E. Science teaching and development thinking, Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, Belmont, USA, 2002, p. 60.18. McKeachie, W.J. Teaching tips. Strategies, research an theory for college and university teachers. Houghton
Paper ID #12151Just-in-Time Support: An Evidence-Based Academic-Student Affairs Part-nership to Enable Engineering Student SuccessDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University Edward Berger is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, having joined Purdue in August 2014. Prior to that, he was the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Virginia, where this initiative took place.Mrs. Lisa Lampe, University of Virginia Lisa Lampe is the Director of Undergraduate Success in the University of
eight courses taught in the profiled higher education makerspace, threedesign-focused instructional methods are presented that integrate course instruction, skilldevelopment, knowledge acquisition, and client-based problem solving by student teams. Thesemethods have been applied across all four undergraduate years in courses closely aligned withbiomedical engineering, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and engineering asa whole (for an introductory course). The courses span design education across the typical gapbetween cornerstone and capstone design courses. In all cases, the specific role of the highereducation makerspace in enhancing the value of these courses is demonstrated.IntroductionThe establishment of higher education
Paper ID #43229Equitable Computing Education ˜Dr. Manuel A. P´ rez-Quinones, University of North Carolina e Dr. Manuel A. P´ rez Qui˜ ones is a Professor of Software and Information Systems at UNC at Charlotte. e n His research interests include diversity issues in computing, CS education, and human-computer interaction. He currently serves on the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering and Medicine at the National Academies and served as Program Officer at the National Science Foundation. His efforts to diversify computing have been recognized with an ACM
at Chicago B.S. Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Introductory Overview of Strategies used to Reduce Attrition in Engineering ProgramsIntroductionThe United States requires qualified engineers for economic growth and prosperity. However,student retention is a challenge that faces engineering education. Reports from US universitiesshow that student retention rates in engineering are in the range of 40-60% with attrition being awell-known issue1,2,3.Studies concluded that inadequate teaching techniques and students’ lack of identification withtheir field of study also resulted in them discontinuing their degree program4. Additionally
Paper ID #38062Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structuresthat Limit Access to Engineering Education throughNarrativesAutumn CuellarBrady Edward WebsterSakshi SolankiCatherine Mcgough Spence (Assistant Professor)Marissa Tsugawa Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Their research interest is in neurodivergence and how it manifests in engineering education. Past work includes exploring motivation and identity of engineering graduate students, women of color's experiences on engineering teams, and experiences around LGBTQ+ advocacy in
volunteered with Page 24.794.9outreach activities that give K-‐12 students an opportunity to explore engineering, such as the weeklong Summer Experience in Science and Engineering for Youth, which focuses on giving girls and minority high school students hands-‐on engineering laboratory experience. Panelist Question 2: From your perspective, what is the greatest challenge ahead for diversifying STEM in the academy? Panelist 1: The largest challenge is educating the general populace on the societal impact and
—Narratives of Identity in Figured Worlds.,” International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 977–996, 2021.[22] N. Sulaiman and H. AlMuftah, “A Qatari perspective on women in the engineering pipeline: an exploratory study.,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 507–517, 2010.[23] F. Adely, “Decolonizing our questions/decolonizing our answers.,” Gender & Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 452–457, 2019.[24] N. Aswad, G. Vidican, and D. Samulewicz, “Creating a knowledge-based economy in the United Arab Emirates: realising the unfulfilled potential of women in the science, technology and engineering fields.,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 6
example, to what extent are faculty aware of how well students are (or are not) achieving target outcomesvia capstones projects?To build on the results of this study, future work is needed to broaden the research scope and perspective toinclude non-accredited programs, journal articles related to multidisciplinary engineering education, andconsider the multidisciplinary as not only an independent variable but also a dependent variable, including tofocus more on the outcomes of programs, projects, and students.References[1] National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10999[2] American Society for Engineering
AC 2012-4630: INCORPORATING SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES INTO ANUNDERGRADUATE CORROSION COURSEDr. Harovel G. Wheat, University of Texas, Austin Harovel G. Wheat has a B.A. in Chemistry from University of Colorado, a M.S. in metallurgy from the University of Denver, and a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas, Austin. Wheat is a faculty member in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas, Austin, since 1986. Page 25.763.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Incorporating Sustainability Issues into an Undergraduate Corrosion
together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research (pp. 109-150). Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.4 Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582-600.5 Weaver-Hightower, M.B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153-167.6 Heaslip, G., Sharif, A. M., & Althonayan, A. (2012). Employing a systems-based perspective to the identification of inter-relationships within Humanitarian Logistics. International Journal of Production Economics.7 Institute of Industrial Engineers. Web. Mar. 22, 2013. http://www.iienet2.org/Details.aspx?id=2828 Hazelrigg, G. A
Aerospace Engineering from UF where his thesis, Reliability Analysis of SwampSat, focused on performing reliability analyses on SwampSat, UF’s first CubeSat. His experiences and as the project manager with SwampSat lead to an internship at NESTRA (Japan) where he worked on developing system diagrams and test procedures as well as assembly integration and testing of their three microsatellites that were in development. In addition to his Ph.D. work, Bungo is the project coordinator for Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE) program on multiphase fluid science and technologies at the UF’s Chemical Engineering Department funded by the National Science Foundation. As the PIRE project coordinator, he