possible about how the institution is handling reports of sexual harassment, such as by providing annual report.• Assess Climate: Utilize climate surveys to further investigate and address systemic sexual harassment. Key RecommendationsStrive for strong and diverse leadership• Make it an Explicit Goal: make the reduction and prevention of sexual harassment an explicit goal of your leadership tenure.• Develop Leadership Skills: Support and facilitate leaders at every level in developing skills in leadership, conflict resolution, mediation, negotiation, and de-escalation, and ensure a clear understanding of policies and procedures for handling sexual harassment issues that is not just about protecting institutional
hybrid format isthe ability to increase the number of worked example problems to which students are exposed. When acourse is offered in a traditional lecture format, there is limited time available to solve exampleproblems in class. After concept introduction and development, only two to three problems can becovered in each lesson. In contrast, videos for three solved example problems are available to studentsonline, and another problem is worked during class time for each lesson in the hybrid format. Inaddition, time is available for dedicated review days before exams in the hybrid format where,depending on class length, three to four more examples can be solved in preparation for the upcomingexam. From an assessment standpoint, another
, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts. She also focuses on the implementation of learning objective-based grading and teaching assistant training.Dr. Nicole M Iverson, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nicole M Iverson is an Assistant Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Ne- braska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Minnesota, her M.S. and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Rutgers University, and completed her post doctor- ate training at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the Chemistry, Biological Engineering, and Chemical Engineering departments. Her main research focus is on
their resumes.Weekly quizzes were given every Friday to assess students’ learning of the topic coveredin the lecture and lab during the week. The instructor adjusted his lecture according to thequiz results. A comprehensive three-hour written examination was given at end of the Page 12.836.4quarter. Most students were judged to have learned the course material enough to applyit to their design work in the future.The students learned the design tools very quickly. They felt that the Xilinx PlatformStudio, ISE, ChipScope and ModelSim were easy to use. Their difficulties were tounderstand and fix the error and warning messages generated by these
assessment that measures the capability of an engineering educationprogram to achieve repeatable results. This model, called the Engineering Education CapabilityMaturity Model, could be used as a blueprint for engineering programs to move systematicallytowards program accreditation. In 2006 y 2007, LACCEI and the Organization of AmericanStates (OAS) co-sponsored two workshops, in Puerto Rico and in Mexico, to formulate strategiesto improve the number of LAC engineering programs accredited. The recommendationsreceived at these workshops were gathered in two documents called The Turabo Declaration andthe Tampico Declaration. In 2006, LACCEI initiated an agreement signed by six multinationalorganizations to advance LAC strategies..In the next section
Technology degree to be offered in the region. Page 13.1207.3 • The consortium collaborated with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to find a creative solution to their high unmet demand for electronics technicians.Objective 4: Develop and implement a model assessment plan to measure longitudinally the success of the educational experience. • In cooperation with community college researchers, CREATE continues to follow the successes of students who have taken CREATE courses. • Continuing studies have shown that since CREATE’s initial NSF funding in 1999-2000, over 22,000 students have taken at least one CREATE credit
growing inindustry and academia as well. Engineers, and thus engineering educators, need to be cognizantof how their specific disciplines interact with, and ultimately impact, the environment. Thisincludes not only waste management practices, which traditionally fall into the domain ofenvironmental engineering, but also green and sustainable subjects as well9. Relevant topicsmust also include product design and material selection, end of life management (includingreuse, recycling, and reverse manufacturing) and environmental impact assessment methods10, 11.In order to understand what topics may be most appropriate to pursue for augmentingengineering and technology coursework, in order to meet the need for increased sustainabilityeducation, it is
” outcomes in the list of 24 relative to the BOK1. Appendix A of this paper contains a chartthat shows the genealogy of the 24 outcomes of BOK2 starting with the ABET/EAC 11. In fact,many of the ABET/EAC 11 were derived from a document from the early 90’s titled “DesiredAttributes of an Engineer”8 , as developed by the Boeing Corporation. Boeing was very active inengineering education, and along with several other large industrial employers of engineers, wasinstrumental in focusing attention on the need to reform the ABET accreditation process andcriteria, resulting in the outcomes based assessment system now used by ABET.The 24 outcomes have been arranged in three categories: Foundational, Technical, andProfessional. The outcome titles in each are
informed decisions about the desirability of engineering activities by weighing the benefits of those activities against their environmental risks • Understand the interdependence of the economic, environmental, and sociological aspects of technological change • Assess the validity and possible weaknesses in predictions of economic, environmental, and sociological consequences of technological change presented by others • Attain a basic understanding of the engineering design process • Achieve a survey-level understanding of why particular materials and processes are used Page 13.897.3 to produce simple engineering
thatCSEMS students matriculate with calculus placement at an overall rate of 97%, including 88%for conditional awardees (i.e. awardees who were not initially calculus-placed). Page 12.108.4According to the University’s Office of Assessment and Institutional Research, the 1-year and 2-year retention rates in CEAS – i.e. the percentage of entering freshmen in CEAS who remainenrolled in CEAS at the beginning of each subsequent Fall semester – are approximately 60%and 45%, respectively7 [3]. According to the Engineering Student Services Office, the generallyaccepted graduation in CEAS – i.e. the percentage of entering freshmen in
responded to the REUadvertisement, all with very good credentials. A female student was initially offered the REU,but ultimately declined. The position was then offered to a male Junior in chemical engineering.The student had good grades, previous research experience, and strong recommendations.Research ProjectThe REU research was on microbial fuel cells (MFCs), devices that can produce electrical powerfrom biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in wastewater.5 The REU research compared MFCpower output for a variety of electrode and proton exchange membrane (PEM) materials.Several MFC configurations were tested, and the relative importance of biofilm growth versussuspended growth was assessed. The oxygen diffusion coefficient was determinedexperimentally
statistically significant increases in knowledgetransferred and retained. The increases are even more pronounced when the assertion to beretained by the students appears in the slide’s sentence headline. Having such a design for theteaching slides, though, has two disadvantages. One is that since the sentence headlines state thekey assertions of the class, the instructor does not have as many opportunities to ask questionsand therefore engage the class in an active way. A second is that because these slides stand as acomplete set of notes, some students mistakenly assume that they need not attend class—theycan just review the class by viewing the posted slides. This paper assesses a new approach thatintegrates this new design for teaching slides with
directly deal with issues discussed in this paper include:NAAB:Architecture students must: Be able to assess, select, configure, and detail as an integral part of the design appropriatecombinations of building materials, components, and assemblies to satisfy the requirements ofbuilding programs. Be able to make technically precise descriptions and documentation of a proposed design forpurposes of review and construction Be able to produce an architecture project informed by a comprehensive program, fromschematic design through the detailed development of programmatic spaces, structural andenvironmental systems, life-safety provisions, wall sections, and building assemblies, as may beappropriate; and to assess the completed project with
teacher instruction and support gains in studentachievement; (4) to construct reliable and valid assessment tools for student and teacher contentknowledge and (5) to increase student interest in STEM curricula and careers. Summarizedbelow is the progress that has been made on each of these fronts, discussion of challenges alongthe way and the continuing plans to successfully accomplish the missions of KEEP.The training and development phases are comprised of three main components: professionaldevelopment workshops for teachers, development of math and science lessons and units andproduction of a CD-ROM resource. The CD-ROM is a collaborative effort of the research team,industry partners and public television to produce a resource for teachers and
indicate that many states include various aspects of EEF contentstandards and widely use the term technology but fail to identify the context of engineeringconcepts as it relates to the disciplines in science. It is important to assess how states areincorporating technology and engineering concepts into their state science curriculumframeworks as promoting technical and engineering literacy in secondary schools may result infostering interest in careers in engineering.Introduction As the world becomes more technically oriented, educators have an increasing challengeto keep their curriculums relevant and evolving to maintain pace with globalization. Science
the progress of the project. At the end ofthe spring semester, students need to submit their final project report and take the oral projectdefense.The department uses the senior project as an assessment tool to evaluate students’ academicachievements. Students’ final grades are based upon the following factors. ‚ Quality of the project ‚ Quality of the report ‚ Project defense ‚ Documentation ‚ Monthly presentation and weekly report ‚ Peer evaluation Page 11.1115.66. ConclusionIn this paper, we present the design and implementation of a senior design project namedDDoS Attack, Detection and Defense Simulation. We build test bed
, inclusion of components of the innovation processin engineering technology and business (marketing and management) courses has been atthe discretion of the instructor responsible for the course. The authors believe thatintentional design of courses to include components of the innovation process is in thebest interest of the engineering technology students and are encouraging professors fromengineering technology and management and marketing to integrate components of theinnovation process in their course content where applicable. The following sections ofthe paper will address the authors’ attempts to embed concepts of the innovation processin their courses and their assessment of the utility of these exercises in teaching thenecessary concepts
placement of formerly sophomore-level engineering courses within thefreshman year. The WSU model concludes with the development of a revised engineeringmathematics sequence, to be taught by the math department later in the curriculum. The resulthas shifted the traditional emphasis on math prerequisite requirements to an emphasis onengineering motivation for math, with a just-in-time placement of the new math sequence. Thecurrent paper summarizes the motivation, goals and development to date of the WSU model,which is currently in its first year of implementation. The paper reflects modifications since theapproach was first reported one year ago, and includes a preliminary assessment of studentperformance and perception during the first run of EGR
training modules couldbe duplicated in other parts of state. The certificate program will be implemented in fall 2006and we will continue to support industry needs through selected short courses. The project willbe continuously evaluated and assessment results will be presented in future.AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the support of U.S. Department of Energy and the ArkansasDepartment of Economic Development (ADED).References1. Society for Manufacturing Engineers Educational Foundation Manufacturing Educational Plan: Phase I Report, Manufacturing Education for the 21 st Century, Volume IV, 1997.2. S. Midturi, Knowledge Base for Wealth Producing Careers: an Advisor’s Point of View, Presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the
existing literature in this area [4] identified generalreferences (e.g., [5], [6], and [7]); models and frameworks (e.g., [8], [9], and [10]); heuristics andguidelines (e.g., [11], [12], and [13]); assessment and evaluation tools, (e.g., [14], [15], and [16]); andresource guides (e.g., [17], [18], and [19]). However, the unique attributes and characteristics ofF&CIS, the complexities of the current processes for their delivery and use, and the diverse set ofresources required for both their delivery and use (e.g., labor, equipment, materials, technologies,money, and energy, among others), make the implementation of built environment sustainability adifficult goal. Consequently, there is a need to develop answers to the following questions
Page 11.1028.15provided on the material cost is illustrated below:Material Cost1. Glass fabric plain weave $300.00 per roll (approximately $0.2 per sq. ft.). Each roll is 300 ft. long and 5 ft. in width.2. Vinyl ester resin 5 gallon for $50.00 (approximately $2.3 per Kg.) 5 gallon ~ 21.5 Kg3. Other related fabrics for VARTM approximately $10.00 per panel of size 2’ x 2’. Eight layers 2’ x 2’ glass composite panel consumes approximately 1 Kg resin. Thus the total cost will be $6.4 for glass fabric + $2.30 for resin + $10.00 for other fabrics = $18.70 per panel.AssessmentIn each of the three workshops to date, there was a required assessment by participating teachers.As part of the general assessment process, teachers provided comments
Entrepreneurs Network and a student run Entrepreneurship Club at Lehigh. Along with teaching the product development process her interests and research focus on intellectual property issues for student entrepreneurs, ethics in entrepreneurship, and assessment of student performance in multi-disciplined, team-based courses. Page 11.1209.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching Ethics Specific to EntrepreneurshipAbstractEntrepreneurship students need the tools for ethical decision making. We have created ethicalstudies with elements specific to entrepreneurship (not merely a
production technology and not commonly practiced inmany educational arenas. Due to the initial cost of the RP establishment, maintenance of theequipment and user training, most educational institutions are not able to have an in-house RPlaboratory. The solution outlined in this project is a best practice replicable for many universitiesaround the nation and an initial pioneering development for this advanced manufacturingtechnology. Initial developments and beta testing results are presented in this paper. Futuredevelopments and assessment studies of student learning with on-site versus online RP studentswill be presented in the upcoming ASEE or FIE publications.AcknowledgementsThis project has been funded by NSF award number 0536509. Authors
3 Wind Power 4The bulk of the project then consisted of the students performing detailed research on theirchosen technology, and preparing two reports. In their research, the students were to findinformation on and provide a summary of the following points: (1) a technical engineering description of the technology, including an assessment of the current state and usage of the technology; (2) a discussion of the environmental impacts of the technology; (3) a discussion of the economics of the technology, considering the capital and operating costs as well as any future potential incentives or taxes; (4) a discussion of the public perception and acceptance of
appropriateinfrastructure in place, and ensuring that faculty receive formal training in distance educationmethods and technology 20.Considerable research has focused on assessing distance education practices, and a number ofpublications have examined this topic in terms of what faculty can do to improve the educationalexperience for students: “What determines the success of distance teaching is the extent to whichthe institution and the individual instructor are able to provide the appropriate opportunity for,and quality of, dialogue between teacher and learner, as well as appropriately structured learningmaterials” 15, p. 6. However, tension can also exist between faculty and instructional designpersonnel. Whereas the ideal relationship would be one of
technologies are not broadly accepted as enhancing learning and should be used with care in unique applications. * The gap between student and faculty perceptions about the use of these technologies needs further investigation. Page 23.541.6 Figure 2. Matrix of Positive Responses by Technology Figure 3. Scatterplot of Percentage of Respondents by TechnologyNote: This is a preliminary assessment and technology needs will continue to be a focus ofCETL and university decision-makersConclusionsThis survey provides a glimpse into the complex decisions associated with
, but do not necessarily teachstudents how to decide when to use a thermocouple, as opposed to another temperaturemeasurement device, or how to properly install a measurement device to avoid experimentalerrors.The idea of redesigning laboratory courses to benefit capstone design has been attemptedpreviously by Folz et. al. In their case, a junior-level materials engineering laboratory coursewas altered to include more engineering design concepts as well as problem solving,collaboration, and communication skills. The teams in this course were assessed during thecourse and showed gains in applying theory to practice. Folz et. al. had planned, but notfinished, assessment of the students after capstone design to determine if the skills learned in
, both from Clemson University. She has served as the Special Programs Coordinator for the Academic Success Center at Clemson Uni- versity since February 2007, with a leadership role for data analysis and assessment of ASC programs. She has 21 years of experience in the data processing and analysis field, and 14 years of experience in higher education. She coordinates the workshop program for the Academic Success Center, has taught the undergraduate university skills course to incoming students, and facilitates a graduate seminar course on BioComplexity. Page 23.658.1 c American
application oriented environment.Gene Dixon [2] described how to formulate capstone project problem statements, and how toassess and evaluate them. Formulating a problem statement in any engineering project seemschallenging for senior capstone students. Gene described the findings from a qualitativeexploration of problem statements and problem statement assessments and evaluation directed at Page 23.730.2determining what characteristics are valued in developing a problem statement. The explorationwas undertaken in an effort to align faculty and students in understanding the value and contentof a quality design problem statement for use in a two-semester
Mechanical Engineering from Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute. His academic background is notable for a strong emphasis on research and teaching.Dr. Qaiser H Malik, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST) Pakistan University Qaiser H. Malik is Principal NUST Institute of Leadership in Education (NILE) and founding Head of Dept. of Engineering Education Research (DEER) at National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Pakistan. He has a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State University. His research interests include assessment, evaluation, and cyberinfrastructure technologies in Engineering Education