engineering programs in the nation, we are building an innovative program aligned with the university mission of Pro Humanitate (For Humanity). We are committed to educating the whole person and the whole engineer with fearlessness and virtuous character. With inclusion being a core value, our engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and founding faculty of the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. As a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee, her expertise and interests focus on
. Muraleedharan has participated in many professional and service activities university wide. In summer 2015, she in- structed Middle school Robotics and Beyond Camp, and in 2014 served as a judge for A.H. Nickless Innovation Award at SVSU. Dr. Muraleedharan strives to promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for young girls and aspire young women engineers by volunteering for MindTrekkers event, Delta College, Middle school girls camp, ISD Bay Arenac and Girls Scouts, Michi- gan yearly. Dr. Muraleedharan is a member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineering (SPIE), Women
eventually followed by a growing hightechnology sector, which continues to be supported by the college today. On average, 60% ofstudents entering this university are first generation college students. The school is an entrancepoint for those who have not previously considered higher education. In a high technology area,there are both job opportunities and a culture of engineering innovation. Given these realities,the College of Engineering sees itself as the vanguard of attracting underrepresented students forits region.2. Underrepresented Groups in EngineeringThe lack of engineers in the USA is a huge problem, made worse by the retiring of a generationoriginally motivated by the space race.1,2 and a declining interest in engineering.3 Moreengineers
application of remote sensing in agriculture, rangeland, and wetlands. He uses evapo-transpiration estimations from satellite images to predict sugar beet yield and quality, develops remote sensing algorithms to assess rangeland productivity, and writes Geographical Information Systems (GIS) models to map water dynamics in the Missouri Cateau wetlands. Page 11.1103.1George Seielstad, University of North Dakota Dr. George A. Seielstad is Associate Dean for Research and Innovative Projects at the John D. Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences of the University of North Dakota. In this position, he
]. More research is needed to explore how teachers engage in these discussions and todevelop the tools to both support and study their engagement.Simulated Classroom EnvironmentsAn innovative tool that can be used for teachers to practice facilitating argumentation discussionsinvolves the use of online technology to create a carefully controlled, classroom-likeenvironment consisting of a small group of student avatars [33]. Originating at the University ofCentral Florida as TeachLivE™ and now offered by Mursion, these student avatars are designedto be “human-like in voice, motion, and appearance, but not so human-like as to be eery” to users[34, n.p.]. The online simulated classroom provides a space for teachers to interact with thevirtual
University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Thomas A. Litzinger is Director of the
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the ASEE. She was the recipient of the 2002 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award. Dr. Atman holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University.Prof. Janet McDonnell, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London Janet McDonnell is Professor of Design Studies at Central Saint Martins, London where she is Director of Research. She holds a PhD for work on modelling engineering design expertise, an MSc in Computer Science and a BSc in Electrical Engineering. She is the editor-in-chief of the International Journal of CoDesign.Mr. Ryan C. Campbell, University
written.More common in the computing disciplines is to find problem-based learning being incorporatedinto the first year or introductory curriculum. Iowa State University developed an educationalmodel where the progression of introduction, illustration, instruction, investigation, andimplementation is used in a sophomore-level introductory microcontrollers course. The purposeof this choice of model is to nurture a learning environment emphasizing creative thinking andproblem solving for a laboratory project by combining a required system integration part with anoptional system innovation part.20 The concept of learning spaces, where students are membersof a learning community grounded in mutual respect and their experience is taken seriously, isoften
to give many keynote addresses, including a Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the UW in 1998 after seven years on the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research focuses on engineering education pedagogy, engineering design learning, assessing the consid- eration of context in engineering design, and understanding undergraduate engineering student pathways. She is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the ASEE. She was the recipient of the 2002 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award. Dr. Atman holds a
. Bothframing and solution-generation processes require consideration of the needs of end users.Second, taking an ethical position requires engineers to consider their role in solving a societalissue; technical expertise is necessary, but not sufficient to meet many of these challenges.Rather than viewing the engineer as a “savior” to the developing world due to their technicalexpertise, a focus on ethical commitments of empathy require the engineer to contextualizetechnical innovations in context7,24,25. Viewing the developing world solely through the eyes of atechnical challenge often ignores the societal framework and other considerations (e.g., climate,availability of resources) that may disallow Western advances in technology to be applied in
perception of littleopportunities for advancement. Conversely, a positive workplace climate also helps to explainwhy women stay in the engineering workforce.3,5For women in engineering careers, those who persist were found in one study to possess highlevels of self efficacy, to describe themselves in terms of their identity as an engineer, and to bemotivated by the innovations and challenges afforded by engineering. This study also reasonedthat those who persist possess an ability to adapt and thrive “despite working in a male-dominated culture characterized by difficulties associated with the workplace, includingdiscrimination”. In contrast to this, women who left the engineering profession were “less likelyto recognize options in navigating the
observations, • form hypothesize about observations, • develop “experiments’ to test these hypotheses • speculate about innovations and improvement to the city’s engineering infrastructure.The journal is distinct from a diary, though it is expected that students will keep a daily log oftheir research activities. Principally the journal is both a growing record and archive of sketches,diagrams, observations, and experiments in support of that student’s contributions to a givengroup project. The journal is discussed and shared among peers and evaluated periodically by thefaculty who look closely at the nature and quality of a student’s observations, sketches, andengineering diagrams that have been produced in the course of both broad
the freshman design experience, along with coordinating junior capstone at JMU. In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Systematic Review of Sustainability Assessments in ASEE ProceedingsAbstractEngineers are increasingly called upon to develop innovative solutions while balancingcompeting economic, environmental, and social design constraints. Consequently, manyeducators and professional organizations are calling for improvements in
application of engineering concepts in the freshman year. Also,more collaborative, interactive and supportive learning environment were created in whichstudents had more contact with their peers and instructors and thereby did not feel isolated.Finally, modern technological tools were introduced into the classroom to make the lecturesmore exciting and to keep pace with the increased influence of technology in students’ lives.This section provides a review of a variety of specific techniques that have been implementedacross engineering programs to increase retention. Key features of these innovative additions toengineering programs are presented below.Improving math skills, Providing community-based support system: Kingma et. al.9 created aprogram
, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six phil- anthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU Tandon’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a
AC 2008-472: A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING ENGINEERINGPRACTICEJames Trevelyan, University of Western Australia James Trevelyan is professor and mechatronics discipline chair at the University of Western Australia. He leads the Engineering Learning and Practice Research group in the School of Mechanical Engineering. He is an elected member of the International Federation for Theory of Machines and Mechanisms Executive Council and is well known for developing sheep shearing robots and innovations in landmine clearance methods. Page 13.42.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A
received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering form the University of Connecticut. He has authored over 40 referred and propriety publications in automotive design, finite element modeling of automobile body structures, and photographic film emulsion coating instabilities. His most recent research includes development of innovative finite element tutorials for undergraduate engineering students and vibrational analysis and measurement of human skeletal muscles under stress using laser holography.Joseph J. Rencis, University of Arkansas Joseph J. Rencis is professor and Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the
for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU-Poly’s 2002, 2008, and 2011 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Lead- ership. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-Poly’s Othmer Institute for
objective if the funding sources arenot disclosed fully. Both authorship and sponsorship remain critical elements in the evaluation ofthe validity of the findings of academic research.The Confusing Collaborative Co-AuthorSome funding proposals emphasize collaborative activities between faculty members fromdifferent disciplines or universities. This collaboration strengthens scientific innovation andcreativity across the academic community especially if the research is initiated by a juniorresearcher and the collaborating member is a senior faculty member who is invited to provideinsight and guidance based on his or her expertise. However, in other cases, this collaboration isnot true and is more of a joint venture that is based merely on mutual
calls for an increasing role for entrepreneurship and innovation inengineering programs.In summary, the Mann report provides an etymological definition of engineering as a nobleventure to help the United States improve industry and production and by so doing haveengineering take its place beside other esteemed professions. Engineering programs were tobalance scientific, technical, and humanistic studies to produce graduates with a measure ofknowledge and character who could take act in their roles in industry; the focus was highlypragmatic. Although taught in universities, engineering was not to be a purely academicdiscipline, and should emphasize both doing and knowing. Engineers clearly worked in thehuman realm and were more valuable in their
remained in close contact ontechnical, budget, and schedule issues, much as a project team might experience in the real worldof professional engineering. Finally, Lockheed-Martin will participate in the semester ending product demonstrationpresentations scheduled for this May 2004, which will be the first class to complete the EICsequence.4.) Reach out beyond the cor e gr oup of pilot pr ogr am faculty. As anyone who has studied orparticipated in curricular innovation knows, many good ideas have no long-term positive impactbecause the core group of innovators who originate and pilot the program never gain broadsupport from other faculty or their institution. Consequently, another guiding principle of ourefforts was to seek faculty buy-in and