a leader in internation- alization of Engineering at NAU since arriving in 1999, expanding this initiative to the Natural Sciences starting in 2005. Significant milestones in this area include the development of an effective model of re- ciprocal ”exploratory trips” to motivate international study in engineering; the International Engineering and Natural Sciences certificate program; and the Global Engineering College project, an NSF-funded exploration of a comprehensively internationalized curricular model for engineering education. These efforts culminated in 2010 with the creation of the Global Science and Engineering Program (GSEP), an innovative initiative to establish a comprehensive framework for
researchsituated in environmental contexts often placed teachers outside of their comfort zone. Theywere confronted with mathematics and science applications that were unfamiliar to them. Inthese new experiences, participants discovered new connections and identified innovative waysto incorporate them into their classroom. One mathematics teacher reflected on his experience, “Igot to see a different perspective. I got to see how mathematics is tying into other things.”Establishing these connections was critical for the design activities in which the teachersengaged. Bringing mathematics and science together was key to successful completion of thetask at hand. One science teacher elaborated, “I think with the beam that was really [obvious],especially that
Northwest serves over 92,000 students and offers over 12,000 degrees annually. This institution offers ten engineering and computer science undergraduate degrees, and is characterized by large classes in freshman and sophomore years (100-500) and smaller classes in junior (40-80 students) and senior year (15-40 students). Classes are commonly supported by multiple teaching assistants and contact with faculty is less frequent than at the other four schools in this study. Teaching (Masters L): A medium-sized institution of over 10,000 students in the Midwest that combines an emphasis on teaching with emerging innovations in research, serving a regional student population. This institution offers over
learning easier to achieve because students can attach new material toexisting related knowledge rather than merely adopting arbitrary frameworks for memorizing thematerial [8].Another of our innovations is providing earlier access to aerospace material than is typical withinconventional ME programs. Aerospace topics are generally only taught as senior-level technicalelectives disjointed from the core ME curriculum. However, the co-investigators’ commonpassion for aerospace engineering and the existing project-based MSOE ME curriculum offer aunifying thread and a natural opportunity to enable aerospace material to be seamlessly presentedin required ME courses within different ME tracks across all four program years.METHODS/DESCRIPTIONTo
working on her Masters in Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois. She received her bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering but is now pursuing a combination of interests related to education enrichment programs for international development, creativity, and commu- nity engagement.Dr. Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Russell Korte is an assistant professor in Human Resource Development and a fellow with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research investigates how engineering students navigate their educational experiences and how engineer- ing graduates transition into the
undergraduate engineers; as such it is a ripe area for investigation and innovation byengineering educators and researchers.As colleges and universities look to retain students in engineering and encourage students topursue engineering careers, alternatives to the traditional lecture model are becomingincreasingly accepted as methods to increase student engagement and improve the overalllearning experience. Active learning is one such approach, defined broadly as “any instructionalmethod that engages students in the learning process”2. Active learning encompassescollaborative learning, a method in which students work together in small groups, cooperativelearning, in which students pursue common goals while being assessed individually, andproblem-based
of how project-based learning, in the form of servicelearning, has been used in science and engineering education.Savery14 and others15 point to innovations in health sciences education in the late 1960’s as thestart of problem-based learning. They also define specific characteristics that they use todistinguish project-based learning from problem-based learning. The key distinction seems to bethat the primary goal of project-based learning is the application of knowledge while the primarygoal of problem-based learning is the acquisition of knowledge. In practice, and in the form ofproject-based learning studied here, each project experience certainly lives at some point on thespectrum between pure acquisition of new knowledge and pure
authors, including what aspects workedwell and what aspects failed, with an aim toward improving the assignment in future offerings.2. Project GenesisThe presented cross-disciplinary, project-based approach to teaching engineering economystemmed from a four-person discussion that occurred prior to the beginning of the sixteen-weekFall 2013 semester. The discussion centered upon an exploration of alternative and innovative Page 24.42.3ways each department within the College of Engineering could teach project management andengineering economy. Currently, each department teaches the course content independently.Electrical and Computer Engineering
and Methodology Conference; 1996; Irvine, CA.15. Otto KN, Wood KL. Product Evolution: A Reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology. Research in Engineering Design. 1998;1998(10):226-243.16. Nagel RL, Bohm MR, Cole J, Shepard P. An Algorithmic Approach to Teaching Functionality. ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences; 2012; Chicago, IL.17. Nagel RL, Bohm MR, Linsey JS. An Investigation into the Effectiveness of an Algorithmic Approach to Teaching Functional Modeling. ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences; 2013; Portland, OR.18. Pierrakos O, Nagel RL, Pappas E, Nagel JK. A New Vision for Engineering Design Instruction: On the Innovative Six Course Design Sequence of James
was featured on the National Science Foundation Discoveries web site. She is a member of Sigma Xi, past chair of the K-12 and Precollege Division of the American Society of Engineering Educators and a Senior Member of the IEEE.Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Page 23.367.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Defining Engineering in K-12 in North CarolinaA great deal of national attention has recently been focused on STEM (science, technology,engineering, and mathematics) education as an educational innovation. The truth is that scienceand
.[53] C. S. Hollenshead, et al., "Work/family policies in higher education: Survey data and case studies of policy implementation," New Directions for Higher Education, vol. 130, pp. 41-65, 2005.[54] M. W. Sallee, "A Feminist Perspective on Parental Leave Policies," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 181-194, 2007.[55] National Science Foundation, NSF's Career-life Balance Initiative, 2011. Available: http://nsf.gov/career- life-balance/[56] C. Schimpf, M. Mercado Santiago and A.L.Pawley, "Access and Definition: Exploring How STEM Page 23.489.13 Faculty, Department Heads and University
, theAmbassadors study innovative presentation techniques, communication strategies (written andoral) for varied audiences, and emerging web communication technologies. The outreach eventsof the Engineering Ambassador Program provide the context and practice forum for conceptsand skills learned in the course. Attention is also given to strategies for effective leadership andnetworking.Educational Outreach EventsThe activities of the program focus on outreach, which fall into two general categories: Middle and high school outreach visits. During the visits to middle and high schools, the Engineering Ambassadors, who are relatable role models, generally provide two types of presentations. Six Ambassadors arrive at the school in the early
) Louis StokesAlliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP) and Partnerships for Innovation (PFI) grants.There were 22 Native undergraduates engaged in the program. During the 2009-2010 academicyear ANSEP had 700+ participants from sixth grade through PhD. As of May 2012, there havebeen 267 Native STEM BS graduates from the University of Alaska Anchorage and theUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) since 1995. In 2001, ANSEP organized an alliance ofuniversities and community colleges to disseminate the model across the nation. This alliancehas expanded into eight additional states.To support this work $35 million in cash has been raised from private industry, Nativecorporations, philanthropic organizations, state and federal agencies, and
has been active in ASEE serving in the FYP, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University. He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the National Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional
-disciplinary group of students (spanning the entire Engineering spectrum of electrical, computer, industrial, civil, mechanical, as well as computer science students) to benefit from this innovative research and curriculum development. • Assess and evaluate the impact of our efforts through a sequence of carefully chosen evaluation instruments, developed by our education specialist. • Disseminate the curriculum development efforts to other Universities.The students that will choose to participate in this CRCD program will go through a number ofeducational experiences that are outlined below. The educational experiences are broken downinto four major categories: Lectures, Discussions/Projects, Industry Interactions
approach also conveys the key notion that ethics is integral tothe practice of engineering versus, at best, an afterthought.Utilized effectively, the SIA has the potential to promote increase awareness of the dual nature oftechnology (i.e. it’s positive and negative impacts) and the complexity of engineering. Far fromscaring students away from STEM disciplines, the SIA can actually generate excitement aboutthe kinds of challenges engineers face. The SIA can desterilize engineering.ConclusionThe SIA is not intended to be an all encompassing approach to ethics education. Nor, do weclaim, is it a wholly new and innovative ethics assignment. It does, however, represent adeparture from the case oriented approaches characteristic of many attempts at
that immerses the student in the academic literature surrounding the relationships between climate and hydrologic processes, and how these rela- tionships impact the various sectors of society, including agricultural production. Dr. Adam is a recent recipient of outstanding teaching awards at both the WSU departmental and collegiate levels.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Dr. Brown conducts research in conceptual and epistemological change, social capital, and diffusion of innovations. In 2011 he received the NSF CAREER Award to investigate how engineers think about and use concepts that academics consider to be important.Mr. Andrew P Easley, Washington State University Andrew Easley is a
information noviceengineering students apply to their decision making processes as they engage in an engineeringdesign challenge. As such, this study answers the question: How do novice engineering studentsnegotiate and apply their various epistemic commitments to their collaborative decision making?Study ContextThe professional development program studied, a collaboration between the colleges of scienceand engineering and a teaching preparation program at our university, offers several programsfor pre-service and in-service teachers to support their use of innovative engineering curriculum.The specific course examined in this paper provides an in-depth, hands-on six-week summerworkshop for in-service teachers. Fifteen in-service teachers
education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He worked on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Page 15.1149.1 Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is currently working on NSF projects
challenges arepresented in terms of class size, facilitation of lab design, managing increasing diversity in termsof the number and variety of students and learning styles. Give these challenges, we have arecipe that requires, when done well, innovation, creativity, and an understanding that thelearning culture we create must serve each and every student and not just the majority “type”.Exploring educational and learning trends, class size implications, and characteristics of thecurrent student generation will help inform us as we seek and plan for effectiveness andexcellence in teaching. That in turn, will allow us insight into the functionality of using theATLAS approach of utilizing classmates as QM’s (Quality Managers) in class and