. Byincluding service learning in the course design project, the students then had a dual vehicle inwhich to refine their designs in ways that deepened their understanding and learning. From ourexperience overseeing this course, we conclude that to truly realize the benefits of servicelearning, integration of CSL throughout the curriculum is needed along with better managementof service learning components.I. IntroductionSite remediation, as a profession, requires a broad range of technical expertise including, but notlimited to engineering (civil, mechanical, chemical, and electrical); natural sciences (geology,hydrogeology, chemistry, physics, and biology); advanced sciences (microbiology,geochemistry, toxicology, etc.) and engineering management. At
engineering knowledge. Therefore teaching methods must be combined with theoryand technical skills to support engineering activities. The engineering technologist’s roleis to be an implementer rather than an inventor, and to support engineering functions.Fluid Mechanics and Materials Technology classes’ sophomore level, courses are offeredin the Engineering Technology department they offers the instructor opportunity to teachtheory accompanied by applied aspects of science and engineering. Students are exposedto problems involving the simultaneous mix of mathematics, physics, chemistry,computers, and common sense in creative and challenging ways.The current text books available for both courses are primarily written for engineeringstudents; they
expects.This may have been acceptable in the past where employees preformed repetitive tasks.Today, however, employers are looking for self-motivated problem-solvers. In fact,today’s employers are looking for entrepreneurs, and this traditional education is not anenvironment that breeds entrepreneurs.The damage done by this type of environment cannot be corrected by having the studentattend a course or two about being an entrepreneur. The problem needs to be addressedglobally; this means that the education environment needs to be modified. Thismodification will include the integration of alternate teaching methods, new twists oncurrent material, and the addition of new material into existing courses. The emphasis inthe entrepreneurial education
, instrumentation, and entrepreneurship.Dr. Paul M Koola, Texas A&M University Paul Mario Koola Ph.D., MBA is the Asst. Director of Freshman Engineering at Galveston and a Professor of Practice at the Ocean Engineering Department, Texas A&M University. His passion is to educate the next generation engineers. Dr. Koola has a BS in Mechanical Engineering in 1983. His Ph.D. is in Ocean Engineering in 1991 from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, where he was a tenured faculty until 1998 when he came to Texas A&M to do an MBA with full scholarship. Dr. Koola is a US Fulbright Scholar, German Alexander Von Humboldt Fellow, and a Danish DANIDA Scholar. He comes with a wealth of knowledge from the industry and his
AC 2011-1080: INNOVATIVE INSTRUCTION FOR UNDERGRADUATEAIRCRAFT DYNAMICS AND CONTROLPraveen Shankar, Arizona State University Praveen Shankar is a lecturer of mechanical and aerospace engineering in the School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy at Arizona State University. He obtained his MS (2004) and PhD (2007) degrees in Aerospace Engineering from The Ohio State University. He has a bachelor’s degree in Mechan- ical Engineering from Bangalore University, India (1999). His research interests are in control theory with application to intelligent/adaptive flight control and innovation in educational methods for undergraduate aerospace education.Jenefer Husman, Arizona State University Jenefer Husman
and their combinations. Not only was function redefined, but inaddition, continuity, differentiability and integration were consequently defined in terms ofdeltas and epsilons. For the working mathematician, this approach was right. It was fantasticallysuccessful in promoting the development of new mathematics. General techniques weredeveloped that worked for all kinds of wild combinations of functions by applying essentially thesame definitions and mechanisms of proof.Nonetheless these definitions took the focus of calculus away from intuitive smooth curves.These 19th century definitions were and continue to be meaningless for many students andtherefore it is time for the STEM community to re-examine the effect on the students of
outputs can be classified into five categories, namely energy,material, information, generalized forces (includes moments) and generalized displacements(includes rotations). The later two categories are included to easily understand some of themechanical engineering tasks. The routes, through which the inputs are processed by the designto create the outputs, are called transmission paths that includes the processes of transfer,transmit, and transform. Thus, tracing the transmission paths is a crucial step in di entifyingfunctionality.2.3. Abstraction – ExampleLet us examine a task statement, that of “design a ship canal to connect two bodies of water.”The first thought that comes to mind is digging a simple “moat,” which is a possible
program are enough to access the educational tool. So they do not need anyadditional programs and expenses.Figure 1: Block diagram of developed educational virtual platform4.1 Development of Electric Machines E-learning & Virtual PlatformOne of the first steps in using computers in education represented the mechanical conversion ofthe traditional study materials into electronic form and making them accessible to students,usually via the university network. New materials were produced and distributed on PCs, butnevertheless, they proved unsuitable for work in electronic form. Their predominantly textualshape directly predetermined them to the traditional form of study – to reading from printedmaterials. In the next paragraphs a development of
and mechanics) of meaningthat result in standard writtenincoherence English F < 60 D 60-69 C 70-79 B 80-89 A 90-100 Page 15.198.1211. Rate the quality of the Diagrams, Graphics, Pictures, Figures and Tables SCORE ____________ Some figures
Paper ID #38603Board 161: Elementary Students’ Mechanistic Reasoning about TheirCommunity-connected Engineering Design Solutions (Work in Progress)Dr. Mustafa Sami Topcu, Yildiz Technical UniversityDr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts with the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach and the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction focus on supporting knowledge construction in engineering classrooms at the pre-college and undergraduate levels
virtual instrument (V I) (Figure 2).Collected data is then transferred to the computer also under control of LabVIEW VI and savedfor future processing. Figure 2. LabVIEW controller for electronics laboratory 2. Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials (NDE) Laboratory. The need for a largenumber of practical engineers with background in service and quality control analysis ofindustrial processes, over the next decade, has been clearly outlined 5, 6, 7. The NDE laboratorybeing developed, provides a mechanism for giving undergraduate AET students direct, hands-onexperience, with quality control analysis in various manufacturing fields, such as inspection ofaircraft wing sections, in-process testing to determine the thickness
2006-784: CASE STUDIES IN GEOTECHNICAL/FOUNDATION ENGINEERING:ENGAGING STUDENTS AND BRINGING THE PRACTICE INTO THECLASSROOMWaddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili has been in the academic arena for over 37 years. He has held academic positions at Drexel University, Philadelphia, Penna (66-69), at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (69-87), and at the University of Qatar, Doha, Qatar (87-00). Professor Akili's major field is geotechnical engineering and materials. His research work & experience include: characterization of arid and semi arid soils, piled foundations, pavement design & materials, and concrete durability. His interests also include
- nuity and persistence” [3]. “We therefore understand tinkering as a disposition towards design and mak- iterative ing characterized by iteration” [4] “The tinkering approach is characterized by a playful, experimental, iterative style of engagement, in which makers are continually reassessing their goals, exploring new paths, and imagining new possibilities”[1]. “It is in this process that authorship, purpose, and deep understanding of the materials and phenomena are developed” [3]. self-directed “The emphasis on participants’ own questions and objectives is part of what distinguishes tinkering
Design and Communication Technology, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI, 799 West Michigan Street, ET 331E, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5160, (317) 274-0819, wworley@iupui.eduTresler Thurston, IUPUI Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI, 799 West Michigan Street, ET 331, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5160, twthurst@indiana.eduStephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Undergraduate Programs, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI, 799 West Michigan Street, ET 215B, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5160, (317) 274-2876, shundley@iupui.edu
skills required of them as engineers but also the social, environmental, and physical implications of implementing technical engineering solutions. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Many Hands on the Elephant: How a Transdisciplinary Team Assesses an Integrative Course For the Evidence-Based Practice Category of ERMAbstract:This paper, for the Evidence-based Practice category of the ERM division of ASEE, describes ourefforts to assess a transdisciplinary course that brings together the humanities and engineering —specifically history, ethics, theatre, writing and literature with fluid mechanics, material properties,statics
the teaching of software testing and provideinstructors with learning materials. There is also work on how LESs can be integrated into teachingcourses in the CS/IT discipline.Li et al.12 found that gamification can be used to increase engagement of CS students in an online,social network-based, collaborative learning environment (PeerSpace). The game mechanics usedin PeerSpace include: participant points, participation levels, and leader boards. Liccardi et al.13investigated the role social networks in computer science education. It was found that social inter-action within an online framework can help university students share experiences and collaborateon relevant topics. As such, social networks can act as a pedagogical agent, for example
: the course objectives,materials, and syllabi. Again, as in the previous summer, training in teaming andcurricular design preceded these meetings.In September of 1995 the new sophomore engineering curricula ran with all sophomoreECE students and some volunteers from mechanical engineering. Mechanicalengineering decided to phase in the SEC as a requirement, so in the fall of 1996 theydecided to require it for all entering freshman in 1997 (the class of 2001). As of this datethere are no plans to require the Sophomore Engineering Curriculum for students in theother two remaining engineering departments, the Departments of Chemical and CivilEngineering.The Impact of Organizational CultureThe curricular changes initiated through IFYCSEM and the
AC 2009-1922: INTEGRATING A FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAMWITH A LIVING-LEARNING COMMUNITYTimothy Hinds, Michigan State University TIMOTHY J. HINDS is an Academic Specialist in the Michigan State University College of Engineering Undergraduate Studies and Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is the lead instructor for the Cornerstone Engineering / Spartan Engineering program teaching courses in engineering design and modeling. He has also taught courses in machine design, manufacturing processes, mechanics, computational tools and international product design as well as graduate-level courses in engineering innovation and technology management. He has over 25 years of combined academic
AC 2009-319: TEACHING FUTURE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERS LAWS,ACTS, STANDARDS, AND LIABILITIESArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University ARIF SIRINTERLIKCI is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering at Robert Morris University. He has been the Coordinator of the RMU Learning Factory and Director of Engineering Laboratories. He holds a B.S. and an M.S., both in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey, and a PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the Ohio State University. He has conducted research and taught in mechanical, industrial, manufacturing engineering, and industrial technology fields. He has been active in ASEE (American
evaluating the program’s achievement of its objectives, weprovide the following responses representing our level of agreement with the program objective statements.Circle the appropriate response (SA=Strongly Agree, A=Agree, D=Disagree, SD=Strongly Disagree).1 OU ME graduates are prepared to practice as entry-level mechanical engineers (Engineers in SA A D SD Training) in a range of specialty areas, including design of thermal/fluid systems, design of mechanical systems, manufacturing, materials, or other related areas; or (for those graduates with the ability and the desire) to gain entry to and successfully complete an advanced degree program in engineering, business, medicine, or any other related field2 OU ME
AC 2007-758: DESIGN TEAM SKILLS CURRICULUM FOR INTERMEDIATELEVEL PROJECT CLASSSteven Zemke, Gonzaga University Steven Zemke is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Gonzaga University. He teaches design classes at the sophomore, junior, and capstone level. His research pursuits are in the pedagogy of design. Steven received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a dissertation on pedagogy from the University of Idaho in 2005. Prior to teaching, Steven was a design engineer and engineering manager for 25 years.Diane Zemke, Gonzaga University Diane Zemke is a Doctoral Student in the Leadership Studies Program at Gonzaga University. Her interests include pedagogy, paradigms
Paper ID #17806Engineering Technology Graduate Students: Roles Professional Societies Havein Their FormationDr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies.Dr. Diane L. Peters P.E., Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical
Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stan- ford University. Dr. Lande is the PI on the NSF-funded projectShould Makers Be the Engineers of the Future? He is a co- PI on the NSF-funded projects:Might Young Makers Be the Engineers of the Future?,I-Corps for Learn- ing:Leveraging Maker Pathways to Scale Steam + Making Outreach Programs,Instigating a Revolution of Additive Innovation:An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking,andIncreasing Learning and Efficacy about Emerging Technologies through Transmedia Engagement by the Public in Science- in-Society Activities.He was also a participant in the NSF Innovation Corps for Learning 2015 cohort
scholarship: Any creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge transfer, or to develop new materials useful for teaching and learning, or to add to the stock of creative works and includes applied, oriented and basic research, consultancy and experimental development.This definition is used because it is broad and inclusive. It covers thecategories of research (including basic or applied); professional andcreative practice (including architecture, design, consultancy, etc.) andknowledge and technology transfer (including development projects andother forms of innovation).There are other relevant definitions of research and scholarly activity, forexample that
three supplies, Iuse standard three-terminal regulators connected to a full-wave rectifier and filtercapacitor. This type of circuit is so standard that it will not be shown here.Reinforcing the course material is the idea of the capacitor used to filter the output of thefull-wave rectifier. I discuss the consequences of varying the capacitance and varying thecurrent drawn from the circuit by the regulator. Also, the practical matter of the tinytantalum capacitor in parallel with the huge electrolytic capacitor is covered. I begin thisdiscussion by pointing out that the capacitance of the electrolytic is probably onlyguaranteed to be within 20% of the stated value, and that the capacitance of the tantalum ismuch less than this 20% variation. If
-issuefor this format of assessment.Discussion and LimitationsExam ComparisonThe t-test p-values for both Exam 1 and Exam 2 between Fall 2023 and Fall 2024 suggest thatstudent performance did in fact improve with a paper exam format of assessment. This doescounter work by Dendir and Maxwell [10] which suggests no change would exist. There aresome limitations with this study that may contribute to this shift such as the limited number ofprofessors included and sharing their student performance for this comparison. Additionally,there were efforts throughout the college to increase the resources available to students throughtutoring groups and other out-of-class mechanisms for improving student learning. This couldalign with the work by Stowell and
project work,and details expectations made as uniform as possible over the range of applications. Thesame portfolio material and rubrics serve as a measure for correlated items of the ABETassessment plan. This paper provides examples of multi-year multidisciplinary servicelearning projects at our institution, and describes the portfolio approach as it has beendeveloped for the purposes of these multi-year projects, including sample rubrics.IntroductionIncreased emphasis on service learning1 in undergraduate engineering education has Page 23.1344.2given rise to the need for an appropriate method to assess ongoing project work. Thetraditional senior project
Department home page with the two linksdiscussed above located in the lower right hand corner. Note that the department houses Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationaccredited programs in Industrial Engineering Technology and Mechanical EngineeringTechnology as well as unaccredited programs in Computer Graphics Technology andOrganizational Leadership & Supervision which accounts for the page’s complexity.Also noteworthy is the fact that the documentation and continuous improvement effortsare at a department level, not a program level. The efforts conducted are for bothaccredited and non-accredited
, detailed design, procurement, construction and occupancy). It is difficult, forexample, to achieve a cost-effective and quickly-constructed building if expensive, labor-intensive materials are chosen during the concept design stage. This same curve applies to thehazards inherent in the design of a building. It is difficult to prevent injuries when the means andmethods that are de facto determined by the building’s design are associated with high hazardwork tasks. Figure 2: The Project Goal Influence CurveThe idea that design can be leveraged to achieve significant reductions in construction siteinjuries is certainly not new, not restricted to construction and not recognized only in the U.S.Indeed, building design
BackgroundStudents’ motivation in a class can lead to better learning gains and understanding of classmaterial, thus it is important to keep student’s motivated inside the classroom, as well asoutside.1,6,7 However, students can struggle with motivation particularly towards the completionof homework.6,7 A method that has shown to improve students’ engagement is gamification.1Gamification is defined by Karl Kapp as using “game-based mechanics, aesthetics and gamethinking to engage people, motivate action, promote learning, and solve problems”.8 Games canbe seen as intrinsically motivating because people who play games are voluntarily investing theirtime into problem-solving even though they receive nothing in return.9 Games allow players the“freedom to fail